
Trump's ‘America First' Agenda Meets China's AI Advancement - CNN One Thing - Podcast on CNN Audio
00:00:04
thank you very much. And it's an honor to be here today. We have a first full day as president. We're back.
David Rind
00:00:13
Last Tuesday, President Donald Trump gathered a trio of tech leaders for a big announcement at the White House.
President Donald Trump
00:00:20
Together, these world leading technology giants are announcing the formation of Stargate. So put that name down in your books, because I think you're going to hear a lot about it.
David Rind
00:00:32
SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison say they're going to invest up to $500 billion into this new company, Stargate, in the coming years to finance the building of massive data centers to help power artificial intelligence projects.
Larry Ellison
00:00:52
The first of them are under construction in Texas, each building a half 1,000,000ft².
David Rind
00:00:57
The fact that this an AI infrastructure announcement was among the very first things Trump rolled out on his first full day back in office, just underscored how badly his administration and advocates like Sam Altman want America to win the AI arms race against China.
Sam Altman
00:01:15
But I do want to say I'm thrilled we get to do this in the United States of America. I think this will be the most important project of this era.
David Rind
00:01:22
Well, less than a week later.
John Berman
00:01:25
Alright, we do have breaking news. Stock markets open just a few minutes ago. And it's not pretty...
David Rind
00:01:31
Known Chinese air company was wreaking havoc on Wall.
Dana Bash
00:01:36
The Chinese startup is called Deep Sick and it says it spent less than $6 million to create its new AI model, challenging the notion that it takes hundreds of millions of dollars and sophisticated chips to develop AI products. Now, the Nasdaq.
David Rind
00:01:52
Now some experts are asking, did deep seek just upend key assumptions about that arms race? My guest is CNN business reporter Matt Egan. We're going to explain how deep sea could reset Trump's America First agenda and his relationship with Big Tech's biggest titans. From CNN. This is one thing. I'm David Wright. So, Matt, what was this air announcement out of China that spooked the stock market so badly on Monday?
Matt Egan
00:02:29
Well, it's really incredible. We had this tiny startup stun investors on Wall Street and really caused them to rethink some fundamental questions about AI. So we're talking about deep sea. This is a little known Chinese startup.
David Rind
00:02:44
Yeah, I'd never heard of it before Monday.
Matt Egan
00:02:46
I don't think many people had either. And it came out on January 20th with an announcement that its latest AI model can basically go toe to toe with the best AI models out there. And this was stunning by itself, but also the fact that they said they were able to build this AI model at a fraction of the cost of what other A.I. technologies are said to cost and with far fewer leading edge computer chips. All of that was just startling to investors and I would imagine officials in Washington.
David Rind
00:03:26
And this is like GPT, right? It's basically a chat bot. You can ask questions. It searches the model that it has and it spits back an answer. Right?
Matt Egan
00:03:35
Exactly. That's right. And the thinking had been that only the United States had that kind of technology. Right? The chat GPT, Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude. And all of a sudden we have this new player, deep sea that can do that. And again, it can do that. It said at a fraction of the cost. And so we saw a really dramatic impact in the market. There was basically a meltdown in the A.I. world.
Boris Sanchez
00:04:03
Breaking news to CNN. US tech stocks took a dive today...
Matt Egan
00:04:06
And computer chip makers, especially in video, which had been going straight up, crashed.
Boris Sanchez
00:04:12
A chip maker and video a giant is also plummeting. You see it there, down a whopping 17%.
Matt Egan
00:04:20
NVIDIA lost more than half $1 trillion in market value in one day. Is the biggest ever wipe out in a single day that we've ever seen. Other computer chip stocks also fell sharply. Even energy and power companies got caught up in this sell off. We saw companies like Constellation Energy, which is planning to bring back online nuclear plants. Even Three Mile Island is supposed to be brought back to help power these data centers. That's why we saw all those companies lose value really sharply. Well, tell.
