Coalition Hopes to ‘Accelerate' Career Training, Apprenticeships
Hoping to promote the growth of career training and apprenticeships, a coalition including five governors and major labor unions have come together to align career training and push for national policy change.
The American Federation of Teachers, the nation's second-largest teachers union, and CareerWise USA, which runs apprenticeship programs for high-schoolers in five states, announced the Education and Apprenticeship Accelerator late last month.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
The International Union of Painters and Allied Trades and the governors of California, Colorado, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania have also joined the coalition.
Its goal is to improve and expand Career Technical Education (CTE) both in high schools and community colleges and create more student internships and apprenticeships where students are paid to both work and go to school. Only about 5% of high school students nationally have a chance at an internship or apprenticeship, estimates available show.
AFT President Randi Weingarten said the union sees a need to shift away from the 'college for all' mindset of the last 20 years, and be a part of giving students other ways to prepare for work and life.
'Look how many kids we've seen in schools that feel totally at sea,' said Weingarten, who also called for changes in a May 6 New York Times opinion piece 'Stop Trying to Make Everyone Go to College.'
Instead of working independently and sometimes at cross-purposes, which has kept the number of opportunities for students low, CareerWise founder Noel Ginsburg said the new partnership will help government, business and schools work together in support of training efforts.
Challenges include aligning school and work schedules, finding transportation for students between work and school, giving students course credit for work-based learning and making sure students are working in fields that are hiring.
Both Ginsburg and Weingarten said the states can serve as laboratories to find the right formulas to succeed, then the partnership can promote them and find a common plan that covers all states.
'This is intended to truly create…examples for the country in multiple states that can show how this matters,' Ginsburg said.
'We'll bring resources to it, both financial, technical and consulting, to enable these states to accelerate faster, to make this happen,' Ginsburg said. '(We'll) bring these systems together so that our gears aren't grinding, that they are connected and, in fact, we're moving forward.'
Governors of the participating states echoed the call for improving training opportunities for students.
Apprenticeships are common in Europe, with more than half of students in countries like Switzerland participating. Apprenticeships In the U.S. usually start after high school, instead of the equivalent of junior year in Europe, and have traditionally been in construction trades.
But apprenticeships across the country have been growing in recent years and in other fields, particularly health care, information technology and advanced manufacturing. New U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon has also voiced support of the Swiss apprenticeship system on social media, and has called for more CTE, apprenticeships and tuition assistance for career training.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order in April calling for a million more apprenticeships. But the administration also shut down a Department of Labor advisory panel on apprenticeships that Ginsburg had a major role on and put a 'pause' May 29 on Job Corps, a training program for 25,000 young people a year, a decision that is being challenged in court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
13 hours ago
- CNN
Amy Coney Barrett leaves no doubt that she stands with Trump and the conservative supermajority
For months, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has faced fierce criticism from conservatives over some of her decisions in cases involving President Donald Trump. That even included Trump at times. But after Friday's blockbuster opinion in the birthright citizenship case, that blowback was suddenly a distant memory. It was Barrett, who Trump nominated to the high court in September 2020, who delivered the president a clear and dramatic win, kneecapping the ability of lower court judges to block his agenda. Trump, who has privately complained about Barrett, was effusive in his praise. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Thomas – great people,' Trump said during a celebratory news conference at the White House. 'I just have great respect for her. I always have,' Trump said. 'And her decision was brilliantly written today — from all accounts.' Given the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative supermajority – cemented when Barrett succeeded the late liberal icon Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – the court's liberal wing has always faced an uphill climb to wind up anywhere but in dissent. But at times, Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts have shown willingness to break from their more conservative colleagues. Many conservatives were apoplectic in March when Barrett voted to reject Trump's plan to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. The backlash over that decision from some close to Trump was swift, with one conservative legal commentator describing her on a podcast as a 'rattled law professor with her head up her a**.' Others took to social media to describe her as a 'DEI hire' and 'evil.' The anger directed at Barrett, a former appeals court judge and law professor, intensified when the Supreme Court divided 4-4 in a high-profile case questioning whether a Catholic charter school in Oklahoma should be entitled to taxpayer funding. Barrett recused herself from taking part in the case – she had multiple ties to the attorneys representing the school – and the even split left in place a ruling from Oklahoma's top court that found the school unconstitutional. In private, some of Trump's allies had told him that Barrett is 'weak' and that her rulings have not been in line with how she presented herself in an interview before Trump nominated her to the bench, sources told CNN. 