logo
Pentagon provided $2.4tn to private arms firms to ‘fund war and weapons', report finds

Pentagon provided $2.4tn to private arms firms to ‘fund war and weapons', report finds

The Guardian08-07-2025
A new study of defense department spending previewed exclusively to the Guardian shows that most of the Pentagon's discretionary spending from 2020-2024 has gone to outside military contractors, providing a $2.4tn boon in public funds to private firms in what was described as a 'continuing and massive transfer of wealth from taxpayers to fund war and weapons manufacturing'.
The report from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and Costs of War program at Brown University said that the Trump administration's new Pentagon budget will push annual US military spending past the $1tn mark.
That will deliver a projected windfall of more than half a trillion dollars that will be shared among top arms firms like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon as well as a growing military tech sector with close allies in the administration like Vice-President JD Vance, the report said.
The report is compiled of statistics of Pentagon spending and contracts from 2020-2024, during which time the top five Pentagon contractors (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman) received $771bn in contract awards. Overall, private firms received approximately 54% of the department's discretionary spending of $4.4tn over that period.
Taking into account supplemental funding for the Pentagon passed by Congress under Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the report said, the US military budget will have nearly doubled this century, increasing 99% since 2000.
The rapid growth in military spending that began under the Bush administration's post-9/11 and the Global War on Terror has now been continued on spending to counter China as the US's main rival in the 21st century, as well record foreign arms transfers to Israel and Ukraine.
'The US withdrawal from Afghanistan in September 2021 did not result in a peace dividend,' the authors of the report wrote. 'Instead, President Biden requested, and Congress authorized, even higher annual budgets for the Pentagon, and President Trump is continuing that same trajectory of escalating military budgets.'
That contradicts early indications from Trump in February that he could cut military spending in half, adding that he would tell China and Russia that 'there's no reason for us to be spending almost $1 trillion on the military … and I'm going to say we can spend this on other things.' Instead, the spending bill pushed by Trump through Congress included a $157bn spending boost for the Pentagon.
The growth in spending will increasingly benefit firms in the 'military tech' sector who represent tech companies like SpaceX, Palantir and Anduril, the report said, that are 'deeply embedded in the Trump administration, which should give it an upper hand in the budget battles to come'.
'High Pentagon budgets are often justified because the funds are 'for the troops,'' said William D Hartung, senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and an author of the report. 'But as this paper shows, the majority of the department's budget goes to corporations, money that has as much to do with special interest lobbying as it does with any rational defense planning. Much of this funding has been wasted on dysfunctional or overpriced weapons systems and extravagant compensation packages.'
'These figures represent a continuing and massive transfer of wealth from taxpayers to fund war and weapons manufacturing,' said Stephanie Savell, director of the Costs of War project.
Calculated for inflation, the military spending dwarfs an approximate $356bn that Congress had appropriated for US diplomacy, development and humanitarian aid.
The Trump administration has continued to slash money spent on aid. Last month, the Guardian revealed that a White House review of grants to the state department recommended a nearly-total cut on democracy promotion programs.
The Guardian has contacted the Pentagon for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump evicts his own wife in White House ballroom blitz
Trump evicts his own wife in White House ballroom blitz

Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Times

Trump evicts his own wife in White House ballroom blitz

Melania Trump will need to find new office space after her husband's plans take over the White House CHIP SOMODEVILLA/GETTY IMAGES It may be hard to imagine, but Donald Trump's plans for a new ballroom in the White House might be less than romantic. The list of people being evicted by the project in the building's east wing happens to include his wife. Melania will need new office space in Washington, which is a shame as her reading of the news from Ukraine has made her one of the president's more effective foreign policy advisers. In fact, there is fresh evidence of Mr Trump's need for help with foreign affairs. His administration has said 'upwards of 200 countries' contacted them about tariffs, which must be news to the US State Department as their website only lists 197 independent states. Perhaps Trump is including uninhabited Antarctic territories which he has also tariffed. Some nations may be recognising Palestine, but Trump is doing the same for penguins. Comedian Frank Skinner was pleased when the King invoked 'It's coming home' this week, because the phrase was rather absent from the Lionesses' Euros campaign. The words are from the song Skinner co-wrote for Euro '96 and he thinks politics is behind its disappearance. 'Someone who worked for the FA told me that … members from other football associations had said it is very jingoistic to suggest that England is the home of football,' Skinner said on Frank Off the Radio. Maybe, or perhaps it's because our women bring football home so regularly that they've rendered the song obsolete? 'Four years of hurt' doesn't sound too bad, but Skinner can rely on the men's team to keep topping up their hurt-o-meter. • Sarina Wiegman boogies to Burna Boy at England Euros parade in London Reshuffle fever is still untreatable in SW1A, but always be wary of such rumours. Former deputy cabinet secretary Helen MacNamara tells the Institute for Government she would 'mischievously' get tongues wagging by randomly wheeling out the reshuffle 'whiteboard' which charts who has what job. 'It used to sit in the corner of my office, shrouded in a sheet,' she said. 'I'd take the sheet off it, and somebody coming in would be like 'What's going on?'' Gossip could get out of hand. In one reshuffle, a minister was thought to be in line for a move, but returned from Downing Street with the same job, and was bemused that civil servants had taken his name off the door and packed his possessions into a box. The novelist Philip Pullman is not generating much hype for his forthcoming memoir. 'I haven't been anywhere and I've not done very much — all I've done is sit in a room and write books,' he told an event given by bookseller Waterstones and publisher Scholastic, who'll have to work on some better blurb. Pullman is marking 30 years of the His Dark Materials trilogy, and 40 years of working with his editor David Fickling. The latter was still green in publishing when he read his first Pullman manuscript. 'I've just read the most amazing book,' he told a colleague at Oxford University Press. 'What am I supposed to do now?' His colleague looked up from the dictionary he was compiling and replied: 'I think you're supposed to publish it.' The RAF has appointed Suraya Marshall to the rank of Air Vice-Marshal. This means that there are now two Marshal Marshalls in the force, as her husband Allan Marshall is Air Marshal Marshall. That's one for General Knowledge.

