The Insane True Story Behind ‘A Widow's Game'—Where Is The Real Maje Now?
Netflix's latest crime thriller A Widow's Game has climbed to the No. 1 spot on the platform after its May 30 release. Viewers may be surprised to learn that the movie is inspired by one of the most shocking true crimes in Spain's history. Read on to learn more about the real-life case involving manipulation, infidelity and murder.
From director Carlos Sedes (The Asunta Case), the film takes place in August 2017, when a dead body is discovered in a parking lot in Valencia, Spain, with several stab wounds. The victim is Arturo Ferrer Puig, a newlywed who had been married to a young woman named Maje for less than a year. Skilled homicide detective Eva is assigned to the case and soon realizes that Maje's story has holes – and all signs point to a crime of passion.
'Why does a person consider that it is better to commit a murder than to get divorced? This was the question that assailed me when I first read the news about Maje and Salvador's crime," executive producer Ramón Campos said in a statement to Netflix.
'Over the years we have been trying to unravel the answer and we think we have understood, but not understood, why Maje decided to manipulate Salvador to murder a person who was undoubtedly a good person. Because this film is not about the victim. It is about the murderers. Because sometimes the answer to our actions lies not in who we are, but where we come from,' he continued.
"A Widow's Game" on Netflix
Yes, Netflix's film A Widow's Game is based on a real-life true crime case from Valencia, Spain, known as La Viuda Negra de Patraix, which translates to 'The Black Widow of Patraix' in English. The character of Maje is based on María Jesús Moreno, while her late husband, Arturo, was inspired by 35-year-old Antonio Navarro. The man who carried out the crime was Maje's boyfriend, Salvador Rodrigo.
LA VIUDA NEGRA. Ivana Baquero as Maje, Tristán Ulloa as Salva in LA VIUDA NEGRA.
María Jesús Moreno was 27 years old at the time of her late husband's murder. According to the Spanish magazine La Razón, Maje was raised in a religious family and was one of five siblings. She met Antonio while she was studying nursing. He was attending the same university as her brother and often visited the house. They officially started dating in 2011, when she was 21 and he was 30.
The couple moved into an apartment in Valencia, located in the Patraix neighborhood. She was employed at Casa de la Salud Hospital, while he worked at the El Rebollar Road Maintenance Center. The magazine reported that even before they tied the knot on Sept. 3, 2016, Maje was 'unfaithful' to her husband. Allegedly, her relationship with a physiotherapist got back to Antonio. He was about to call off the wedding, but she managed to convince him that he was the love of her life.
LA VIUDA NEGRA. Tristán Ulloa as Salva, Ivana Baquero as Maje in LA VIUDA NEGRA.
Salvador Rodrigo, who also worked at Maje's hospital, became involved in a romantic relationship with her. He was 20 years her senior, married, and the father of a daughter in her late twenties. La Razón reported that Salvador and Maje met in secret, exchanged letters, and that he attempted to leave his family to be with her. She allegedly continued seeing Salvador after her wedding to Antonio and was involved in several other extramarital affairs.
LA VIUDA NEGRA. Tristán Ulloa as Salva in LA VIUDA NEGRA.
According to La Razón, after a lunch date at Salvador's country home in Ribarroja, Maje told Salvador that her husband was psychologically abusing her. She reportedly told her boyfriend that she wanted to see her husband dead. They crafted a meticulous plan and determined that the best way to kill Antonio would be in the garage on a day that was convenient for both of their jobs.
Salvador later confessed that before the killing, he started to become nervous. He allegedly expressed his hesitations to Maje, like not wanting to kill a man he didn't even know, but she allegedly pressured him to carry out the crime, the magazine reported.
LA VIUDA NEGRA. Tristán Ulloa as Salva in LA VIUDA NEGRA.
At 7:30 a.m. on the morning of Aug. 16, 2017, as Antonio was leaving for work, Salvador hid in the couple's building garage, according to TIME. He was armed with a 15 cm kitchen knife. When Antonio came down, Salvador attacked him and stabbed him to death, piercing his lungs and heart. He discarded the murder weapon in a cesspit on his property and disposed of his bloody clothes. He then met with Maje, who had not been at the apartment during the crime. That's when Maje began playing the role of the grieving widow—including reading a farewell letter at Antonio's funeral, per La Razón.
