Browning Superposed Overview: Why the First Affordable Over/Under Is Still Worth Considering Today
The Browning Superposed is America's over/under. Like so many of John Browning's designs, there was nothing like it on the market when it appeared in 1931, when the country was in the throes of the Great Depression. To the delight of American hunters and shooters, Browning created the mass-produced, affordable O/U at a time when the only O/U guns were high-end British Bosses, Purdeys, and Holland and Hollands.
The Superposed is more than a piece of shotgunning history. In its Lightning and Superlight configurations, John Browning's O/U still makes a great upland bird gun as it nears its 100th birthday. The heavier 3-inch magnum guns have have to be babied with bismuth, but they can drop ducks as well as any modern gun. If you're a trapshooter looking for a distinctive, old-school gun, the Broadway trap Superposed with ⅝'-wide vent rib is worth seeking out. In any configuration, the Superposed is durable, reliable, well-made and good-looking.
Action: Boxlock O/U
Produced: 1931-1976
Designers: John and Val Browning
Gauges:12-, 20-, 28-gauge and .410 bore
Notable Variants: Lightning, Superlight, Broadway trap, Pigeon, Pointer, Diana and Midas grade
As the Twenties roared, John Browning saw the possibility for a new shotgun. Americans had money in the post World War I economy. They moved to the suburbs and the cities. They bought things. Their new cars took them outdoors, to the field, to the marsh, and to the range where they shot trap and the new, popular game of Skeet. The times were right for an aspirational shotgun. Browning believed American shooters, who had plenty of side-by-sides to choose from, would see the advantage of a break-action gun with a narrow sighting plane. He also believed that repeating shotguns might someday be restricted to protect game populations, leaving only break-actions in the field. In 1922, he began working on his O/U.
The road to the Superposed's birth wasn't smooth. It would survive the death of its inventor, a global depression and a world war. At sixty-seven, Browning, a notorious workaholic, was trying to slow down. Although he handed the Superposed project off to his son Val after he had made some prototypes, he couldn't leave the gun alone. In 1926 he traveled to Belgium – his 61st Atlantic crossing – to help Val work on the Superposed at the FN factory. Browning died of a sudden heart attack in the factory, leaving Val to finish the gun alone.
The design Val Browning inherited had a tall frame to make room for a locking bolt that fit into two lugs on the bottom of the barrels. The Superposed would not be as light, low-profile, and trim as a British O/U, but it would be extremely durable. John Browning also designed a fore-end that slid forward rather than pivot off when it was unlatched, so that it remained on the barrel when the gun was taken apart.
The elder Browning believed Americans would prefer one trigger, but it was left to Val to create a reliable single trigger mechanism. The first Superposeds had traditional double triggers. Val then invented double-single triggers for subsequent models. Pull one trigger, and it would shoot the first barrel, then the second on the following pull. The other trigger fired the barrels in the opposite order. Eventually Val hit upon an inertia block that toggled under recoil allowing the trigger to trip the hammer for the second barrel — a design that proved highly reliable.
Read Next:
The good times of the 1920s came to abrupt halt on 'Black Tuesday,' October 29, 1929, when the stock market crashed and the Great Depression began. And, like that, the market for aspirational shotguns dried up. Browning introduced the Superposed in 1931, and they kept the gun alive through the Depression by cutting prices. Originally the Grade I Superposed listed for $107.50. By 1935, you could buy one for $69.75. The aggressive pricing strategy worked. Superposed sales doubled and the gun was a success. It was a desirable gun, too. When Ernest Hemingway won a tony live pigeon shoot in the south of France in 1935, the first prize was a Browning Superposed that he treasured. Browning added the lighter Lightning model in 1937. Engraved Pigeon, Diana, and Midas grades were offered, too.
Price-cutting kept the Superposed afloat, but low prices couldn't stop the Germans from conquering Belgium in 1940. The Germans occupied the factory and used it for the production of small arms, especially Browning's 9mm P35 Hi-Power. After liberation, the Germans damaged the factory with V-1 rocket attacks. Superposed production resumed in the rebuilt factory in 1948. The 20-gauge version debuted in 1949.
