
Zohran Mamdani's SAT score sparks controversy — but what exactly is the SAT and why does it matter?
Zohran Mamdani's campaign was everywhere—and now, so is he. After clinching the Democratic nomination in the race for New York City Mayor, Mamdani has become a name impossible to ignore.
But with fame comes scrutiny, and in Mamdani's case, that spotlight has now shifted to his academic past.
The controversy began when The New York Times revealed that Mamdani had selected both 'Asian' and 'Black' on his Columbia University application. Soon after, conservative commentator Christopher Rufo unearthed his full admissions file.
The headline detail?
Mamdani scored 2140 out of 2400 on his SAT—a solid score for most, but reportedly below Columbia's median of 2250–2300 at the time(The highest score on the current SAT is 1600.
The SAT used to be scored out of 2400, but that was before March 2016 when the test format was changed). It wasn't his first attempt either; his initial SAT score was 1650, a number unlikely to turn heads in Ivy League admissions.
This revelation has led to a lot of speculations and some uncomfortable allegations, with critics asking if Mamdani used his dual racial identity in any way during his academic journey. On social media too, people are reacting aggressively.
One user wrote, "Zohran's SAT scores were good enough to get a lot of kids into Columbia that year, and allegedly "likely above the median score for black students"--and he didn't get in, which shows he didn't get any special treatment for checking the African American (Ugandan) box.
"
Another commented, "Is the next "bombshell" going to be that he answered a question without raising his hand in 3rd grade?"
However, this moment also has many questioning the importance of SATs and why they carry so much weight in American education.
What is the SAT
, and why is it important?
The SAT, short for Scholastic Assessment Test, is a standardized entrance exam used by many colleges and universities across the U.S. to help make admissions decisions. Administered by the College Board, it is a multiple-choice, computer-based test designed to measure a high school student's readiness for college-level work.
In an admissions process filled with essays, extracurriculars, recommendation letters, and interviews, the SAT stands out for one key reason: it gives colleges a common data point to compare all applicants, regardless of what school they attended or how their GPA was calculated.
A high SAT score can:
Increase your chances of being accepted into competitive colleges
Help qualify you for academic scholarships
Open doors to honors programs and funding opportunities
Offset a weaker GPA in some cases
That said, different schools give different values to the scores, some institutions are going test-optional or test-blind.
What's on the SAT?
The current version of the SAT has two main sections, each divided into two adaptive modules: evidence-based reading and writing and math. Each section has two modules
Because it's an adaptive test, your performance in the first module influences the difficulty of the second. While you can move back and forth within a module, you can't revisit previous ones.
How long are SAT scores valid?
Technically, SAT scores don't expire, but most colleges consider them reliable for up to five years. After that, the College Board attaches a note indicating they may no longer accurately reflect your academic ability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Zohran Mamdani Faces Backlash Over Visit To Mosque Where Cleric Praised Hamas
New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani faced criticism after he was photographed visiting a Brooklyn mosque led by a cleric who has publicly praised Hamas and called for the 'annihilation of Israel." On January 17, Zohran Mamdani posted a photo on social media showing him standing beside Sheikh Muhammad Al-Barr, the imam of the Islamic Society of Bay Ridge, writing, 'It was a privilege to join Jummah prayers at the Islamic Society of Bay Ridge today."


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US Supreme Court clears way for Donald Trump's federal workforce downsizing plan
The Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's sweeping plan to downsize the federal workforce, overriding lower court rulings that had temporarily blocked the move. Demonstrators protesting against President Donald Trump and his policies march toward the White House on Friday.(AP File) The decision comes despite warnings that critical government services could be disrupted and hundreds of thousands of federal employees risk losing their jobs. In an unsigned order, the justices overturned multiple lower court freezes on the cuts, which have been spearheaded by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the Associated Press reported. The court clarified that no specific personnel cuts were under review, only the executive order signed by Trump and a subsequent administration directive instructing agencies to undertake reductions in force. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson cast the sole dissenting vote, criticising the majority for a 'demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.' President Trump has repeatedly claimed that voters gave him a mandate to overhaul the federal government and has entrusted that mission to billionaire businessman Elon Musk, who led DOGE until his recent departure. Since the directive's introduction, tens of thousands of federal employees have either been terminated, entered deferred resignation programmes, or been placed on administrative leave. Over 75,000 US federal employees opt for deferred resignation While the administration has not released an official figure, at least 75,000 employees are reported to have opted for deferred resignation, and thousands of probationary workers have already been dismissed. In May, US District Judge Susan Illston ruled that the administration required congressional approval to make such substantial cuts to the federal workforce. A panel of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld her order in a 2–1 vote, warning that the reductions could affect essential functions, including the nation's food safety system and veterans' healthcare. Following her ruling, Illston ordered multiple federal agencies to cease implementing both the president's executive order, issued in February, and a subsequent memorandum from DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was appointed to the bench by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. Labour unions and non-profit organisations that filed suit against the downsizing presented the Supreme Court with several examples of potential consequences if the plan were allowed to proceed, including anticipated staff reductions of between 40 and 50 per cent at several key agencies. Among the agencies affected by the executive order are the Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labour, the Interior, State, the Treasury, and Veterans Affairs. The cuts also impact the National Science Foundation, the Small Business Administration, the Social Security Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency. With AP inputs

The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
U.S. Supreme Court clears way for Trump's plans to downsize federal workforce
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs. The Justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency. The Court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Mr. Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a 'demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.' Mr. Trump has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate to remake the federal government, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Mr. Musk recently left his role. Downsizing of federal workforce Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go. In May, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Illston's order, finding that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care for veterans. Illston directed numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the President's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. The labor unions and nonprofit groups that sued over the downsizing offered the justices several examples of what would happen if it were allowed to take effect, including cuts of 40% to 50% at several agencies. Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labour, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency.