AgriZeroNZ puts millions into US start-up reducing methane emissions
'They're developing two different things,' he said.
'One is an enzyme blend that you mix into supplementary feed, which looks to reduce emissions by about 80% while at the same time improving milk yield and meat yield.
'The great benefit for a farmer would be if you can make more meat and milk with the same amount of feed, and also reduce emissions, that would be ideal.
'This [enzyme] still needs to be fed as a feed supplement, but only a small amount once a day.'
The enzyme could work for dairy cows, which come into the milking shed once or twice daily.
'The company is also looking to develop probiotics which would enable it to be fed less often, maybe weekly or monthly, which could then be used for a much more extensive system like a beef or sheep system.'
McNee said Hoofprint representatives had been visiting New Zealand looking for research partners to run an animal trial.
Methane from livestock makes up almost half of New Zealand's annual tally of greenhouse gas emissions.
AgriZeroNZ is a joint venture aimed at getting that tally down by investing in new methane-cutting products.
It is half owned by the Government and half owned by a group of companies including The a2 Milk Company, ANZ, ASB, BNZ, Fonterra, Rabobank, Ravensdown, Silver Fern Farms and Synlait.
Its latest investment takes AgriZeroNZ's total investment in Hoofprint to $13 million, its largest investment to date.
It has also invested in several other potential methane-cutting products, including another US start-up, ArkeaBio, trialling a methane vaccine.
The first product likely to reach farmers is a slow-release bolus out of New Zealand that releases bromoform into an animal's gut.
New Zealand company Ruminant Biotech has developed a small metal capsule (bolus), which delivers a potent methane-squashing medicine, which McNee said should be ready in 2026, before Hoofprint's enzymes.
Fonterra has also been trialling its own 'Kowbucha' probiotic to cut methane from dairy cows.
Meanwhile, New Zealand scientists have been working on their own vaccine and methane inhibitors for years,
McNee having a range of alternatives on the market would help keep prices competitive for farmers.
There was also potential for additional benefits from adding together different products - but it was too soon to know whether that would work, he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
New Zealand Reaches Deal With Canada In Long-Running Dairy Trade Dispute
Canada has agreed to allow access for New Zealand dairy products following a long running trade dispute, Trade Minister Todd McClay says. Dairy exporters had been blocked from the Canadian market, despite the move being in breach of the CPTPP trade agreement. On Friday morning McClay announced an agreement had been reached. He says Canada has committed to making changes to its dairy quotas which will deliver up to $157 million to New Zealand dairy exporters. New Zealand initiated formal dispute settlement proceedings over restricted access to the Canadian market for dairy exports under the CPTPP in 2022. A dispute panel found in New Zealand's favour, however, Canada failed to fully comply with the panel's ruling. New Zealand threatened further action last year including the imposition of retaliatory tariffs against Canadian exporters. "The government is pleased that this dispute has now been settled, and New Zealand exporters are guaranteed better access to the Canadian market," McClay said. Canada said the changes have been negotiated with "close consultation" with its dairy sector and the amendments will result in "minor policy changes". In a statement Canadian Agriculture minister Heath MacDonald said it was a "mutually satisfactory" resolution. Under the agreement, Canada has committed to changing the way it administers its dairy quotas under CPTPP, including faster and more efficient access to quotas for New Zealand exporters, reallocation of underused quotas, and penalties for importers who misuse quotas. "The CPTPP is a world leading agreement that unlocks significant opportunities for all parties, but its obligations must be upheld. Today's agreement reinforces support for the rules-based trading system," McClay said. He added Canada was a long-stranding friend and trading partner of this country and "constructive engagement" had brought about a resolution. Last year ACT Party trade spokesperson Dr Parmjeet Parmar called the dispute a "betrayal of our friendship". She said if Canada could not comply with the CPTPP, it should be "booted out of the deal". Deal welcomed Fonterra is pleased to see the end of a long running trade dispute involving NZ and Canada. Fonterra global external affairs director Simon Tucker told Midday Report Canada has a very protected dairy market and it has taken what he calls "dogged determination" by governments and officials to force Canada to comply with its obligations. He said dairy farmers could sell millions of dollars of products into Canada but it is only a small part of the Fonterra sales which has revenues of more than $20 billion a year. "Canada is one of those high value niches around the world which would be good for Fonterra. "This was the right to do; to use the disputes settlement over