Chad Erueti drove car into victim, pinning her against retaining wall
'There's nothing really to stop him from just showing up ... he's done it before.'
The assault was the latest and most serious in a series of violent incidents Erueti has notched up over the past 10 years, leaving a frustrated judge asking; 'What is it that will make Mr Erueti stop harming people?'.
The 39-year-old appeared in the Hamilton District Court for sentencing last week for breaching a protection order, intentional damage, driving while disqualified and assault with a weapon - a car.
'Pinned by the legs'
On the morning of December 9, last year, Erueti texted the victim and said he was heading to her Tokoroa home.
He arrived about 40 minutes later, and was told to leave multiple times by the victim.
The pair argued and got to the point where an angry Erueti started kicking the back of the victim's car, causing damage.
He then got into his car and drove to the end of the street and stopped.
Erueti then turned around and drove back up the victim's driveway, but didn't slow down.
He aimed the car at the victim, and she turned, thinking it'd be better to have broken legs than a broken back.
The vehicle hit her, causing her to be pinned by the back of her legs between the car and a retaining wall.
'I can't relax for fear of him coming back'
In her statement read by the judge, the victim said the whole right side of her body was sore after Erueti 'smashed' into her.
Even now, if she did too much, she would get sore.
'A lot of things I still can't do,' she said.
'I thought I was going to die. The only thing that kept me going was my children.'
Chad Lionel Erueti, 39, was jailed for 28 and a half months after appearing in the Hamilton District Court last week. Photo / NZME
Erueti's counsel, Mitchell Stuthridge, said as his client didn't have a suitable property for home detention, jail was currently the only option.
However, he urged the judge to grant leave to allow him the option of applying if he did find one.
But Judge Tini Clark was struggling to see how she could get to the home detention threshold of 24 months, given Erueti had been jailed in 2021 for 'almost identical' offending.
Stuthridge pointed to Erueti's background and childhood, and the fact that the victim didn't suffer serious injuries.
Judge Clark remained unconvinced before a police prosecutor pointed out that it was the same victim.
Stuthridge held firm, seeking home detention so that he could complete the rehabilitative Tai Aroha programme.
'None of this should have happened'
Judge Clark told Erueti it was important the victim's impact statement was read out to the court so people could hear about 'the long-term negative effects on this family and everyone is suffering because of you, Mr Erueti, and the choices that you made'.
As for Erueti's letter to the court, Judge Clark said it mainly revolved around him rather than the harm he'd caused others.
'There's only so much weight I can give to Mr Erueti's background when he has so often victimised others.
'Mr Erueti has an unimpressive history of violence.
'I am now told that the set of offending from 2021 refers to the same victim, and that simply makes things worse.'
Over the past 10 years, Erueti had been arrested in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2023, and 2024.
'And here we are today ... this is the worst offending so far.'
The judge was quick to rule out home detention as an option.
'This offending is far too significant for that,' she said.
Erueti also had an ongoing series of non-compliance with protection orders.
'None of this should have happened.
'It's only by good luck than anything else, that the victim was not more significantly hurt.
'I add to that just how deliberate it was.
'It was not an accident or anything close to an accident and really does beg the question, 'what is it that will stop Mr Erueti from harming other people'?.'
In jailing him for 28 and a half months, Judge Clark told him he hoped it would be a wake-up call.
'There's just no way that anything can change in your life unless you do the mahi.'
Erueti was also disqualified from driving for six months.
