Scientists Say Float Therapy Can Reset Your Mind. Here's What It Really Feels Like.
Float therapy involves floating in lukewarm water (meant to match your body temperature) mixed with magnesium sulfate, or Epsom salt. When you're floating, the magnesium sulfate enters the body through the skin and helps your muscles relax—similar to how you would in a homemade Epsom salt bath.
Meet the expert: Justin Feinstein, PhD, is a clinical neuropsychologist and the president and director of the Float Research Collective.
This type of sensory deprivation therapy is 'a unique way to help people access states of mindfulness,' says clinical neuropsychologist Justin Feinstein, PhD, who has studied the effects of float therapy in those with anxiety. "It puts the nervous system in a reset" and can improve your mental health in the short term.
The goal of floating in a pod is to minimize every outside sensation so you're left focusing only on what you're feeling (your heartbeat, breathing, being alive, etc). That's why the room is as silent and dark as possible, and why the water and air temperatures match that of the skin.
But float therapy isn't just helpful for relaxing—ahead, find out more benefits, plus what happened when I tried it for the first time.
The Benefits Of Float Therapy
It may improve mental health. Float therapy can be a good stress outlet for folks teetering on the edge of burnout, and even help ease symptoms of anxiety and depression, per the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This can also help improve muscle tension and sleep difficulties.
It might help people with physical conditions. Research suggests it can be used as a treatment for chronic pain, fibromyalgia, and multiple sclerosis.
It can potentially improve . Through his research, Feinstein found that some people's 'blood pressure goes down 10 to 15 points during the float,' he says.
It may help sore muscles recover. Epsom salt offers anti-inflammatory benefits, Feinstein explains, and studies show that it may reduce muscle soreness.
Something especially cool: Apparently the full relaxation effect of float therapy does not even set in until an hour after the float—and your state of relaxation can even last for a full 24 hours afterward. In addition to being a great workout recovery tool, Feinstein says he recommends float therapy as a short-term solution for people with anxiety or depression—although more research needs to be done to solidify its benefits.
If you're thinking these benefits sound too good to be true, I was in the same boat. I was especially intrigued given its muscle recovery benefits, since I'm an avid runner. Here's what happened when I gave it a shot.
Join Women's Health+ today for member-exclusive workout and meal plans.
Here's What Happened When I Tried Float Therapy For The First Time
A quick internet search revealed there was a studio that offered float therapy only 15 minutes away from me, called Float Seattle. Given that I was primarily interested in the potential muscle recovery benefits, I went on an intense tempo run the day before to make sure I was really putting float therapy to the test.
As predicted, I walked into the studio feeling the kind of soreness that likes to say hi after every stair you climb up. But I was feeling immediately more at ease when I got inside the waiting area. Rather than the clinical environment of a doctor's office waiting room, the lobby reminded me of the lounge at a high-end spa: squishy couches positioned in front of framed photos of abstract art, ginger tea brewing at a station in the corner, and nature sounds wafting throughout the space.
Upon my arrival, I completed a quick orientation. An employee showed me my pod and explained how to open and close the top, how to position my body when floating, and what to do before getting into the water. She also let me know that music would play when it was time for my session to end, then she left the room.
Like at most pools, I was required to shower before entering the pod. The employee recommended cleansing in lukewarm water towards the end of the shower to prepare for the water in the pod being a little cooler than my usual shower temp. While I could wear a swimsuit if I wanted, I opted not to in order to enhance the experience.
When I entered the pod, all I could think about was how...not spa-like it felt.
I knew that the water wouldn't be super hot, but I was expecting an experience a little bit like being in a hot tub. However, in the pod, it almost felt like I was in a womb. (I mean, I was naked inside an egg with water.) I also found myself wondering how much of the hour I had left.
But eventually I stopped counting the minutes. I slowly started to feel less self-conscious and aware of the fact that I was exposed and trapped in the small space. I stopped thinking about how the fluid kept drifting in my ears, or how to position my body in the least-weird way. I turned off the light and closed my eyes. All of my thoughts seemed to sink to the bottom of the pod.
Once I let go of my anxiety and insecurity about the experience, it felt like the music chimed only minutes later. But when I put my watch back on, I realized I had actually been in the pod for over an hour.
After my session, my mind felt calm and my body felt ready to take on another tough run.
Every muscle in my body felt relaxed during and after my soak. I'd compare it to how you might feel after, say, a three-hour (!) massage. When the employee at the front desk asked how I liked the experience, all I could do was nod with a daydreamy expression and sip at my cup of ginger tea.
It's hard to remember another time I truly just let myself literally lay back and think about nothing. Even when I've tried meditating, I've usually just spent the time stressing about how I was stressing. Beyond physically repairing my body, I felt amazed at how mentally calm and clear the experience made me. Hey, maybe it was just placebo—but I felt good.
