
One Big Tax Break: The Top 5 Business Cuts In The Big Beautiful Bill
On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law what he has called the biggest tax cut in U.S. history—the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (OBBBA). The act is poised to serve as a comprehensive effort to stimulate economic growth, minimize regulatory burdens, and foster greater benefits for entrepreneurs. The Bill introduces a range of tax changes benefiting both individuals and business owners. While the legislation is broad in scope, and extends beyond tax matters, one of its key features is the slate of tax cuts targeted at American businesses, particularly those in the small and growing category. These elements are designed to reduce tax liabilities and encourage capital investment for business owners navigating a challenging
post-pandemic economy. Let's take a closer look at the top five business tax cuts in the OBBBA and what they could mean for entrepreneurs in 2025 and beyond.
Permanent Extension of the Qualified Business Income Deduction
The Act makes a major, permanent change to the tax code by securing the Section 199A pass-through deduction—commonly known as the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction—as a permanent feature of U.S. tax law. Originally introduced under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 during President Trump's first term, the QBI deduction allows eligible owners of pass-through entities—such as sole proprietorships, partnerships, S corporations, and certain trusts and estates—to deduct up to 20% of their qualified business income from taxable income. The deduction was a significant tax benefit designed to level the playing field between pass-through businesses and C corporations, which had received a substantial corporate tax rate cut under the same legislation.
Under the original TCJA, however, the QBI deduction was scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025, creating uncertainty for millions of small business owners and entrepreneurs who relied on the deduction to reduce their effective tax rate. The expiration would have effectively raised taxes on pass-through businesses, many of which are the backbone of the American economy. By making the QBI deduction permanent, the OBBBA eliminates that looming uncertainty and ensures long-term tax stability for a wide range of businesses.
In addition to making the deduction permanent, the OBBBA also raises the income thresholds at which the deduction begins to phase out. Joint filers with taxable income up to $494,600 are now eligible to claim the full deduction, an increase of more than $10,000 over previous limits. This change expands access to higher-earning business owners who were previously limited or excluded from the deduction. Notably, these expanded thresholds will be indexed to inflation beginning in 2026, helping the deduction maintain its value and reach over time.
The Act also introduces a minimum deduction safeguard for the smallest businesses. Under the new provision, businesses with at least $1,000 in qualified business income from an active trade or business are guaranteed a minimum deduction of $400, ensuring that even the smallest entrepreneurs benefit. Like the income thresholds, this minimum deduction will also be adjusted for inflation starting in 2026, providing lasting relief to microbusinesses and sole proprietors.
Together, these updates to the QBI deduction reflect the OBBBA's broader goal of supporting small businesses, reducing tax burdens, and encouraging long-term investment in the U.S. economy. By removing the expiration date and enhancing accessibility, the Act strengthens a vital tool for American business owners and brings a new level of predictability to tax planning for years to come.
Increases Research and Development Deductions
The OBBBA introduces a significant change to how businesses handle domestic research and development (R&D) expenses by permanently restoring immediate expensing. This means that companies can now deduct the full cost of their qualified R&D expenditures in the year those expenses are incurred, rather than amortizing them over several years—a requirement that had been in place since 2022 under the TCJA.
For small businesses—defined as those with average annual gross receipts of $31 million or less—the law goes a step further. These businesses are allowed to retroactively apply immediate expensing for domestic R&D costs incurred after December 31, 2021, offering a valuable opportunity to amend past returns and recover tax benefits that were previously deferred under the amortization rules.
For larger businesses, or those with gross receipts above the $31 million threshold, the legislation allows for a transition period. Domestic R&D expenses incurred between December 31, 2021, and January 1, 2025, that were previously amortized can now be accelerated and deducted over a shortened period of one or two years, depending on the company's choice or eligibility criteria. This acceleration provides meaningful near-term tax relief while phasing in the return to full expensing.
Together, these changes are aimed at incentivizing innovation, easing cash flow constraints, and reversing the chilling effect the TCJA's R&D amortization requirement had on business investment in domestic research. The provision is especially beneficial for startups and small tech-driven enterprises, which often rely on R&D investment but lack the capital to wait years for tax benefits to materialize.
