Minister Majodina says SA doesn't have a bulk water crisis, it's a supply problem
She said the billions of rand owed by municipalities to water boards could further exacerbate the provision of water.
On Tuesday, Majodina appeared before Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) for the first time since the start of this administration.
The department said that while there's currently enough raw water supply to meet national demands, there are deficits at the local level.
Majodina said that of the 144 water operators in the country, 105 of them are performing dismally, hence the water shortages.
'There's no crisis. When it comes to bulk water supply, we do have, but when it comes to access of water through the taps, there's a challenge.'
She added there's only so much intervention the national department can make to ensure local authorities supply communities with water.
'That is why we are bringing reforms, that there must be separation of powers. We cannot be a service authority as well as a service provider.'
By the end of April, municipalities owed water boards R25 billion, and Majodina said they were simply not honouring agreements to pay up.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
When Playing Politics Misinforms the Public
The community of KwaNdengezi has been without running water for weeks which has made their lives even harder because it is during school holidays. Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers Media reports tell us that the Powers and Privileges Committee recently referred uMkhonto we Sizwe party member and parliamentarian, Visvin Reddy to the Disciplinary Committee following his yelling "Pemmy must go" on March 4, 2025 during a sitting of the National Assembly to debate unreliable water supply to residents in Germiston. The Pemmy in question being, of course, Minister of Water and Sanitation, Pemmy Majodina who Mr. Reddy blamed for her (mis)handling of that crisis. Next year, it will be 30 years since the promulgation of the Constitution. Next year too, we shall be voting in local elections and it is worth asking South Africans whether our politicians are serving us well. In this case, Mr. Reddy, rather than Ms. Majodina, failed South Africa dismally as he played politics. To begin, the complaint that was being debated on the day in question was in reference to a 2023 petition that affected residents of Wards 20, 29, 36 and 92 in Germiston. At that time, Ms. Majodina was not the Minister heading that portfolio. Even if she were, neither her Ministry nor would she have been the right person to rail against. Many of us do not know who owns water and generally it becomes an issue only when it's not flowing from our taps otherwise its not something we think much about. A small tutorial as received from Rand Water Chair who also happens to be Chair of Association of Water and Sanitation Institutions of South Africa (AWSISA), Mr. Ramateu Monyokolo proved that Mr. Reddy railed against the wrong person and department. In South Africa, water belongs to the Department of Water and Sanitation. The water boards then get water from the department and purify it and provide to municipalities. Municipalities provide the water to the consumers (us). And yes. Unfortunately this water doesn't always trickle down when we want it and how we want it but the rand and rant must and should stop, by and large, with municipalities who tend to politicise their roles, in the case in question, Ekurhuleni Municipality. Much like our Constitution which it is a part of, South Africa has a water policy that is admired worldwide but that does not always deliver to the people. In my chat with Mr. Monyokolo, I tried to understand how some of the problems we have in accessing water can be solved. The fact that, I, a regular Thandi, can be curious enough to be an active citizen and seek this information out should make the Honourable Member of Parliament, and his party, ask the same about his actions, more so because he has the responsibility of making laws for the rest of us. Perhaps the key questions that Mr. Reddy should have been asking – and which I have been asking since I travelled the country in an attempt to understand the state of the nation last year – should have been more on why, as we go into local elections next year, our municipalities are failing us in water provision. It's worth noting that in 1994, there were 19 Water Boards. Due to non-payment of bills by municipalities, many of those water boards went bankrupt and now we currently have seven water boards nationwide with at least two about to shut down due again to non-payment of bills timeously by municipalities. This is particularly irking as municipalities have no problem cutting water supplies when individuals and companies do not pay what's owed to them so why exactly are they not passing on the payments they receive from us so that water boards can continue doing their jobs? Both water boards, as State Owned Enterprises, and municipalities, are public bodies that exist to serve the people of South Africa. It would therefore be problematic for water boards to take the municipalities, some of them often bankrupt, to court to ensure that they meet their obligations. And water is a basic need so often water boards, at their own expense, find themselves providing water and then risking bankruptcy. How