logo
Will notify Southern Ridge for full protection without ground verification: Delhi govt tells NGT

Will notify Southern Ridge for full protection without ground verification: Delhi govt tells NGT

Hindustan Times2 days ago
The Delhi government will now issue a final notification granting complete protection to the Southern Ridge without conducting the previously planned ground verification, the state forest and wildlife department has informed in an affidavit to the National Green Tribunal. Delhi's Ridge areas have already been notified under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act. However, the final notification under Section 20 is yet to be completed, which grants complete protection and defines the boundaries. (HT FILE)
The change in stance comes a week after the department had said that it will carry out the verification across 12 south Delhi villages in the next six months.
The timeline for the notification will be shared with NGT, the department added in the affidavit dated July 31.
The issue has been a long-pending one. During a hearing on July 25, the amicus curiae in the case argued that it has been four years since the NGT sought notification of the southern Ridge. On a plea filed by activist Sonya Ghosh, the NGT, in January 2021 directed the Delhi government to ensure that the notification under Section 20 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927is issued within three months. Ghosh in 2024 filed an executive application, seeking compliance with the 2021 order.
Delhi's Ridge areas have already been notified under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act. However, the final notification under Section 20 is yet to be completed, which grants complete protection and defines the boundaries.
On July 23, the forest department had said it plans to carry out on-ground verification of 3,287 hectares of land across 12 villages in south Delhi by January next year before the issuance of the final notification.
On Thursday, a bench headed by NGT chairperson took on-record the changed stance of the forest department during a hearing.
'Learned Counsel appearing for Delhi government and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) has now submitted that a decision has been taken that no ground verification will be done for issuing the final notification under Section 20 in respect of Phase-1,' the bench said, stating the Delhi government had sought time to submit a fresh timeline for issuing the final notification. The matter will now be heard on August 7.
Delhi has four prominent Ridge areas, with the total area under the Ridge as reserved forests totalling around 7,784 hectares. The largest – the southern Ridge is spread over an area of 6,200 hectares.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Centre didn't comply with NGT order on Great Nicobar project: Plea
Centre didn't comply with NGT order on Great Nicobar project: Plea

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Centre didn't comply with NGT order on Great Nicobar project: Plea