Increases Business Interest Deductions
The new legislation permanently reinstates the EBITDA-based limitation on business interest deductions. EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In 2017, TCJA introduced a limit on business interest expense deductions to 30% of adjusted taxable income (ATI). Initially, from 2018 to 2021, ATI was calculated using an EBITDA-based approach. However, for tax years starting after December 31, 2021, the calculation shifted to an EBIT-based approach (earnings before interest and taxes), which excludes depreciation and amortization. This change generally resulted in stricter limitations and increased tax liability for businesses, particularly capital-intensive companies. In short, by permanently restoring the EBITDA-based limitation, the OBBBA provides many business owners with a greater ability to deduct business interest expenses. This is because the EBITDA-based ATI calculation typically yields a higher ATI amount, enabling a larger interest deduction. This will create some relief for capital-intensive businesses that invest a significant amount into long-lived assets like equipment and machinery. The previous EBIT-based limitation had a negative impact on capital-intensive businesses due to their significant depreciation and amortization expenses. The shift back to EBITDA may alleviate some of the tax burden on these companies in industries like farming and manufacturing.
Restores 100 Percent Bonus Depreciation
The OBBBA permanently restores 100% bonus depreciation for short-lived investments. Purchases of business assets, such as equipment and vehicles, are now 100% deductible in the year they are purchased and/or put into service for the business. Congress first introduced 100% bonus depreciation as part of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010. This allowed for a temporary 100% bonus depreciation rate from September 2010 through the end of 2011. More recently, the TCJA of 2017 allowed businesses to deduct 100% of the cost of eligible property placed in service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023. The TCJA required bonus depreciation began phasing out in 2023, resulting in a reduction in the percentage deductible, decreasing to 80% for 2023, 60% for 2024, and now 40% for 2025. With the BBB, the deduction will be restored to 100% for 2025 and remain at 100% permanently.
Plus, for vehicles purchased in your personal name, the law now provides a deduction for auto loan interest of up to $10,000 for purchases of new vehicles that are assembled in the United States. If the vehicle is purchased personally but used in the business, you can take advantage of the deduction for bonus depreciation and the auto loan interest deduction.
Provides 100 percent expensing of new business buildings
The Act includes a targeted incentive aimed at stimulating domestic industrial investment through a special provision for structures classified as qualified production property (QPP). These are buildings and facilities that are primarily used in the manufacturing, production, or refining of tangible personal property within the United States. The goal is to encourage companies to expand or modernize their physical infrastructure to support domestic industrial activity and strengthen U.S. supply chains.
To qualify for the 100% immediate expensing benefit, certain timing and use conditions must be met. Construction of the QPP structures must commence after January 19, 2025, and before January 1, 2029, offering a defined window during which businesses must begin their projects to be eligible. Additionally, the property must be placed in service no later than January 1, 2031, ensuring that the economic benefits are realized within a reasonable timeframe.
However, this tax benefit is not universally available to all types of property within a facility. The provision explicitly excludes parts of a structure that are used for non-production activities, such as office space, administrative functions, employee cafeterias, parking garages, and other ancillary or support areas. Only the portions of the structure that are directly involved in qualifying industrial processes—like assembly lines, fabrication areas, or refining equipment spaces—are eligible for the accelerated deduction.