this issue. We won, and then governments and officials have worked hard to force Canada into compliance. "This is the right outcome." Tucker said the win opens up opportunities for New Zealand to pursue further moves especially around Canada's protein subsidies which are considered unfair. ExportNZ has also welcomed the deal, saying it will unlock higher export value for Kiwi business. Executive director Josh Tan said the outcome was a win for New Zealand dairy exporters, and a win for the rules-based trading system. "It's essential that our trade agreements function as they were agreed to - particularly in the current global trade context. Likewise, our trade partners should ensure they are playing by the rules." Canada was a valuable trading partner for New Zealand, Tan said. The Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand congratulated the Government for settling the dispute, which was first initiated under the previous Government. Executive director Kimberly Crewther said the outcome proved that dispute mechanisms were still a valid and viable approach to be taken. She said Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade estimated $157 million of trade revenue was not able to be used, due to breaches of the CPTPP. "Previously, it was giving the majority of export licences under these quotas to its own processors, many of whom had very little interest in seeing imports occur and they could hold on to those export licences and not use them without any penalty," Crewther said. "The changes introduce penalties... so that's a good improvement and we hope that it will lift the utilisation rates." She said Canadian dairy farmers received subsidies, which brought low prices to global dairy trading among nations without farmer subsidies, like New Zealand. "They're skewing the global dairy trade playing field quite significantly," she said. "Unfortunately, Canada's not a stranger to having these sizeable impacts on trade opportunities for New Zealand exporters. "Canada has a reputation for being amongst the most protectionist of dairy countries in the world, and they do that in a way that makes their market very difficult to access even with these CPTPP quotas, it remains 95 percent closed." Crewther said New Zealand had "virtually no tariff protections" on dairy into the market, and openly imported dairy into the country. "So we operate on an open basis, our farmers are not receiving direct subsidies and we are we're trading fairly in the world." She said its first preference is an on-demand licensing system which ensured those applying for the quotas would utilise them appropriately. "It's really important to hold them to account. This case has shown that dispute settlement can and does work, and it's important that New Zealand continues to move forward and uses these mechanisms where we need to."
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Government ponders radical power reforms as prices rise
Back then, the person leading the prosecution was none other than Willis herself, and she was ruthless in her disallowance of Grant Robertson's excuses. Pressing Robertson on skyrocketing mortgage costs, Willis asked the following: 'Is it seriously his position that international factors are to blame for this growth in a core component of New Zealanders' cost of living?' The answer then, as it is now, is sadly yes. The international factors that were responsible for a third or more of the post-Covid inflation spike, according to Treasury research, are much the same as the factors weighing on Willis' growth prospects in 2025. These have caused Treasury to revise its forecasts for GDP growth in the coming year from an impressive and possibly election-winning 3.3% to a less impressive 2.9% at the most recent Budget. That follows revisions to its GDP estimates for the year to the end of June, which Treasury tweaked from a gloomy 0.5% growth to a decidedly grim 0.8% contraction. Voters may be slightly more forgiving of first-term Willis than they were of second-term Robertson – but only slightly. Like frustrated parents, voters tend to care less about who made the mess than they do about who will clean it up. National, a party elected on a mandate of getting New Zealand 'back on track', will begin the election year presiding over an economy that's on the same high inflation, slow growth track voters rejected in 2023. There's not a lot of space for the Government to move. Witness the performative outrage over butter prices, which Willis will raise in a meeting with Fonterra boss Miles Hurrell when she meets him next week. These high prices are the result of a good thing: high commodity prices that are buoying rural economies. The problem is that incomes are so low people cannot afford to pay them. The Government knows these prices are a good thing (Willis certainly does, having spent five years at Fonterra) and so does most of the Opposition. As recently as April, it celebrated them, with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon then telling the Taranaki Chamber of Commerce the economic recovery was being led by farming. 