
Could Donald Trump be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize?
During a press briefing on Thursday (July 31), Leavitt said Trump brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office since January. This is not the first time that Trump supporters have made such calls, even as his track record is debatable, at best. For one, New Delhi has countered his repeated claims of mediation.
US President Donald Trump posts, '… I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this (Treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the Republic of Rwanda), I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for… pic.twitter.com/vboXwZXjXf
— ANI (@ANI) June 20, 2025
Still, that has not stopped the likes of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the governments of Pakistan and Cambodia, from saying they would nominate him. So, can a country actually nominate another world leader for the prize, whose previous nominees include Mahatma Gandhi and, briefly, Adolf Hitler? Is there an eligibility criterion? And would it be unusual for a US President to win the honour?
Theoretically, yes, depending on the outcomes of the nomination process.
The first stage for any category of the Nobel Prize involves nominations. A range of people — university professors, former Nobel winners in that category, etc. — are deemed eligible by the respective Nobel Committee to submit a nomination for that award. The Norwegian Nobel Committee, which is responsible for awarding the Peace Prize, consists of five individuals appointed by the Norwegian parliament, who are often politicians.
Heads of state and members of national assemblies and national governments can send nominations for the Peace Prize. The nominations are sifted through to make a list of valid nominations. For instance, Swedish Parliamentarian and Social Democrat, Erik Brandt, sent a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, nominating Adolf Hitler for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1939. However, it was meant to be ironic and eventually withdrawn.
The Nobel committee then creates a shortlist, external consultants research those candidates, and the committee finally makes its choice after discussions. The entire process takes eight months, and the full list of nominees is made public 50 years after the submission.
Officially, the Nobel website states that the will of Alfred Nobel, the inventor who instituted the prize, mentioned a broad criterion. The prize was to be awarded to the person 'who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses'.
Over time, the definition of peace has included areas such as gender equality and non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Yes. In 1906, Theodore Roosevelt received the Peace Prize for having negotiated peace in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-05, becoming the first US President to be honoured with the award.
Woodrow Wilson won in 1920, for his efforts in ending the First World War and helping in creating the League of Nations, which was the precursor to the United Nations. Jimmy Carter won in 2002, for working to find 'peaceful solutions to international conflicts, advancing democracy and human rights, and promoting economic and social development.'
US Vice President Al Gore (during Bill Clinton's tenure) was awarded in 2007, for his efforts to obtain and spread knowledge about climate change.
The next year, then US President Barack Obama won the prize in a controversial decision, as he had yet to complete even a year of his presidency. The official citation said it was 'for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples'.
Obama himself acknowledged the elephant in the room during his winning speech, saying, 'I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated. In part, this is because I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labours on the world stage. Compared to some of the giants of history who've received this prize… my accomplishments are slight.'
In Trump's case, he has frequently lamented not being awarded the prize, and world leaders hoping to develop a deeper relationship with the United States have picked up on the concern. Last month, as leaders of five African nations — Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal — met Trump in Washington to discuss a trade deal, they spoke positively about the possibility of a nomination.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
No Order to Halt Russian Oil Imports Despite Trump Tariff Threat, Says Report
India Unfazed By Trump Tantrums; Gives This Big Directive To Refiners On Russian Oil Purchase India defies US President Donald Trump's threat on the purchase of oil from Russia. According to a Bloomberg report, citing people familiar with that matter, New Delhi has not issued any directive to its oil refiners to halt purchases of Russian crude. Bloomberg said no official decision has been made to stop imports from Russia. Trump on Wednesday slammed India for continuing to buy most of its military equipment and energy from Russia. Trump also imposed a 25% tariff on India and threatened an additional penalty for its close ties with Moscow. Watch this video to know more.#india #trump #russianoil #russia #oil #oilpurchase #oilrefineries #russiancrude #russianimports #trumpthreat #trumptariffs #trumpsanctions #us #indiarussiaties #modi #putin 1.5K views | 2 hours ago