This distinction is critical, as it ensures the tax benefit is narrowly tailored to incentivize core production investments rather than general corporate expansion. By doing so, the OBBBA aims to maximize the economic impact of the expensing provision, driving capital investment directly into the sectors and activities that are central to domestic manufacturing competitiveness and economic resilience.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act marks a sweeping shift in U.S. tax policy, particularly for the business community. By making key provisions permanent—like the Qualified Business Income deduction, 100% bonus depreciation, and EBITDA-based interest deductions—while expanding incentives for research, innovation, and industrial infrastructure, the Act seeks to reduce financial friction for businesses of all sizes. It delivers targeted relief to small businesses and capital-intensive industries alike, while sending a clear message: the U.S. is doubling down on domestic growth, productivity, and entrepreneurship. As business owners look ahead, these tax cuts are poised to not only lower costs but also fuel reinvestment, expansion, and innovation in an economy still reshaping itself in the post-pandemic years ahead. Whether you're a startup founder, manufacturer, or seasoned entrepreneur, the OBBBA's top five tax breaks represent new opportunities—and new responsibilities—to plan smart and grow strong.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's golf trip to Scotland reopens old wounds for some of his neighbors
BALMEDIE, Scotland − Long before talk of hush-money payments, election subversion or mishandling classified documents, before his executive orders were the subject of U.S. Supreme Court challenges, before he was the 45th and then the 47th president: on a wild and windswept stretch of beach in northeast Scotland, Donald Trump the businessman was accused of being a bad neighbor. "This place will never, ever belong to Trump," Michael Forbes, 73, a retired quarry worker and salmon fisherman, said this week as he took a break from fixing a roof on his farm near Aberdeen. The land he owns is surrounded, though disguised in places by trees and hedges, by a golf resort owned by Trump's family business in Scotland, Trump International Scotland. For nearly 20 years, Forbes and several other families who live in Balmedie have resisted what they describe as bullying efforts by Trump to buy their land. (He has denied the allegations.) They and others also say he's failed to deliver on his promises to bring thousands of jobs to the area. Those old wounds are being reopened as Trump returns to Scotland for a four-day visit beginning July 25. It's the country where his mother was born. He appears to have great affection for it. Trump is visiting his golf resorts at Turnberry, on the west coast about 50 miles from Glasgow, and at Balmedie, where Forbes' 23 acres of jumbled, tractor-strewn land, which he shares with roaming chickens and three Highland cows, abut Trump's glossy and manicured golf resort. On July 28, Trump will briefly meet in Balmedie with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to "refine" a recent U.S.-U.K. trade deal, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Golf, a little diplomacy: Trump heads to Scotland In Scotland, where estimates from the National Library of Scotland suggest that as many as 34 out of the 45 American presidents have Scottish ancestry, opinions hew toward the he's-ill-suited-for-the-job, according to surveys. "Trump? He just doesn't know how to treat people," said Forbes, who refuses to sell. What Trump's teed up in Scotland Part of the Balmedie community's grievances relate to Trump's failure to deliver on his promises. According to planning documents, public accounts and his own statements, Trump promised, beginning in 2006, to inject $1.5 billion into his golf project six miles north of Aberdeen. He has spent about $120 million. Approval for the development, he vowed, came with more than 1,000 permanent jobs and 5,000 construction gigs attached. Instead, there were 84, meaning fewer than the 100 jobs that already existed when the land he bought was a shooting range. Instead of a 450-room luxury hotel and hundreds of homes that Trump pledged to build for the broader community, there is a 19-room boutique hotel and a small clubhouse with a restaurant and shop that sells Trump-branded whisky, leather hip flasks and golf paraphernalia. Financial filings show that his course on the Menie Estate in Balmedie lost $1.9 million in 2023 − its 11th consecutive financial loss since he acquired the 1,400-acre grounds in 2006. Residents who live and work near the course say that most days, even in the height of summer, the fairway appears to be less than half full. Representatives for Trump International say the plan all along has been to gradually phase in the development at Balmedie and that it is not realistic or fair to expect everything to be built overnight. There's also support for Trump from some residents who live nearby, and in the wider Aberdeen business community. One Balmedie resident who lives in the shadow of Trump's course said that before Trump the area was nothing but featureless sand dunes and that his development, carved between those dunes, made the entire landscape look more attractive. Fergus Mutch, a policy advisor for the Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said Trump's golf resort has become a "key bit of the tourism offer" that attracts "significant