Only 15 electric vehicle brands in China will be financially viable by 2030, AlixPartners says
These 15 brands are projected to account for approximately 75% of China's EV and plug-in hybrid market by the end of the decade, each averaging annual sales of 1.02 million vehicles, AlixPartners said, without specifying brand names.
However, consolidation in China is expected to proceed more slowly than in other markets, said Stephen Dyer, head of AlixPartners' automotive practice in Asia, because local governments may support non-viable brands due to their importance to regional economies, employment and supply chains.
"China is one of the most competitive NEV (new energy vehicle) markets in the world, with intense price wars, rapid innovation, and new entrants constantly raising the bar," Dyer said.
"This environment has driven remarkable advances in technology and cost efficiency, but it has also left many companies struggling to achieve sustainable profitability."
China's automotive market, the world's largest, is currently facing a price war and significant overcapacity, both of which are straining profitability. Aside from BYD (002594.SZ), opens new tab and Li Auto (2015.HK), opens new tab, no other publicly listed Chinese EV maker has achieved full-year profitability.
Chinese regulators have called for automakers to halt the price war. However, Dyer said it would likely continue, but through "hidden" factors such as insurance subsidies and zero-interest financing rather than direct price cuts.
The capacity utilisation ratio at Chinese car plants fell to an average of 50% in China last year, the lowest in a decade, pressuring profits, Dyer said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump to start TikTok sale talks with China, he says, with deal ‘pretty much' reached
Donald Trump has said he will start talking to China on Monday or Tuesday about a possible TikTok deal. The United States president said the US 'pretty much' had a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video app. 'I think we're gonna start Monday or Tuesday ... talking to China – perhaps President Xi or one of his representatives – but we would, we pretty much have a deal,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Friday. Trump also said he might visit Xi Jinping in China or the Chinese leader may visit the US. The two leaders last month invited each other to visit their respective countries. Trump last month also extended a deadline to 17 September for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok, a social media app with 170 million users in the US. A deal had been in the works this spring to spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors, but it was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump said on Friday the US would probably have to get a deal approved by China. Asked how confident he was that Beijing would agree to a deal, he said: 'I'm not confident, but I think so. President Xi and I have a great relationship, and I think it's good for them. I think the deal is good for China and it's good for us.' Trump's June extension was his third executive order to delay the ban or sale of TikTok and gave ByteDance another 90 days to find a buyer or be banned in the US. Trump's first executive order giving TikTok a reprieve came on his first day in office – just three days after the supreme court ruled to uphold the ban. Trump issued the second executive order in April. The deadline for the sale or ban was then set for 19 June. Now, TikTok has until September. In a statement issued the same day, TikTok thanked Trump and JD Vance. 'We are grateful for President Trump's leadership', the statement said, and TikTok would 'continue to work with Vice President Vance's Office' to come to an agreement. Democratic senator Mark Warner, vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee, accused Trump of sidestepping the law with an executive order. With reporting by Dara Kerr
Auto Blog
7 hours ago
- Auto Blog
4 Vehicles That Went Boxy and are Much Better For It
Some cars just look better without angles The boxy trend for SUVs is on a roll with manufacturers recognizing that buyers want the rugged look even if they have no intention of doing anything more challenging than summer car camping with the kids. In a sea of rounded-off SUVs and crossovers, the boxy look is very much on the rise. Buyers also want the practicality of squared-off versions that provide more space, in addition to a stronger presence on the road. Not all SUVs have taken this path, but we applaud the ones that have. Let's take a closer look at four standout models that went boxy and benefited from the design change. 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe — Source: Hyundai Let's put it this way. There was nothing wrong with the last Santa Fe. Its only major demerit was the fact that it didn't especially stand out in a crowd with its ubiquitous shape. The soft design was attractive but not distinctive. The 5th-generation looks about as different as a vehicle redesign can, and it has been transformed from a conventional SUV into a head-turner. Land Rovers don't even get this much attention, frankly. Everything about the new Santa Fe looks vastly different from its predecessor, most notably the unapologetically boxy shape. 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe — Source: Hyundai The Santa Fe's styling cues are in line with the boxy shape: there are H-shaped LED signature lighting in front and back, a rectangular grille on a vertical front fascia, and an upright greenhouse with plenty of blocky windows. The new Santa Fe also gets crisp body lines, large squared-off wheel arches, and a huge liftgate that provides a terrace-like rear cargo section for a lounge-like atmosphere. The Santa Fe no longer blends in with the crowd. Instead, it makes just about every other competitor fade into the shadows. 2026 Honda Passport 2026 Honda Passport TrailSport — Source: Honda Ever since its second-generation debut in 2019, the midsize Honda Passport has looked a bit minivan-like, but for 2026, the Passport has gone properly boxy and stands out in the process. Even boxier than its Pilot sibling, the redesigned Passport ditches its rounded corners for a tougher, more angular shape that clearly signals its off-road ambitions. The Passport gets a flatter hood, a more vertical front end, and a wider stance that fits well with the more capable TrailSport trim. 2024 Honda Passport TrailSport — Source: Honda TrailSport models add off-road suspension tuning, all-terrain tires, steel skid plates, and a subtle lift for extra ground clearance. The 2026 Passport's newfound looks are consistent with its more capable TrailSport trim. The boxier design allows for increased cargo capacity, now offering over 100 cubic feet of space with the rear seats folded, way up from the 77.7 cubic feet in the second-generation Passport. It has shed its minivan appearance completely, and boxy might just be here to stay. 