The Union government has not complied with the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) April 3, 2023 order on revisiting the deficiencies in the environmental clearance granted to the Great Nicobar Holistic Development project, a petitioner challenging the green nod to the key project has claimed before NGT. The petitioner prayed that ecologically sensitive areas be excluded from project areas. (AFP) In a 39-page detailed submission made on July 24 by petitioner-environmentalist Ashish Kothari said the objective of this application is to seek the enforcement and implementation of the law. The petitioner highlighted that the three terms of reference for the NGT-appointed high-powered committee (HPC) were not met — specifically related to coral transplantation, environmental baseline data collection and review coastal regulation zone (CRZ) boundaries of the proposed port project. On April 3, 2023, NGT directed that clearance dated November 11, 2022 be revisited in the light of 'some unanswered deficiencies' pointed out by the appellants which need to be addressed. 'By way of instance, it is pointed out that out of 20,668 coral colonies, 16,150 are proposed to be translocated without any mention of threat to the remaining 4,518 coral colonies. It is pointed out that ICRZ Regulations prohibit destruction of corals. Further, data collected for impact assessment is only of one season as against requirement of three seasons. It is also shown that part of the project is in the CRZ IA area where Port is prohibited,' the NGT had said. HT had reported on April 7, 2023 that NGT had constituted a high-powered committee, headed by Union environment ministry secretary, to revisit the environmental clearance (EC) granted by the ministry to the Great Nicobar township and area development project. Experts, however, have questioned how a subordinate authority headed by the environment secretary revisit the green nod granted by its own ministry? In the submission to NGT, the petitioner has pointed out that several clauses of the Island Coastal Regulation Zone (ICRZ) Notification, 2019 and its annexure prohibit the destruction of corals. Annexure I to the notification prohibits destruction of corals, coral reefs and surrounding areas and allows coral transplantation activities only when necessary for regeneration after obtaining permission under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Activities like dredging and discharge of ballast water are also prohibited in and around coral reefs. 'Even according to the MoEFCC, the HPC has only looked at the Zoological Survey of India's (ZSI) proposal to translocate coral colonies, and has agreed with the recommendation of ZSI. The mandate of the law, the fact that coral reefs are protected and that their translocation is not permitted by law etc. have not even been considered by the HPC,' the submission said. Importantly, the petitioner has pointed out that fringing coral reefs around the island have been marked clearly in the draft ICRZ coastal land use plans prepared under the 2019 notification but they are not there in the approved land use plans. 'Even according to the MoEFCC, the ZSI's report itself states that 16,150 coral colonies need to be translocated due to the port project. The ICRZ Notification, 2019 does not permit such transplantation to facilitate or clear the area for a port. Coral reefs and their associated biodiversity are extremely sensitive and cannot be moved around to suit the convenience of project proponents,' the submission added. It further claimed that the second aspect of TOR was also not met. 'The MoEFCC and the HPC have failed to see that the requirement of comprehensive EIA, i.e, an EIA based on three season data collection, is mandated under the ICRZ Notification, 2019 and the EIA guidance manual itself requires data collection of more than one season...' it said, adding that the survey of ecology and biology was conducted between December 14 and 22, 2020, and the survey of leatherbacks was conducted between February 12 and 18, 2021 and hence the season was not covered. The third ToR was to 'Review the boundaries of the port project with respect to ICRZ Notification, 2019.' The tribunal in its April 2023 verdict has observed that 'it is also shown that part of the project is in the CRZ IA area where Port is prohibited.' The 2019 notification lists mangroves, corals and coral reefs, biologically active mud flats, turtle nesting grounds, nesting grounds of birds as CRZ IA — ecologically sensitive areas. 'It is submitted that coral reefs, turtle nesting sites, megapode (bird) nesting grounds, mangroves, etc. do not and cannot magically disappear to suit the convenience of the project proponent. It is shocking that the HPC has relied only on a report of the NCSCM, the consultant of the project proponent, to come to the conclusion that no part of the project area falls under CRZ IA,' the submission said. The petitioner also prayed that ecologically sensitive areas be excluded from project areas. 'Unless this tribunal directs the exclusion of admitted CRZ IA areas such as coral reefs along the coast, turtle nesting grounds, megapode nesting grounds, biologically active mudflats etc. from the project area, they will be converted and destroyed,' it said. The matter was heard by NGT's eastern bench on July 24. People aware of the matter said additional solicitor general (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati submitted that the ministry did not violate any law and was aware of the sensitive nature of the island's environment and has ensured that sustainable development is achieved while keeping in mind the strategic requirements to ensure national security. The hearing was adjourned and the tribunal directed the MoEFCC to produce the revised layout which excludes all the CRZ-1A areas from the port, according to lawyers. The matter will be heard again on August 6. ASG Bhati did not respond to HT's request for a comment on whether the ministry will be making a submission on other concerns raised in the application. The Great Nicobar Holistic Development Project has four major components: an international container transshipment terminal (ICCT); an international airport; a power plant; and a township. The total cost is estimated at ₹81,800 crore. The Nicobar Islands fall in the Sundaland Biodiversity Hotspot and cover the western half of the Indonesian archipelago. Union environment minister Bhupender Yadav in August last year said that 'exemplary mitigation measures' have been incorporated to minimise the environmental impact of the project, 'keeping the strategic, national and defence interests' in mind. .