'What has been exciting to see is dairy prices are hitting an all-time high,' he said. Finance Minister Nicola Willis applauds the regional economic recovery but has to manage the high consumer prices that have followed it. Photo / Mark Mitchell Fonterra may be being naughty, potentially fattening the margins of its consumer products to make that side of the business attractive for sale, but the key driver of those prices is the high value of commodities at the moment – and that's a good thing for the country. You can slightly forgive the Government for not saying this. Celebrating high butter prices does have a Marie Antoinette-ish aspect to it. However, they perhaps did not need to point the finger so vigorously in the other direction. The problem with affordability is only half to do with prices. The other half is wages. While it seems an affront to our identity that people of a dairying nation like ours cannot afford butter, the more serious question is why New Zealand incomes struggle to keep up with those of international consumers who are willing to pay for our products. There's a reason why everyone turns their guns on Fonterra and the farmers for high prices, and that's because it's easier to blame producers than it is to solve the manifold crises that have held back New Zealanders' wages. Act Party leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour at a rally last weekend. Photo / Alex Burton This browbeating of corporate New Zealand is becoming a coalition issue. Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour had a go at critics of the supermarkets and banks in his rally speech last Sunday. 'It would be the easiest thing in the world for me to give a speech saying they're crooked and need to be punished somehow. They should be taxed somehow, have their businesses broken up, or be watched over by even toothier watchdogs. It's the curse of zero-sum thinking,' he said. The remarks were not just directed at Labour and the Opposition, but at the rest of the coalition, which, since coming into office, has engaged in enthusiastic supermarket bashing. In the backdrop to all of this is a looming cost-of-living decision that will likely be made in the next few months and could have a big influence on the election campaign. In February, Energy Minister Simon Watts and his Associate Minister Shane Jones selected offshore economics consultancy Frontier to be the lead reviewer of the electricity market (the review was announced in November 2024). The terms of reference are bold, saying the firm needed to look at foundational parts of the market such as generation investment incentives, efficiency, and effective wholesale and retail markets. The report came back some weeks ago and is sitting on the desks of ministers. Watts has told media a decision can be expected before the end of September. One idea is to revive Contact Energy's 2021 Thermal Co plans. Frontier has worked with Contact before, writing evidence on the firm's behalf for its proposed acquisition of Manawa. That idea would be for a company, 'Thermal Co', to own, operate and eventually retire the major power companies' thermal generation assets. The price of thermal energy sets the price for the rest of the electricity market. This new entity, potentially with a large Crown stake, would have a large influence over prices and over the incentive for firms to bring forward renewable generation, the only long-term fix to the predicament of high prices. The move would be incredibly interventionist, which is perhaps why NZ First seems so keen on it and why no one in the Act Party seems to know the report is back. National is caught in the middle. It knows something is wrong in the market but wonders whether radical reform is quite what's needed to fix it. After all, six years of radicalism from the oil and gas ban, to the 100% renewable electricity generation target, to Lake Onslow are at least partly responsible for the mess the market's in at the moment. Those decisions were unhelpful. Labour's own appointed working group told the Government in 2019 the 100% target would lead to 'large increases in retail electricity prices from today's levels' and would undermine decarbonisation efforts by putting up prices – advice that turned out to be prescient. Do we really want another few years of radicalism? National may seek to make a virtue out of mild, stable reforms that bring stability to the market and encourage private investment in more generation. The challenge here is that this new generation needs to be in firming and, in the short to medium term, there's a good chance this will involve fossil fuels (Jones floated the idea of a new coal station in the House this week). That's going to be unpopular. Other ideas floating around the coalition include changing ETS settings to reduce the Government-imposed cost of burning coal, a cost that is reflected in the wider electricity price. That might fix one broken market by undermining another. Something needs to happen and not just because high prices are weighing on households. The coalition, or at least the National and Act parts of it, appears ready to campaign on asset sales at the next election. That argument is going to sound a lot less persuasive if the gentailers, part-privatised in the last major asset selloff, are squeezing consumers. Treasury papers gush about the fact that the mixed-ownership companies, Air NZ, Genesis, Mercury, and Meridian, are