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser — Source: Toyota Toyota was certainly baking something during the Toyota Land Cruiser's hiatus between 2021 and 2024. The formerly V8-powered off-road luxo-barge was replaced by a less-expensive but still tremendously off-road capable version with a fresh, boxy design last year, marking a return to form reminiscent of the F60 Land Cruiser from the '80s and '90s. and built to conquer harsh terrain. The new Land Cruiser uses Toyota's TNGA-F body-on-frame platform and features a retro-modern design with upright pillars, square fenders, and round LED headlights that evoke the legendary FJ40. The grille is simple and functional, with prominent 'TOYOTA' lettering that leaves no doubt about its heritage. Nothing about the new Land Cruiser carries over from the last one, and that's a good thing. It had morphed into an overpriced and nondistinctive SUV, and the poor sales figures were clear evidence that Toyota needed to make a change if it wanted to bring the Land Cruiser back. On the new model, the boxy body, squarish-fender trim, eggcrate grille, and upright greenhouse all make for a rough-and-ready look. The design finally exhibits the rugged underpinnings and components, and the Land Cruiser has returned to its former glory. 2026 Hyundai Palisade 2026 Hyundai Palisade — Source: Hyundai It seems the Santa Fe's market success gave cause for Hyundai to apply the same thinking to its flagship SUV. The second-generation Palisade is more refined in its appearance than the Santa Fe, and it applies the square look a bit differently. The fenders receive boxy creasing that's more understated, and the stacked DRLs and larger grille are more upscale in their appearance. 2026 Hyundai Palisade — Source: Hyundai The look is more cohesive than the first-generation Palisade. Hyundai never quite figured out what kind of front fascia and grille looked right, and the refresh made improvements but added more complexity at the same time. The new Palisade also adds a modicum of cargo space to its already spacious interior, and there's more rear legroom thanks to a longer wheelbase. Its new, more premium look should also draw customers away from pricier brands. Final thoughts These four SUVs prove that going boxy isn't just a style statement; it's a functional choice that pays dividends in interior space, visibility, off-road capability, and presence. The return of square proportions helps the Santa Fe, Passport, Land Cruiser, and Palisade stand out on the road (and off, as the case may be) while offering practical benefits that curvier designs can't provide. We like the new trend toward SUVs looking like SUVs rather than attempting to be curvaceous, and hope the industry will continue in this direction. About the Author Amos Kwon View Profile
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's Government is grossly naive about the threat posed by China
The Labour government's China policy is a shambles. It did not list China as a top threat under its new foreign-influence rules – even though the government admits that China has undermined Britain's economic security and engaged in espionage and acts intended to undermine democracy. The government's failure to apply these rules means that China, and China-controlled entities, do not have to register their activities with the British government. Those who lobbied against designating China as a top-tier threat argued that it would have a chilling effect on closer economic ties. The China lobby carried the day. It's part of a pattern that sees London determined not to offend China ahead of Keir Starmer's rumoured trip to Beijing later this year. 'China will continue to play a vital role in supporting the UK's secure growth,' David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said last week in a speech announcing the country's new engagement policy, the China Audit, tucked inside the UK's National Security Strategy. The government seems set on emulating the 'golden years,' when David Cameron and China's leader Xi Jinping shared a pint at a British pub, even as the danger posed by China grows more pronounced. 'Cooperate where we can, compete where we need to, and challenge where we must,' coos Labour, but there's little challenge. Why has Labour gone off the rails with its China policy? Starmer's background as a human rights lawyer and Labour's historical concern for human rights have fallen victim to a mistaken belief that China will somehow save the British economy. Starmer is right to focus on economic growth. But he's looking for it in the wrong place. Despite being the world's second-largest economy, China registers below France as a British trading partner, and remains an insignificant investor. China dominates trade between the two countries, with its almost £70 billion exports to Britain, more than double the £29.7 billion Britain sends to the People's Republic. Britain's exports to China fell by £3.8 billion, or 12 per cent, in 2024 and accounted for only 3.4 per cent of the country's shipments abroad. The EU and US made up 63.8 per cent of the total. The investment picture is even less promising, with Sino-British investments well under one percent of total investments. With its economy faltering under a sustained property crash, China hardly seems like the market of the future, notwithstanding the boasts of Rachel Reeves, who says she signed deals during a trip to Beijing in January that would bring an additional £600 million in benefits to Britain over the next five years. Britain has proven unwilling or unable to hold China to account for breaching its treaty obligations under the Sino-British Joint Declaration. Britain handed Hong Kong to China in exchange for a promise that the colony would enjoy its tradition of freedom and would be protected by the common-law system. China shredded that agreement. In the five years since Beijing imposed a vague and sweeping National Security Law on the city, nearly 2,000 people have been jailed on political charges. Newspapers have been forcibly shuttered, and the last remaining pro-democracy party this week announced it has been forced to disband. Jimmy Lai, a newspaper publisher and British citizen, remains in solitary confinement in Hong Kong, jailed for more than 1,600 days because of his commitment to free speech and his desire to uphold the values that Britain bequeathed to its former colony. British diplomats have not even been able to meet with Mr Lai to provide consular access. In London, officials prepare to approve a mega-embassy, China's largest diplomatic outpost in Europe, despite opposition ranging from London residents to US politicians. The irony is that this will do little for the economy all while undermining the very national security that it's designed to protect. During her trip to Beijing in January, Rachel Reeves published an opinion piece in The Times titled, 'Choosing not to engage with China is no choice at all.' That's setting up a strawman. No one is suggesting that engagement with China should be cut off. But engagement should uphold the British values of freedom, liberty, and the rule of law rather than rewarding China for its lawless behaviour.
