logo
He moved from California to rural Italy because he ‘didn't want to be anywhere near a McDonald's or Starbucks'

He moved from California to rural Italy because he ‘didn't want to be anywhere near a McDonald's or Starbucks'

CNN16-04-2025
A bargain-price home in a beautiful town — with a cleaner and a handyman thrown in for good measure — would be enough of a deal for many people to make the leap to Italy, but American Keith Richardson had one other key requirement.
The property where he intended to start his new life must not be anywhere near a McDonald's or Starbucks, for him two symbols of the commercialized world he was trying to escape in the US.
Once he'd decided on Puglia, the mainly rural region that stretches down into the heel of Italy's boot, after viewing online properties, an expat friend introduced him to an American real estate consultant living in the area, who directed him toward Nardò, a quiet town just inland from the coast.
'I gave her a list of homes I like,' Richardson, who used to work in the US education system, told CNN. 'She suggested including Nardò because I told her that I didn't want to be anywhere near a McDonald's or Starbucks.'
And, after some shrewd low-ball bidding, he secured the property he hopes to spend the rest of his retirement in for barely one-tenth of the cost of a similarly situated property back home in Southern California.
'The house was listed for 138,000 euros ($153,000) but I negotiated and paid €100,000 ($111,000). I put in another 3,800 euros to restyle it to my liking and give it a fresh look,' he tells CNN.
'It was a very pleasant surprise. I was willing to pay more, but started at 100,000 euros to see if the sellers would counter offer.'
They did not.
The 667-square-foot house (62 square meters) he bought is a two-bed, two-bath home on the ground floor of what was originally storage or dwellings for the servants working in Palazzo Tafuri, one of Nardò's landmarks.
The dwelling is made with Puglia's typical pinkish-golden stone blocks. It came with a fireplace, three stellar ceilings, limestone walls, and had been completely renovated by the original owners.
Richardson's only major addition was a permanent roof over the patio, and strong, long-lasting bamboo privacy screens. A very small price to pay, he says, considering the value for money the house represents.
'Homes in Southern California within three miles from the coast, in such a desired area, would cost anywhere from $700,000 to $1.4 million,' he says.
Nardò is off the beaten track, far from the crowds and unknown even to many Italians. Located at the heart of Puglia's pristine Salento area, it's close to 'Italy's Maldives,' some of the country's best tropical-style beaches. Richardson says it's the perfect spot to soak up seaside vibes while enjoying a less hectic, carefree life.
'Puglia is definitely the place to live and invest in, if you're searching for that dolce vita coastal lifestyle,' he says.
'I've fallen in love with the Italian lifestyle and domani (tomorrow) attitude. No need to worry because there is always domani. No worries, it will be taken care of domani, so for now, let's just have a coffee and watch the people promenade by.'
Other plus points were the affordability and lower cost of living compared to the US, the fresh chemical-free produce on sale in local shops, and the gorgeous coastlines and olive groves.
'It's reminiscent of Southern California in the 1960s,' Richardson adds. 'I remember as a child passing through orange groves to get to Disneyland, Riverside, Santa Barbara.'
He says his love for Italy originally stemmed from his passion for learning languages — he taught Spanish for several years at university before working in administration.
Richardson retired as director of research and curriculum for a high school district in the Los Angeles suburbs in 2015 and then later began to travel to Italy twice a year, exploring by rental car with friends and falling in love with the country's lifestyle and what he calls the 'candidness' of locals.
By 2023, he was home-hunting and narrowed his search down to Puglia, eventually choosing Nardò for its non-touristy appeal — and its absence of US fast food chains.
He says he wanted a place where everything was authentic and 'local,' with nothing linked to mass tourism or major brands. Puglia was the obvious answer: 'Beautiful beaches and coastlines, picturesque cities and towns, great weather (even in winter), and not full of the tourists that are found throughout Tuscany, Venice, Milan and Rome. In fact, most tourists tended to be Italians or other Europeans. The Dolce Vita was genuine.'