basically the publicly-owned companies that are performing well. Consumers, feeling fleeced by all of them, probably disagree. And that's the trouble with this economic recovery. It might look okay from the Beehive – even good. The recovery is under way and it's a good one. For once, we are seeing an economic recovery driven by exports and not immigration and house prices, which continue to fall. As Chris Bishop said this week, New Zealand would be a better country were it to 'destroy' the idea that the economy is linked to growing house prices. He's right, the country would be better off if we did. Sadly, the record of the electorate is that house prices, where two-thirds of New Zealand households have stashed the vast bulk of their wealth, seem to be the main indicator they care about. The Key Government, often remembered as a time of relative economic prosperity, presided over years of high unemployment. The unemployment rate didn't fall below 5% until the quarter before that Government was voted out of office. Inflation, however, was almost always below 2% and house prices were rising. House prices made people feel richer. It wasn't good, but it worked – and it wasn't just Key, the Ardern Government turned a blind eye to unsustainable house prices too. Unfortunately for National, this is probably the 'track' many households are keen to get back on – and not the one currently being taken by the coalition. You can hardly blame them for feeling the surest sign of economic recovery is in their own balance sheets. The Government's challenge is to persuade people that its own 'track' is the better one.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Simon Wilson's Love this City: Talkfests and Auckland's bad case of Fonterra Syndrome
Fonterra moved into brand-new custom-built Greenstar premises in the Wynyard Quarter in 2016. It's the city's premium commercial and upmarket residential precinct. The streets are beautifully planted and limited to 30km/h. The design standards of all new buildings are tightly controlled and some of those buildings even house tech companies, both large and small. Wynyard has the waterfront, a series of parks and play areas, a theatre, a seawater pool, events centre and outdoor events venues, and it's home base for some major water sports. It connects directly to trains, buses, ferries, boardwalks, cycleways and the motorway. It's central Auckland as its movers and shakers want it to be: lovely, highly functional, a drawcard day and night for locals and visitors, humming with achievement and with potential for more. A fully modern precinct in a city that says it really, truly does want to be modern. And Fonterra? In May last year, this export-led company announced it would ditch its value-added strategy and focus instead on commodity sales. Even though it's a tech-driven company, Fonterra has reverted to a bulk, low-value approach to making money. Head office is in the Wynyard Quarter (great modern company!) but the business model is mired in the 19th century. And don't even start me on methane. There is some good news in that State of the City report. Auckland is a leader among other comparable cities in its cultural appeal, environmental commitments and climate-disaster resilience. Strong rankings in these areas are a testament to Auckland Council's targeted environment rate, to the Making Space for Water plans and to its cultural and community programmes, all of which enjoy strong public support. Whether or not you think they're part of the 'basic' spending the Government wants councils to focus on, they make a difference to our lives. The Fonterra headquarters on Fanshawe St in the Wynyard Quarter. Photo / Grant Bradley But then there's the rest of the report. Mark Thomas of the Committee for Auckland, which initiated it, says 'inadequate skills and innovation development, and disjointed and delayed planning are causing Auckland to lose ground, with the risk of falling further behind'. Auckland ranked 99th globally for productivity, which according to the report means we're about 15-20% behind where we should be. There are seven peer cities we're directly benchmarked against: Copenhagen, Fukuoka, Vancouver, Austin, Tel Aviv, Dublin and Helsinki. Among them, our productivity ranking is last. The report's author, Tim Moonen, says; 'Other cities internationally have now moved in some cases quite substantially ahead on investment, business appeal, job outcomes, wages versus costs. On balance, more capital, more talent is consistently flowing out to larger and better places'. Mayor Wayne Brown says the State of the City report 'highlights an urgent need to lift Auckland's economic performance and competitiveness'. But does he take this seriously? Brown has announced a 'Leadership Group' for the Auckland Innovation & Technology Alliance, a body he set up in May after an Auckland Innovation Forum attended by more than 130 tech and innovation leaders. The leadership group is led by Simon Bridges, chief executive of the Auckland Business Chamber. 'This isn't another talk shop,' says Brown. 