logo
Canada cancelled its digital services tax. What was it and why did the U.S. hate it?

Canada cancelled its digital services tax. What was it and why did the U.S. hate it?

OTTAWA – Tech giants such as Amazon and Google will not have to shell out close to $2 billion as expected today, as Canada moved to cancel the controversial digital services tax on Sunday, just one day before the first payment was due.
The announcement from Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne came late Sunday evening, following a phone call between Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump.
That call concluded a flurry of discussion between the two countries since Trump suddenly announced on Friday afternoon that he was ending all trade talks with Canada and threatened new tariffs.
But the standoff had really been building for years.
Here's a brief look at what the tax was about and why Trump made such a drastic move to try and kill it.
What is the digital services tax?
The tax was announced in 2020, but the legislation to enact it didn't pass until last year. While it has been in effect for a year, the first payment, retroactive to 2022, was to be submitted on June 30.
The government intended it to overcome what Canada saw as a tax loophole, with big tech companies operating in Canada digitally, making money off Canadian users and data, but not paying tax on it in Canada.
The tax was to apply to companies that operate online marketplaces, online advertising services and social media platforms, and those that earn revenue from some sales of user data.
It meant companies such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb, would pay a three-per-cent levy on revenue from Canadian users.
The tax was only to cover large companies, those that have worldwide annual revenues greater than 750 million euros per year and Canadian digital services revenue greater than $20 million per year. The parliamentary budget officer had estimated it would bring in $7.2 billion over five years.
Because the first payment was retroactive to cover three years, the expectation was the companies collectively could be on the hook for an initial payment of around US$2 billion.
Why did Canada impose it?
Work has been underway for years at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development to set up a multilateral tax approach meant to replace digital service taxes imposed by individual countries.
But after that work stalled, Canada went ahead with its own tax. Other countries, including France and the United Kingdom, also have digital taxes.
The Liberals had long maintained Canada would go ahead on its own if the OECD deal fell through. In a 2024 release, the government said while 'Canada's priority and preference has always been a multilateral agreement,' many of Canada's allies have digital services taxes in place.
'Canada has been at a disadvantage relative to these countries which have continued collecting revenue under their pre-existing digital services taxes,' it said.
Why do some oppose it?
Critics of the tax took issue with Canada's refusal to wait for a global deal. They also opposed the retroactive application of the tax, which means companies will have to pay several years' worth of taxes at once.
U.S. businesses and politicians argued the tax targets U.S. companies. The tax applied to all large tech companies no matter where they were based, but because so many of those companies are American, U.S. firms would have paid the bulk of the money.
In a letter earlier this month, 21 members of Congress said U.S. companies will pay 90 per cent of the revenue Canada will collect from the tax, and that first payment will cost U.S. companies US$2 billion.
That opposition isn't new. The Biden administration also pushed back against the tax, and the stance isn't isolated to Canada, with the U.S. also opposing digital service taxes imposed by other countries.
Before the tax was rescinded on Sunday, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Canada said its 'members have been warning for years that this tax would become a flashpoint in the Canada-U.S. relationship. That moment has arrived.'
The tax is 'retroactive, one-sided, and deeply damaging to cross-border trade,' Rick Tachuk said in an emailed statement, which encouraged Canada to cancel its tax.
Michael Geist, Canada research chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa, wrote in a blog post Saturday the current conflict shouldn't come as a surprise.
'Canada pushed ahead despite efforts at an international agreement on the issue and later dismissed the increasing friction over the issue with the U.S., which has been signalling its opposition to the DST for many years,' he said.
Geist said once Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne confirmed on June 19 Canada would be going ahead with the tax, the government 'virtually guaranteed the U.S. would respond as it did.'
Where does Trump come in?
While opposition to the tax has been brewing south of the border for years, Trump escalated it abruptly Friday afternoon with an online post.
He wrote he was 'terminating all discussions on trade with Canada' because of the tax and called it a 'direct and blatant attack on our country.' He also complained about Canada's dairy-sector protections that include high tariffs on imports of American milk and cheese.
Canada and the U.S. have been in a trade war for months, triggered by Trump's imposition of tariffs. At the G7 summit in Alberta earlier this month, Carney and Trump agreed to work on reaching a deal by mid-July — work that Trump said was halted Friday.
Friday afternoon, shortly after Trump's post went live, Carney told reporters he hadn't spoken to Trump that day but that 'we'll continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians.'
So what happened on Sunday?
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
A flurry of activity followed Trump's post on Friday, culminating Sunday night in the call between Trump and Carney.
The decision opened the door for trade talks to restart, and Carney said in a statement, the overall results of those talks were paramount.
'In our negotiations on a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the United States, Canada's new government will always be guided by the overall contribution of any possible agreement to the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses,' he said.
'Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump Has Made Some Big Social Security Changes, but So Far He Hasn't Touched This Key Issue
President Trump Has Made Some Big Social Security Changes, but So Far He Hasn't Touched This Key Issue