David Rind
00:04:56
Me about these chips then, because I thought the U.S. was trying to restrict the export of these very specialized chips that were developed in the U.S. to other countries like China so they don't get a leg up. So what happened?
Matt Egan
00:05:09
That's exactly right. In theory, Deep Seek shouldn't really be possible because the U.S. has these very tough export restrictions that are supposed to be preventing the flow of leading edge computer chips and AI software from getting to China with this specific goal of slowing their progress on. So the fact that Deep Seek has done it has raised some questions. And there's a few schools of thought here.
Erica Hill
00:05:39
Just a week before Donald Trump takes office, the Biden administration unveiling a fresh round of restrictions on the export of U.S. developed computer chips that power artificial intelligence.
Matt Egan
00:05:49
Some argue that the export restrictions have backfired because they essentially forced China to come up with ways around the restrictions to innovate around them and to come up with new efficiencies to build their AI models.
Erica Hill
00:06:07
These new restrictions are quite broad. They essentially divide the world into three tiers. The first tier is includes U.S. allies like South Korea, Japan, Australia, Taiwan. They will face no new restrictions. The second tier includes China and Russia, which are already blocked from buying advanced AI chips. They will now face restrictions on buying closed source A.I. models.
Matt Egan
00:06:29
One researcher said We accidentally upped China's technical game. So that's one school of thought. But there's also some doubt about some of the claims that the U.S. is making.
David Rind
00:06:43
Yeah, I was going to say, what kind of proof is this company putting forward that they were able to do this without these chips and at such a cheap cost?
Matt Egan
00:06:51
We don't know. We don't know yet whether or not those claims are accurate. And that is part of the issue here. They're claiming that they built this on less than $6 million to train their model. Some experts that I talked to that are very skeptical about that figure. And there's also some skepticism about whether or not Deep Seek had access to the leading edge in Vedere computer chip.
David Rind
00:07:23
There's some that could have gotten in some other way.
Matt Egan
00:07:26
'Right. That perhaps they stockpiled some chips before certain restrictions went into effect or that they were buying a lot of those chips on what has been described to me as a very active black market or perhaps a combination of the two. I talked to Art Hogan. He's a veteran market strategist, and he said, look, China is claiming that they came up with a silver bullet here, but it could be like the guy in high school who says he has a girlfriend, but she's just at a different school. So there's some skepticism here. And that's important because if what happened is that China was able to get around the restrictions by stockpiling or through the black market or both, then that suggests that perhaps the export controls that were put in place by Trump 1.0 by President Biden and are in fact right now, that perhaps they should be strengthened. And there's some analysts that I talked to who say, look, it's been a game of Whac-A-Mole and there are loopholes. There's not enough enforcement and that President Trump is likely to double down here.
David Rind
00:08:32
I was going to say, it seems like, you know, either way, this company had to get creative and had to find a way to kind of work around whatever was in place. So what does the Trump administration do from here? Because they've been, you know, touting these relationships with leaders in the field to build more data centers because they want to win this arms race. Right. So what has been Trump's reaction to all of this?
Matt Egan
00:08:58
Well, President Trump said it's been a wake up call and he said that it really puts the onus on the tech industry, on Silicon Valley to do more.
President Donald Trump
00:09:07
I really think if it's if it's fact and if it's true and nobody really knows if it is, but I view that as a positive because you'll be doing that too. So you won't be spending as much and you'll get the same result, hopefully.
Matt Egan
00:09:20
And given the fact that he has surrounded himself with some hawks on China, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, it's easy to see how deep seek and this moment that we've seen in this reaction in the market could spur the Trump administration to take a tougher look at these export controls and do more to try to restrict the flow of leading edge technology to China.
David Rind
00:09:46
Is there more to be done?
Matt Egan
00:09:48
I'm told that there is, especially on enforcement, that to some extent this has been left up to companies, to police themselves. And I could see the Trump administration taking a tough look at what's been done on enforcement, what else can be done here. And look, David, that the stakes are massive for I mean, is this technology that has potential to reshape society. And there is this arms race and we knew there was an arms race. Yeah, but deep sick suggest that the arms race is closer than we had previously realized.