'It's not just one ruling. It's been a few different events he's complained about privately,' a senior administration official said earlier this month. So it was notable that Barrett, the second-most junior member of the court, was assigned Friday's major opinion. Because the senior-most justice on each side of a decision assigns the author of that decision, it means Roberts assigned the case to Barrett. Most court watchers assumed Roberts would write the opinion himself, or that it would be unsigned. It was, by far, the highest-profile opinion Barrett has authored on the court. And it was a major win for the president – the second time the Supreme Court has ended a term in as many years with a blockbuster ruling in his favor. Last year, the court ruled that Trump was entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution on federal election interference charges. Barrett's opinion doesn't necessarily mean that Trump will be able to enforce the birthright citizenship order. Lower courts are likely to move swiftly to shut it down through other paths, such as through class-action lawsuits. But it will at least make it harder for groups challenging future Trump policies to get those measures paused on a temporary basis. 'As the number of universal injunctions has increased, so too has the importance of the issue,' Barrett wrote, without addressing the fact that some of that increase has been the result of a president who had admittedly sought to push the boundaries of the law in his favor. 'As with most questions of law, the policy pros and cons are beside the point,' Barrett wrote. 'Under our well-established precedent, the equitable relief available in the federal courts is that 'traditionally accorded by courts of equity' at the time of our founding. Nothing like a universal injunction was available at the founding, or for that matter, for more than a century thereafter.'
CNN
15 hours ago
- CNN
Amy Coney Barrett leaves no doubt that she stands with Trump and the conservative supermajority
For months, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has faced fierce criticism from conservatives over some of her decisions in cases involving President Donald Trump. That even included Trump at times. But after Friday's blockbuster opinion in the birthright citizenship case, that blowback was suddenly a distant memory. It was Barrett, who Trump nominated to the high court in September 2020, who delivered the president a clear and dramatic win, kneecapping the ability of lower court judges to block his agenda. Trump, who has privately complained about Barrett, was effusive in his praise. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Thomas – great people,' Trump said during a celebratory news conference at the White House. 'I just have great respect for her. I always have,' Trump said. 'And her decision was brilliantly written today — from all accounts.' Given the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative supermajority – cemented when Barrett succeeded the late liberal icon Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – the court's liberal wing has always faced an uphill climb to wind up anywhere but in dissent. But at times, Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts have shown willingness to break from their more conservative colleagues. Many conservatives were apoplectic in March when Barrett voted to reject Trump's plan to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. The backlash over that decision from some close to Trump was swift, with one conservative legal commentator describing her on a podcast as a 'rattled law professor with her head up her a**.' Others took to social media to describe her as a 'DEI hire' and 'evil.' The anger directed at Barrett, a former appeals court judge and law professor, intensified when the Supreme Court divided 4-4 in a high-profile case questioning whether a Catholic charter school in Oklahoma should be entitled to taxpayer funding. Barrett recused herself from taking part in the case – she had multiple ties to the attorneys representing the school – and the even split left in place a ruling from Oklahoma's top court that found the school unconstitutional. In private, some of Trump's allies had told him that Barrett is 'weak' and that her rulings have not been in line with how she presented herself in an interview before Trump nominated her to the bench, sources told CNN. 'It's not just one ruling. It's been a few different events he's complained about privately,' a senior administration official said earlier this month. So it was notable that Barrett, the second-most junior member of the court, was assigned Friday's major opinion. Because the senior-most justice on each side of a decision assigns the author of that decision, it means Roberts assigned the case to Barrett. Most court watchers assumed Roberts would write the opinion himself, or that it would be unsigned. It was, by far, the highest-profile opinion Barrett has authored on the court. And it was a major win for the president – the second time the Supreme Court has ended a term in as many years with a blockbuster ruling in his favor. Last year, the court ruled that Trump was entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution on federal election interference charges. Barrett's opinion doesn't necessarily mean that Trump will be able to enforce the birthright citizenship order. Lower courts are likely to move swiftly to shut it down through other paths, such as through class-action lawsuits. But it will at least make it harder for groups challenging future Trump policies to get those measures paused on a temporary basis. 