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

President Trump Has Made Some Big Social Security Changes, but So Far He Hasn't Touched This Key Issue

If you rely heavily on your Social Security benefits, chances are you've been kept up a night or two wondering whether they'd go far enough. So when President Donald Trump came along promising to make major changes to the program, including ending Social Security benefit taxes for seniors and reducing fraud, you probably felt either hopeful or even more uneasy. The president did make several key changes to the program this year, but his main agenda item -- ending benefit taxes -- has yet to come to fruition. And there's an even bigger Social Security issue that President Trump has remained virtually silent on, to everyone's detriment. Social Security is headed for a crisis While President Trump hoped to alleviate short-term pain for seniors by eliminating Social Security benefit taxes, doing so would exacerbate a much bigger issue that's already uncomfortably close to becoming reality. Social Security has been spending more than it's earning since 2021, and it's only thanks to the extra money in its trust funds that it's been able to keep up with scheduled benefits so far. That can't last forever. The latest Social Security Trustees Report estimates the trust funds will be depleted in 2034. That's a year earlier than what last year's report predicted. That doesn't mean Social Security would disappear, though. It would still take in money from Social Security payroll taxes that workers pay as well as Social Security benefit taxes for as long as those remain on the books. But together, that would only be enough to cover about 81% of scheduled benefits in 2035 and beyond. Social Security reform is the only way to avoid major benefit cuts. This has happened before when the program last faced insolvency in the 1980s. And it's likely to happen again in the next few years -- the sooner, the better. What Social Security reform could look like There are three ways to resolve this funding crisis: increase revenue for the program, cut benefits, or do both. Increasing revenue usually means increasing taxes. This could include across-the-board increases or more targeted increases, like raising the ceiling on income subject to the Social Security tax (currently $176,100 in 2025), that would mostly affect the wealthy. We don't know yet what Congress will choose. What we do know is that the longer the government waits to address this issue, the more significant the changes will have to be. The Trustees Report says that if Washington acted immediately to make Social Security fully solvent, it would have to do one of the following: Increase revenue by an amount equal to a permanent payroll tax increase of 3.65%, bringing it to 16.05% as of January 2025 Reduce all current and future benefits immediately and permanently by 22.4% as of January 2025 (or by 26.8% if cuts were only applied to those who applied in 2025 and later) Some combination of the above That's already not a great position to be in, but it gets even worse if we wait. Taking action after the trust funds are depleted would require one of the following steps to keep the program solvent: Increasing revenue by an amount equal to a permanent payroll tax increase of 4.27%, bringing it to 16.67% in 2034 Reduce all scheduled benefits permanently by 25.8% starting in 2034 Some combination of the above What happens next? We don't have any good options, which is part of the reason why President Trump and Congress aren't eager to tackle this issue. No one wants to be the one to make a decision that's guaranteed to hit millions of Americans directly in the pocketbook. But there isn't a way around it. There are ways to mitigate the toll it will take on ordinary Americans, like forcing wealthier Americans to pay more into the program. This could reduce the benefit cut or Social Security payroll tax increase, but it wouldn't be enough to sustain the program on its own. For now, there isn't much we can do other than to make our feelings known to our Congressional representatives, who will ultimately decide what the reforms look like. We're only eight years away from insolvency, so we can't kick the problem down the road much further. Expect to see this issue start to gain more attention in the next few years. And when Washington does make a decision, it'll be time for workers and retirees alike to review their retirement plans and make some changes. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.

