First phase of £30m Plymouth's Armada Way revamp project to open
'Very positive'
Zone 1, from North Cross to Mayflower Street, which started last October, is almost finished and includes 10 extra trees lining each side of the performance space.All three zones, along the boulevard which leads to the Hoe, are expected to be complete by June next year.Lowry said: "We do get caught up in trees for obvious reasons with this project and we wish it didn't start where it did. But we are moving on at pace, there is a very professional team up there now, and they have learnt from the hardship of doing Old Town Street and New George Street."The council's regeneration and placemaking manager, Martin Ivatt, said there was a "total change" in how people responded to the scheme since the other streets had been finished."It's gone from more adversarial to very friendly and very positive," he said.
The new trees on Armada Way include 30 to 40-year-old magnolias, field maple, ginkgo and elm, which are resistant to Dutch elm disease; and Persian ironwoods, which change colour in autumn and have coloured bark.There is 1,000 sq m of wildflower turf in the first zone and 15,000 herbaceous perennials will be in place once it is complete.Paving will be granite and an ornamental rill will water the trees at night, and planned 'rain gardens' are part of a drainage system to stop flooding.Temporary bridges are to connect walkways with shops to stop interruption to them while work goes on underground.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
25 minutes ago
- Times
MPs condemn water regulators — as utility chief gets double pay boost
MPs have accused Ofwat and the Environment Agency of being 'missing in action' while water bills rise, as the boss of Southern Water saw his pay package almost double to £1.4 million. In a highly critical report on water regulation, the public accounts committee said the sector was 'failing', in a 'farcical state' and being 'left to flounder' by the government. At the same time, environmental campaigners representing millions of people called on ministers to 'end the sewage scandal' by systemically transforming the industry. The interventions come just three days before the recommendations of a government-ordered independent review of water regulation, billed as the biggest shake-up since privatisation in 1989. The committee said that with water bills rising at their fastest rate in real terms since 2005 and customer trust in water firms at its lowest since 2011, a 'complete overhaul' of the sector was needed. Water bills are expected to rise by an average of £31 per household each year until 2030, with the true figure even higher after inflation. 'The monumental scale of work required to reverse the fortunes of failing water companies is rivalled only in difficulty by the efforts needed to repair customers' faith in the sector,' said Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the committee and Conservative MP for North Cotswolds. The environmental performance of water companies is 'woeful', the MPs said. They noted that the Environment Agency found breaches in more than a quarter of 4,600 inspections at sewage treatment works last year, including 92 serious ones. Sewage spills into rivers and seas last year rose to a record duration of 3.61 million hours — equivalent to more than 400 years. The committee said companies were not doing enough to explain to bill payers what £104 billion of investment over the next five years will achieve. It said Ofwat must issue guidance, before the end of the year, to make firms outline what improvements the price rises are paying for. • Wild swimmers' health should be 'legal objective' for water companies The MPs said Ofwat had also failed to ensure the financial resilience of water companies, allowing them to build up too much debt and pay out too much in dividends. Ten companies did not earn enough income in the 2023-24 financial year to cover their debt interest payments. Thames Water, which is struggling under £16.8 billion of debt, this week warned it would collapse into emergency nationalisation if the government did not waive billions of pounds of fines. Southern Water, which is also facing financial challenges, awarded its chief executive, Lawrence Gosden, £691,200 under a two-year incentive plan and £687,100 in fixed pay for the utility's last financial year. Gosden was among leaders at six water firms that recently had their bonuses banned by government for poor performance. His would have been worth £396,475, company filings this week revealed. Helena Dollimore, the Labour MP for Hastings and Rye, said: 'There is no justification for Southern Water hiking up their CEO's pay cheque after the Labour government banned his bonus.' However, Southern Water said that the award to Gosden was not a bonus but from a 'long-term incentive plan' set up in 2023. It was also for before the period covered by the government ban. The company was rescued from financial collapse and a potential temporary renationalisation during the pandemic. This month Macquarie, the Australian investor, and co-investors agreed to inject up to a further £1.2 billion to help Southern Water through its present five-year spending cycle. The public accounts committee found that the Environment Agency and Ofwat had made water firms pay out £430 million in penalties for wrongdoing over the last five years. However, the agency reported it was facing a 'justice gap' where some cases were not pursued because there were so many suspected violations and prosecution was too expensive. The MPs also found a water restoration fund created last year, designed to spend water company fines to pay for improvements of waterways, had still not distributed its £11 million pot. They said it should be disbursed by the end of the year. Separately, charities including Surfers Against Sewage, Greenpeace and River Action have written to Steve Reed, the environment secretary, asking him to put 'environmental good' before 'private profit'. 'Coastal economies and communities are being hammered. Rivers declared ecologically dead. Pollution poisoning our wildlife. Thousands of people are falling ill after swimming in raw sewage,' they said in an open letter. • The Times view: A new water regulator is needed 'Yet water bills will keep rising — to service debt, to fund dividends — and so it is the public who will continue to pay the price,' said the green groups, which also includes Wildlife and Countryside Link, an alliance including the National Trust and RSPB. The signatories said that together they represent 8.9 million British people. The Times's Clean it Up campaign has been calling for stronger regulation to help Britain's rivers and seas. An Ofwat spokesman said: 'We are clear that change is needed, and the independent water commission is a key opportunity to help rebuild public trust.' A Water UK spokesman said: 'We agree that fundamental change to regulation is needed.' The government and the Environment Agency were contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Risk of 'voter fraud' over Labour plans to allow bank cards as identity at polling stations - as party to let 16-year-olds vote
