Max-Herve George heads new $11 billion investment platform
Savills, a global property consultant, projects European deal volume will reach €50 billion in Q1 2025. The firm forecasts full-year transactions of €216 billion across European markets.
'Our timing aligns with what we believe is a favourable window in the market cycle,' said Max-Herve George, who chairs SWI Group. 'We've built this platform specifically to capture opportunities emerging from the current shift in market dynamics.'
According to Savills' data, Germany, France, and the UK are expected to be key destinations for real estate investment this year. Their research indicates logistics and residential sectors—both areas where SWI maintains positions—along with prime office buildings in major cities are attracting investor interest as market participants adapt to workplace trends and sustainability standards.
'With our combined expertise in logistics and residential sectors, we're uniquely positioned to benefit from these market trends,' Max-Herve George pointed out. 'Our long-term strategy has always emphasised these sectors, which are now seeing the strongest investor demand.'
The European logistics sector currently shows vacancy rates of approximately 5 per cent across major markets, with limited availability of premium warehouse space in urban-adjacent locations. Similarly, residential vacancy rates in major European cities stand at around 3 per cent, with rent growth outpacing inflation in many markets.
'Our structural advantage comes from combining institutional-scale capital with localised execution capabilities,' Max-Herve George explained. 'This allows us to identify opportunities across diverse European markets.'
SWI operates through two divisions: Stoneweg Real Assets, which focuses on traditional property investments, and Icona Alternatives, which handles private equity and venture capital activities. The organisation employs 350 professionals across 26 offices in 18 countries, providing market intelligence across multiple European regions.
SWI recently completed a $303 million acquisition of Cromwell Property Group's European platform, including a 27.8 per cent stake in Cromwell European REIT, expanding the firm's European holdings.
'This acquisition gives us immediate scale and diversification,' noted Max-Herve George. 'It accelerates our ability to implement our investment strategy across multiple markets and property sectors as Europe's real estate recovery gains traction.'
SWI Group offers institutional investors access to European property markets through a platform with significant scale and geographic diversification.
Investing and crypto
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
3 minutes ago
- Filipino Times
Astronomer CEO Resigns After Viral Kiss Cam Moment in Coldplay concert With Colleague
Andy Byron, the chief executive officer of New York-based tech firm Astronomer, has officially stepped down from his role following a public incident that went viral. The video showed Byron embracing a colleague during a Coldplay concert, prompting public scrutiny and internal company discussions. According to a statement posted on social media, Astronomer's board of directors accepted Byron's resignation and announced they would begin the search for a new CEO. The tech company clarified that Byron has not made any official public statement, countering widespread online claims suggesting otherwise. In fact, Astronomer previously posted on LinkedIn emphasizing that reports stating Byron addressed the matter were false, also correcting misidentification of a third individual seen in the viral video. The incident occurred on Wednesday at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, where Byron was captured on the 'kiss cam' with Kristin Cabot, Astronomer's chief people officer. The two appeared on the screen before quickly ducking out of view. In response, the company reiterated its commitment to upholding strong values and accountability, stating, 'Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met.' Astronomer, founded in 2018, focuses on solving problems in data and artificial intelligence. The company acknowledged that public awareness about them 'may have changed overnight' due to the viral clip but stressed that their mission remains unchanged. On Friday, the company announced that Pete DeJoy, Astronomer's co-founder and chief product officer, will take over as interim CEO. Following the announcement, Byron's LinkedIn account was made private and he was removed from the company's leadership page. However, he still appears on the company website as a member of the board of directors. CNN noted that they were unable to reach Byron for comment. The story has since been updated with additional content.
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Anthropic to Deploy Global Data Processing Infrastructure
Anthropic will extend its data processing infrastructure on 19 August 2025 to include servers across the United States, Europe, Asia and Australia. This expansion applies to Anthropic API and Claude for Work customers, aiming to enhance operational reliability through geographic redundancy. The company emphasises that data storage will remain strictly within the US. Customers requiring data processing solely within US-based servers must opt out of international regions by the effective date. Those who have already specified this preference through a custom agreement or order form are unaffected and need not take further action. This strategic shift reflects Anthropic's broader infrastructure evolution. As AI workloads grow, the company is adopting a multi-region architecture to reduce latency, enhance service continuity, and bolster failover capabilities. The decision mirrors industry practices where global coverage mitigates regional outages and performance bottlenecks. ADVERTISEMENT Security standards and infrastructure design are outlined in Anthropic's Trust Center, which details compliance with industry norms and data protection measures. Despite the geographical expansion of processing, the firm underscores that all stored data remains within US jurisdiction, alleviating concerns tied to sovereignty and regulatory oversight. Customers who do not choose the default multi-region processing by mid-August will be transitioned automatically. Anthropic urges affected users to submit their preferences ahead of time to ensure compliance with regulatory or internal policy mandates. Experts noted that the policy update signals a balancing act between performance and privacy. An infrastructure built across multiple regions reduces risk of service disruptions, but also raises questions on data governance. Anthropic's retention of US-only storage and explicit opt-out pathway aims to reconcile these objectives. Anthropic's public filings and product documentation confirm the timeline and scope. The Trust Center highlights end-to-end encryption, stringent access controls, and audit logging across geographies. Internal compliance teams reportedly reviewed the regional rollout to ensure compatibility with data protection laws like GDPR. Industry analysts view the move as a logical progression for AI service providers. As model sizes scale and workloads intensify, single-region dependencies become untenable during outages or maintenance windows. Multi-region architectures offer resilience and enable seamless user experiences across time zones. At the same time, customer demand for data sovereignty remains strong. Since Anthropic explicitly maintains storage in the US and offers selective processing opt-outs, clients bound by financial, legal or governmental constraints can retain compliance without sacrificing service continuity. The executive team at Anthropic, including leadership of enterprise products, reportedly supported the phased rollout. In practice, enterprise and API customers were notified via direct communication with clear opt-out channels and a deadline to lock in processing preferences. The announcement coincides with broader initiatives by Anthropic to enhance global reach. Earlier in 2025, the firm expanded Claude's availability in Europe and launched enterprise editions via AWS Marketplace. It also secured partnerships with major data providers such as S&P Global to enrich Claude's enterprise capabilities using its Model Context Protocol. Anthropic's phased rollout strategy is guided by its history of deploying across diverse regions, ensuring that security controls and compliance protocols are harmonised across geographies. The Trust Center details these measures, including data encryption at rest and in transit, strict key management, and role-based access control audits. Absent further opt-out instructions, customer accounts will be migrated to the new multi-region configuration by 19 August 2025. Anthropic encourages users with policy-driven or legal constraints to declare their preferences promptly.