David Rind
00:10:35
The fact that this is a Chinese company is interesting, right? Because I, I downloaded the app and I used it and I was asking it some questions. I asked it about Taiwan and I wanted to see what it would say. And it was giving me at first a bunch of like, I can't answer that right now. I don't have an answer to that. And eventually it said something to the tune of, you know, China recognizes the one China policy regarding Taiwan. I have to follow that because it is linked to the Chinese government. Right. So like, how much of a concern is that to American officials when you see a company like this, take these leaps and steps and it be linked to Chinese government?
Matt Egan
00:11:16
There's obviously a lot of concerns about censorship when it comes to technology. But when you add in the deep sea China element, those concerns have got to go on steroids. Because to your point, China can and is said to already be censoring some of the results here. It's easy to see how that continues. And that is a very important thing when you consider that deep sea, this newest model's only been around for a little over a week, and yet it's already topping the charts on the Apple App Store. And so a lot of people are going to be using this and they're going to be asking questions about what's going on in the world. And it's not totally clear that they're going to be getting a real factual, objective answer.
David Rind
00:12:05
From these countries that to ticktock. And the conversations are on there. And it seems like a much more blatant example of what the hawks talk about exactly are.
Matt Egan
00:12:14
Tik Tok has these national security privacy concerns, according to many people in the government, because of its links to China. And again, those concerns are magnified and much clearer when it comes to deep sea and whatever comes after deep sea.
David Rind
00:12:35
'Well, you know, so more broadly, when we talk about Silicon Valley and the whole concept of just how much investment is going to be needed to fuel the so-called A.I. revolution and whether it will actually revolutionize anything is kind of an open question at this point. I think it's fair to look at it with some skepticism. But like Mark Zuckerberg said that Metta would spend $65 billion on AI this year. Sam Altman from OpenAI. I predicted trillions trillions would be needed to fuel data centers. But if the numbers that DB Sic is putting out, you know, the 6 million or so to develop the model up to this point turns out to be true, wouldn't that basically just blow up this whole idea of we need to scale, we need to value this whole kind of business model that is undergirding Silicon Valley.
Matt Egan
00:13:24
It would force a rethink of just how much money it's going to cost to build this AI boom. But it is important to make a distinction between training in a AI model and running it so deep. Sik has talked about how it didn't cost them very much to build this model, to train it, but that's different from running it. And if you have millions of people using deep seek, that is going to take a significant amount of computing power to answer all of those queries from the people around the world. And that is also going to consume a significant amount of money. There's just a lot of uncertainty here, and I think that's what happens sometimes when you have a game changing technology. There's a wide range of possibilities and there are moments like this deep sick moment that force a reevaluation of preconceived notions.
David Rind
00:14:23
And we've seen Trump really stressing the need for less regulation on this industry to kind of prop up that growth here in the US. But there are questions as to the byproduct of that, right?
Matt Egan
00:14:35
Listen, there's always a balance between having enough safeguards in place to innovate in a responsible way and not having so many safeguards that it stifles innovation and the building of the next great technology. I think the stakes here are even bigger because artificial intelligence is getting so smart that it has raised significant safety concerns. And I think some of those safety concerns have actually been pushed out of the spotlight recently by these advancements in China. But they do still exist. And so it's going to be really important to try to get that balance right between supporting the investment and the innovation and keeping it safe and also getting that balance right over time. When you have these swings in power in Washington, it's it's not going to be easy.
David Rind
00:15:31
Yeah, there's there's not a lot of stability for an industry. It is constantly in flux. And that makes things really difficult going forward. Well, Matt, thank you for introducing me to Deep Sick. I feel like I at least have some understanding of it now.
Matt Egan
00:15:43
Thank you. Of course. Thanks for having me. I appreciate it.
