Housing market remains mired, report shows
Average housing values rose 0.1 percent in the three months ended May, the same as April, QV says
Photo:
RNZ
The housing market remains mired in a glut of properties, uncertain buyers, static prices and weak sales volumes, according to Quotable Value's (QV) price report.
It showed average housing values rose 0.1 percent in the three months ended May - the same as April - with the average value staying close to $914,000, down 1.1 percent on a year ago.
QV operations manager James Wilson said prices and sales were not changing much, but there were signs the market's mood was.
"The housing market is still softening, but doing so at a slowing pace with signs of tentative confidence beginning to surface.
"With interest rates easing and more owner-occupiers re-entering the market - particularly in the middle and upper-middle brackets - we're observing a return to activity in the main urban centres."
He said first home buyers remained active along with growing investor activity, which was generating "subtle competitive pressures".
But he said prices were being kept in check by high stock levels and vendor caution driven by issues such as tariffs and worries about holding on to jobs.
"While we don't expect a dramatic winter upswing, it's likely we'll see growing buyer engagement as confidence continues to build," Wilson said.
As with the broader economy regions were faring better than the main cities.
The best performing region was Northland with a 2.2 percent, while Whangarei had a 3.2 percent rise.
Other strong performers were Nelson, Christchurch and Invercargill all gaining more than 1 percent in the three months ended May.
QV's Nelson/Marlborough manager Craig Russell said first home buyers were active at the cheaper end of the market.
"A number of investors are selling properties which they've held as rentals for a number of years which is likely due to these investors wanting to free up capital, or obtain better returns elsewhere, after a period of no capital growth."
However, Auckland and Wellington remained housing market laggards, falling 0.5 percent and 1.3 percent respectively.
Auckland valuer Hugh Robson said the overall market was subdued, but there were differences through the city with first-home buyers taking advantage low interest rates to chase properties in medium to lower districts.
Wellington was the worst performer in the report.
Senior consultant David Cornford said prices continued to go backwards and showed little inclination to spark.
"Despite interest rates now being significantly lower, these rate drops have not correlated to an increase in property values and it's likely the region will require economic conditions to improve before we see a strengthening market."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
How to get into the housing market with $80
HomeShare has worked with the Financial Market Authority to finetune its offering. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds If you want to get into the property market, but don't have the money to do so, you may be about to get your chance - again. New fintech start-up HomeShare plans to launch later this year, offering investors the opportunity to buy a share in residential property. If that sounds familiar, that's because it's not the first attempt to offer this sort of investment scheme - The Property Crowd and The Ownery have both tried it within the past decade. In 2022, the Financial Markets Authority suspended the crowdfunding licence of The Property Crowd, after it contravened licensee obligations. No investors were using the platform at that point. The Ownery launched in 2016, offering shares in an Ellerslie house, but there was reportedly underwhelming investor interest and less than a quarter of shares were sold. It has not responded to a request for comment. Homeshare founder Martin van Blerk said the key difference between those previous attempts and his latest was that he had worked with the Financial Markets Authority in its fintech sandbox. The 'sandbox' is designed to encourage innovation, and allow participants to test their new products and services in a controlled environment, getting a better understanding of what the regulator will expect of them and adjusting as required. Van Blerk said HomeShare would offer 10,000 shares in a property based on an independent valuation. Its first property would be in Hamilton. People could buy single shares or many. On an $800,000 property, a share would be $80. Martin van Blerk is aiming for an October launch for HomeShare. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds "The goal is making housing more affordable, more transparent and just easier to access for a lot of people, who'd otherwise be locked out, either because they don't have enough for a deposit or a mortgage, or they just don't know how to go about it." He said he aimed for an October launch and hoped to eventually have properties all over New Zealand. "Instead of buying one property in Auckland, you could buy shares in 100 throughout New Zealand, so it's a great way to diversify risk for property owners." Owners would receive a proportionate amount of rental income from the property and pay a proportional amount of the cost of ownership, including maintenance. People who wanted to exit their investment could sell their shares on HomeShare's secondary marketplace, as long as the price was set within what the company said was a reasonable range. Fees would be charged when shares were bought and sold. For first-home buyers, the fee is 0.95 percent "or slightly higher if you're a traditional investor". Van Blerk said the model had proved popular in other countries. "New Zealand is sort of lagging behind. I think this is a chance to put us at the front of a shift that's happening." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pasifika Medical Association rejects claims public funds used inappropriately