LA VIUDA NEGRA. Pablo Molinero as Turrientes, Carmen Machi as Eva, Pepe Ocio as Bernardo in LA VIUDA ... More NEGRA.
After police weren't convinced that robbery was the motive for the killing, investigators began to focus on Maje. They tapped her phone and discovered a message to a friend in which she admitted feeling liberated after Antonio's death and said she was now collecting his €1,100 pension, La Razón reported.
Now under surveillance, Maje called Salvador for the first time since the murder on Nov. 8, 2017, and they had one of many incriminating conversations. On Jan. 2, they met in person to discuss what she would say if the police questioned her again. Ten days later, Maje and Salvador were arrested in January 2018.
While Salvador tried to take full responsibility for the murder, he changed his story after learning that Maje was romantically seeing another inmate while in custody. 'In my previous statement, I said it was all my idea. But it was both of us,' Salvador said in a recording played end of A Widow's Game.
Salvador's defense claimed that he was the victim of the obsessive love he felt for Maje. He also alleged that Maje portrayed herself as a victim of psychological and physical abuse. According to TIME, she also said that if her husband died, she wouldn't have to go through a divorce, which meant she could still receive a widow's pension and inheritance.
Meanwhile, Maje denied any involvement in her husband's death. Despite the growing evidence against her – including phone calls, incriminating text messages, and witness testimonies – Maje said she believed Salvador was only fantasizing about what he was going to do to Antonio.
In October 2020, a jury found both Maje and Salvador guilty. Maje was sentenced to 22 years in prison for murder with the aggravating circumstance of kinship. Salvador was sentenced to 17 years in prison, and both were ordered to pay €250,000 (approximately $280,000) in damages to Antonio's family.
Maje is currently serving a 22-year prison sentence at Fontcalent Prison in Alicante, Spain. She became pregnant by another inmate, and in July 2023, gave birth in police custody. She is now residing in the prison's mother-child unit, where she can stay with her baby until the child turns three, per TIME. As for the identity of the baby's father – his name is David, a prisoner convicted of a 2008 murder. They reportedly met while she was serving time at Picassent Prison.
A Widow's Game is now streaming on Netflix. Watch the official trailer below.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Bryan Kohberger to Be Sentenced in Killing of 4 Idaho Students
Bryan Kohberger, a former Ph.D. student in criminology who pleaded guilty in the fatal stabbing of four University of Idaho students, will hear from the victims' families in court for the first time on Wednesday as a judge considers his sentence for the crimes. Mr. Kohberger, 30, has already agreed to accept four consecutive life sentences as part of a plea deal that allows him to avoid the death penalty. But many questions remain unanswered, including one that has vexed investigators and families for years: What was the motive? Prosecutors have said Mr. Kohberger had no known relationship to the victims, and even President Trump urged the judge in the case to press for answers before sentencing. 'I hope the Judge makes Kohberger, at a minimum, explain why he did these horrible murders,' Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Monday. 'There are no explanations, there is no NOTHING.' Family members of the students will have a chance to address the court, an emotional conclusion to a case that created fear across the small college town where the murders occurred and elicited sympathy nationwide for the students whose lives were cut short. Some family members have expressed outrage that prosecutors agreed to drop their bid for the death penalty in exchange for the guilty plea. Mr. Kohberger was a student at nearby Washington State University when the murders occurred sometime around 4 a.m. on Nov. 13, 2022. The victims — Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Madison Mogen, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Ethan Chapin, 20 — had spent a typical Saturday night out near their campus before returning to the three-story house that several of the students shared. Two roommates survived the night. Text messages show that they discussed a masked person one of them had briefly seen inside the home, but neither seemed aware that something so horrific has happened. A 911 call was made more than seven hours later after several additional friends gathered at the home. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bryan Kohberger has another chance to explain why he killed 4 Idaho college students. But he doesn't have to speak
