Court finds no duty of care owed to Torres Strait Islanders over climate change
Judge Michael Wigney ruled Australia's greenhouse gas emissions targets are matters of "core government policy" which should be decided by the parliament, not the courts.
"My heart is broken for my families and my community," Guda Maluyligal traditional owner Uncle Pabai Pabai said after the decision was handed down.
The judge also rejected the Torres Strait Islanders' claims that their cultural loss should be compensated under negligence law.
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai — from the islands of Saibai and Boigu — brought the case and travelled almost 900 kilometres from their ancestral homes to the Federal Court in Cairns to hear the outcome.
Despite the finding, the judge also said the Uncles had proven many of the factual elements of their case, including that Australia's emissions targets between 2015 and 2021 were not consistent with the best available science to hold global temperatures to 1.5 degrees.
He found the Commonwealth "did not engage with or give real or genuine consideration to the best available science" when setting those targets.
The judge said the Torres Strait Islander peoples' case did not fail because there was no merit in their allegations, but rather because negligence law does not allow compensation for matters of government policy.
Supporters wearing colourful dresses gathered in a separate room in the courthouse to watch the judgement, singing songs from their homeland, and waving Torres Strait Islander flags.
Judge Wigney acknowledged the Torres Strait Islands "have in recent years been ravaged by the impacts of human-induced climate change … rising sea levels, storm surges and other extreme water level events".
"The Torres Strait Islands and their inhabitants are, however, undoubtedly far more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change than other communities in Australia," he said.
"There could be little, if any, doubt that the Torres Strait Islands and their traditional inhabitants will face a bleak future if urgent action is not taken to address climate change and its impacts."
This is the first time an Australian court has ruled on whether the Commonwealth has a legal duty of care to protect their citizens from the impacts of climate change, and whether cultural loss from climate change should be compensated.
The landmark litigation has been financed through the NGO the Grata Fund, and modelled on a successful case from the Netherlands.
As part of the case the Federal Court visited the islands of Boigu and Saibai, about 6 kilometres from the shores of Papua New Guinea, and Badu.
Evidence of coastal erosion, destruction of ancestral graves and soil salinity that prevents crops from growing was presented to the court.
It also heard of extreme weather events, including storms that cause intense flooding and inundate the islands, which lie at just 1.6 metres above sea level.
The court heard sea levels in the Torres Strait were rising at double the rate of the rest of the world and that inaction on climate change may cause irreversible impacts for First Nations people in the Torres Strait.
The plantiffs' legal team argued the Guda Maluyligal people risked losing their culture if rising sea levels, caused by climate change, forced them to leave their homes.
The court heard breaching the 1.5 degrees global emissions limit would cause irreversible damage to small and low-lying islands, including those in the Torres Strait.
Judge Wigney said today's findings "should not be construed as somehow sanctioning or justifying being the unquestionably modest and unambitious greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets that were set by the Commonwealth in 2015, 2020 and 2021".
"Unless something is done to arrest global warming and the resulting escalating impacts of climate change, there is a very real risk that the applicant's worst fears will be realised and they will lose their islands, their culture and their way of life, and will become, as it were, climate refugees," he said.
This is not the first time Torres Strait Islanders have taken the federal government to court over their long connection to Country.
The decade-long Mabo case led by Meriam man Eddie Koiki Mabo dispelled the legal notion of terra nullius — land belonging to no-one and recognised the land of his people. It also led to the development of the Native Title Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
'Back on track': China hails Anthony Albanese's 'personal efforts' to restore ties
Relations between China and Australia reached a "low point" but are back on track under Anthony Albanese's leadership, Chinese premier Li Qiang says. On Tuesday, the prime minister wrapped up a day of high-level talks in Beijing when he met with Li at the Great Hall of the People. China's premier congratulated Albanese on his re-election and for his "personal efforts" to stabilise the China-Australia relationship, which soured under the former Liberal government during the COVID-19 pandemic. "China-Australia relations have moved beyond a low point and returned to the right track of stability and development," Li said. Since the pair last met in October last year, "a lot has happened in the world", Li said, and there was growing instability and uncertainty in the global economy. "The development of all countries is faced with new challenges. Given such circumstances, China and Australia as important trade partners, should strengthen dialogue and co-operation," he said. Albanese said he looked forward to the two nations exploring new opportunities in trade, climate change, tourism and culture. "We'll also have an opportunity to have a frank and open dialogue that enables us to navigate issues that need to be discussed," he said. The live firing exercise in international waters near Australia in February forced commercial flights overhead to divert. Speaking after Tuesday's meeting, Albanese said he had secured a commitment for China to better inform Australia on military drills in the region. The prime minister noted the drills being in international waters did not contravene international law, "but that we were concerned about the notice and the way that it happened, including the live fire exercises". Australia's position on there being no unilateral change to the status quo over Taiwan was also conveyed to the president, he said. "We want peace and security in the region, that is in the interests of both Australia and China," Albanese replied when asked whether he had raised China's unprecedented military build-up. Australian and China would be able to have "a frank and open dialogue", Anthony Albanese said. Source: AAP Xi didn't raise reports that the United States had asked Australia to commit to teaming up during a potential conflict with China over Taiwan, nor Labor's commitment to terminate a Chinese company's lease of the Port of Darwin , Albanese added. Yang was given a suspended death sentence in China on secretive national security charges that Australia rejects. "I raised the case, you