then do we ensure that municipalities keep their end of the bargain to the water boards and pay what is owed and how too do we ensure they provide service to residents so that we can be guaranteed clean water? These are the questions Mr. Reddy should be asking. Another worthwhile question to ask, again to municipalities, is how they are not serving the no/low-income citizens. Our national water policy gives us equitable access to water which includes Free Basic Water or subsidised basic water services to low-income households. Unfortunately while the idea is great in theory, it has been difficult to implement practically and this is not due to failure from the Department or the Water Boards but again from the municipalities and a different Ministry. The community of KwaNdengezi has been without running water for weeks which has made their lives even harder because it is during school holidays. Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Media
Daily Maverick
7 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Inside the RAF's broken books — CEO Letsoalo's court bid fails, deficit stays
Embattled Road Accident Fund CEO Collins Letsoalo's court bid to keep his seat may have failed, but his possible ousting and the pending Scopa inquiry highlights the fundamental problem with the RAF's books that no fuel levy increase can fix. On Thursday, 26 June the Pretoria High Court dismissed suspended Road Accident Fund (RAF) CEO Collins Letsoalo's bid for reinstatement, finding his application to be vexatious. Letsoalo, who was suspended by the board four weeks ago on Monday, 3 June 2025 after allegedly failing to attend a Scopa hearing in breach of a statutory summons, now finds himself on the wrong end of a governance crisis. Judge Nasious Moshoanathe ruled that Letsoalo failed to show any factual or legal right to an urgent interdict. The court's decision was welcomed by the Association for Protection of Road Accident Victims (Aprav). 'This is a watershed moment for the fund's governance,' said Ngoako Mohlaloga, Aprav deputy chairperson. 'The ruling is a crucial affirmation of the board's contractual authority and reinforces the principle that no one is above scrutiny.' The impending Scopa inquiry announced on Tuesday, 24 June, which was scathing in its condemnation of the board and executive, will in part lay bare the problem that has been evident on the RAF's books for ages. What's in a clean audit? The last clean audit that the RAF received from the Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) was for the 2018/2019 financial year – which is an indication that financials were transparent and verifiable – but it merely confirmed the size of the hole at the RAF, not that it was in good running order. The total liabilities at the time were a staggering R273-billion, with the state-owned enterprise(SOE) clearly insolvent. By the next financial year, the challenges had only worsened, with total liabilities now at R332-billion for 2019/2020. The fuel levy remained stable while costs and claims continued to rise. But no reform followed. It was during this ailing period that Collins Letsoalo was appointed as acting CEO in April 2020 under then Minister of Transport Fikile Mbalula, with the role being made permanent in August 2021. On the books at least, RAF seemed to be turning a corner. A turnaround on the books When Letsoalo took the CEO's seat, the RAF appeared to make one of the most astounding SOE turnarounds to date – liabilities dropped from R332-billion to around R31.5-billion, and a surplus was reported. The AGSA also provided the RAF's audit status as 'disclaimer lifted' – meaning that it accepted the restatement but flagged ongoing risks. On paper, it looked like the RAF was resolving its challenges with an alacrity not seen in any other SOE – but that's the only place the change was: paper. What caused the RAF to reflect such an incredible transformation was a change of key reporting metrics and mechanisms, restating the way it presented its financial position. Instead of recording the full long-tail liability upfront, the liability was spread across the cost over future levy income, which shrank liabilities overnight. This accounting shift produced a paper surplus and temporary breathing room, but the underlying claims backlog stayed firmly in place. In its April 2024 statement, the RAF argued: 'The RAF is fundamentally a social security fund.' The AGSA accepted the technical adjustment but repeatedly warned that the solvency gap was merely deferred, not resolved. Reality puts the books in reverse Once the restatement effect faded, the fund slid straight back into deficit. The AGSA issued another disclaimer, citing persistent gaps in how claims liabilities were accounted for and managed. Internal controls failed to keep pace with real claims growth, and cash flow again fell short of the paper surplus. Letsoalo's contract expires in August 2025 – but after his failed bid at reinstatement, the prospect of a reappointment is now remote. Asked whether the fund will now advertise and fill the CEO post permanently, RAF spokesperson McIntosh Polela was noncommittal, telling Daily Maverick in a written response: 'The board will give direction in this regard.' What this means for you Behind the annual disclaimers sit thousands of South Africans with years-long payout delays. The RAF