Trap, skeet, magnum and smallbore 28-gauge and .410 models appeared in the 1950s, the decade that marked the true heyday of the Superposed. Post-war Americans were the affluent, aspirational consumers Browning imagined when he conceived of the gun in the 20s. World War II had killed off the American double gun industry. The Superposed had its segment of the market practically to itself. A Superposed, even a plain Grade I, became the aspirational gun regular people saved for at mid-century. And, just because they had the market cornered didn't mean Browning cut corners. The guns from the 1950s were beautifully fit and finished.
The early 60s started well for the Superposed. The gun's popularity ran high, leading, in part, to the infamous salt wood disaster. In need of wood for Superposeds, Browning bought into a system invented by Morton Salt that reduced the time it took to dry a walnut blank. Stacks of wood were covered with salt to leach out moisture. And, it worked — for the blanks at the top. It was a different story at the bottom, where the moisture pulled out of the blanks seeped into the wood below them. Guns made from those bottom blanks became 'salt wood' Brownings that rusted where the salted wood met metal. Salt wood affected many Superposed guns made from 1966 to 1972, although 1967-69 were the worst years. Browning replaced customer's damaged guns, at no small cost to the company.
Much worse than salt wood, though, was the rising cost of labor in Belgium, which pushed the prices of Superposeds higher even as shooters came to accept Japanese-made competitors like the Winchester 101. Browning kept the Superposed in the line while auditioning a pair of lower-priced replacements.
One was the Liege, a simplified Superposed made by FN, but with a conventional fore-end latch, coarser checkering and sparse engraving. The other was a Japanese-made Superposed copy, again, simplified. Someone at Browning HQ doodled the name 'Citori' in a meeting. It sounded vaguely Japanese and became the name of the Miroku-made O/U. The Liege only lasted a couple of years. 'Citori' became a household name among shooters. The Superposed went out of production in 1976, then was revived briefly during a limited production run between 1983 and 1986. It survives today as a high-end custom order.
With more than 200,000 Superposeds made, there are plenty to be found on the used market. The 12-gauge Grade I, especially, is not particularly expensive and you'll find them for about $1,500. It will be heavy, and it won't have chrome-lined chambers so you will have to clean the barrels every time you shoot it to prevent chamber rust.
Then there's the 'RKLT' version, which stands for 'Round Knob, Long Tang,' and it refers to the Prince of Wales-style grip and long lower tang that is the most the desirable configuration. There were short-tang and full-pistol grip guns made, too, and there's nothing wrong with them as shooters.
A 20-gauge Superposed will run you $2,500 or so, depending on the grade. A 12-gauge Superlight sells for about $3,500, a 20-gauge Superlight for upwards of $5k. The 28s and .410s and the higher grade-guns run much steeper. The high grades were originally the Pigeon, Diana and Midas (shown in the photo above). Browning switched to numbered grades I-VI for a while, then Browning went back to the Pigeon, Diana, and Midas designations, plus 'Pointer' grades snuck in there at some point. The Blue Book of Gun Values is a good resource for straightening out models and grades. Ned Schwing's book 'Browning Superposed: John M. Browning's Last Legacy,' is the last word on the Superposed. Unfortunately, it's out of print — used copies start around $250.
Read Next:
Browning spent most of his career increasing firepower, with lever-actions, pump-actions, semi- and fully-automatic actions. That his last gun would be a two-shot break action seems like a conscious step backward. Yet Browning, a thoughtful and self-aware man, once said to one of his sons: ' . . . this progress we brag about is just a crazy, blind racing past the things we are looking for – and haven't got the sense to recognize. And, in the matter of guns, that makes me crazier than most.'