After almost a year of looking around, in March 2024 he flew over from Orange County and in just a few days bought the house of his dreams in Nardò's historical center, surrounded by majestic churches and lavishly decorated palazzos.
Part of the property's attraction was its proximity to the main Piazza Salandra, lined with café terraces. Another plus was that it was located on the ground floor with a patio, without any stairs — older properties in Italy's historic centers are often spread over multiple floors, with steep, narrow staircases that are difficult to navigate with shopping or other items.
Richardson currently comes and goes between South California and Nardò, but plans, once he gets his visa, to spend more time in Italy, though not on a permanent basis at first. 'My parents are currently still living and I do so much want to spend several months out of the year near them' in the US, he adds.
He plans to apply for an elective residence visa in May 2025, which is based on a minimum pension income requirement. At this point, he will have to 'surrender' his passport to the Italian Consulate in Los Angeles for three months for processing and approval of the visa.
In Nardò, he loves the small-town vibe and enjoys experiencing cultural clashes as he adapts to local ways of life. He now spends his days in Italy visiting nearby villages, sipping coffee in the morning at the many bars, and savoring local dishes at trattorias in Nardò, where foreign tourists are a rare sight.
Adjusting to the Italian way hasn't been all smooth sailing though. Particularly when it comes to frank conversational exchanges.
'Several individuals have actually told me that they're not being rude, but trying to save me time and money' in getting things sorted out.
He says it also took him a while to adapt to local closing times — with stores closing in the middle of the day.
'I still haven't gotten used to shops closing and opening when the proprietor feels 'ready.' I now just shrug it off, go for a coffee and relax. It's part of the dolce vita.'
Richardson's path to a new life in southern Italy also seems to have avoided many of the bureaucratic pitfalls that some people complain of when moving to the country.
The process of buying a house was 'a breeze,' he says.
'Horror stories only exist because most people don't do their homework. Before purchasing, the consultant and friends told me about the need of a codice fiscale (tax identification number). When I arrived in Italy I was told where to go to obtain an Italian number, which is mandatory as well.'
He says the real estate agency in Nardò assisted him in obtaining a bank account, which proved more difficult and time consuming than buying the house.
'Banks need either your SSN (national health insurance number) or federal tax code number or both. The process took some three hours, but even now I am greeted with smiles from the representative that set up my account.'
The agency also found him a housekeeper who comes regularly to clean his place and keeps in touch with him. Her boyfriend, who works in construction, has become his go-to handyman, fixing any problems that come up at the house while Richardson's away.
One big issue for Richardson has been the fact he's not allowed to buy a car in Italy before acquiring a residence card.
'I really can't grasp that part of Italian law,' he says. In the meantime, he's buying an e-bike and using rental cars.
Once he will relocate full-time to Puglia, Richardson says he'll lease his home in Southern California to his twin brother, so as to always have somewhere to stay when he visits the United States.
He says he's looking forward to enjoying Puglia's mild winters, vast olive groves, quaint towns and villages, architectural beauty and amazing cuisine.
'If you haven't tried a bombette, you haven't lived!', he says. These are one of Puglia's iconic recipes and street foods: savory fresh pork meatballs stuffed with cheese and pepper.
Above all, he says he has been won over by the open friendliness of the people, who are 'genuine and sincere' and look out for one another.
'I love the fact that on my small L-shaped lane there is a typical 'Italian alarm and neighborhood watch'. It is a little old man that lives at the bend on the lane. He is out every morning investigating and greeting all throughout the day. He talks to and watches the gas delivery man and construction workers.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Big, beautiful bill" gives some seniors hefty tax break
"Big, beautiful bill" gives some seniors hefty tax break

