Govt, corporates settle tax row over factories in hilly regions
Many companies, including some of the large ones, would now be spared of the allegation of claiming extra benefits from factories in the North East and other states.
Under the law, these units receive budgetary support and can claim refunds of the goods and services tax (GST). This is a continuation of the government's area-based exemption programme intended to promote industries in some of the remote regions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Tallakulam: 1 Trick to Reduce Belly Fat?
Home Fitness Hack
Shop Now
Undo
Over the past two months, some of the pharmaceutical and other manufacturing companies received notices from the GST authorities stating that they had over-claimed the benefits. The companies were asked to pay back the extra benefits they had received.
However, on Friday, a direction from the Central Board of
Indirect Tax
and Customs (CBIC), the apex indirect tax authority, to principal chief commissioners and chief commissioners of Chandigarh, Silkim, Kolkata, Guwahati and Meerut, stating that units would be "eligible to claim refunds based on actual value addition subject to verification' brought an end to the dispute, sources told ET.
Live Events
According to Ashish Karundia, founder of the CA firm Ashish Karundia & Company, 'The notices were issued on two main grounds: (a) excessive claims of budgetary support, and (b) claims made for ineligible activities. The clarification issued by CBIC is both timely and beneficial, particularly for those in the industry who have claimed refunds beyond the prescribed rates of value addition. Although the clarification responds to concerns raised by pharmaceutical units, it should be applicable across the industry, whoever has claimed the refunds.'
The bone of contention related to the extent of value addition eligible for tax benefit. Under the earlier pre-GST structure, the excise benefit in the form of tax refund was the lower of the cash component of the excise paid and a certain percentage of the value addition. The extent of value addition was prescribed by the tax department and differed from industry to industry. Under a special rate scheme, refund claims above the prescribed value addition was also allowed subject to verification.
The difference between the industrial units and the tax department arose from the ambiguity in the language of the revised notification that was issued post GST. The department argued that the caps on value addition prevailed and companies have claimed refunds beyond the caps. But the companies disagreed, with some moving the court, on the grounds that there were no rigid caps in the new scheme under which 58% of the cash component of GST could be claimed as refund.
'Also, the (new) scheme applies only to specified goods that are both manufactured and cleared by eligible units. Unlike the previous excise regime, wherein the benefit of exemption was available even to deemed manufacturing units, barring a few exceptions, the GST budgetary support scheme limits the benefits to manufacturing activities only. If the units are engaged in activities that do not qualify as 'manufacture' within their natural meaning, such units may be denied the refunds, relying on the wording of the scheme notification. However, given that the budgetary scheme is only a substitute for the erstwhile scheme wherein deemed manufacturing activities were eligible, the denial of refunds may not be justified,' said Karundia.
THE ARITHMETIC
Excise
payment
was typically split between cash and cenvat
credit
that was derived from payment of taxes for procurement of inputs.
Say, the extent of value addition pegged by the government is 56%. For an item worth Rs 100 and excise duty of Rs 12.50 (@ 12.5%), the refund claimed was Rs 7 (i.e, 56% of Rs 12.50). Even if the unit had paid Rs 10 as cash and the balance Rs2.50 as credit for the excise duty amount, the refund in this case would not exceed Rs 7.
Under the revised scheme brought in with GST, companies interpreted that 58% or 29% of the quantum of cash amount could be claimed as refund. But according to the tax department, the refund could not exceed 58/29% of the cap (which it insisted continued in the new scheme). This significantly lowered the refund amount as the capped amount was 56% of the GST amount.