Tesla found partly to blame for fatal Autopilot crash
Tesla found partly to blame for fatal Autopilot crash

BBC News

time41 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Tesla found partly to blame for fatal Autopilot crash

A jury in Florida has found Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash in which a Model S sedan using self-driving software killed a pedestrian and severely injured had argued the assistance software, called Autopilot, should have alerted the driver and activated the brakes before the had maintained the driver, George McGee, was at fault and called the verdict "wrong" in a statement to the BBC, while vowing to appeal. The result means the company will have to pay as much as $243m (£189) in punitive and compensatory verdicts marks a setback for Tesla and CEO Elon Musk, who has touted self-driving technology as critical to the company's future. Shares of Tesla dipped following the news and was nearly 2% lower when US markets the verdict, plaintiff's attorneys said Mr Musk had misrepresented the capabilities of the company's Autopilot driver assistance software."Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," said attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement to the BBC. Mr Schreiber said Tesla and Mr Musk had long propped up the company's valuation with "self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.""Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology," he added. The company was sued by the family of Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, who was killed when she was struck by the Model S at a T-intersection in Florida Keys in 2019. Her boyfriend Dillon Angulo suffered life-long injuries and was also involved in the court heard the driver, George McGee, lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone as he was approaching the intersection, causing his car to continue through it and crash into an SUV parked on the other side. The two victims were standing Mr McGee, nor the Autopilot software, hit the brakes in time to prevent the crash. After a three-week trial, the jury awarded $329m in total damages, including $129m in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages aimed at deterring Tesla from harmful behaviour in the will be responsible for paying one-third of compensatory damages - $42.5m - and the entirety of the $200m in punitive damages, but according to the company, punitive damages are likely to be capped at a lesser amount."Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said in a said evidence at the trial showed the driver was solely at fault because he was speeding with his foot on the accelerator, which overrode Autopilot, while looking for his phone and not at the road."To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash," Tesla said. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility."While there have been other federal lawsuits involving Autopilot during fatal crashes, Tesla has settled prior year, it settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X collided with a highway barrier while operating the company's Autopilot Florida case which culminated on Friday was the first to go to a trial, Mr McGee said his concept of Tesla's Autopilot was that "it would assist me should I have a failure" or "make a mistake," and that he felt the software had failed McGee has settled a separate lawsuit with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed has long faced scrutiny over its Autopilot and self-driving technology, and critics hailed the jury's decision."Tesla is finally being held accountable for its defective designs and grossly negligent engineering practices," said Missy Cummings, a robotics professor at George Mason verdict comes as Tesla is battling weakening sales stemming in part from Mr Musk's political activities. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

Musk's X must face part of lawsuit over child pornography video
Musk's X must face part of lawsuit over child pornography video

Reuters

time41 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Musk's X must face part of lawsuit over child pornography video

Aug 1 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday revived part of a lawsuit accusing Elon Musk's X of becoming a haven for child exploitation, though the court said the platform deserves broad immunity from claims over objectionable content. While rejecting some claims, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said X, formerly Twitter, must face a claim it was negligent by failing to promptly report a video containing explicit images of two underage boys to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The case predated Musk's 2022 purchase of Twitter. A trial judge had dismissed the case in December 2023. X's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk was not a defendant. One plaintiff, John Doe 1, said he was 13 when he and a friend, John Doe 2, were lured on SnapChat into providing nude photos of themselves to someone John Doe 1 thought was a 16-year-old girl at his school. The SnapChat user was actually a child pornography trafficker who blackmailed the plaintiffs into providing additional explicit photos. Those images were later compiled into a video that was posted on Twitter. According to court papers, Twitter took nine days after learning about the content to take it down and report it to NCMEC, following more than 167,000 views, court papers showed. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest said section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability over user content, didn't shield X from the negligence claim once it learned about the pornography. "The facts alleged here, coupled with the statutory 'actual knowledge' requirement, separates the duty to report child pornography to NCMEC from Twitter's role as a publisher," she wrote for a three-judge panel. X must also face a claim its infrastructure made it too difficult to report child pornography. It was found immune from claims it knowingly benefited from sex trafficking, and created search features that "amplify" child pornography posts. Dani Pinter, a lawyer at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement: "We look forward to discovery and ultimately trial against X to get justice and accountability." The case is Doe 1 et al v Twitter Inc et al, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-177.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store