Bryan Kohberger has one last chance Wednesday to give the grieving parents of four University of Idaho students he admitted to killing the answers they've desperately sought for nearly three years. Why did he do it? Kohberger will have an opportunity to reveal those details before his sentencing Wednesday, following a remarkable change-of-plea hearing on July 2 that spared him the death penalty and his highly anticipated murder trial by admitting guilt to burglary and first-degree murder in the November 2022 killings of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen. Kohberger will be granted an allocution — the formal opportunity defendants are given to speak directly to the court before they are sentenced by the judge. Traditionally, defendants use allocution to humanize themselves and express remorse, or offer an apology, or even an explanation for their actions — anything that could be taken into account during sentencing, according to the American Bar Association. But it's unlikely he'll say a thing, legal analyst and trial attorney Mercedes Colwin told CNN. 'What we can expect in sentencing would first be the victim impact statements by the families. We already know that there are several that are going to speak, which should be horrendous,' Colwin told CNN. 'I'm sure it's going to be gut-wrenching, and then he will be given the opportunity to address the court before the judge sentences him. That's where he can say, 'I'm sorry for what I've done,' which I don't expect any of that to take place,' Colwin said. The question of whether Kohberger will speak about his crimes even invited a comment from President Donald Trump, who said in a post on Truth Social on Monday the judge should make the 30-year-old 'explain why he did these horrible murders' before the sentencing. In every previous court appearance, Kohberger has remained expressionless, silent and unmoved as prosecutors recounted the chilling details of the late-night killings — how he entered a home through a sliding door and savagely stabbed four young students to death while two survivors, terrified, texted each other about a masked figure moving through the hallway. Despite Kohberger admitting to the crimes, the July 2 change-of-plea hearing left one giant hole in the story: why he targeted the residents of the King Road house. It's unclear whether the public will ever get an answer, as it's not required by the plea deal. Allocution may offer one final chance for him to address it in court. Here's what to expect. Allocution does not require him to divulge any details During the change-of-plea hearing, Judge Steven Hippler formally questioned Kohberger to ensure he fully understood the charges, the consequences of pleading guilty, and his rights before accepting the plea. 'Are you pleading guilty because you are guilty?' the judge asked. 'Yes,' Kohberger said. 'Did you on November 13, 2022, enter the residence at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho, with the intent to commit the felony crime of murder?' Hippler asked. 'Yes,' Kohberger again responded, as one of the victims' family members silently wept while other loved ones listened intently. But that was all. The judge asked Kohberger only basic confirmation questions. There was no inquiry into why he committed the crimes or whether he felt any remorse. The plea agreement and the written factual basis offer little insight into Kohberger's motive. Several key concerns were left unaddressed, including what drove Kohberger to carry out the killings, why he targeted the students specifically and why two roommates were spared. The plea agreement doesn't necessitate that Kohberger disclose any details about the murders at his sentencing. 'I had hoped the agreement would include conditions that required the defendant to explain his actions and provide answers to the many questions that still remain, especially where evidence is missing or unclear,' Xana Kernodle's father, Jeff Kernodle, said in a statement following the guilty plea. At Wednesday's sentencing, allocution will offer Kohberger a confronting choice: stay silent or face the families of his four victims and attempt to explain the horror he inflicted. Allocution rights can be traced to 1689, when English courts recorded that, in cases in which defendants faced possible death sentences, the failure to ask defendants directly whether they had anything to say prior to sentencing constituted a basis for reversal, according to the American Bar Association. Numerous historic allocution statements have been delivered over the years, including John Brown's address to the court after his death sentence in 1859, and Susan B. Anthony's defiant speech following her arrest for voting in 1873. Several convicted murderers have also given allocution statements, including serial killer Ted Bundy; Timothy McVeigh, convicted for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing; and John Wayne Gacy, known as the 'Killer Clown.' Allocution rights appear at the state level, though they vary across jurisdictions. But according to Idaho law, the defendant has the 'right of allocution,' or the right to personally address the judge, if they choose to. 'Before imposing sentence the court must give counsel an opportunity to speak on behalf of the defendant and must ask the defendant personally if the defendant wishes to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of punishment,' Idaho's Criminal Rule 33 states. Allocutions are not made under oath and and Kohberger will not be subjected to cross-examination, according to the state law. 