'It's a delivery-focused team of proven Auckland leaders who know how to cut through and get things done.' A cynic might wonder if they're all talk shops: State of the City reports, Innovation Alliances, the works. Brown's announcement was full of jargon and didn't propose anything specific. Sir Peter Gluckman, who's on his leadership group, said; 'If we want to build a future-ready economy, we must ensure Auckland's innovation system is better aligned, better resourced, and globally connected. Cities are the primary units of innovation internationally'. It's true. It's obviously true. But how much does it help just to keep saying it? Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown: a "leadership group" but it won't be "another talkfest". Photo / Alex Burton The former head of Business NZ, Phil O'Reilly, is just back from a trip to Europe and he's been saying the same thing too. In EU countries, he told RNZ, the best business opportunities are shifting from agriculture to high-tech, logistics, infrastructure and digital sectors. You might almost think he was having a dig at Fonterra. But are we geared up for it? There's enormous scope for Auckland to apply tech-driven solutions to some of its biggest problems. Transport, freight management, flooding, housing, healthcare, addressing the long tail of failure in education. But perhaps we have to stop thinking that 'tech' means RocketLab. Relatively cheap modern tech solutions abound. Why are we still not building thousands of prefab houses? Where's the commitment to experimenting with mass transit like overhead services. Why is it taking forever to introduce congestion charging? This week we learned that most students in South Auckland have failed their literacy and numeracy tests. One of the reasons is said to be the tests are conducted online and many students from low-income homes don't have access to a computer. There'll be a lot more to it than that, but this looks a lot like the city not only has an IT gap, we are now punishing people for being on the wrong side of it. Do we want the city to thrive or not? Give them a computer! Postscript: On Friday the Government announced it would fund a new Institute for Advanced Technology (NZIAT), to be based in Auckland, to the tune of $231 million over four years. We'll learn more about this soon. More diesel ferries on the way A pair of diesel ferries run by Fullers on the Waiheke route. Photo / Jason Oxenham You read that right. The board of Auckland Transport, acting on advice from its executive, has decided to buy more diesel ferries for use on the Waitematā Harbour. This was revealed in a council meeting on Thursday, shortly after chief executive Dean Kimpton had assured councillors; 'We're committed to reducing emissions'. 'But,' spluttered councillor Shane Henderson, 'we've given you a clear direction to buy electric ferries and yet the AT board had made a decision contradicting that'. 'I understand that 70% of new ferry orders around the world are for electric ferries,' said councillor Richard Hills. 'Why would you not be part of that?' AT actually has bought two new electric ferries, made here in Auckland, and they'll soon be in use. It also has two hybrid electric-diesel ferries on the way and it's been rolling out the charging network to service all four boats. But, AT's Stacey van der Putten told the council, more ferries will be needed by 2028 and 'modern diesel' offers the best option for cost and reliability, at least for now. Especially as the Government will not help fund electric ferries. AT board chair Richard Leggat added, 'It comes down to dollars'. Then he said it comes down to reliability. 'If we have a ferry out [of action], we lose consumer confidence.' Both appeared to worry that e-ferries may be less reliable, although neither produced any evidence for this. The first of two fast ferries that will be used by Auckland Transport. Designed by EV Maritime, they're being built at the McMullen & Wing shipyard in Auckland. Photo / Dean Purcell Councillors all around the table were sceptical of the cost and reliability arguments and asked to see the evidence. Michael Eaglen from EV Maritime, which designed the new e-ferries Auckland is getting, told me after the meeting that a comparative analysis of electric and diesel was a good idea and most of the work had already been done, by his company and by AT. 'Life cycle analysis shows that carbon-fibre electric ferries have much lower emissions intensity on a whole-of-life basis than any form of aluminium ferry, or any form of diesel or hybrid ferry,' he said. He didn't think there was any substance to the suggestion e-ferries are less reliable. Some councillors suggested the new diesel ferries could be made 'electric-ready': able to be converted at some point in the future. Eaglen doubts the value of that, too. 