News18
10 minutes ago
- News18
News18 Daily Digest, August 4: EC Data Shock SpiceJet Assault Case
Your go-to podcast for the biggest news stories of the day. Get quick, reliable updates across politics, business, world affairs, and more. PREVIOUS News18 Daily Digest, August 1: Trump Tariffs ... VIEW ALL EPISODES RECENTLY ADDED EPISODES LOAD MORE RECENT PODCASTS SHOWS The birthstone of Aries is Red Coral, which is related to Mars... Learn More
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
'No more partial deals with Hamas': Major shift in Israel's Gaza war policy, US backs it
Israel and the US are working on an umbrella deal with Hamas to permanently stop the war in Gaza. This marks a major shift in the Israeli government's Gaza policy of pushing for a phased agreement. read more As the crisis in Gaza intensifies, Israel and the United States are planning to shift their policy regarding reaching a ceasefire deal with Hamas. Both nations are now aiming to put a comprehensive framework in place instead of partial ceasefire agreements and hostage-release deals. The news for this approach was first shared by an Israeli official close to the matter; however, American officials are also hinting at the same shift. 'There will be no more partial deals,' the official was quoted as saying, explaining that Israel and the US now concur on the need to 'shift from a framework for the release of some of the hostages to a framework for the release of all of the hostages, the disarmament of Hamas and the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip," The Times of Israel reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'At the same time, Israel and the US will work to increase the humanitarian aid, while continuing the fighting in Gaza,' the source was quoted as saying. The remarks from both the Israeli and the US officials came following the US's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff's visit to Israel. However, the ambiguous nature of the comments leaves one wondering how or when the war in Gaza would end. The shift is also coming at a time when ceasefire talks between the two warring sides have stalled, with Israel attacking Gaza aid sites and Hamas committing atrocities against Israeli hostages. A major shift for Israel and the reasons behind it If the idea is actualised, it would mark a major shift for Israel, which came up with the phased hostage deal framework during the first year of the war. For months, the Israeli government only focused on negotiating a two-phased deal for a 60-day cease-fire in Gaza and the release of some hostages, leaving talks on the end of the war at bay. Many believe that the shift in Tel Aviv's rhetoric comes as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government faces rising domestic pressure to secure the release of hostages still held in Gaza. Israel believes that there are around 20 hostages who are still alive in Gaza, and the bodies of 30 others remain in the coastal enclave. A gut-wrenching video released by Hamas over the weekend showed two living captives looking emaciated and frail, shocking many Israelis and sparking fear among the hostages' families. Apart from this, the Israeli government are also facing major international backlash over the mass hunger that has spread through Gaza's population of about two million people after Israel imposed strict restrictions in recent months on the entry of aid. Witkoff hinted at the same While speaking to the families of the Israeli hostages during his visit, US envoy Steve Witkoff said that US President Donald Trump now wants to see all the living hostages released at once, hinting at a push for a comprehensive deal. 'No piecemeal deals, that doesn't work,' he said, according to an audio recording of part of the meeting published by the Ynet Hebrew news site. 'Now we think that we have to shift this negotiation to 'all or nothing' — everybody comes home,' he said. 'We have a plan around it,' he added, without elaborating. Meanwhile, a participant in the meeting also confirmed that Witkoff made such remarks. In light of this, Netanyahu and Trump are reportedly working on a new proposal that would involve presenting Hamas with an ultimatum. According to The Times of Israel, the ultimatum for Hamas would be that the Palestinian militant group would have to release the remaining hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and agree to terms to end the war that include the group's disarmament. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The term maintains that if Hamas fails to abide by it, the Israeli military would continue with its campaign in Gaza. Amid the reports, Mahmoud Mardawi, a Hamas official, said the Palestinian armed group had yet to receive a formal Israeli proposal for a comprehensive deal from Arab mediators. He made it clear that while Hamas would support the agreement in principle, it would not disarm. 'This has been our demand from the beginning: an end to the war, the release of prisoners, and day-after arrangements in the Gaza Strip — a clear and comprehensive deal,' Mardawi said in a phone interview to The New York Times. Hence, the prospects of any rapid advancement of such a deal look bleak.