David Rind
00:16:00
One thing is a production of CNN Audio. This episode was produced by Paola Ortiz and me, David Rind. Our senior producers are Felicia Patinkin and Faiz Jamil. Matt Dempsey is our production manager. Dan Dzula is our technical director and Steve Lickteig is the executive producer of CNN Audio. We get support from Haley Thomas, Alex Manasseri, Robert Mathers, John Dianora, Leni Steinhart, Jamus Andrest, Nichole Pesaru and Lisa Namerow. Special thanks to Wendy Brundage. If you're new here, make sure you follow the show so you don't miss an episode we post on Wednesdays and Sundays. And if you like what you're hearing, leave a rating and a review wherever you listen. It helps other people discover the show and hate the more the merrier. Talk you on Sunday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
15 minutes ago
- Associated Press
House GOP clears key hurdle on Trump's big bill, pushing it closer to vote
WASHINGTON (AP) — Up all night, House Republicans voted pre-dawn Thursday to advance President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, recouping after GOP leaders worked almost around the clock trying to persuade skeptical holdouts as they race to send the bill to his desk by the Fourth of July deadline. A roll call that started late Wednesday finally closed almost six hours later, a highly unusual stall on a procedural step. Trump, who had hosted lawmakers at the White House earlier, lashed out at the delay. Once the gavel struck, 219-213, the bill advanced to a last round of debates toward a final vote, which is expected later Thursday morning. 'Our way is to plow through and get it done,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said, emerging in the middle of the night from a series of closed-door meetings. 'We will meet our July 4th deadline.' The idea of quickly convening to for a vote on the more than 800-page bill after it passed the day before in the Senate was a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump's demand for a holiday finish. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by the narrowest of margins — just one vote. Their slim 220-212 majority leaves little room for defections. Several Republicans are balking at being asked to rubber-stamp the Senate version less than 24 hours after passage. A number of moderate Republicans from competitive districts have objected to the Senate bill's cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals. 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???' Trump railed in a post-midnight vote. He also warned starkly of political fallout from the delay 'COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' It fell to Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. They needed assistance from Trump to close the deal, and lawmakers headed to the White House for a two-hour session Wednesday to talk to the president about their concerns. Trump also worked the phones. 'The president's message was, 'We're on a roll,'' said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. 'He wants to see this.' Republicans are relying on their majority hold of Congress to push the package over a wall of unified Democratic opposition. No Democrats voted for bill in the Senate and none were expected to do so in the House. 'Hell no!' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, flanked by fellow Democrats outside the Capitol. In an early warning sign of Republican resistance, during a first procedural vote that also stalled out as GOP leadership waited for lawmakers who were delayed coming back to Washington and conducted closed-door negotiations with holdouts. By nightfall, as pizzas and other dinners were arriving at the Capitol, the next steps were uncertain. Trump pushes Republicans to do 'the right thing' The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks from Trump's first term, plus temporarily add new ones he promised during the 2024 campaign. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over 10 years. The bill also provides about $350 billion for defense and Trump's immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all through less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects the bill will add about $3.3 trillion to the federal debt over the coming decade. The House passed its version of the bill in May by a single vote, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now it's being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill's projected impact on the nation's debt, for example, is significantly higher. 'Lets go Republicans and everyone else,' Trump said in a late evening post. The high price of opposing Trump's bill Johnson is intent on meeting Trump's timeline and betting that hesitant Republicans won't cross the president because of the heavy political price they would have to pay. They need only look to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and criticizing him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term. One House Republican who has staked out opposition to the bill, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, is being targeted by Trump's well-funded political operation. Democrats target vulnerable Republicans to join them in opposition Flanked by nearly every member of his caucus, Democratic Leader Jeffries of New York delivered a pointed message: With all Democrats voting 'no,' they only need to flip four Republicans to prevent the bill from passing. Jeffries invoked the 'courage' of the late Sen. John McCain giving a thumbs-down to the GOP effort to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, and singled out Republicans from districts expected to be highly competitive in 2026, including two from Pennsylvania. 'Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?' Jeffries asked. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that Medicaid cuts would result in lives lost and food stamp cuts would be 'literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors,' Jeffries said Monday. Republicans say they are trying to right-size the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits. The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn't act. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired. ___ Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Matt Brown contributed.


Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Some education grants in limbo were used for ‘leftwing agenda,' Trump administration says
The Trump administration has accused states and schools of using federal education grants earmarked for immigrants' children and low-income students to help fund 'a radical leftwing agenda .' The administration this week withheld more than $6 billion intended for after-school and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more, saying it would review the grants to ensure they align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The freeze sent schools and summer camp providers scrambling to determine whether they can still provide programs like day camps this summer or after-hours child care this fall.


CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
European renewable stocks to watch as Trump's megabill hangs in the balance
Among the myriad details stuffed within U.S. President Donald Trump's bumper "big beautiful bill," European investors have been keeping an eye on one in particular — renewable energy policy. Shares of the region's wind power firms gained on Wednesday after Senate lawmarkers narrowly approved a heavily amended version of the package . The move higher continued Thursday as the U.S. House began a final debate on the megabill — after a dramatic night of voting that was nearly derailed by Republican defections. Turbine manufacturer Vestas was 3.4% higher in early trade Thursday after gaining more than 10% in the previous session. Windfarm operator Orsted and turbine maker Nordex , meanwhile, built on Wednesday's gains to both trade over 2% higher early Thursday. The bill's current revisions are a relief to a sector already grappling with funding challenges, competition from China and tariff uncertainty. Among the key amendments to the bill is the removal of a tax on wind and solar projects that use components from "foreign entities of concern" — understood to primarily mean China — which analysts said could have a chilling effect on new orders in the sector more broadly. Another major revisions relevant to European renewables firms is the removal of a controversial cliff-edge deadline that would have required all projects benefiting from tax credits to be in service by the end of 2027. Now, all projects commencing before mid-2026 will be eligible, which analysts at Citi said was likely to spur a flurry of near-term activity, as all a project must do to "start" is spend 5% of capital. U.S. clean energy shares also rose on this news this week. If the bill is voted through in its current form, the change "will lay the foundation for a solid American onshore wind turbine market in the years after 2027 — and not an 'almost complete stop' in 2028, which the previous text has a high inherent risk of. This seems like a gigantic relief for the onshore wind market in the U.S.," Sydbank analysts said. U.S. importance Tancrede Fulop, senior equity analyst and renewables expert at Morningstar, said the bill amendments, along with a resumption of construction work on Equinor's Empire Wind project off the New York coast, "suggests that the worst-case scenario for the renewables sector under the Trump administration may not materialize." The U.S. market plays a pivotal role for Europe's largest renewable developers such as RWE , EDPR and Iberdrola , according to Morningstar's Fulop. It accounts for around 50% of the installed renewable capacity of the former two, and around 40% of the latter. However, while wind developers could potentially offset any phase out of tax credits by selling power at higher prices or pressuring manufacturers to cut their prices, manufacturers such as Vestas — which has 35% of its onshore wind backlog in the U.S. — and Siemens Energy are more vulnerable, Fulop said. Pierre-Alexandre Ramondenc, equity research analyst for utilities and renewables at AlphaValue, told CNBC that the positive market reaction reflected the fact that the Senate's amendments were broadly good news for the sector. But overall, Trump's bill "largely dismantles the core mechanisms supporting clean energy" under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, he said. Rather than fully repealing provisions that have been established and generated business activity under the IRA, the new megabill puts fresh constraints on the sector. The primary blow is to the U.S.' efforts to modernize its grid infrastructure and lead in decarbonization efforts, he continued. In Europe, the market has already been revising down its expectations for U.S. renewables since Trump's election, Ramondenc noted, with the main risk now being the cancellation of projects already under construction. European utilities also have "flexibility in deploying capex across different technologies and geographies," he added. — CNBC's Erin Doherty contributed to this report.