boasts that claimants now receive 83% of spending compared to 66% in 2018/19 – but without fixing the core funding model, no efficiency will close the gap; Every litre of fuel props up old claims with no capital reserve to break the cycle. Despite record fuel levy revenue in 2023/24, the core mismatch hasn't budged. The fund's own statements show a bigger share of costs now goes directly to claimants – but total payouts still exceed income by billions. Cash reserves cover days, not months. Scopa's full committee inquiry – only the fourth of its kind since 1994 – is now Parliament's last tool to force overdue reform. Judge Moshoanathe's ruling laid the governance crisis bare: the board failed, the CEO's restatement trick failed, and Parliament's oversight has arrived years too late. The only question left is whether Scopa will confront the truth everyone pays for – a complete overhaul of the RAF. DM
IOL News
27-06-2025
- IOL News
Road Accident Fund acknowledges Scopa's inquiry into its operations
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts has resolved to launch a full committee inquiry into allegations of maladministration, financial mismanagement, wasteful and reckless expenditure, and related financial misconduct at the Road Accident Fund. Image: File The Road Accident Fund (RAF) said on Friday it noted the decision of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) to institute a full committee inquiry into its affairs. This comes days after Scopa resolved earlier this week to launch a full committee inquiry into allegations of maladministration, financial mismanagement, wasteful and reckless expenditure, and related financial misconduct at the RAF. The decision was taken after attempts by the committee to obtain truthful, complete information from the RAF board and executive management came to no avail. The RAF said in a statement it respected Scopa as an accountability body which derives its functions and powers from Rule 245 of the rules of the National Assembly. 'We will continue to account to the people of South Africa through this important organ of Parliament. We reiterate and put emphasis on what we have already reported in the RAF annual reports for the last three years, that the RAF has been financially unsustainable since its establishment in 1946.' The RAF stated that it has been the subject of multiple commissions of inquiry, and the common thread across all commissions' findings has been the disconnect between the funding model and the benefit structure. 'The unsustainable funding and operating models were further compounded by an increase in administrative costs, driven mainly by legal and medical costs,' said the accident insurance fund. In a memorandum prepared for Scopa, committee Chairperson Songezo Zibi cited issues related to the organogram and vacancies at the RAF. Zibi also mentioned the submission of inaccurate, misleading, and/or false information to Parliament by the entity. There were also issues related to whistle-blower reports on two media services contracts worth R1 billion, RAF's acquisition of offices, as well as litigation against the Auditor-General and matters of rule of law. 'The information I set out raises numerous and serious concerns about corporate governance at the RAF,' he said. Scopa's secretariat is expected to draft the terms of reference for the inquiry to be considered by the MPs on July 1 and then use the period afterwards to prepare for the inquiry. The DA wants the inquiry to cover all of the outrageous financial mismanagement identified over the past months and years at the RAF. In the letter to Zibi, DA MP Patrick Atkinson said they welcomed the resolution to initiate the parliamentary inquiry into the worsening crisis at the RAF. 'However, for this inquiry to be meaningful and in the public interest, it must be comprehensive in scope. A surface-level examination will fail to address the systematic mismanagement, misconduct and abuse of public funds that have defined the RAF's recent history,' Atkinson wrote. The RAF defended its use of litigation against the Auditor-General, which will form part of the inquiry. The entity has pursued the legal action despite being advised not to do so by the Transport Department. The RAF said it is only in the audit of financial statements that the disagreement with the Auditor-General of South Africa on the accounting policy change resulted in an adverse opinion. It also said it has internal forensic investigations and ethics divisions to ensure proper and transparent management of corrupt and unethical practices. 'An independently managed ethics and fraud hotline is available for staff and stakeholders to anonymously report any unethical and corrupt practices. Furthermore, the introduction of the RAF Contact Centre will go a long way in ensuring that claimants' queries are addressed.' The RAF said despite its positive strides, it continued to manage challenges associated with a transforming organisation. 'The 2025–30 strategic plan presents an opportunity to optimise areas that have worked and to improve where gaps still persist. To this end, the RAF proactively subjected the 2025/26 annual performance plan to an independent review by the AGSA. 'The RAF reiterates that the most urgent task required to ensure financial and operational sustainability for the Fund is a legislative review.'