With Browning's last design, the Superposed, he slowed down enough to give shotgunners exactly what they were looking for.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
an hour ago
- Vox
Meet the Substackers who want to save the American novel
is a senior correspondent on the Culture team for Vox, where since 2016 she has covered books, publishing, gender, celebrity analysis, and theater. In book world, the summer of 2025 is officially the summer of Substack. Over the past few years, Substack has been slowly building a literary scene, one in which amateurs, relative unknowns, and Pulitzer Prize-winning writers rub shoulders with one another. This spring, a series of writers — perhaps best known for their Substacks — released new fiction, leading to a burst of publicity that the critic, novelist, and Substacker Naomi Kanakia has declared 'Substack summer.' Vox Culture Culture reflects society. Get our best explainers on everything from money to entertainment to what everyone is talking about online. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 'Is the Next Great American Novel Being Published on Substack?' asked the New Yorker in May. Substack 'has become the premier destination for literary types' unpublished musings,' announced Vulture. Can Substack move sales like BookTok can? No. But it's doing something that, for a certain set, is almost more valuable. It's giving a shot of vitality to a faltering book media ecosystem. It's building a world where everyone reads the London Review of Books, and they all have blogs. 'I myself think of BookTok as an engine for discovery, and I think Substack is an engine for discourse,' said the journalist Adrienne Westenfeld. 'BookTok is a listicle in a way. It's people recommending books that you might not have heard of. It's not as much a place for substantive dialogue about books, which is simply a limitation of short form video.' Related How BookTokers make money Three years ago, Westenfeld wrote about Substack's rising literary scene for Esquire. Now, Esquire has slashed its book coverage, and Westenfeld is writing the Substack companion to a traditionally published nonfiction book: Adam Cohen's The Captain's Dinner. That progression is, in a way, par for the course for the current moment. All the sad young literary men that are said to have disappeared are there on Substack, thriving. With both social media and Google diverting potential readers away from publications, many outlets are no longer investing in arts coverage. The literary crowd who used to hang out on what was known as 'Book Twitter' no longer gathers on what is now X. All the same, there are still people who like reading, and writing, and thinking about books. Right now, a lot of them seem to be on Substack. What strikes me most about the Substack literary scene is just how much it looks like the literary scene of 20 years ago, the one the millennials who populate Substack just missed. The novels these writers put out tend to be sprawling social fiction about the generational foibles of American families à la Jonathan Franzen. They post essays to their Substacks like they're putting blog posts on WordPress, only this time, you can add a paywall. All the sad young literary men that are said to have disappeared are there on Substack, thriving. On Substack, it's 2005 again. Substack is a lifeboat in publishing… or maybe an oar Writers can offer Substack literary credibility, while Substack can offer writers a direct and monetizable connection to their readers. In a literary landscape that feels perennially on the edge, that's a valuable attribute. 'As long as I've wanted to be a writer, as long as I've taken it seriously, it's been mostly bad news,' said the novelist and prolific Substacker Lincoln Michel. 'It's been mostly advances getting lower, articles about people reading less, book review sections closing up, less and less book coverage. Substack feels like a bit of a lifeboat, or maybe an oar tossed to you in your canoe as you're being pushed down to the waterfall. You can build up a following of people who are really interested in books and literature or whatever it is you might be writing about.' Substack summer, however, is not about the established big-name novelists. Substack summer is about writers who are not particularly famous, who found themselves amassing some tens of thousands of followers on Substack and who have recently released longform fiction. They are the ones whose works are getting discussed as central to a new literary scene. In her original 'Substack summer' post, Kanakia identified three novels of the moment as Ross Barkan's Glass Century, John Pistelli's Major Arcana, and Matthew Gasda's The Sleepers. To that list, Kanakia could easily add her own novella, Money Matters, which she published in full on Substack last November. 