The elections watchdog warned of a risk of voter fraud last night over Labour plans to allow the public to use bank cards to prove their identity at polling stations. Angela Rayner yesterday unveiled a 'seismic' shake-up of Britain's voting system which will give 16-year-olds the vote at the next election and make it easier for people to pass identity checks designed to combat fraud. Existing laws require people to show photographic ID such as a passport or driving licence at the polling station before they can vote. But Labour's plan would make the system more 'accessible' by allowing people to use a bank card as proof of identity, even though it would not allow polling station staff to confirm a voter's likeness against a photograph. The Electoral Commission, which oversees Britain's voting system, last night said using bank cards 'has risks for security and voter trust'. Tory spokesman Paul Holmes also warned switching to non-photographic ID could 'undermine the security of the ballot box'. Prominent Reform politician Darren Grimes said that voting in an election could become 'less robust than collecting a parcel from the Post Office'. During angry exchanges in the Commons yesterday, Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice said the risk of election fraud was already too great. Mr Tice said there were 'grave concerns' about the risk of voter impersonation and told MPs he had witnessed people 'carrying bag loads of postal votes to a polling station on election day'. The row came as Ms Rayner confirmed controversial plans to lower the voting age to 16, despite widespread public opposition. A YouGov poll last night found the public oppose the move by a margin of 57 to 32 per cent. The Deputy Prime Minister brushed aside allegations of 'gerrymandering' and said the move would be introduced in time for the next election. Children will be able to register from the age of 14 and will get the vote at 16, although they will not be permitted to stand for election until the age of 18. Government sources said changes could be made to the national curriculum to deliver 'relevant democratic education in schools'. But critics warned the changes could lead to children as young as 14 being targeted by political parties. Ms Rayner said the change would give young people a 'stake in the future' but the Conservatives said the plan was 'hopelessly confused'. Mr Holmes added: 'Why do they think a 16-year-old should be able vote, but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket or an alcoholic drink, marry, go to war or even stand in the elections they are voting in?' Former Tory Cabinet minister Sir James Cleverly accused ministers of rushing forward the plans because of panic about Labour's collapse in the polls. But Ms Rayner denied the claim, saying: 'This is about democracy and giving young people an opportunity to have a say.' Pollsters suggested lowering the voting age could give Labour less of a boost than it is expecting. Elections expert Robert Hayward said: 'There is a real risk it will backfire on Labour. Historically, young people have been perceived as Labour supporters but there are clear polling indications young people do not vote for the two traditional parties.' Nigel Farage, who has a large following of young people on TikTok, accused Labour of an 'attempt to rig the political system', but added: 'We intend to give them a nasty surprise.'
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Meddling with the voting age will only harm trust in British democracy
SIR – Labour really must be scared of Reform UK. Last week it announced that mayoral elections will move to a 'supplementary vote' from the current first-past-the-post system ('Mayoral vote overhaul will favour Labour', report, July 13). Now it has announced that voting will be extended to 16 and 17-year-olds ( July 17). Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, says: 'For too long public trust in our democracy has been damaged.' It will be damaged further by the Government meddling with elections. Roger Gentry Weavering, Kent SIR – As our Prime Minister announces that he will give 16-year-olds the vote, I look back to my 16th year and shudder at my stupidity. It was only four years later, in 1979, that I voted in my first general election. Fortunately I chose the right candidate. Simon Perks Poughill, Devon SIR – If 16-year-olds are deemed sufficiently mature to be enfranchised, this has wider implications. They should also be considered old enough to drive a car, pay adult fares on public transport, buy alcohol and tobacco, be tried in an adult court – and, if convicted, be sent to an adult prison. Without such changes, Labour's plan can only be seen as an attempt to garner votes at the next general election. Dr Alf Crossman Rudgwick, West Sussex SIR – Sir Keir Starmer argues that, as 16-year-olds are old enough to work and pay tax, they are entitled to a say over how those taxes are spent. Does this imply that those who choose not to work and do not pay tax should not be able to vote? John D Frew Ipswich, Suffolk SIR – This move will give disproportionate political power to teachers. I know of a case where a teacher was indoctrinated with far-Left views while at training college and now works at a state school. There must be many other such cases. Scary. Keith Ferris Maidstone, Kent SIR – If Labour is to lower the voting age to 16, the school curriculum must be adapted so that it fully prepares pupils for their new civic responsibility. Schools are already required to teach pupils about the democratic process – but they will need a firmer grasp of the political landscape, rather than just a theoretical one. This does not mean that teachers should engage in party-political instruction. It does, however, require a more purposeful approach to political literacy. Young voters must be able to assess claims, interrogate sources and evaluate policies with discernment. Dr Millan Sachania Chertsey, Surrey