Axios

time40 minutes ago

  • Axios

"Big, beautiful bill" gives some seniors hefty tax break

The " big, beautiful bill" features a new tax break for older Americans who pay taxes on Social Security income. But there's a significant catch. Why it matters: The break leaves out the poorest seniors, and the very rich ones, too. How it works: Both the House and Senate bills include an increased tax deduction for tax filers age 64 and older. In the Senate version, the new deduction is $6,000 for individuals and $12,000 for couples. The deduction starts phasing out for those who earn over $75,000 ($150,000 for couples), and phases out completely at $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples, in the Senate version. The break expires in 2028 when President Trump leaves office, as do a few other White House priorities in the bills, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on auto loan interest. What they're saying: "This amounts to the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," per a report out earlier this week from the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Yes, but: Most seniors — 64% of them — don't pay taxes on Social Security, according to the White House's own analysis. Those who can't afford the taxes already don't pay. This break targets most, but not all, of the rest. Between the lines: Trump promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security income. Lawmakers couldn't pull that off entirely, given the constraints of passing a reconciliation bill and changing Social Security law. This break comes close. After adding the recipients of the new tax break, 88% of seniors wouldn't pay Social Security tax, per the White House. "The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers on President Trump's promise of no tax on Social Security," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson says in a statement, noting the analysis by the Council of Economic Advisers. Zoom out: For those upper-middle class folks who pay taxes on retirement benefits, this is a "substantial tax break," says Marc Goldwein, senior policy director for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that advocates for fiscal responsibility. For the several million senior citizens who live in poverty, and already don't pay taxes on Social Security, this doesn't help. The bill would also accelerate Social Security and Medicare insolvency by a year, to 2032, per an analysis from the group. The bottom line: Seniors in the U.S. overall are doing great financially right now, sitting on assets that have soared in value in recent years.

Trump's legislative win could make him a political loser
Trump's legislative win could make him a political loser