'No other piece of new fiction I read last year gave me a bigger jolt of readerly delight,' the New Yorker said in May of Money Matters. It wasn't quite Oprah putting Franzen's Corrections in her book club, but it was still more attention than you would reasonably expect. When Barkan and Pistelli's novels came out in April and May, they garnered a surprising amount of attention, Kanakia said. The books were both ambitious enough to be of potential interest to critics — Glass Century follows an adulterous couple from the 1970s into the present, and Major Arcana deals with a death by suicide at a university. Still, both books were from relatively small presses: Belt Publishing for Major Arcana and Tough Poets Press for Glass Century. That kind of book traditionally has a limited publicity budget, which makes it hard to get reviewed in major outlets. (Not that coverage is all that easy for anyone to get, as Michel noted.) Nonetheless, both Major Arcana and Glass Century got reviewed in the Wall Street Journal. A few weeks later, Kanakia's Money Matters, which she published directly to Substack, was written up in the New Yorker. It wasn't quite Oprah putting Franzen's Corrections in her book club, but it was still more attention than you would reasonably expect. 'I was like, 'Something's happening,'' Kanakia says. ''This is going to be big. This is going to be a moment.'' 'Had this novel been released two or three years ago, it would have been completely ignored,' says Barkan of Glass Century. 'Now it's been widely reviewed, and I credit Substack with that fully.' Pistelli's Major Arcana is even more a product of Substack than the others. Pistelli originally serialized it on Substack, and then self-published before Belt Publishing picked it up. The book didn't garner all that much attention when he was serializing it — Pistelli's feeling is that people don't go to Substack to read fiction — but after it came out in print, Substack became the peg for coverage of the book. 'A lot of the reviews, both positive and negative, treated my novel as kind of a test of whether Substack can produce a serious novel, a novel of interest,' said Pistelli. 'The verdict was mixed.' The theory that Substackers have about Substack is this: As social media and search traffic have both collapsed, the kinds of publications that usually give people their book news — newspapers, literary magazines, book specific websites — have struggled and become harder to find. Substack, which delivers directly to readers' inboxes, has emerged to fill the gap in the ecosystem. 'It's very easy to talk to people and it's very easy to get your writing out there,' said Henry Begler, who writes literary criticism on Substack. 'It feels like a real literary scene, which is something I have never been part of.' While there are lots of newsletter social platforms out there, Substack is fairly unique in that it's both a place for newsletters, which tend towards the essayistic, and, with its Twitter clone Notes app, a place for hot takes and conversations. The two formats can feed off each other. 'It creates an ongoing discussion in a longer and more considered form than it would be on Twitter, where you're just trying to get your zingers out,' says Begler. The buzzy authors of the Substack scene are also all associated with the Substack-based literary magazine The Metropolitan Review. Barkan is co-founder and editor-in-chief, and Kanakia, Pistelli, and Gasda have all written for it, as has Begler. 'Basically, we're just a group of friends online who read each other's newsletters and write for some of the same publications,' said Kanakia. For Barkan, the Metropolitan Review is at the center of a new literary movement, which he's dubbed New Romanticism, that is 'properly exploiting the original freedom promised by Internet 1.0 to yank the English language in daring, strange, and thrilling directions.' Barkan's idea is that the kind of publications that used to host such daring, strange, and thrilling speech no longer do, and the Metropolitan Review is stepping into the breach. He argues somewhat optimistically that the Metropolitan Review, which has around 22,000 subscribers, is 'one of the more widely read literary magazines in America.' The combined mythologies of Metropolitan Review and Substack summer have given these writers the beginnings of a cohesive self-identity. The world they've built with that identity is, interestingly, a bit of a throwback. The literary culture of 2005 is alive and well Here are some characteristics of the literary world of 2005: an enchantment with a group of talented young male writers who wrote primarily big social novels and a lot of excitement about the literary possibilities of a nascent blogosphere. Here are some characteristics of the Substack literary scene: a lot of young male writers, a lot of social novels, and a lot of excitement about the literary possibilities of newsletter essays. Glass Century and Major Arcana are both big, sprawling novels that take place over decades, and Glass Century, in particular, reads as though it was written under the influence of Jonathan Franzen. That's a departure from what's been more recently in vogue, like Karl Ove Knausgaard's titanic autofictional saga. 'I think there's a lot of nostalgia for a time when the novel was maybe a more discussed form or a more vital form or trying to capture a lot more of contemporary society.' 'The big trend in the world of literary fiction for the last decade or so was really autofiction, the idea of you would write a slice of life first person narrated often in a kind of transparent, not very adorned prose,' said Pistelli. 'I think there's been some desire to get back to that bigger canvas social novel that has been lost in the autofictional moment.' Literary Substack in general also seems to espouse a desire to return to a time when literature was more culturally ascendant. 