Yankees SS Anthony Volpe makes 12th error in loss at Toronto, tying him for most in AL
Volpe won the AL Gold Glove as a rookie shortstop in 2023, when he made 17 errors in 1,346 2/3 innings. He had 16 errors in 1,416 2/3 innings last year.
Volpe has played 846 2/3 defensive innings this season. He matched Kansas City's Jonathan India for the AL lead with an errant throw to first base that led to a run in Toronto's four-run fifth inning.
'I rushed the throw and pulled it and gave Goldy (first baseman Paul Goldschmidt) a tough pick to handle,' Volpe said.
It came one play after third baseman Oswald Peraza also made a throwing error that allowed a run to score.
Boone acknowledged that Volpe's error total is high but insisted he's not worried about the shortstop's overall defensive performance.
'He's still making a lot of rangy plays, he's still making a lot of plays,' Boone said. 'He just hasn't been as consistent as he has in his first two years. That's three or four plays we're talking about.'
Volpe had an ice pack on his left shoulder following the game but both he and Boone insisted there are no health concerns.
Yankees left-hander Carlos Rodón said he hasn't lost faith in Volpe.
'Just hang with him,' Rodón said. 'He'll be better.'
San Francisco Giants shortstop Willy Adames had major league-high 13 errors entering play Monday. Cincinnati's Elly De La Cruz and San Diego's Manny Machado also had 12 errors.
The Yankees are 2-6 against Toronto this season, losing the past five meetings. New York is 10-17 against AL East opponents.
'It's been a month now where we haven't been our best,' Boone said. 'We need to, obviously, start playing better consistently and putting wins in the win column. That's all we can really worry about.'
___
AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/mlb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tennessee Titans' Cam Ward on Treylon Burks: 'He's going to be one of our best targets'
One of the things that happened Wednesday, on the first day of Tennessee Titans training camp, that flew under the radar was the return of Treylon Burks to full practice. Burks, who is returning from a torn ACL, has had an amazing recovery and, in many ways, is ahead of schedule. After participating in a limited fashion during OTAs and minicamp, Burks is settling in and preparing to battle a group of young receivers for his spot on the roster. After practice, Burks spoke with a reporter about his offseason and how it felt to be back on the field. The veteran receiver appears to be embracing the dynamics of the rebuilt receiver room as he works his way back to 100 percent. "It was a different type of offseason for me. Learn how to run, learn how to jump. Get back stronger, get back in shape, and catch up with where I left off to be out here," he said. Cam Ward also noticed Burks during team drills and singled him out during his first training camp media scrum. "He's going to be one of our best targets this year. Not a lot of guys at his size can move like him," he said. These comments were interesting and could have some legs. But there is still a long way to go in the camp, and nothing is set in stone. Ward has always had a reputation for being a great teammate and leader, and he could be using his platform to further motivate Burks. No matter what happens in training camp, Burks has worked his way into an opportunity. Now it is up to him to seize his moment and potentially live up to his draft pedigree. This article originally appeared on Titans Wire: Cam Ward on Treylon Burks: 'He's going to be one of our best targets'
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Perils of tanking, costs of fandom and intrigue of Nick Lardis: Lazerus NHL mailbag
Before we get to the silliness, futility and futile silliness of a summer hockey mailbag, I just wanted to say a quick thanks for the overwhelming and unexpected response to my column about my dad a few weeks ago. It was just something I wrote in a daze on the plane that night; I tend to think with my fingers and was just trying to put the mental chaos I was feeling into something coherent for my own sake. And I've never been so uneasy about an edit as I was when I had my mom read it first. But all your comments, tweets, texts and personal stories were genuinely heartening and comforting. My mom, my brother and I read them all, and we all thank you. Advertisement Now, on to the promised nonsense. I'll let the results of our Chicago Blackhawks fan survey next week address all the conspiracy theories and rending of garments about Danny Wirtz and the rest of the team brass. And none of you asked anything nearly as interesting and involved as 'Reimagine the Blackhawks as Harry Potter characters,' so I'm going to try to be succinct (not my forte!) so I can get to as many as possible. Part 2 will run soon. Questions have been edited for clarity and length. Let's dive in. Maybe I'm too late, but I just heard you