spenders" to a region gripped by economic turmoil, steep job cuts and a prolonged downturn in its North Sea oil and gas industry. Trump in Scotland: Liked or loathed? Still, recent surveys show that 70% of Scots hold an unfavorable opinion of Trump. Despite his familial ties and deepening investments in Scotland, Trump is more unpopular among Scots than with the British public overall, according to an Ipsos survey from March. It shows 57% of people in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland don't view Trump positively. King Charles invites Trump: American president snags another UK state visit While in Balmedie this time, Trump will open a new 18-hole golf course on his property dedicated to his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, who was a native of Lewis, in Scotland's Western Isles. He is likely to be met with a wave of protests around the resort, as well as the one in Turnberry. The Stop Trump Coalition, a group of campaigners who oppose most of Trump's domestic and foreign policies and the way he conducts his private and business affairs, is organizing a protest in Aberdeen and outside the U.S. consulate in Edinburgh. During Trump's initial visit to Scotland as president, in his first term, thousands of protesters sought to disrupt his visit, lining key routes and booing him. One protester even flew a powered paraglider into the restricted airspace over his Turnberry resort that bore a banner that read, "Trump: well below par #resist." 'Terrific guy': The Trump-Epstein party boy friendship lasted a decade, ended badly Trump's course in Turnberry has triggered less uproar than his Balmedie one because locals say that he's invested millions of dollars to restore the glamour of its 101-year-old hotel and three golf courses after he bought the site in 2014. Trump versus the families Three families still live directly on or adjacent to Trump's Balmedie golf resort. They say that long before the world had any clue about what type of president a billionaire New York real estate mogul and reality-TV star would become, they had a pretty good idea. Forbes is one of them. He said that shortly after Trump first tried to persuade him and his late wife to sell him their farm, workers he hired deliberately sabotaged an underground water pipe that left the Forbes – and his mother, then in her 90s, lived in her own nearby house – without clean drinking water for five years. Trump International declined to provide a fresh comment on those allegations, but a spokesperson previously told USA TODAY it "vigorously refutes" them. It said that when workers unintentionally disrupted a pipe that ran into an "antiquated" makeshift "well" jointly owned by the Forbeses on Trump's land, it was repaired immediately. Trump has previously called Forbes a "disgrace" who "lives like a pig." 'I don't have a big enough flagpole' David Milne, 61, another of Trump's seething Balmedie neighbors, lives in a converted coast guard station with views overlooking Trump's course and of the dunes and the North Sea beyond. In 2009, Trump offered him and his wife about $260,000 for his house and its one-fifth acre of land, Milne said. Trump was caught on camera saying he wanted to remove it because it was "ugly." Trump, he said, "threw in some jewelry," a golf club membership (Milne doesn't play), use of a spa (not yet built) and the right to buy, at cost, a house in a related development (not yet constructed). Milne valued the offer at about half the market rate. When Milne refused that offer, he said that landscapers working for Trump partially blocked the views from his house by planting a row of trees and sent Milne a $3,500 bill for a fence they'd built around his garden. Milne refused to pay. Over the years, Milne has pushed back. He flew a Mexican flag at his house for most of 2016, after Trump vowed to build a wall on the southern American border and make Mexico pay for it. Milne, a health and safety consultant in the energy industry, has hosted scores of journalists and TV crews at his home, where he has patiently explained the pros and cons − mostly cons, in his view, notwithstanding his own personal stake in the matter − of Trump's development for the local area. Milne said that because of his public feud with Trump, he's a little worried a freelance MAGA supporter could target him or his home. He has asked police to provide protection for him and his wife at his home while Trump is in the area. He also said he won't be flying any flags this time, apart from the Saltire, Scotland's national flag. "I don't have a big enough flagpole. I would need one from Mexico, Canada, Palestine. I would need Greenland, Denmark − you name it," he said, running through some of the places toward which Trump has adopted what critics view as aggressive and adversarial policies. Dunes of great natural importance Martin Ford was the local Aberdeen government official who originally oversaw Trump's planning application to build the Balmedie resort in 2006. He was part of a planning committee that rejected it over environmental concerns because the course would be built between sand dunes that were designated what the UK calls a Site of Special Scientific Interest due to the way they shift over time. The Scottish government swiftly overturned that ruling on the grounds that Trump's investment in the area would bring a much-needed economic boost. Neil Hobday, who was the project director for Trump's course in Balmedie, last year told the BBC he was "hoodwinked" by Trump over his