HIGHLIGHTS:
Tax benefits are aimed to promote industry in hilly areas
This was in the form of partial excise relief
The notification was tweaked post GST
Dispute arose in the interpretation of the new scheme
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India's gross GST collections rise by 7.5% YoY in July to Rs 1.96 lakh crore, refunds surge 66.8% to Rs 27,147 crore
Gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections rose 7.5 per cent year-on-year to Rs 1.96 lakh crore in July (for sales in June), data released by the government on Friday showed. Even though the pace of growth in gross GST collections picked up to 7.5 per cent in July from 6.2 per cent, this is the second consecutive month wherein the growth rate has been in single digits and much lower after posting double-digit growth in the first two months of the ongoing financial year. Net GST collections, after accounting for refunds, took a hit by growing by just 1.7 per cent to Rs 1.69 lakh crore in July as refunds jumped sharply by 66.8 per cent, the data showed. In the previous month, net GST collections had risen 3.3 per cent. Total refunds stood at Rs 27,147 crore in July, sharply up by 66.8 per cent YoY. While domestic refunds grew 117.6 per cent YoY to Rs 16,983 crore in July, refunds for imports were up 20 per cent to Rs 10,164 crore. In June, total refunds had risen 28.4 per cent to Rs 25,491 crore, with domestic refunds rising 14.1 per cent YoY to Rs 12,643 crore, while refunds on imports rose 46.4 per cent YoY to Rs 12,848 crore. The trend of slower growth was also visible in GST collections on the imports front as they increased sequentially but the pace of year-on-year growth slowed down in July. GST collections from imports rose 9.7 per cent year-on-year to Rs 52,712 crore in July as against 11.4 per cent growth seen in June at Rs 45,690 crore. The revenue collections were better on the domestic front, with GST collections rising 6.7 per cent to Rs 1.43 lakh crore in July, up from 4.6 per cent growth at Rs 1.39 lakh crore in the previous month. What experts are saying Experts said the muted growth in net revenue is mainly due to a pickup in GST refunds. MS Mani, Partner, Deloitte India, said, 'While GST revenues for the past few months have been on an upward trajectory, the muted increase of 1.7 per cent in the net GST collections for the month and 8.4 per cent during this year can be attributed to the increased refunds. During the month, domestic refunds have more than doubled compared to the same month last year and during the current year refunds have increased by 46 per cent. This increase in refunds augers well for businesses as it indicates stability in the online refund processes and quicker refund sanctions,' he said. Abhishek Jain, indirect tax head and partner, KPMG said, 'Higher refunds on domestic supplies could be from excess tax payments, inverted duty structures, and other adjustments. The increased refunds should aid cash flows for businesses.' State-wise GST collections in July State-wise data for July showed that out of 38 states/Union territories, 20 states/UTs recorded higher growth in gross GST collections than the national average of 7.5 per cent growth rate. In absolute terms, Maharashtra was at the top with collection of Rs 30,590 crore (6 per cent growth), followed by Karnataka with collection of Rs 13,967 crore (7 per cent growth), Gujarat with collection of Rs 11,358 crore (3 per cent growth), and Tamil Nadu with Rs 11,296 crore (8 per cent growth). States/UTs which recorded a contraction in GST collections in July included: Jammu & Kashmir at Rs 599 crore (-5 per cent), Chandigarh at Rs 221 crore (-5 per cent), Manipur at Rs 43 crore (-36 per cent), Mizoram at Rs 31 crore (-21 per cent) and Jharkhand at Rs 3,040 crore (-3 per cent). The gross Central GST (CGST) — the tax levied on intra-state supplies of goods and services by the Centre — collections stood at Rs 35,470 crore, State GST (SGST) — the tax levied on intra-state supplies of goods and services by the states — collections were Rs 44,059 crore, while Integrated GST (IGST) — the tax levied on all inter-state supplies of goods and services — collections stood at Rs 1.04 lakh crore and cess at Rs 12,670 crore during the month. Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there. ... Read More
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Real estate, infra sectors short of 20 lakh skilled workers; increasingly difficult to provide affordable housing: NAREDCO chair Hiranandani