Silver Viper Upsizes Private Placement to $3.6M
Silver Viper Upsizes Private Placement to $3.6M

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

Silver Viper Upsizes Private Placement to $3.6M

VANCOUVER, BC, June 30, 2025 /CNW/ - Silver Viper Minerals Corp. (the " Company" or " Silver Viper") (TSXV: VIPR) (OTC: VIPRF) is pleased to announce that, due to strong demand from prospective subscribers, the Company has upsized its previously announced non-brokered private placement (the " Offering") to up to 12,000,000 units of the Company (" Units") at a price of $0.30 per Unit to raise aggregate gross proceeds of up to approximately $3,600,000. The other terms of the Offering, initially announced on June 18, 2025, by the Company, remain unchanged. The Offering is anticipated to close in a series of tranches, with the first tranche on or about July 10, 2025. The closing of the Offering is subject to certain conditions, including the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange and certain other conditions customary for a private placement of this nature. The securities described herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the " U.S. Securities Act"), or any state securities laws, and accordingly, may not be offered or sold within the United States except in compliance with the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities requirements or pursuant to exemptions therefrom. This press release is not an offer or a solicitation of an offer of securities for sale in the United States, nor will there be any sale of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. About the Company Silver Viper Minerals Corp. is a Canadian-based junior mineral exploration company focused on precious metals exploration in Mexico. The Company is the operator and 100% owner of the La Virginia Gold-Silver Project in Sonora. The Company continues to evaluate and advance mineral exploration opportunities across key mining jurisdictions in Mexico and in May 2025 entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Cimarron Project in Sinaloa, Mexico. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Steve Cope President and CEO Follow us on social media: X: @SilverViperCorp LinkedIn: Silver Viper Minerals Corp. Facebook: Silver Viper Minerals YouTube: @SilverViperMinerals Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Forward Looking Information This news release may contain forward-looking statements, including statements with respect to the terms of the Offering, the receipt of regulatory approvals for the Offering, closing of the Offering and use of proceeds of the Offering. These statements reflect management's current estimates, beliefs, intentions and expectations; they are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions and therefore involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Such factors include, among other things: risks and uncertainties relating to exploration and development, the ability of the Company to obtain additional financing, the need to comply with environmental and governmental regulations, fluctuations in the prices of commodities, operating hazards and risks, competition and other risks and uncertainties, including those described in the Company's financial statements, management discussion and analysis and/or annual information form available on The risk factors identified in such documents are not intended to represent a complete list of factors that could affect the Company. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements and the Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements, except as required by law. SOURCE Silver Viper Minerals Corp.

G7 urges talks to resume for deal on Iran nuclear program
G7 urges talks to resume for deal on Iran nuclear program

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

G7 urges talks to resume for deal on Iran nuclear program

WASHINGTON/OTTAWA, June 30 (Reuters) - Foreign ministers from the Group of Seven nations said on Monday they supported the ceasefire between Israel and Iran and urged for negotiations to resume for a deal to address Iran's nuclear program, according to a joint statement. Since April, Iran and the U.S. have held talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear program. Tehran says its program is peaceful and Israel and its allies say they want to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. 'We call for the resumption of negotiations, resulting in a comprehensive, verifiable and durable agreement that addresses Iran's nuclear program,' the G7 foreign ministers said. Last week, Trump announced a ceasefire between U.S. ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. Before the ceasefire was announced, Washington struck Iran's nuclear sites and Iran targeted a U.S. base in Qatar in retaliation. The G7 foreign ministers said they urged 'all parties to avoid actions that could further destabilize the region.' U.S. Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff has said talks between Washington and Tehran were 'promising' and that Washington was hopeful for a long-term peace deal. The G7 top diplomats denounced threats against the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Monday, after a hardline Iranian newspaper said IAEA boss Rafael Grossi should be tried and executed as an Israeli agent. On June 12, the U.N. nuclear watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, says it has 'no credible indication' of an active, coordinated weapons program in Iran. Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington and Ismail Shakil in Ottawa; Editing by Chris Reese and Lincoln Feast.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store