'I think there's a lot of nostalgia for a time when the novel was maybe a more discussed form or a more vital form or trying to capture a lot more of contemporary society,' said Begler. 'It's partially just a shift from one mode of thinking to another, and it's partially a nostalgia for your Franzen and your David Foster Wallace and whatever.' This desire is, in its way, very Franzenian. Franzen famously wrote an essay for Harper's in 1996 in which he describes his 'despair about the American novel' after the jingoism of the lead up to the first Gulf War. Franzen thought that television was bad for the novel; he hadn't yet seen what TikTok could do to a person. While the Franzen mode pops up a lot with this crowd, there are outliers to this loose trend. Gasda's Sleeper is very much a product of millennial fiction (detached voice describing the foibles of Brooklyn literati), and Kanakia's work on Substack, which she calls her 'tales,' tends to be sparse, with little attention paid to description or setting. There's also the question of gender. The amount of men in this literary Substack scene is particularly notable in a moment so rich with essays about the disappearance of men who care about and write books. Some observers have drawn a lesson of sorts from this phenomenon: The mainstream literary world alienated men. They had to flee to Substack to build their own safe haven. 'The literary establishment treats male American writers with contempt,' wrote the writer Alex Perez on his Substack last August. His commenters agreed. The answer, they concluded, was building a platform and self publishing. 'I'm a middle-aged, straight, white, conservative, rich male who writes literary fiction. It's like a demographic poo Yahtzee. I don't stand a chance,' wrote one commenter. 'But I have 85K Twitter followers and an email list with thousands of people, so I can self-publish and sell 5,000 copies of anything I write.' 'These aren't manosphere men who are constantly raging against the influence of women on fiction. These are men just writing.' For the Metropolitan Review crowd, the amount of men in Substack's literary scene is mostly value-neutral. 'I do think there's something to the fact that when I got on Substack, I was like, 'These are people that are producing work that I'm actually interested in and I actually find compelling,' and that they were probably majority men,' said Begler. 'Overall, it's a rather welcoming environment for all,' Barkan adds. 'These aren't manosphere men who are constantly raging against the influence of women on fiction. These are men just writing.' Kanakia thinks the narrative about literary white men is more complicated than literary white men let on, but ultimately harmless. 'In 2025 the varieties of men advocating for themselves — most of them are very horrific. This variety is not so bad,' she says. 'If they want a book deal at Scribners, like, fine, if that'll make you happy. That'll be great. I have no problem with that.' In the meantime, literary Substack keeps expanding. Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Michael Chabon just signed up. 'It's smart of him,' says Barkan. 'If I were Michael Chabon and was working on a novel, I would be on Substack. I think more literary writers who have platforms already should be there.' The closest antecedent to this moment did not last. The literary moment of 2005 was blown apart the way everything of that era was: under the pressure of the 2008 recession and the so-called Great Awokening, under the slow collapse of the blogosphere as social media took off — and everything that came along with them. Will the same thing happen to this crowd? It's hard to know for sure this early. At least for right now, Substack is having its summer.
Cosmopolitan
an hour ago
- Cosmopolitan
Are Love Island winners Toni and Cach still together? Relationship timeline and latest news
Love Island has officially come to an end for 2025, with Toni and Cach being crowned as this year's winners. The show wrapped up on Monday 4th August, and saw the couple in the final along with Shakira and Harry, Yasmin and Jamie, and Angel and Ty. During the finale, Toni revealed that Cach dropped the L-bomb the night before and she said it back (you guys!) But, there is one elephant in the room when it comes to this couple - Cach lives in the UK and Toni lives in the US, leading fans to wonder if these two will be able to make it work on the outside. Read on for everything you need to know. They are! It's still very early days, but Toni and Cach left the villa in a an exclusive couple. During the final, they also revealed that they'd both said "I love you" and were making plans to split their time between the UK and US. Cach and Toni got together during Casa Amor when Cach joined as a bombshell. The pair hit it off instantly and shared multiple kisses, before Toni decided to choose him at the recoupling. However, when Toni's ex Harrison returned to the villa, it was clear there was still some unfinished business between them. She chose Harrison at the next recoupling, leaving both Cach and Harrison's partner at the time, Lauren, distraught. But it wasn't meant to be between Toni and Harrison, as she learned he'd been intimate with Lauren prior to this and still decided to take her to the terrace. Lauren was later dumped and Harrison decided to leave