claim that he would spend more than a billion dollars on it. Hobday said he felt "ashamed that I fell for it and Scotland fell for it. We all fell for it." The dunes lost their special status in 2020, according to Nature Scot, the agency that oversees such designations. It concluded that their special features had been "partially destroyed" by Trump's resort. Trump International disputes that finding, saying the issue became "highly politicized." For years, Trump also fought to block the installation of a wind farm off his resort's coast. He lost that fight. The first one was built in 2018. There are now 11 turbines. Ford has since retired but stands by his belief that allowing approval for the Trump resort was a mistake. "I feel cheated out of a very important natural habitat, which we said we would protect and we haven't," he said. "Trump came here and made a lot of promises that haven't materialized. In return, he was allowed to effectively destroy a nature site of great conservation value. It's not the proper behavior of a decent person." Forbes, the former quarry worker and fisherman, said he viewed Trump in similar terms. He said that Trump "will never ever get his hands on his farm." He said that wasn't just idle talk. He said he's put his land in a trust that specified that when he dies, it can't be sold for at least 125 years.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rising Fiscal Deficits Drive Billions Into Credit
(Bloomberg) -- Investors are showing signs of pulling money out of government bonds and plowing it into US and European company debt. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy If the moves persist, money managers could be shifting what for decades has been market orthodoxy: that nothing is safer than buying US government debt. But as US fiscal deficits climb, hurt by tax cuts and rising interest costs, the government may look to borrow more, and company debt may be the safer option. In June, money managers pulled $3.9 billion from Treasuries, while adding $10 billion to European and US investment-grade corporate debt, according to EPFR Global data. In July, investors have added another $13 billion to US high-grade corporates, the largest net client purchasing in data going back to 2015, according to a separate note from strategists at Barclays on Friday. Michaël Nizard, a portfolio manager at Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management, started making the switch from government into corporate debt at the end of last year and is holding on to the position. And in a note in the latest week, BlackRock Inc. strategists wrote, 'Credit has become a clear choice for quality.' To the extent this shift is happening, it's a slow change. The US doesn't have foreign currency debt, and can print more dollars as it needs to. When money managers were alarmed about tariff wars in April, US Treasuries still performed better than corporate bonds, even if prices for both sectors broadly fell. And foreign demand for Treasuries has remained resilient, with holdings climbing in May. But tightening corporate bond spreads in recent months may be a function of government debt looking relatively weaker now. The US government lost its last triple A grade in May, when Moody's Ratings cut it to Aa1. The bond rater pointed to factors including the widening deficit and the rising burden of interest, noting that payments will likely absorb around 30% of revenue by 2035, compared with 18% in 2024 and 9% in 2021. And US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut bill could add about $3.4 trillion to US deficits over the next decade, according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. At the same time, corporate profits remain relatively strong, and although there are some early reasons for caution, high-grade companies are generally generating enough earnings to easily pay their interest now. More US companies are topping earnings estimates this reporting season than the same period last year. Valuations for company debt have been high recently, reflecting investor demand for the debt. High-grade US corporate spreads have averaged below 0.8 percentage point, or 80 basis points, in July through Thursday. That's far below the mean for the decade of about 120 basis points, according to Bloomberg index data. Spreads for euro-denominated high-grade corporates have averaged about 85 basis points in July, compared with about 123 basis points for the decade. To some money managers, high valuations for corporate credit are cause to be wary. Gershon Distenfeld, a fund manager at AllianceBernstein Holding LP, pared back a position that favored credit risk to rates risk earlier this month. Dominique Braeuninger, a multi-asset fund manager at Schroders Investment Management Ltd., agrees that corporate bond spreads are too tight to make them attractive. And even if BlackRock is generally positive on corporate debt, it is underweight long-term high-grade notes because spreads are tight, while being overweight short-term credit. But to many market observers, the world appears to be shifting, and it makes sense to hold more corporate debt now. 'What we've seen on the government fiscal side is not great news,' said Jason Simpson, a senior fixed income SPDR ETF strategist at State Street Investment Management. 