on 'The Athletic Hockey Show' saying, 'These kinds of rebuilds never work' about the Blackhawks. But I think you're the same guy who's said, 'No one's ever done it like this before.' Who, as a Chicago radio institution put it, are you crappin'? — Ted M. I say a lot of stupid things, so I'm going to need some accurate citations here. But both of those statements are true. At least, in the modern era. I'd argue that no team in the salary-cap era has won the Stanley Cup by actively tanking. The closest one would be the 2010 Blackhawks, but organizational incompetence isn't quite the same thing as intentionally losing. Sure, you need a couple of big names at the top of the lineup, and the draft is an excellent way to get there. But no team successfully builds exclusively through the draft. Not those Blackhawks. Not these Florida Panthers. Not anyone. At some point, you have to start trying. And it's true, the Blackhawks have tanked harder than any team has tanked since maybe the 1983-84 Pittsburgh Penguins. And with Chicago GM Kyle Davidson making an absurd 11 first-round picks in the last four drafts, and possibly Gavin McKenna waiting next summer, maybe I'll look foolish in the long run. Wouldn't be the first time. But given how disastrous other full guts have gone (hello, Buffalo and Detroit!), all I can hear in my head is Tobias Fünke saying, 'But it might work for us,' or Chief Wiggum saying, 'No, no, dig UP, stupid.' Advertisement Will Laurent Brossoit ever play a game for the Blackhawks? — Gregory E. You know, I actually saw Laurent Brossoit — or, at least, someone who WGN's Charlie Roumeliotis told me was Laurent Brossoit — walking out of the locker room after a game late last season, but I'm still not entirely convinced he's a real person and not simply a deepfake we all saw online last summer. If he does exist, I imagine he's in the same dungeon underneath the United Center in which Stan Bowman stashed Nikolai Khabibulin after Antti Raanta's emergence in 2014. Seriously, though, put it this way: If Brossoit — a very good goalie, historically — is physically able to play this season, it should be for the Edmonton Oilers, not the Chicago Blackhawks. Lord Stanley knows they need him. Will you please stop being a smug elite journalist who is above reproach and who has never done anything wrong? And please get off your high horse and report sports rather than your political and progressive views. When you report sports, you are actually a very good reporter. Nobody but your political believers cares about your personal opinions; just do the sports. — Jed I. Three things: First, very kind of you to call me elite. Thank you. Second, I'm literally an opinion columnist. It's my primary role at The Athletic. So, no? Third, I only included this question because my 13-year-old daughter was Googling me (as, I suppose, you do as a kid these days) recently and found a robust Reddit thread entitled, 'Does anyone like Mark Lazerus? [serious question]' and she read every word and showed all her friends and thought it was the funniest thing ever. And she was correct. [serious answer] At what point should fans be much more upset about the costs involved with attending and supporting a team that seems to think of them as piggy banks? I have had full-season seats since 1994. The costs around this incarnation of the team are ridiculous. From parking to concessions and even merch, I feel like the club is raising costs whenever and however they like, with absolutely no consideration for the people who go to 30-plus games a year. I am not angry about the team trying to make a buck, but this is getting ridiculous. They have one of the lowest salary outputs in the league, the squad will most likely have yet another bottom-five finish, and if/when they get to be decent again, all I know is my seats will go up another 10-30 percent. When does it stop? Is the problem me? — Andrew C. Couldn't have said it any better myself. It'll never stop. And every single one of you (well, at least those without a trust fund) should have reached that point years ago. Nearly every team in every league has made it all but impossible for an average family of four to reasonably attend a game. And for billionaires to keep asking for the same amount of money (or more!) from working-class fans when they're actively trying to put a failing team on the ice or on the field or on the court, as the Blackhawks and so many other teams have done in this era of long-term tear-down rebuilds, is genuinely unconscionable. It's wealth inequity and late-stage capitalism at its worst. Eat the rich, man. (Sorry not sorry, Jed I.) Advertisement How detrimental is it to Connor Bedard's development not to find at least one high-performing winger to help open up Bedard's game? I understand wanting to make room for young players, but having a third year of plugging in secondary options on the top line seems risky. — JR. I've been beating this