Vox

timean hour ago

  • Vox

Trump's legislative win could make him a political loser

is a senior politics reporter at Vox, where he covers the Democratic Party. He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic's politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election. President Donald Trump speaks during an address to a joint session of Congress at the US Capitol on March 4, 2025. Allison Robbert/AFP via Getty Images President Donald Trump is about to achieve his biggest legislative victory yet: his 'one big, beautiful bill' — the massive tax- and Medicaid-cutting, immigration and border spending bill passed the Senate on Tuesday — is on the verge of passing the House of Representatives. It's a massive piece of legislation, likely to increase the national debt by at least $3 trillion, mostly through tax cuts, and leave 17 million Americans without health coverage — and it's really unpopular. Majorities in nearly every reputable poll taken this month disapprove of the bill, ranging from 42 percent who oppose the bill in an Ipsos poll (compared to 23 percent who support) to 64 percent who oppose it in a KFF poll. And if history is any indication, it's not going to get any better for Trump and the Republicans from here on out. In modern American politics, few things are more unpopular with the public than big, messy bills forged under a bright spotlight. That's especially true of bills passed through a Senate mechanism called 'budget reconciliation,' a Senate procedure that allows the governing party to bypass filibuster rules with a simple majority vote. They tend to have a negative effect on presidents and their political parties in the following months as policies are implemented and campaign seasons begin. Part of that effect is due to the public's general tendency to dislike any kind of legislation as it gets more publicity and becomes better understood. But reconciliation bills in the modern era seem to create a self-fulfilling prophecy: forcing presidents to be maximally ambitious at the outset, before they lose popular support for the legislation and eventually lose the congressional majorities that delivered passage. Presidents and their parties tend to be punished after passing big spending bills The budget reconciliation process, created in 1974, has gradually been used to accomplish broader and bigger policy goals. Because it offers a workaround for a Senate filibuster, which requires 60 votes to break, it has become the primary way that presidents and their parties implement their economic and social welfare visions. The public, however, doesn't tend to reward the governing party after these bills are passed. As political writer and analyst Ron Brownstein recently pointed out, presidents who successfully pass a major reconciliation bill in the first year of their presidency lose control of Congress, usually the House, the following year. In 1982, Ronald Reagan lost his governing majority in the House after using reconciliation to pass large spending cuts as part of his Reaganomics vision (the original 'big, beautiful' bill). And the pattern would repeat itself for George H.W. Bush (whose reconciliation bill contradicted his campaign promise not to raise taxes), for Bill Clinton in 1994 (deficit reductions and tax reform), for Barack Obama in 2010 (after the passage of the Affordable Care Act), for Trump in 2018 (tax cuts), and for Biden in 2022 (the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act). The exception in this list of modern presidents is George W. Bush, who did pass a set of tax cuts in a reconciliation bill, but whose approval rating rose after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Increasing polarization, and the general anti-incumbent party energy that tends to run through midterm elections, of course, explains part of this overall popular and electoral backlash. But reconciliation bills themselves seem to intensify this effect. Why reconciliation bills do so much political damage First, there's the actual substance of these bills, which has been growing in scope over time. Because they tend to be the first, and likely only, major piece of domestic legislation that can execute a president's agenda, they are often highly ideological, partisan projects that try to implement as much of a governing party's vision as possible. These highly ideological pieces of legislation, Matt Grossman, the director of Michigan State University's Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, and his partners have found, tend to kick into gear a 'thermostatic' response from the public — that is, that public opinion moves in the opposite direction of policymaking when the public perceives one side is going too far to the right or left. Because these bills have actually been growing in reach, from mere tax code adjustments to massive tax-and-spend, program-creating bills, and becoming more ideological projects, the public, in turn, seems to be reacting more harshly. These big reconciliation bills also run into an issue that afflicts all kinds of legislation: It has a PR problem. Media coverage of proposed legislation tends to emphasize its partisanship, portraying the party in power as pursuing its domestic agenda at all costs and emphasizing that parties are fighting against each other. This elevates process over policy substance. Political scientist Mary Layton Atkinson has found that just like campaign reporting is inclined to focus on the horse race, coverage of legislation in Congress and policy debates often focuses on conflict and procedure, adding to a sense in the public mind that Congress is extreme, dysfunctional, and hyperpartisan. Adding to this dynamic is a quirk of public opinion toward legislation and referenda: Proposals tend to get less popular, and lose public support, between proposal and passage, as the public learns more about the actual content of initiatives and as they hear more about the political negotiations and struggles taking place behind the scenes as these bills are ironed out. Lawmakers and key political figures also 'tend to highlight the benefits less than the things that they are upset about in the course of negotiations,' Grossman told me. 'That [also] occurs when a bill passes: You have the people who are against it saying all the terrible things about it, and actually the people who are for it are often saying, 'I didn't get all that I wanted, I would have liked it to be slightly different.' So the message that comes out of it is actually pretty negative on the whole, because no one is out there saying this is the greatest thing and exactly what they wanted.' Even with the current One Big Beautiful Bill, polling analysis shows that the public tends not to be very knowledgeable about what is in the legislative package, but gets even more hostile to it once they learn or are provided more information about specific policy details. Big reconciliation bills exist at the intersection of all three of these public image problems: They tend to be the first major legislative challenge a new president and Congress take on, they suck up all the media's attention, they direct the public's attention to one major piece of legislation, and they take a pretty long time to iron out — further extending the timeline in which the bill can get more unpopular.

The Bulletin June 23, 2025
The Bulletin June 23, 2025

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

The Bulletin June 23, 2025

The rundown: Iranian lawmakers have said blocking the strategic Strait of Hormuz could be one retaliatory response to U.S. and Israeli attacks, and have given symbolic approval to the decision. Find out how it will impact the global oil trade. Why it matters: If the Iranian government blocks passage through the Strait, Asian markets are expected to be most hit, but American markets will be too, with energy prices likely to rise. Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January following the U.S. strikes. Located between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, connecting to the wider Indian Ocean, the chokepoint on one of the world's busiest maritime routes is vital to global energy security and it handles roughly 20 percent of global oil trade. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China on Sunday to press Iran against closing the Strait following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Read more in-depth coverage: Oil Prices Jump, Stocks Fall After US Strikes Iran Nuclear Sites TL/DR: Since 2019, Iran has repeatedly used the Strait of Hormuz to apply pressure. What happens now? Iran has signaled that there will be a response to U.S. strikes, but has not said exactly what yet and whether that would include targeting shipping in the Strait or Hormuz. Deeper reading How Iran Could Close the Strait of Hormuz

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store