How To Try Float Therapy For Yourself
Want to try float therapy yourself? It's totally safe for most people—even those who are pregnant. The only people who should exercise caution are those with claustrophobia, since it involves lying in an enclosed space filled with water. However, because you can lift the top of the pod at any time, you might be fine after you get used to the atmosphere.
Feinstein says that he's never actually tested float therapy on anyone using a closed pod because people with severe anxiety generally don't want to try it if they're enclosed in a space. Instead, he has simply made sure the room had the same effects that the enclosed pod would (sound-proofing the space, removing light, etc.). So you might even be able to find a studio that provides the experience without being put in a small space. You can also talk to your doctor or therapist first if you're unsure about whether float therapy is a good fit for you.
The only issues I had with float therapy were the price (one session at Float Seattle costs $89) and the amount of time it took (the entire experience took about 90 minutes—not including the time to get there and back).
Ultimately, while it sounded strange at first, float therapy ended up being a great way to recover and relax, and I definitely see myself going back for a second try.
You Might Also Like
Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream
These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pharma interest can plug NIH funding gap: Illumina CEO
Genetic sequencing company Illumina (ILMN) has had a rough few years. It has battled activist investors, faced off with the Federal Trade Commission, and, most recently, agreed to a $9.8 million settlement with the Department of Justice over a cybersecurity breach. To add to the pile: sanctions in China and the Trump administration cutting National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, which the company relies heavily on for clinical research. The numbers don't lie. The stock is down more than 21% in the past year and sank more than 11% in after-hours trading Thursday after the company reported an earnings miss for the second quarter. The company reported $1.06 billion in revenues compared to expected revenues of $1.05 billion. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $1.19 compared to estimates of $1.01. But CEO Jacob Thaysen told Yahoo Finance he remains positive about the company's near-term growth. Why? Because, in part, pharmaceutical companies can provide a new market. "Now, we're shifting from small things to really big programs. Some of the things making up for the reduction from the NIH is kind of indirect, but pharma is getting more interest in these big programs," he said, noting that 15% of the company is exposed to government research funding. "It's not only about sequencing itself, but really using massive amounts of data ... to really identify new drug targets and understand a disease," Thaysen said. The idea to use patient data to help the pharmaceutical world was also identified by 23andMe, which recently came out of bankruptcy through a nonprofit led by founder Anne Wojcicki. Thaysen said that unlike 23andMe, which he has worked with, his company is not going to pursue drug development on its own. "We have a lot of pharma companies that are very excited to work with us," he said. In addition to genetic testing of patient samples, the company is looking at growing in the preventative side of care with cancer screenings. The oncology business, Thaysen said, will have healthy growth over the next 10 or so years. China China banned importations of the San Diego-based company's sequencing machines earlier this year as part of its retaliatory actions to Trump's tariff war. Thaysen said he is working with regulators to try to reverse that, but "in the meantime, that business is declining, and we are expecting it to be flat." In fact, though China has historically been about 10% of the company's business, it contributed to half of the decline in earnings this past week. "China was never a huge part of Illumina's business. When it was the largest, it was just around 10%. We're down to 5% of the business," Thaysen told Yahoo Finance. But because of the tariff war and China's goals to boost its domestic innovation market, Illumina has faced a setback in its market power there from local competition. "As soon as there is a Chinese alternative that is good enough, then you will see that the Chinese government is pushing for the Chinese population, the Chinese companies to use that technology," Thaysen said. He added that even with the increased competition, China is an appealing market to remain in. Analysts are still waiting to see more progress on Illumina's return to growth. Jefferies analyst Tycho Peterson said in a note to clients that the firm will reiterate its Hold rating until things settle: "While the clinical traction is encouraging, we view clarity on near-term headwinds (A&G, China, Roche) and a path to sustainable HSD growth as key to a more constructive view. Reiterate Hold." Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, provider services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNN
a day ago
- CNN
Judge pauses termination of LGBTQ+ health research grants
LGBTQ issuesFacebookTweetLink Follow A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's cancelation of US National Institutes of Health grants that research on LGBTQ+ related health issues. Ruling from the bench, US District Judge Lydia Griggsby, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, said she would issue a preliminary injunction against NIH directives to terminate grants for LGBTQ+ health research, describing such directives as designed to 'focus and target LGBTQ+ members.' 'It's clear that why the funding is being terminated and why the grants will not move forward is because they relate to that community,' Griggsby said. The lawsuit, filed in May by the American Association of Physicians for Human Rights, against the NIH and Department of Health and Human Services alleges that in targeting only certain, predominantly LGBTQ+-related research projects for funding cuts, the NIH engaged in unlawful discrimination. In determining what grants to cut, Physicians for Human Rights attorney Omar Gonzalez-Pagan argued on Friday, NIH employees 'literally do a search term of projects, and they literally look for words' associated with LGBTQ+ related issues – including transgender, nonbinary, and sexuality. The reason the government is targeting transgender research projects 'is because they believe transgender people do not exist,' Omar Gonzalez-Pagan said. 'We need to take the government at its word,' he continued. 'That this a president of the United States who has spoken so denigratingly of the people that he governs' Assistant US Attorney Michael Wilson argued that the court lacked jurisdiction and would become 'involved in what should be a political process.' This is not the first time a district court has thwarted the NIH's attempts to cancel grants funding identity-related research. In a separate legal challenge to the case, a district court judge in Massachusetts ruled in June that the gutting of NIH grants in diversity-related fields is illegal, though that ruling addressed only a fraction of the hundreds of grants actually terminated. District Judge William Young, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan, said it is 'palpably clear' that 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community' was behind the NIH's grant termination plans. Griggsby said she would issue a written ruling on the matter in the coming weeks.