'EV Maritime, and I think both Fullers and AT, have all looked at this and all found it to be demonstrably unattractive. Simply put, you wind-up building bad diesel boats, which later become bad electric boats.' Hills reiterated his point, mentioning 'New South Wales, Brisbane, British Columbia, Seattle' and 'many Chinese cities' as places where electric ferries are running successfully. His '70% of all new ferries' figure comes from Clean Technica, a clean-energy information service. He could have added Norway: it has about 70 highly functional e-ferries. Or spelled out that in Sydney they've committed to a fully electric ferry fleet by 2035. Given all this, Hills wondered, why would AT think e-ferries are less reliable than diesel ferries? Who's AT been talking to that it would suddenly back away from electric ferries? More to come on this. Falling in love with ferries again Ferry popularity in Auckland compared with other public transport modes. In better ferry news, they've become Auckland's most popular form of public transport. Stacey van der Putten produced a graph at the council meeting showing that in the March 2025 quarter, ferries enjoyed 92.3% customer satisfaction. It's the highest mark they've reached for at least 10 years. Buses were at 91.3% and trains at 88.1%. The graph makes the benefit of improving services very clear. The rail network had low and erratic support until electrification was completed in 2015, after which its popularity soared. The rollout of new bus services the following year had the same effect. Ferries, meanwhile, endured years of instability from 2017 until the end of 2023, but then their popularity rose sharply too. Trains, on the other hand, took a dive during the maintenance closures and major disruptions of recent years, before bouncing back a bit this year. AT also reports the ferries currently have 96.4% punctuality and 96.8% reliability. Restaurant Month menus are live Meals for different price points and special drinks to accompany them: all part of the fun in Restaurant Month. Bookings are open. Photo / Supplied Restaurant Month is less than two weeks away. The special menus of participating restaurants are available to view online and Heart of the City reports that bookings are up 88% on the same time last year. This year's theme is 'Don't Try This At Home'. The full programme, with options for meals at $35, $45 and $55+ price points and a whole lot of special one-off events, is here. The great Karanga-a-Hape rethink rethink On the streets around the Karanga-a-Hape Station, the original pedestrian-focused plans will now proceed. Photo / Simon Wilson Last week Auckland Transport (AT) announced it had revived its original plans for a pedestrian-focused precinct around the new Karanga-a-Hape railway station, part of the City Rail Link. On Tuesday, the Waitematā Local Board endorsed the decision, 4-3, with the City Vision members and independent chair Genevieve Sage voting for it and the C&R members voting against. This overturns a decision to abandon those plans in favour of a more car-focused approach, and brings to an end a remarkable episode of urban planning of the city. The original plans included a pedestrian mall on Mercury Lane, between Karangahape Rd and the station entrance just past the old Mercury Theatre. The revised plan made it easy for cars to pass through. The original has now been largely restored, although in a slightly peculiar way. Bollards will be in place at each end of the block, but technically it will be a shared space, with vehicles still able to enter and exit the street, by triggering the bollards to be lowered. AT calls this 'consultation by doing': if the street is used overwhelmingly as a pedestrian mall, that will lead to it becoming one. But if it's not, then the bollards might stay down. Once the CRL opens next year, the theory goes, the users of the street will vote with their feet, or their car horns. On Cross St, which runs east from the station entrance, the original plan reduced the parking and widened the footpaths. The revised plan removed almost all the pedestrian-friendly features and made it a street for vehicles. The final plan ensures there is enough parking for service vehicles while restoring the footpath extensions and adding better lighting. The original also retained the cycleway and north-only roadway on East St. The revised plan removed the cycleway and made the road two-way for cars, but the final plan reverts to the original. The Karangahape Rd Business Association and the City Centre Advisory Panel both told AT they would prefer a 'modal filter': a barrier halfway up the street, so vehicles could drive in and out from either end, but could not drive through. This is a way to support local traffic while stopping rat running. AT couldn't see their way to allowing that. But the council and its new Urban Development Office have both expressed interest, which means it could happen later. When the original plans were consulted on in 2023, more than half of submitters 'strongly agreed' they would improve the precinct and their own lives, and that rose to about three quarters when the 'agreed' numbers were added. That indicated strong public support. These views reflected a larger issue: that after all the investment in the CRL, catching the train and using the railway station should be a safe and rewarding experience. But earlier this year, due to opposition from some retailers and some residents in a nearby building, AT withdrew the proposals. It then faced a barrage of complaints from people wanting the original plans and the original consultation process honoured. After all, what's the point if it's just going to be ignored? This week, after more 'stakeholder engagements', AT accepted that logic and largely restored the original plans. Inside the new Karanga-a-Hape Station, part of the City Rail Link. Photo / Auckland Council 'We take feedback from the community seriously, which is why we took time to revisit the design and engage widely,' said Jane Small, AT's group manager of rail infrastructure. 