Barmer MP raises Balotra pollution issue in Lok Sabha
Barmer MP raises Balotra pollution issue in Lok Sabha

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Barmer MP raises Balotra pollution issue in Lok Sabha

1 2 Jaisalmer: In a Zero Hour reference to rising pollution in Balotra, Lok Sabha MP from Barmer, Ummedaram Beniwal, accused the state govt of negligence, corruption and administrative failure in addressing the environmental crisis. Beniwal said illegal factories in Balotra, Pali, and Jodhpur districts have blatantly violated environmental regulations, while toxic chemical water from these factories flooded fields, reservoirs, schools, homes, and even cremation grounds, submerging villages under two to three feet of polluted water. The contamination, Beniwal alleged, rendered agricultural land barren, destroyed vegetation, killed livestock and wildlife, and disrupted daily life for thousands of villagers, he said. Beniwal added that govt-run common effluent treatment plants (CEPT) and effluent treatment plants (ETP) exist only on paper and that these facilities have been non-functional for years, despite govt claims of their operation. He accused the Rajasthan Pollution Control Board and state authorities of ignoring repeated orders from the high court and the National Green Tribunal (NGT), and alleged that central govt investigation teams collude with corrupt officials and industrialists to produce misleading reports while pollution continues unchecked. Beniwal warned that without immediate and strict action, the pollution crisis could escalate into a severe public health disaster. He urged both central and state govts to prioritise the issue and take decisive steps to prevent further tragedy. The crisis has had direct impact on local communities. In Doli village, the govt high school was closed for 15 days due to chemical water flooding, raising concerns about building safety. After a villager's death on July 24, the cremation could not be performed because the cremation ground was waterlogged, leading villagers to block a highway in protest. In response, the administration ordered villagers to vacate their homes, shifting responsibility onto the affected residents. The situation is worsening in surrounding areas such as Araba, Melba, Dhawa, and Rajeshwar Nagar, where toxic water has accumulated in fields, public buildings, and homes. Beniwal warned that chemical waste from factories in Jodhpur, Pali, and Balotra is also polluting the historic Maruganga Luni River and its tributaries, endangering water sources and the region's biodiversity. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

NGT fines HP officials for not disclosing action against polluting sewage treatment plants
NGT fines HP officials for not disclosing action against polluting sewage treatment plants

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

NGT fines HP officials for not disclosing action against polluting sewage treatment plants

Kullu: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 each on Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board (HPSPCB) state chief secretary and member secretary for not disclosing any action taken against sewage treatment plants (STPs) that are polluting rivers. In a recent order, NGT chairperson Prakash Shrivastava directed the chief secretary to file a report within a week and asked the HPSPCB member secretary to inform it when the report was submitted. During the previous hearing in March, the tribunal observed that many STPs in the catchment area of Sukhna Khad and Ashwani Khad were not complying with environmental norms, and hence environmental compensation should be imposed against them. The tribunal also ordered the HPSPCB to submit a fresh report disclosing details on the environmental compensation imposed against the project proponents running the STPs, which are not complying with environmental norms. During the same hearing, the tribunal observed that the chief secretary, in his report, did not disclose STP-wise details regarding installed capacity and capacity utilisation. In May last year, NGT directed the chief secretary to file a report on STPs in the catchment area of nine rivulets, which are getting polluted due to the discharge of industrial effluents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain! Techno Mag Learn More Undo The tribunal also ordered the chief secretary to disclose in the report the results of the analysis of samples collected from these STPs. Acting suo moto, the tribunal had in Jan last year asked the state chief secretary to file a report on pollution levels in nine rivulets — Ashwani Khad, Giri, Markanda, Pabbar, Ratta, Shikari Khad, Baald, Sarsa, and Sukhna Khad. The tribunal also asked the chief secretary to file his response on the govt's action plan to clean these rivulets. The tribunal observed that the water quality assessed by the Central Pollution Control Board at 137 locations across 37 rivers and rivulets in the state revealed disturbing trends due to the unregulated disposal of industrial effluents and untreated sewage. NGT also noted that biological oxygen demand (BOD) level in the nine rivulets exceeded prescribed pollution standards, posing a threat to public health, agriculture, and biodiversity. As per a report submitted to the tribunal by CPCB, there are 15 STPs installed in catchment areas of six of the nine rivers. There are no STPs in the catchments of Shikari Khad in Rohru and Giri river and Markanda Khad in Sirmaur. The report revealed that most of these STPs are operating without consent to operate (CTO) and violating environmental norms. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store