'Their families may never hear why he targeted this house and their children, what made him do it. He's not required to answer the 'why,' although we know he killed them because he's already taken this plea,' Colwin said. 'They may never get true closure.' He may one day speak to the media A pile of questions over the killer's method and motive have haunted the case since the four students were discovered stabbed to death in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho, with no signs of forced entry. But even if Kohberger remains silent now and does not exercise his right to allocution, there's still a possibility he will speak out later. There is no stipulation in Kohberger's plea agreement to prevent him from doing interviews with media or writing a book. A trove of documents and discovery that could also shine more light on the case remains sealed by the court and is expected to stay that way until after his sentencing on July 23. But it's unclear how the court will handle the large volume of material. 'The families who want an explanation believe the ultimate closure is understanding why,' Colwin said. 'Even if he someday explains his motivations, I shudder to think of what he might say.' For some, the plea deal was injustice. For others, closure After the victims' families were informed of the plea deal, fathers Jeff Kernodle and Steve Goncalves harshly criticized prosecutors for not consulting the victims' families before agreeing to conditions of the deal. The Goncalves family members said in a statement earlier this month they had expected more answers from the change-of-plea hearing when Judge Hippler questioned Kohberger before accepting his guilty plea. 'Today was the day, the day for answers, the day to find out what happened, to find out really anything about what the Defendant did that night and why he took the lives of 4 beautiful people. At least that's what we hoped for but hope is really all we had today,' the Goncalves family's July 2 statement read. 'We'll never see this as justice,' Steve Goncalves told CNN's Jim Sciutto. Others voiced acceptance, saying that despite a lack of answers, they were relieved to avoid a drawn-out trial and the possibility of a yearslong appeals process. Mogen's father, Ben Mogen, told the Idaho Statesman he viewed the deal as an opportunity to avoid the pain and spectacle of a trial and focus on healing. 'We support the plea agreement 100%. While we know there are some who do not support it, we ask that they respect our belief that this is the best outcome possible for victims, their families and the state of Idaho,' said Leander James, who represents Mogen's mother and stepfather, Karen and Scott Laramie. The Chapin family's 'initial response was, 'an eye for an eye,'' Stacy Chapin, Ethan Chapin's mother, told NBC's 'Today.' 'But we've spent a ton of time talking about it with prosecutors, and for us, we always felt like this was a better deal,' she said. Had Kohberger gone to trial, a death sentence was not guaranteed. And even if he had received one, it likely would have taken years, possibly decades, to carry out, with no certainty it would ever happen. Kohberger will be sentenced this week to life in prison without parole, and he'll forfeit his right to appeal. He will no longer be allowed to appear in the civilian shirt and tie he usually wears for hearings, according to Hippler. The next time he sets foot in the courtroom, he will be dressed in prison garb. 'To the families of Kaylee, Madison, Xana and Ethan – we will never forget the beautiful light your precious children shone brightly in the world,' Colwin said. 'No evil will ever take that away.' CNN's Taylor Romine, Jean Casarez, Elizabeth Wolfe, Rebekah Riess, Dakin Andone, and Kit Maher contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Third charged over grandmother's fatal shooting
A third person has been charged in relation to the fatal shooting of Sydney grandmother Kim Duncan in April. Police allege three men, including Manase Fakahau, 19 and Jesse Evans, 34, approached the southwestern Sydney home of Ms Duncan, 65, about 11pm on Monday, April 14, before several shots were fired in the direction of the house. Ms Duncan was inside the house at the time, as were her 34-year-old son and a 21-year-old woman. She was shot in the leg and died at the scene while bing worked on by paramedics. Her son and the woman were uninjured. Police charged Mr Fakahau and Mr Evans with murder last Wednesday and their matters remain before the courts. At about 9.25am on Wednesday, a 34-year-old man was also arrested and charged with murder. He was refused bail and is scheduled to appear before Parramatta Local Court on Wednesday. As part of the ongoing investigation, strike force detectives searched a Parsons St, Ashcroft residence about 4pm on Tuesday and arrested a 40-year-old man. During the search, police seized 11.3kg of cannabis, $91,600 in cash, 31 mobile phones, a laptop, and a knuckle duster. The man was charged with recklessly dealing with proceeds of crime, supplying a prohibited drug in an indictable but non-commercial quantity, and possessing suspected stolen goods. He was granted conditional bail and is set to appear at Liverpool Local Court on Wednesday, August 23, 2025. Investigations under Strike Force Apslawn are ongoing. More to come