drum for a while now. But to be fair to Davidson, he did try to get Jake Guentzel last summer and had to settle for Tyler Bertuzzi and Teuvo Teräväinen, both of whom seem to have been poached for the second line by Frank Nazar. The fact is, Bedard does need someone who can keep up with him — physically and mentally — for him to reach his almost limitless potential. But the fact also is, no stud winger in his prime is looking to sign with the Blackhawks until they show they're serious about trying to win. Call it a Catch-98. Part of the perils of tanking. Favorite 'KPop Demon Hunter' song? Are you Team Huntr/X or Team Saja Boys? — Conor H. Please. I'm here for the bops, not the abs. And how does that Saja Boy with the gray hair even see? Truthfully, the songs all blur together for me as my 9-year-old plays the movie on an endless loop, the way I did 'Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory' when I was her age. But someone explain to me how you make a movie that focuses so seriously on a trifurcated three-person songwriting process — the lyrics, the harmonies, the beat — and then have it culminate in a completely spontaneous yet perfectly structured final song, like the kind you see in a Broadway musical? It's just bad screenwriting. It's 'Up' all over again. (Do NOT get me started on 'Up.' You think I'm an insufferable pedant with the 'dynasty' talk …) Who is your 'long-shot' prospect who gets some NHL time this year? — Anthony D. Samuel Savoie. The Blackhawks have a ton of talent in the system. They don't have a ton of sandpaper. Savoie's nasty side could be enough for him to leapfrog a bunch of guys. What did players who had the type of OHL season Nick Lardis had last season do the following year? Did they open in the NHL? How many points did they follow their monster year with? — Joshua T. It's difficult to find a historical trend for Lardis because so few players in the modern era have done what he did last season. Since the turn of the century, only John Tavares (72) has scored more goals in an OHL season than Lardis' 71 last season (thanks to Elite Prospects for the data). Of course, Tavares was 16 when he did that and Lardis was 19, so temper your expectations a bit. But next on the list in the 21st century? Alex DeBrincat, with 65 goals. He was 19, too. DeBrincat jumped right into the NHL the next season, a year earlier than expected, after a very impressive rookie tournament in Traverse City and a strong preseason. Could Lardis do the same? Sure. Is it likely? No, but I do expect we'll see him at some point in the 2025-26 season. For more Chicago comparisons, Patrick Kane had 62 goals and 83 assists in his one OHL season, and walked right into the NHL as the No. 1 overall pick. Dave Bolland had 57 goals and 73 assists as a 19-year-old in the OHL and played one game in the NHL the following season. The only real conclusion I can draw from these numbers is that OHL goaltending stinks. Which Blackhawk, who played with the team before 2000, would you want on this current Blackhawks team in their prime? — JP G. This is where I get myself in trouble. I genuinely think every single player in the NHL right now is significantly better than the very best player on the planet in, say, the 1950s and 1960s. I don't think it's particularly close, either. MacKenzie Entwistle would skate circles around Rocket Richard. The game is virtually unrecognizable, and the year-round, life-long training has transformed these guys into near metahumans. So while the standard answer would be Stan Mikita, who, relative to his peers, is one of the greatest of all time (or Bobby Orr, if you want to be cheeky), I'd want someone from the 1990s. I'd pick 1991-94 Jeremy Roenick. Advertisement Montreal surprised everyone last season, and the Blue Jackets very nearly made the playoffs, too. What needs to go right for the Hawks to be in the mix rather than another year in the basement? — Andrew L. I won't be shocked if the Blackhawks are markedly better this season. I also won't be shocked if they're truly abysmal. But to really be in the playoff mix? It would have to involve Spencer Knight being a Vezina Trophy finalist. I don't see any other way. (Top photo of Nick Lardis: Jamie Sabau / USA Today)
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why the Angels need to embrace role as sellers ahead of trade deadline