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Stop obsessing over protein goals — the latest health craze — and just enjoy your food
The cookbook section of any used bookstore is a museum of past health trends. Browse through the stock and you'll trace the rise and fall of nutritional villains: eggs, butter, red meat and more — first demonized, then rehabilitated by the next wave of experts. We've all seen America's food rules shift beneath our feet, as nutritional gospel one year becomes heresy the next. In 2025, we're in the era of protein. More specifically, we're in the era of more protein. Advertisement Inspired by bodybuilders, weight-lifters and hardcore health gurus, packing on the protein has gone mainstream. But while these athletes need the nutrient to build muscle and maintain their exercise routines, the average carpooling mom has no such requirement. Yet grocery-store shelves shout their macronutrient stats like badges of honor: '18 grams per serving!' 'Protein-rich!' Advertisement Social-media influencers cheerfully explain how to sneak ever more protein into cookies, pancakes and even ice cream; cottage cheese is the new star of the show, blended into everything from pasta sauce to dessert bars. Ads hawk 'gourmet protein powders' to be dumped into your morning latte. Many women's Instagram feeds have become a stream of 'high-protein lunchbox' reels and 'six ways to eat 100g of protein' posts. Advertisement I recently watched as one food blogger, a former champion of plant-based eating, crammed half a rotisserie chicken into her mouth on camera. Her caption: 'Gotta hit those protein goals!' Curious about my own goals, I calculated how much protein I'd need to eat in a day to meet the online experts' frequently cited benchmarks. The result was nauseating: seven eggs for breakfast, a whole chicken breast for lunch, meat again for dinner, plus multiple high-protein snacks — Greek yogurt, nuts, cottage cheese, protein bars — to stay on target. This isn't just a quirky health trend. It's disordered eating with a veneer of wellness. Advertisement That's not to say protein is bad for you; quite the opposite. It's a vital macronutrient, essential for muscle repair, hormone production and immune function; it also provides a sense of fullness after meals, helping to maintain a healthy weight. For growing kids, pregnant women, aging adults and those recovering from illness or intense exercise, protein is especially crucial. The problem isn't the nutrient itself, but the obsessive, all-consuming fixation on it. Consider this: For a healthy, active 175-pound man, the National Institutes of Health recommends about 63 grams of protein per day. But the popular MyFitnessPal website advises that same man to aim for 164 grams, well more than double the federal guideline. 'The average man in the United States is overshooting the federal protein recommendation by more than 55%,' says Alice Callahan, a New York Times health reporter who holds a nutrition PhD, 'and the average woman by more than 35%.' What happens to all that extra protein? The body can't store it. Instead, the liver converts the surplus into energy — and if that isn't used, packs it on as fat. Advertisement So if we're already getting enough, why the obsession? Maybe it has something to do with who's leading the conversation. A 2017 study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics found that 49.5% of registered dietitians were at risk for orthorexia nervosa, a condition marked by an unhealthy fixation on eating 'correctly.' Another 13% were at risk for traditional eating disorders like anorexia, and 8% had previously received treatment for them. Advertisement In other words, the very people we look to for food guidance may be struggling with disordered eating habits themselves. Women are more prone to eating disorders than men by orders of magnitude — and the current protein craze is largely female-led. Compared to other nutrition fads, the high-protein trend might seem harmless; after all, it's not demanding the total elimination of food groups, or promoting outright starvation. Advertisement However, it's steeped in the same obsessive mindset. When every bite must be justified by its protein content, when food becomes math instead of nourishment, something has gone wrong. A healthy approach to protein centers on real, unprocessed foods like eggs, fish, beans, nuts, meat and dairy — not processed powders with ingredients you can't pronounce, or bars that taste like compressed chalk. You don't need to count every gram or hit some arbitrary benchmark. Just eat a variety of whole foods, and you'll get what you need. Food fuels our bodies, but it's also meant to be enjoyed. We shouldn't have to choke down dry chicken or gag on cottage-cheese brownies in the name of health. Advertisement Because if wellness doesn't include balance, sanity and flexibility, it isn't wellness at all. Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars and is a homeschooling mother of six in greater Washington, DC.