Pasifika Medical Association group chair Kiki Maoate. Photo: Pasifika Medical Association Group The Pasifika Medical Association (PMA) is rejecting claims that public funds have been used in an inappropriate manner. Te Puni Kōkiri is launching an independent review into allegations that money was used inappropriately for Whānau Ora commissioning services. It relates to allegations of funds misused by two agencies, including Pasifika Futures Limited, where it is alleged that [ Moana Pasifika received $770,000 a year] from a Whānau Ora contract with the Pasifika Medical Association. However, Pasifika Medical Association group chair Kiki Maoate said no public funding has been used to support the professional rugby team. "We strongly reject any claim that public funds have been used in an inappropriate manner," Maoate said. Moana Pasifika became part of the Pasifika Medical Association Group (PMA) on 1 July 2024. At that time, the Moana Pasifika Charitable Trust was formally established to hold both the professional rugby team and the Moana Pasifika Community Sports Programme, Maoate said. "Moana Pasifika has always been more than a rugby team. From the outset, it was established as a platform for social good and long-term transformation for Pacific people. That founding purpose made it a natural strategic fit for PMA, which recognised the opportunity to strengthen and expand Moana Pasifika's reach. With that alignment of values and mission, PMA invested to optimise the organisations positive impact, capability and connection to Pacific communities. "In 2021, a small amount of funding was provided to the Pacific Business Trust to support the development of a business case for the establishment of the Moana Pasifika Charitable Trust. This was consistent with broader support for Pacific-owned and delivered initiatives under the economic domain of Pasifika Futures. "Since that time, any public or Whānau Ora funding has been directed solely to the Moana Pasifika Community Sports Programme. No public funding has been used to support the professional rugby team." the statement from PMA said. RNZ has approached the PMA for further comment. Te Pou Matakana, otherwise known as the Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency Limited, is also being investigated after Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka seeked urgent advice on "electioneering concerns". The concerns related to an advertisement encouraging Māori to sign-up to the Māori electoral roll paid for by Te Pou Matakana, which was released this week. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
How to get into housing market with $80
HomeShare has worked with the Financial Market Authority to finetune its offering. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds If you want to get into the property market, but don't have the money to do so, you may be about to get your chance - again. New fintech start-up HomeShare plans to launch later this year, offering investors the opportunity to buy a share in residential property. If that sounds familiar, that's because it's not the first attempt to offer this sort of investment scheme - The Property Crowd and The Ownery have both tried it within the past decade. In 2022, the Financial Markets Authority suspended the crowdfunding licence of The Property Crowd, after it contravened licensee obligations. No investors were using the platform at that point. The Ownery launched in 2016, offering shares in an Ellerslie house, but there was reportedly underwhelming investor interest and less than a quarter of shares were sold. It has not responded to a request for comment. Homeshare founder Martin van Blerk said the key difference between those previous attempts and his latest was that he had worked with the Financial Markets Authority in its fintech sandbox. The 'sandbox' is designed to encourage innovation, and allow participants to test their new products and services in a controlled environment, getting a better understanding of what the regulator will expect of them and adjusting as required. Van Blerk said HomeShare would offer 10,000 shares in a property based on an independent valuation. Its first property would be in Hamilton. People could buy single shares or many. On an $800,000 property, a share would be $80. Martin van Blerk is aiming for an October launch for HomeShare. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds "The goal is making housing more affordable, more transparent and just easier to access for a lot of people, who'd otherwise be locked out, either because they don't have enough for a deposit or a mortgage, or they just don't know how to go about it." He said he aimed for an October launch and hoped to eventually have properties all over New Zealand. "Instead of buying one property in Auckland, you could buy shares in 100 throughout New Zealand, so it's a great way to diversify risk for property owners." Owners would receive a proportionate amount of rental income from the property and pay a proportional amount of the cost of ownership, including maintenance. People who wanted to exit their investment could sell their shares on HomeShare's secondary marketplace, as long as the price was set within what the company said was a reasonable range. Fees would be charged when shares were bought and sold. For first-home buyers, the fee is 0.95 percent "or slightly higher if you're a traditional investor". Van Blerk said the model had proved popular in other countries. "New Zealand is sort of lagging behind. I think this is a chance to put us at the front of a shift that's happening." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