with he. During this time, Cach had been getting to know Billykiss, however, the Islanders decided to send her home during a twist. Cach and Toni then rekindled their romance, and made it to the final together. Toni and Cach were announced as the season 12 winners on Monday 4th August 2025. Speaking after the show, Toni said: "Oh it's so crazy that we won just because I know none of my Americans can vote, so thank you to all of my UK people for voting for us." Cach added: "For me, big up the UK! Thank you so much. I appreciate you guys a lot. This is a connection right now and I love you guys a lot." Looking at Cach, Toni said: "Oh I couldn't have done this without you, honey." He replied: "I couldn't have done it without her. You made this ride bumpy, but I enjoyed every bump of the way. I appreciate having you by my side. And I wouldn't want to stand here with anybody else but her." The pair then hugged, as Toni gushed: "Thank you for treating me like the queen I am." Oh these two are just too cute! Love Island is available to stream on ITVX.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Sydney Sweeney 'jeans' ad signals major cultural turning point, industry experts say
Call it Jean theory. Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad sent shockwaves through the advertising world, winning immense praise and triggering fierce backlash as well – but experts are saying that the ad represents a profound cultural shift. Industry analysts are saying that the ad represents a cultural turning point away from hyper-wokeism and towards more traditional forms of advertising. "The Sydney Sweeney ad is not just selling a product; it is signaling a cultural turning point. For years, brands have bent over backwards to appease a small but loud activist class, producing ads that felt forced, joyless, and polarizing. Instead of speaking to consumers, they pandered to an ideology that policed language, celebrated grievance, and punished anything deemed insufficiently progressive. This ad does the opposite. It is confident, fun, and refuses to apologize for appealing to mainstream sensibilities," psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert told Fox News Digital. The "Euphoria" star's American Eagle sultry ad, which featured her decked out in a denim jacket and jeans with the tagline "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans," has been celebrated for its unapologetic embrace of a conventionally attractive spokesmodel and panned as an endorsement of "eugenics" by woke critics. "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color," Sweeney says in the ad. "My jeans are blue." The jeans/genes pun left many hyper-left viewers incensed, with many going so far as to compare the ad for pants to full-blown Nazism. "Oh cute she's in her Nazi propaganda era," one social media user wrote. "Maybe I'm too woke. But getting a blue-eyed, blonde, white woman and focusing your campaign around her having perfect genetics feels weird," an X user wrote. But others celebrated the ad, with Sen. Ted Cruz accused the "crazy Left" of coming out against beautiful women in a post on X. President Trump has also praised the ad after finding out that Sweeney is a registered Republican. "Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves. Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. The American Eagle ad comes in the wake of several high-profile woke advertisements that spelled disaster for major American brands. Bud Light sparked a national outcry and saw a steep drop in sales after the enlisted transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney for a brand partnership. Jaguar sparked major backlash after they released a 2024 ad featuring androgynous models wearing futuristic clothing that many viewers branded as woke. The luxury automaker's CEO Adrian Mardell announced Thursday that he is retiring, just months after the ad debuted. "The Sydney Sweeney ad campaign is striking a cultural nerve because it signals a return to traditional branding strategies: sex appeal, simplicity, and star power. What makes it stand out isn't just the creative - it's the backlash to the backlash. For years, brands have chased ideological alignment with 'woke' values, but consumer fatigue is setting in. This ad leans into mass appeal rather than moral signaling, and it's working," business and entertainment podcaster Shawn French told Fox News Digital. American Eagle refused to back down in light of the controversy, and released a statement saying the ad "is and always was about the jeans," in an implicit rebuke to the eugenics comparisons. "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way," the statement read. "Great jeans look good on everyone." Juda Engelmayer, a crisis PR expert who reps high-profile clients such as Harvey Weinstein, says that while woke may not be completely dead yet, the ad is benefitting from an environment in which wokeness is in retreat. In previous years, woke activists could engage in cancel culture tactics that could severely hurt a brand for not hewing the party line, but the energy to fight over trivial cultural issues appears to have waned, Engelmayer said. "It's not resonating as much. You're not seeing them screaming in protest as they did on other issues. Even people who are more on the woke side are rolling their eyes," he told Fox News Digital.