Arabian Post
6 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Wall Street Journal's Ahmedabad Crash Report May Well Be A Plant
By K Raveendran The Wall Street Journal's report on the Ahmedabad Air India crash has triggered a storm of controversy not only for what it suggests but also for what it deliberately avoids. The claim that the crash, which took 260 lives, may have been caused by the senior pilot unintentionally or mistakenly putting the fuel control switch in the cut-off position is presented as a finding from preliminary investigations. Yet the entire report is predicated on anonymous sources, vague phrasing, and an overall speculative tone that raises more questions than it answers. In a case of such magnitude and human tragedy, a claim of this nature carries heavy implications—not least because it seems to absolve the aircraft manufacturer, Boeing, of any blame. And that is precisely where the unease lies. At face value, the report offers no hard evidence, no black box transcript, and no direct statements from investigating authorities to support its most consequential insinuation. It is speculative by admission and selectively sourced, quoting individuals purportedly 'familiar with the probe.' In the world of aviation reporting, particularly in the context of post-crash assessments, this kind of journalistic hedging can often be more strategic than informative. The timing, anonymity, and framing of the article all suggest that it may serve a public relations purpose more than it serves public interest. The possibility that the story is a planted narrative cannot be dismissed lightly, especially given the track record of how Boeing and other aviation corporations have navigated crises in the past. Media placement is a subtle but potent weapon in the realm of crisis management, and Boeing is no stranger to this strategy. Following the two catastrophic crashes involving the 737 MAX aircraft in 2018 and 2019, the company was initially quick to point to pilot training and operational errors. Only under mounting international pressure and meticulous investigative scrutiny did Boeing concede to software flaws and systemic safety issues in the MCAS system, which were ultimately found to be central to the crashes. Given that history, the suggestion that the Ahmedabad crash report may be part of a broader attempt to refocus blame is not a wild conspiracy theory, but a plausible continuation of an established pattern. In this case, the framing of the WSJ article effectively shifts the lens away from mechanical, software, or design faults that could potentially point back to Boeing, and instead plants the seed of human error, specifically that of the pilot. The pilot, of course, is not here to defend himself. Nor are the 259 other lives lost in the tragedy able to provide context or counterpoint. The tactic of blaming pilot error is particularly insidious because it operates on multiple psychological levels. For one, it exploits the public's general lack of technical understanding about aircraft systems. To the layperson, the idea that a pilot 'mistakenly flipped a switch' seems like a tragic but understandable human slip. It plays into a narrative of fallibility and distraction, steering the emotional focus away from mechanical flaws, production shortcuts, or system design oversights. At the same time, it serves the institutional interest of the aircraft manufacturer, which has billions of dollars at stake in current and future contracts, not to mention shareholder confidence. There is a grim irony in how the narrative around pilot error is often deployed. Pilots are among the most highly trained professionals in any field. Their every move is subjected to simulation, testing, review, and regulation. While human error is never out of the question, it is seldom the sole or primary cause of major aviation disasters—especially when it comes to systemic failures or design flaws that lie hidden beneath layers of operational complexity. The attempt to scapegoat a pilot in the immediate aftermath of a crash—before full data from black boxes is made public, before the investigation is complete—should always raise red flags. Moreover, the involvement of a US media outlet, particularly one with the stature of The Wall Street Journal, adds a significant dimension of corporate intrigue. Boeing, as one of America's flagship manufacturing giants, has deep roots not just in commerce but in politics and international diplomacy. It is a major defence contractor and a symbol of American industrial power. That reality brings with it a strong motivation—if not outright pressure—to protect the company's reputation in global markets. Favourable media coverage, carefully curated leaks, and selectively attributed information are all part of the playbook when a company of Boeing's stature is under scrutiny. This is not to argue that media organizations are complicit in misinformation, but it does highlight how strategic narratives can be embedded in seemingly routine reporting. Especially in crisis situations, the distinction between a leak and a plant is often only a matter of motive and timing. For a company under the shadow of past failures, a well-placed article can serve as a preemptive shield, setting the stage for public perception before the official facts are fully established. It is crucial that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) release their findings in a manner that is not only scientifically robust but also publicly transparent. Leaks through foreign media should not be allowed to shape the early narrative of a tragedy that occurred on Indian soil and involved Indian carriers and passengers. The families of the victims deserve nothing less than an unambiguous and fact-based explanation for what went wrong. (IPA Service)