'As the number of universal injunctions has increased, so too has the importance of the issue,' Barrett wrote, without addressing the fact that some of that increase has been the result of a president who had admittedly sought to push the boundaries of the law in his favor. 'As with most questions of law, the policy pros and cons are beside the point,' Barrett wrote. 'Under our well-established precedent, the equitable relief available in the federal courts is that 'traditionally accorded by courts of equity' at the time of our founding. Nothing like a universal injunction was available at the founding, or for that matter, for more than a century thereafter.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Ed Committee Advances Schwinn, Richey Nominations to Full Senate
Penny Schwinn, Tennessee's former education chief, is one step closer to joining the U.S. Department of Education as deputy secretary after the Senate education committee on Thursday advanced her nomination to the full chamber. The committee also voted to move the nomination of Kimberly Richey to lead the Office for Civil Rights. A conservative civil rights lawyer, Richey served in the second Bush and first Trump administrations. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter The votes for both nominees fell along strict party lines, 12 to 11. 'These nominees are crucial to enacting President Trump's pro-America agenda,' Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, who chairs the committee, said in a statement. With the Senate focused on passing President Donald Trump's tax bill and roughly 200 nominations awaiting a vote, it could be several weeks before both are confirmed. Schwinn would oversee K-12 policy. During a June confirmation hearing, she expressed support for a more hands-off approach from Washington while also strengthening reading instruction based on science. A week after the hearing, she participated in an event at a Nashville charter school with Education Secretary Linda McMahon to promote one of the Trump administration's top priorities — school choice. The visit came as the department has increased funding for charters while proposing over $4 billion in cuts to other programs. If confirmed, Richey would take over a civil rights office with a much leaner staff following mass firings in March and recommendations from McMahon for further reductions. She vowed to continue the department's actions against schools that permit antisemitic demonstrations and allow trans students to use facilities or compete in sports consistent with their gender identity. Those views have drawn opposition to her nomination from civil rights groups that advocate for LGBTQ students. In advance of Thursday's vote, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, along with 45 other organizations, sent senators a letter saying Richey 'has not demonstrated a willingness and ability to enforce civil rights law and protect all students in our country from discrimination.' Some hope she'll prioritize disability complaints. As acting assistant secretary for civil rights during the pandemic, she launched investigations into districts that failed to provide students with disabilities services written into their individual education programs. 'She was responsive during the first Trump term and pushed through the COVID complaints,' said Callie Oettinger, a special education advocate in Fairfax County, Virginia. Related While Richey's track record fits squarely within the Trump administration's ultra-conservative agenda, many education insiders view Schwinn as a moderate who largely avoided culture war clashes while holding schools and students accountable for progress in reading. Unlike McMahon, Schwinn has always worked in education. The California native founded a charter school in Sacramento in 2011 and held top positions in Delaware and Texas before Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee appointed her commissioner in 2019. Related 'Penny has the strongest literacy chops of any state supe I've known, and she has Linda McMahon's ear and trust,' said Robert Pondiscio, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. But controversy tends to follow her. Under her leadership in Tennessee, staff turnover was higher than normal. Conservatives who signed letters calling on senators not to confirm Schwinn argue that she holds progressive views on educational equity and proposed an unpopular effort to conduct 'well-being' checks on students during the pandemic. Others question her judgement, pointing to incidents in which Texas and Tennessee directed no-bid contracts to companies where Schwinn had personal connections, including her husband, Paul Schwinn. Related But those complaints didn't sway Republicans on the committee, and Pondiscio dismissed the backlash to Schwinn as 'B.S.' In a February commentary, he suggested that her 'conservative critics want a culture warrior, not an administrator focused on competent governance and delivering results.' He's among those who hope her confirmation brings more attention to core education issues.'If you see the secretary spending her time on curriculum and instruction,' he said, 'that will be Penny's thumbprint.'