wouldn't expect there to be an immediate outcome and that is not the way things work," Albanese told reporters. In a pointed prod at US isolationism under Donald Trump, Xi said countries should work together to "support multilateralism and free trade, defend the UN-centred international system and the international order". The Chinese readout noted the prime minister "reaffirmed Australia's commitment to the one-China policy and its opposition to 'Taiwan independence'". The bilateral meetings with Xi, Li and Communist Party Chairman Zhao Leji — the three highest-ranking members of China's ruling committee — mark the centrepiece of Albanese's six-day tour of the Middle Kingdom. In his meeting with Zhao, the chairman noted Albanese's visit so soon after his re-election showed the importance of the Sino-Australian relationship. Earlier on Tuesday, Chinese security officials tried to stop Australian journalists, who were travelling with the prime minister's delegation, from leaving a tourist attraction in Beijing after filming in the area. The group of reporters had permission to film at the location, but were stopped by security officials and were told to hand over footage before police arrived. The journalists were able to leave the site with the footage, despite being followed by security.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Climate justice push turns to leaders after court loss
Political leadership is needed on climate change, experts say following the rejection of a landmark case in the Federal Court. On Tuesday, the court rejected the case led by Uncle Pabai Pabai and Uncle Paul Kabai, which argued the Commonwealth owed a duty of care to protect their Torres Strait homelands from the impacts of climate change. The uncles filed the landmark case against the government in the Federal Court in 2021, seeking orders from the court that would require the government to take steps to prevent harm to their communities, including cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. In handing down his decision, Federal Court Justice Wigney Michael accepted many of the key factual elements of the case, including the impacts of climate change on the islands. The case failed, Justice Wigney said, because negligence law does not allow compensation when it comes to government policy decisions. "That will remain the case unless and until the law in Australia changes, either by the incremental development or expansion of the common law by appellant courts or by the enactment of legislation," Justice Wigney said. "Until then, the only real avenue available to those in the position of the applicants and other Torres Strait Islanders, involves public advocacy and protest and ultimately recourse via the ballot box." La Trobe University anthropology lecturer Aidan Craney, whose work is focused on understanding social change in the Pacific Islands region, said the decision shows the need for political leadership on climate justice. Dr Craney said the government's reaction to the case could influence Australia's relationships in the Pacific. "How the Australian government responds to this decision may influence the levels of support it receives from the region," he said. "Current sentiment is broadly positive. However, dissent has come from respected sources, such as the Pacific Elders Voice." Uncle Pabai Pabai and Uncle Paul Kabai said they were shocked and heartbroken after the decision, but vowed to continue pushing to protect their islands. "I'm feeling very emotional," Uncle Pabai Pabai told AAP after the decision. "I wasn't thinking we'd lose this case ... I'm very heartbroken." Griffith University Law School professor Susan Harris Rimmer said the decision was indeed a heartbreaking outcome. She urged the federal government to pass human rights legislation that would allow for the right to a clean, healthy and safe environment. "The United Nations Human Rights Committee has already ruled that rights have been breached by Australia in relation to climate impacts in the Torres Strait," she said."Australia is running out of time for the kind of incremental advocacy and protest that Justice Wigney noted was the only current avenue for reform."
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Climate justice push turns to leaders after court loss
Political leadership is needed on climate change, experts say following the rejection of a landmark case in the Federal Court. On Tuesday, the court rejected the case led by Uncle Pabai Pabai and Uncle Paul Kabai, which argued the Commonwealth owed a duty of care to protect their Torres Strait homelands from the impacts of climate change. The uncles filed the landmark case against the government in the Federal Court in 2021, seeking orders from the court that would require the government to take steps to prevent harm to their communities, including cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. In handing down his decision, Federal Court Justice Wigney Michael accepted many of the key factual elements of the case, including the impacts of climate change on the islands. The case failed, Justice Wigney said, because negligence law does not allow compensation when it comes to government policy decisions. "That will remain the case unless and until the law in Australia changes, either by the incremental development or expansion of the common law by appellant courts or by the enactment of legislation," Justice Wigney said. "Until then, the only real avenue available to those in the position of the applicants and other Torres Strait Islanders, involves public advocacy and protest and ultimately recourse via the ballot box." La Trobe University anthropology lecturer Aidan Craney, whose work is focused on understanding social change in the Pacific Islands region, said the decision shows the need for political leadership on climate justice. Dr Craney said the government's reaction to the case could influence Australia's relationships in the Pacific. "How the Australian government responds to this decision may influence the levels of support it receives from the region," he said. "Current sentiment is broadly positive. However, dissent has come from respected sources, such as the Pacific Elders Voice." Uncle Pabai Pabai and Uncle Paul Kabai said they were shocked and heartbroken after the decision, but vowed to continue pushing to protect their islands. "I'm feeling very emotional," Uncle Pabai Pabai told AAP after the decision. "I wasn't thinking we'd lose this case ... I'm very heartbroken." Griffith University Law School professor Susan Harris Rimmer said the decision was indeed a heartbreaking outcome. She urged the federal government to pass human rights legislation that would allow for the right to a clean, healthy and safe environment. "The United Nations Human Rights Committee has already ruled that rights have been breached by Australia in relation to climate impacts in the Torres Strait," she said."Australia is running out of time for the kind of incremental advocacy and protest that Justice Wigney noted was the only current avenue for reform."