'Corporates seem to be chugging along nicely.' Week In Review The US leveraged loan market saw more than $83 billion of launches in the latest week, the second busiest on record, including a $7.57 billion two-part deal from Medline that is set to be the market's biggest pricing since 2015. Repricings were an important driver of volume, representing about two thirds of the tranches, as companies look to cut borrowing costs. Many of the loans that were repriced had already been repriced before The return of billion-dollar M&A deals was supposed to be a boon for Wall Street's leveraged finance desks. It's turning out to be anything but, as private equity cuts them out of many of the most coveted deals. Lenders are demanding higher pricing from two European leveraged-loan borrowers, a rare sign of difficulty these days in the buoyant market for sub-investment grade debt. Chinese developer Country Garden Holdings Co. has agreed to some key restructuring terms a group of bank creditors had demanded, potentially easing the path for an overall debt deal. PepsiCo Inc. sold $4.7 billion of bonds in a pair of offerings that included the longest-dated euro-denominated corporate new issue since February. FedEx Corp. followed Pepsi with a rare two-part euro debt sale as some of its existing notes in the single currency near maturity. Meanwhile, General Electric Co. sold $2 billion of investment-grade bonds, as did Lockheed Martin Corp. Saks Global Enterprises launched a debt exchange after weeks of negotiations with creditors as its $600 million fresh financing takes shape. Separately, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. launched a multi-currency debt tender. Banks led by UBS Group and Citigroup have offloaded about $2 billion of debt to support Patient Square Capital's acquisition of Patterson Cos., reviving a deal more than three months after the bonds and loans got stuck on their books due to tariff turmoil in the market. Patterson received about $1 billion of orders for the $500 million junk-bond part of the sale. Dog walking service Wag! Group Co. won court permission to try to slash debt and hand control to senior creditor Retriever LLC as early as next month. On the Move Carlyle Group Inc. recruited Alex Chi, who was most recently co-head of Americas private credit at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s asset management arm, to lead its direct lending business. Chi will join Carlyle in early 2026. BMO Capital Markets hired Nii Dodoo as head of private credit financing. Dodoo joins from BTIG, where he was a managing director. Christina Chan, BNP Paribas' regional head of loan sales and head of corporate loan syndicate, Asia Pacific, has left the bank. Toronto-Dominion Bank's US credit trading unit has re-hired Sarah Classen from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. for its voice-trading business. Classen starts in mid-September as a director in TD Securities' global US dollar fixed income trading team, based in New York. Ares Management Corp. hired Sarah Cole as a partner and co-head of Ares Global Capital Solutions to bolster its partnerships with banks, insurance companies and across capital markets broadly. Hedge fund Squarepoint Capital LLP recruited Nathan Fabius, a former strategist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., to cover Latin American debt. Fabius joined Squarepoint this month and is based in New York. Jefferies Financial Group Inc. plans to double the number of people on its credit secondaries team by the end of 2025, as demand has surged from investors who want to buy and sell existing exposure amid a dearth of fresh deals. Ardagh Group SA creditors are set to pay billionaire owner Paul Coulson as much as $300 million as part of a deal to hand over the keys to the company. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
42 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
North Bay Nissan dealership closes amid automaker's financial struggles
As its parent company struggles financially, a North Bay Nissan dealership has permanently closed. A note by the Petaluma dealership's employees on their website Friday afternoon announced the closure, which follows several others in the Bay Area in recent years. 'As of 3 pm on July 25th, we have officially concluded our operations as North Bay Nissan,' the statement said. 'It has been a true honor serving the Petaluma and North Bay communities and we are deeply grateful for your loyalty over the years.' More details were not immediately available Saturday morning. The closure comes as North Bay Nissan's parent company, Nissan Motor Co., has weathered significant losses in recent years, leading to factory closures and thousands of job cuts. The company entered the American market in the late 1950s and by the 1970s as one of the world's largest exporters of automobiles. But the automotive giant ran into serious trouble over the past decade after its former CEO was jailed for underreporting his income to Japanese financial authorities and scandal engulfed the company. Over the past five years, the company has laid off thousands of employees, cut production and closed factories. Last November, Nissan announced a plan to cut thousands more employees, and one executive reportedly warned that without a major turnaround, the company would cease to exist in '12 to 14 months.' Nissan's troubles only grew this year, when the carmaker posted its worst financial results in 25 years and after President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs on imported vehicles, which make up a significant portion of the company's U.S. sales. Several other Nissan dealerships have also closed in recent years, including showrooms in Burlingame, Fresno and Antioch.