Pomona Congresswoman blasts ICE over denied access, gas deployment
In a formal letter sent to ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons, the Southern California Democrat said ICE falsely claimed more than 1,000 protesters were present that day – an assertion Torres says was used to justify deploying chemical agents that caused her to seek emergency medical treatment and begin respiratory medication.
According to Torres, the delegation included four members of Congress, along with legal counsel, staff, immigrant rights advocates and members of the media.
Federal law prohibits ICE from denying access to members of Congress and specifically guarantees congressional entry into detention facilities. Torres says ICE's actions represent 'a direct violation of the law and a breach of transparency and accountability.'
'This false characterization appears designed to justify the dangerous and unjustified deployment of chemical agents,' Torres wrote. 'These actions have not only endangered lives but have broken the public's trust and violated the law.'
Torres further criticized ICE for a failure to maintain accurate and timely updates to its Online Detainee Locator System, which she said has left families in the dark and scrambling to locate detained loved ones — sometimes resorting to missing persons reports or hospital visits.
In her letter, Torres demanded a full investigation into the events of June 7, including identification of personnel responsible for the use of force, legal justification for the denial of entry, and a review of detainee communication systems.
The Roybal Federal Building has become a flashpoint during recent immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles, drawing protests and national scrutiny.
ICE has not yet publicly responded to Torres' letter or accusations.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Immigration Budget Now Bigger Than Israel's Military Spending
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Senate has passed a bill making Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the U.S.'s largest interior law enforcement agency with funding for Donald Trump's immigration enforcement agenda higher than most of the world's militaries, including Israel's. Pending its passage in the House of Representatives, Trump's bill could mean a massive increase in ICE funding as part of an immigration enforcement agenda worth $150 billion over four years. This image from June 12, 2025 shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at Delaney Hall, a migrant detention facility, in Newark, New Jersey. This image from June 12, 2025 shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at Delaney Hall, a migrant detention facility, in Newark, New It Matters If passed by Congress, Trump's 1000-page bill could reshape the U.S. immigration system with a significant increase in funding for expanding law enforcement and detention network while increasing costs to legally immigrate to the U.S. What To Know A revised version of Trump's bill was narrowly voted through the Senate on Tuesday. The estimated price tag of the legislation is around $150 billion between now and 2029—an annual average of $37.5 billion, which is higher than the military expenditure of all but 15 countries. This figure is more than the annual military budget of Italy, which at $30.8 billion, is the world's 16th highest defense spender for this year according to tracker Global Fire Power. It is also higher than military spending for Israel, ($30 billion), the Netherlands ($27 billion) and Brazil ($26.1 billion). Different news outlets have broken down in different ways. The National Immigration Law Center said that ICE's detention budget would increase to $45 billion to build immigration jails for single adults and families, a price tag 13 times more than ICE's 2024 detention budget. The bill also allocates $29.9 billion in additional funding for ICE activities, including hiring new agents and securing transportation contracts to move migrants between detention centers and facilitate deportations, according to Migrant Insider. Meanwhile an assessment by Detention Watch Network said the bill set aside $59 billion to militarize the border which included wall construction, CBP agents and vehicles, and border surveillance technology. It also said that there was $10 billion for grants to reimburse states who enact anti-immigrant policies and another $1 billion to the Department of Defense to deploy military personnel to the border and to detain migrants. What People Are Saying House Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X that the bill "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation's borders." Silky Shah, Executive Director of Detention Watch Network said in a statement: "This bill skyrockets ICE's budget to never before seen funding levels and will make it the largest law enforcement agency in the country." "ICE will now have 13 times its current fiscal budget for detention, which is already operating at a historic high, on top of the funding in ICE's annual budget that Congress sets each year." Adam Isacson, a researcher with human rights advocacy organization WOLA per the AP, "One thing about this bill, these sections are super no real specificity in the bill about how it's going to be spent." What Happens Next Trump's bill returns to the House of Representatives on Wednesday after a revised version was narrowly voted through the Senate on Tuesday. The president has set Congress a loose deadline of July 4 but further opposition is expected.
Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Overperform in Major California Election
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republicans scored an unexpectedly strong showing in a closely watched special election in California. Early returns in Tuesday's high-stakes runoff for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors show Republican candidate John McCann running significantly closer than many expected in a Democratic-leaning district that former Vice President Kamala Harris won by 20 points. Newsweek reached out to McCann via email for comment. Why It Matters The special election comes after widespread protests and unrest in nearby Los Angeles over Trump's immigration policies, which have seen Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carrying out deportation raids in the city. But despite intense anti-ICE protests in California, that wave of activism does not appear to be translating into stronger support for Democrats. Chula Vista Mayor John McCann and Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre, who are running in a special election to fill the District 1 seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.. Chula Vista Mayor John McCann and Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre, who are running in a special election to fill the District 1 seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.. City of Imperial Beach and Mayor McCann via Facebook What To Know As of late Tuesday night, Paloma Aguirre, the Democratic mayor of Imperial Beach, held a narrow 6-point lead over McCann, the Republican mayor of Chula Vista, with 53 percent to 47 percent in the race for the District 1 seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors. Newsweek reached out to Aguirre via email for comment. So far, the ballots counted represent about 19 percent of the more than 370,000 registered voters in the district, according to the Registrar of Voters. District 1 includes much of the South Bay and parts of the city of San Diego, and is widely regarded as a pivotal swing seat on the influential five-member Board. Since the sudden resignation of Supervisor Nora Vargas last December, who stepped down citing "personal safety and security reasons," the Board has been split 2–2 between Democrats and Republicans. If Aguirre's early lead holds, she will become the next District 1 supervisor, tipping the balance of power back in favor of Democrats. The last time Republicans dominated the Board was before 2020, when Democrats secured a majority for the first time in a generation. San Diego County supervisors oversee an $8.5 billion budget and play a major role in administering state and federal programs, such as CalFresh and Medi-Cal, while also governing unincorporated communities throughout the region. Aguirre says she is running to "bring change to county government" and to fight for working people by tackling local crises head-on. Aguirre has focused much of her campaign on addressing the issue of sewage pollution at the United States–Mexico border, which has plagued South Bay beaches for years. She has pledged to push for new infrastructure funding, a Superfund designation from the EPA, and to treat the issue as a public health emergency. She's also promised to prioritize an audit of homelessness spending, expand treatment and shelter options, and address crime and high energy costs for residents. McCann, a U.S. Navy veteran, has emphasized his record on emergency response and public safety. His campaign focuses on increasing law enforcement funding, reducing government waste, and opposing new taxes, including the proposed mileage tax. McCann says he'll work to expand health care, job training, and other essential services for veterans, while also helping to secure funding to fix the border sewage crisis and hold responsible parties accountable. What People Are Saying Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre, in a Tuesday statement to KPBS: "Today belongs to the working-class people of District 1, a nuestra gente trabajadora, who now have a fighter at the county Board of Supervisors who will hold the line against the Trump administration." Chula Vista Mayor John McCann told ABC 10 San Diego: "Paloma and I actually went back to Washington, D.C., to help raise money at the White House and Congress together. I'm willing to work with anybody as long as we want to focus on results and having solutions." What Happens Next County officials expect to continue counting ballots throughout the week, with an official update on results scheduled for 6 p.m. Wednesday. The Registrar of Voters' Office has until July 31 to certify the election. The winner will fill the vacant seat for the remainder of the current term that ends in January 2029.
Chicago Tribune
17 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits,' going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054″ and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall.