'In a public project like this, it is challenging to satisfy everybody completely. 'We have worked hard to balance the different perspectives in the local community, and ensure the project aligns with plans and aspirations for Auckland's city centre, maximising the positive impacts of the City Rail Link.' Councillor Richard Hills led the effort inside the council to push AT into a rethink. He says; 'This result is so much better than where we were a few months ago. It's not perfect but it's a good result if everyone sees it as a compromise. 'It will encourage safe entry and exit to and from the new world-class station for the thousands of people who will use it each day, which will also help invigorate the Karanga-a-Hape business and residential areas'. Greater Auckland's Connor Sharp, who led the public campaign, says; 'It's vital to remember the key lesson here. We don't have to accept plans and promises being watered down, backed away from, and broken. 'When we choose to speak up, we can make a difference and change things for the better'. Bus drivers who go above and beyond Auckland Transport has a reward scheme for drivers who go above and beyond. Photo / Dean Purcell Deputy Mayor Desley Simpson told her colleagues on council a story this week about a bus driver who had helped every passenger in the pouring rain get safely off the bus and into covered shelter. 'Going above and beyond,' she called it. She said Auckland Transport has a scheme to reward drivers who go above and beyond, and anyone who sees it happening might like to let them know. Aucklanders like Government most We like him in Auckland: Christopher Luxon, local lad and Prime Minister. Photo / Mark Mitchell Aucklanders are much fonder of the Government than the rest of the country is, according to a Freshwater Strategy poll released this week. Nationally, a mere 29% of us think the country is 'heading in the right direction', but in Auckland it's 48%. This mirrors the result of the 2023 general election, where the National Party was more popular in Auckland than in the rest of the country. The unfavourability ratings are similar: 54% of the country thinks we're heading in the wrong direction, but only 38% of Aucklanders think that. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is also more popular in his home town than elsewhere. His net favourability rating is –1% here, but –27% nationally. No word yet on whether there's a settled view of who should be playing in jerseys 6, 11, 13 and 14 for the All Blacks. Midtown programme update An artist's impression of what Victoria St will look like after the completion of the Midtown upgrade. Midtown, the central city area around the Civic and stretching a block or two down Queen St, is still disrupted by roadworks. Some of them are because of the City Rail Link and some are because Auckland Transport is giving Victoria St a makeover, but perhaps the biggest disruption is caused by Watercare, which is replacing some very old pipes. They have a tunnel boring machine down there and it's a tough, complex job. Queen St used to be Te Waihorotiu stream, which became more or less an open sewer as the city started to grow. Then the stream was walled off and over a hundred years of pipes, cables and other paraphernalia were buried beneath the road. Putting in new pipes means they have to work their way through all that, digging out what's not wanted and taking care not to disrupt what's still in use. In the meantime, with Queen St, Quay St and Victoria St more pedestrianised, and with Wellesley St destined to become the main crosstown route for buses, Auckland Transport has produced a map showing the easiest ways for cars from the east to get across the city. Auckland Transport's map of the best routes to use to drive across the city centre. Essentially, it suggests drivers should not try to use Wellesley St, Victoria St or the western end of Quay St, but should take Customs St or Mayoral Drive and Nelson St. Going round is quicker and easier than trying to go straight through. At the council meeting where this was discussed, councillor Mike Lee complained that the roadworks 'are doing a great deal of harm to the city centre'. Councillor Chris Darby responded that those roadworks are 'future facing work for the city centre for generations to come'. 'Dystopia!' shouted Lee. Councillor Richard Hills told him there's a pipe being replaced on Victoria St that's 13m deep, and that the work was necessary because there are 18 development projects in the central city and they need good infrastructure. 'Remember Quay St?' he said. 'Everyone complained when that work was being done, but we needed to do it. A 100-year-old seawall was replaced, basically the front of the city was falling off. 'But look at how good it is now, look at how popular it is. Midtown will be the same.' Councillor Andy Baker said he had just one word to say to everyone who complains that Auckland is fixing its infrastructure: 'Wellington'. To sign up for Simon Wilson's weekly newsletter, click here, select Love this City and save your preferences. For a step-by-step guide, click here.