The real estate and infrastructure sectors are currently short of 20 lakh skilled workers — a gap that could widen to 50 lakh over the next five years, according to Niranjan Hiranandani, chairman of the Hiranandani Group. Speaking at an industry event on Friday, Hiranandani also flagged declining sales in the affordable housing segment, adding that high land costs around city centres must be addressed for developers to build such housing. 'In real estate and infrastructure, we are 20 lakh skilled workers short in India today… On one side we have unemployment, on the other side we have no skilled workers,' he said at a National Real Estate Development Council (NAREDCO) gathering. Hiranandani is also NAREDCO's chairman. 'This is going to grow in the next five years because of real estate and infrastructure growth — the gap will go to 5 million skilled workers. This is (a) disaster because neither the private sector nor the government sector has been able to fulfill (the demand),' Hiranandani added. Earlier, in June, Larsen & Toubro (L&T) chairman S N Subrahmanyan had said the group's construction business is facing a shortage of 25,000-30,000 labourers. 'Affordable housing not possible due to high costs' While he remains bullish on the real estate sector, which he claimed grew by 10 per cent in 2024-25, Hiranandani flagged a dip in affordable housing sales. 'In the affordable housing segment, for the first time in my 45 years in real estate, sales have decreased by 15 per cent. I am talking about the whole country, not just Delhi and Mumbai. This is a big problem that is to be sorted out,' he said. Since 2020, the Indian real estate market has seen rapid premiumisation, with the share of supply priced below Rs 40 lakh shrinking across key cities and most new launches priced above Rs 80 lakh — driven largely by demand for luxury homes above Rs 1.5 crore. Hiranandani said while the PM Awas Yojana 2.0 will provide interest subsidy for 1 crore homes in urban areas, building affordable housing near city centres is difficult due to rising circle rates. 'How do you match rising land prices and giving affordable housing? It is not possible today with inflation in the cost of construction, the tax rates which are there, stamp duty rate, GST rate, local authority rates, etc. You cannot make affordable housing close to the city centre where employment opportunities exist,' he told The Indian Express, calling for the government and local authorities to intervene. 'No dip in pan-India housing sales' In India's top seven residential markets — Delhi-NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Kolkata — overall sales dropped by 3.5 per cent year-on-year in 2024. In the first half of 2025, sales fell 24.3 per cent, according to data shared by property consultancy Anarock. Hiranandani said there has been no dip in pan-India housing sales. 'If you look at the national level, real housing growth has been more than 10 per cent (in 2024-25). On an annualised basis, it will go up by more than 15 per cent (this fiscal). So it will probably be one of the highest growth years ever,' he said. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No formal talks yet with US on F-35 buy': Government in Lok Sabha
NEW DELHI: India has not had any formal talks with the US over the purchase of fifth-generation F-35 fighter jets, the external affairs ministry informed the Lok Sabha Friday. Responding to a written query, MoS (MEA) Kirti Vardhan Singh said the India-US joint statement following the meeting between PM Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump in Feb 2025 had mentioned that US will undertake a review of its policy on selling fifth-generation fighters (such as the F-35) and undersea systems to India. "No formal discussions have been held as yet on this issue," added the minister. A news agency reported on Thursday that India had told the US that it is not interested in purchasing the F-35 jets. The minister was also asked whether the govt has reviewed the dynamics relating to US military assistance proposals and India's autonomy in terms of foreign policy, given its strategic implications, especially in a conflict scenario involving third-party mediation. The minister responded by saying that the India-US partnership has benefited from growing strategic convergence & cooperation and that India closely evaluates all its external partnerships, including those in the defence and strategic domains, through the prism of its national interest and commitment to strategic autonomy. "India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership is anchored in mutual trust, shared interests, goodwill and robust engagement between our citizens," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like San Ramon: How Much Does It Cost To Replace Old Windows? Beautiful Energy-Efficient Windows Learn More Undo As regards third-party mediation, the minister said that it has been India's longstanding position that any outstanding issue with Pakistan will be discussed only at a bilateral level. "This has been made clear to all nations, including by the PM to the US president," he said.