NEW YORK — After the Angels were swept by the Mets on Wednesday afternoon, interim manager Ray Montgomery walked into the visitors clubhouse, where many players ambled around their lockers. It wasn't a formal team meeting; not everyone was present. Still, he wanted to deliver a message. 'I said to the guys, there wasn't one ounce of quit,' Montgomery said. 'The guys kept grinding through a tough game that could have gotten away from us, and it didn't. We had chances. I was proud of the way we kept fighting.' Advertisement He's right. The Angels have played inspired baseball, sometimes even in losses. It's a team that is far more enjoyable to watch than the 99-loss disaster of last season. But when it comes to the tough choices this organization needs to consider over the next week, fight, heart and competence really shouldn't matter that much. The Angels, GM Perry Minasian and owner Arte Moreno need to face facts. They have a 2.8 percent chance to make the postseason this year, according to FanGraphs. They are 4 1/2 games out and have six teams ahead of them fighting for the final wild-card spot. It's not impossible. But anything other than preparing to sell wouldn't be prudent. Minasian declined to discuss the deadline approach Monday at Citi Field, stating he'd talk next after the July 31 deadline passes. He hasn't taken questions from reporters since the beginning of July. There's a lot of interest in Angels players, and competing teams around the league are very hopeful that they sell. It's a huge opportunity for a team that has proven something very important this season: Acquiring good young players eventually leads to more wins. This deadline presents an opportunity to lean into that even more, given they have leverage over competing teams desperate to improve. It's an opportunity to put the franchise in a position to be legitimately competitive long-term. That might mean trading players with more than one year of team control. That includes Taylor Ward, Reid Detmers and José Soriano, among others, all of whom have been inquired about by competing clubs. Reasonable people could disagree on just how aggressive a sell-off the Angels want to conduct. But there's no reasonable argument for anything other than selling, as things stand presently. Particularly as Moreno has been more frugal in his free-agent spending over the years, with Yusei Kikuchi's 3-year, $63 million contract marking the most expensive deal since 2019. Advertisement Leveraging the deadline is a crucial element of building a competitive operation. But it's unclear if Moreno understands that. And Minasian, whose contract expires after next season, might not be inclined to think far beyond 2026. It will ultimately come down to Moreno's inclinations, as always. One team source suggested before the Mets series that he might not want to sell off, since it's unfair to the fans. That's flawed logic — the kind they've employed over the last 11 dreadful seasons. What's unfair to the fans is a malaise of perpetual failure. They've been different iterations of bad every year since 2015. Sure, they have a higher floor than the Rockies or White Sox. But with their modus operandi, their ceiling is also a lot lower. Trading a player like Ward would be tough. And it would hurt their chances in 2026. But it might also bring back talented players who could be the backbone of their competitive window. That's how good teams build, and rebuild quickly — by establishing a pipeline of talent that has not existed in Anaheim in a long time. Winning often requires tough choices and sacrifice. That's the mindset the Angels need to employ, but almost certainly won't. They have always operated in the interest of cobbling together a good enough team, not building something self-sustaining. That's why trading players with years of team control is often off-limits this time of year. The Angels' run differential this season is minus-65. They are 19-12 in one-run games. And they have remained extremely healthy, thus far, throughout the season. They went the entire first half of the season using the same five starting pitchers. Players, coaches and fans want to, and should, look for the positives in evaluating where the Angels are. Hope and optimism can help a club. But front offices need to be cold calculators in assessing the operations. They need to ask if what they've built is actually good enough to be one of the best teams after 162 games. Advertisement The Angels were not overmatched by the Mets. But the sweep highlighted areas of weakness. Poor defensive decision-making was on display. The bullpen wasn't able to lock down leads. And the offense missed several big scoring chances. 'It's frustrating,' Angels catcher Logan O'Hoppe said after his team blew a four-run lead in a loss Monday. 'We've got to win games in the second half. We're over good looks, we're over good signs. We've got to win games.' This is what you want your starting catcher to say. This is exactly the right mindset, and whether the Angels sell, the players need to keep that way of thinking. But there needs to be a distinction between what the players' goals are in the clubhouse and the prudent decisions of a big-league front office. Maybe they'll go 7-0 this week, and change the entire calculation. If that happens, great, you can reset. The whole point, however, is that this team's decision-makers need to be preparing for what's most likely, instead of praying for a miracle. (Top photo of Ray Montgomery: Ronald Martinez / Getty Images)