Belinda Feek is an Open Justice reporter based in Waikato. She has worked at NZME for 10 years and has been a journalist for 21.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Second cannabis conviction for former policeman
A former police officer has been convicted of cannabis crime — and it is not the first time. Adrian John Van Der Eik (also known as Frank), 66, appeared in the Dunedin District Court yesterday and was sentenced to supervision after earlier admitting cultivating the drug. The court heard that on February 24, police attended the defendant's rural Otago home and found seven semi-mature cannabis plants growing outside. Yesterday, counsel Brendan Stephenson said his client suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder after his time as a police officer. He had been battling with ACC to get counselling and there was a strong link between the defendant's mental health issues and the offending, his lawyer said. Judge Maria Pecotic agreed and noted Van Der Eik had "a longstanding addiction issue" with cannabis which he used to self-medicate. "I understand why you're standing here today," the judge said. "It's not just the nature of the work you engaged in beforehand but it seems other family members have similar issues to you." She sentenced the tearful defendant to nine months' supervision. "I hope you are able to get the help you need Mr Van Der Eik, and don't end up coming back before the court on another charge like this again," Judge Pecotic said. The defendant was set for a judge-alone trial on a charge of speaking threateningly yesterday but was offered diversion. The police diversion scheme allows eligible offenders to avoid a conviction by completing an agreed set of tasks. The recent cannabis conviction was not the first time Van Der Eik had faced drug charges laid by his former employer. In 2004 he was convicted of possessing the class-C drug and a pipe and was fined. The Otago Daily Times previously reported that Van Der Eik was employed by police from 1978 to 1991. He had been a sole-charge officer at Clinton and transferred to Middlemarch in 1989. Van Der Eik said he was forced to "medically disengage" from police in June 1991, with chronic severe post-traumatic stress disorder. Earlier this year, Van Der Eik sent an email to police prosecutions, into which the ODT was copied, saying he intended to defend the charges and "this case is all about PTSD". "We shall expose the causation by police, gaslighting by ACC, and the Tail Management Plan between both during late 1990s that required ACC to exit the 129 long term injured police with expected savings of millions as we were permanently injured," the email read. "I thank police for bringing this matter to public attention." — Felicity Dear, Court reporter
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Jevon McSkimming facing charges of possessing objectionable material
Former Deputy Police Commissioner Jevon McSkimming is facing eight charges of possessing objectionable material, namely bestiality and child exploitation, it can be revealed. McSkimming had name suppression since first appearing in court last month, but it has lapsed following his appearance in the Wellington District Court on Monday. He resigned as the country's second most powerful police officer in May amid separate investigations by the Independent Police Conduct Authority and police. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including toddler found in suitcase on bus, Russian volcano erupts, and Liam Lawson pips former world champion. (Source: 1News) In July, a court "superinjunction" lapsed, which allowed media to report the details of the objectionable material alleged to be found on McSkimming's work devices. ADVERTISEMENT On the same day McSkimming resigned, Police Commissioner Richard Chambers ordered an independent review of the organisations IT systems to ensure sufficient security measures for the detection and prevention of misuse. The review found police needed more monitoring of staff internet use and stronger filtering mechanisms to guard against "inappropriate or harmful content" being accessed or downloaded. McSkimming was one of the final two candidates for the role of police commissioner last year, with Richard Chambers eventually appointed. He was promoted to statutory deputy commissioner in 2023 on the recommendation of then-prime minister Chris Hipkins. He joined police in 1996 and worked on the frontline in Auckland and Southland.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Prominent figure with name suppression set to reappear in court
Photo: RNZ / Dan Cook A prominent New Zealander is set to reappear in court on Monday. RNZ earlier revealed a prominent New Zealander had been arrested . After being made aware of the man's arrest, RNZ approached the Wellington District Court to see if there were any suppression orders and when he would be appearing in court. In response, a registrar said the man faced eight charges, all of which are category three offences meaning the offence is punishable by imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for two years or more. However, an application had been granted prohibiting media from being able to report the man's name, identifying particulars as well as the nature of the charges he faced before his first appearance. The man appeared in the Wellington District Court via audio visual link on 3 July. Media opposed the suppression orders. However, the defendant's lawyers asked for the orders to continue on an interim basis until their next appearance. Judge David Laurenson agreed to continue the orders. The man was remanded on bail without plea until his next appearance on Monday. Under the Criminal Procedure Act a court may make an order forbidding publication of the name of a person who is charged with an offence if the court is satisfied publication would be likely to result in eight different outcomes including causing extreme hardship and creating a real risk of prejudice to a fair trial. The fact a defendant is well known does not, of itself, mean that publication of his or her name will result in extreme hardship. At first appearance a defendant only needs to advance an "arguable case" that one of the eight grounds applies. The only section in the Criminal Procedure Act that permits suppression of the charges is section 199C, which permits suppression of "trial-related information" where the court is satisfied publication of that information is likely to create a real risk of prejudice to a fair trial. Trial-related information includes "any other specific information in relation to any trial". Where an interim order is made under section 199C it only lasts until the defendant's next court appearance. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
