
Push ahead with BRICS, economists say, despite Trump's threat
They said Malaysia should deepen its engagement with the Global South and move quickly towards full BRICS membership, despite warnings from the United States of possible penalties for backing the bloc.
"Malaysia, for now, is doing the right thing, that is, to focus on multilateralism," said Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Associate Professor Dr Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin.
"With the US, Malaysia should continue engaging with them through mutual respect and inclusivity without compromising our own interest," he told Business Times.
On Sunday, US President Donald Trump announced that any country supporting the "anti-American policies" of the BRICS alliance will face an additional 10 per cent tariff.
In a post on Truth Social, a platform owned by Trump Media and Technology Group, the former president said the policy would apply "without exception".
Irwan said Malaysia will likely be hit with the additional 10 per cent tariff, with the impact of the reciprocal tariffs remaining uncertain.
"Already, our exports fell 1.1 per cent on a yearly basis in May this year. An additional 10 per cent on top of the reciprocal tariffs will not be good for the development of the Malaysian economy.
"It might impact Malaysia's gross domestic product growth forecast this year, and I think a reduction of 25 basis points for the overnight policy rate in the near future is warranted," he added.
Irwan said that while global supply chains may face disruptions, no party has a genuine interest in dismantling them entirely.
"For Malaysia, it is actually a blessing in disguise, if we know how to manoeuvre it well. Malaysia must play its role as a middle power, not taking sides and stay neutral," he said.
Associate Professor Aimi Zulhazmi Abdul Rashid from Universiti Kuala Lumpur Business School said a 10 per cent tariff by a potential Trump administration would impact Malaysia's exports.
He said semiconductors, which make up about 60 per cent of Malaysia's exports to the US, would be the most affected.
"Other exports like gloves, furniture and machinery will be more expensive in the US. However, whether Malaysia's products will be less competitive than other countries will only be known when other countries also completed their trade negotiations with the US.
"The customers in the US eventually will have to pay more unless they find alternative sources of production," he said.
Aimi said that as a trading nation, Malaysia must remain highly adaptable and strike a careful balance between its political and economic interests on the global stage.
"Malaysia also needs to collaborate in a group like Asean in order to continue to be significant in multi lateral trades with all nations," he said.
Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the Malaysian government has carried out due diligence and scenario planning.
Afzanizam said since the Trump tariff is beyond its control, the government must take a pragmatic approach in addressing the issue.
"In essence, the government is still practicing non-partisan but at the same time, they are also exploring other opportunities. They need to be tactful as it is quite a fine line in respect to foreign and trade policy," he added.
On whether the tariff regime would impact investor confidence, Afzanizam said foreign investors evaluate countries based on various factors.
He said ultimately, they invest where they believe their capital will generate returns that exceed their initial investment.
"My take is that the Malaysian government would just need to be clear on their narratives and execute them accordingly.
"We have various policy documents such as Ekonomi Madani framework, New Industrial Master Plan 2030, National Energy Transition Roadmap, National Semiconductor Strategy and soon, the 13th Malaysian Plans to be tabled at the end of July," he added.
Malaysia's engagement with BRICS
Malaysia's involvement with BRICS, the economic bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, has gradually evolved from informal alignment to formal participation.
In June 2024, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim expressed Malaysia's interest in joining BRICS during a meeting with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
This move marked a shift in Malaysia's foreign policy posture, positioning the country more actively within the Global South.
Anwar later reinforced this intent during a working visit to Russia in September, where he met with President Vladimir Putin and discussed Malaysia's aspirations to strengthen cooperation through BRICS.
Malaysia's momentum was acknowledged at the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, in October 2024.
In January 2025, the country was welcomed as one of 13 new "partner countries," a designation that allows for greater engagement in trade, investment, and policy dialogues within the bloc, though without full membership status.
In April 2025, Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan represented Malaysia at the BRICS Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Rio de Janeiro.
There, he called for stronger Asean–BRICS linkages and emphasised Malaysia's position as a regional bridge advocating for sustainable growth, resilient supply chains, and inclusive multilateralism.
Currently, Anwar is attending the 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro from July 6-7, 2025, as part of his working visit to Brazil.
His presence underscores Malaysia's increasing involvement in BRICS, particularly as it seeks to advance Global South interests while maintaining pragmatic ties with traditional economic partners.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Watch] Durian Dreams Turn Sour: Malaysian Fruit Vendor Reports RM5,000 Loss In Challenging Market](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.therakyatpost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F07%2FUntitled20-1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Watch] Durian Dreams Turn Sour: Malaysian Fruit Vendor Reports RM5,000 Loss In Challenging Market](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Ftherakyatpost.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Rakyat Post
21 minutes ago
- Rakyat Post
[Watch] Durian Dreams Turn Sour: Malaysian Fruit Vendor Reports RM5,000 Loss In Challenging Market
Subscribe to our FREE A Malaysian durian vendor's Facebook post has shed light on the financial pressures facing fruit retailers, as she detailed losing RM5,000 in what she describes as an increasingly difficult market. 'Selling durians until I'm exhausted, still can't recover RM5,000 in costs,' the vendor posted, sharing her experience of the current durian trade conditions. The vendor provided a detailed cost breakdown for Grade A durians to illustrate her situation: Purchase price: RM20 per kilogram Daily water loss: 10-20% weight reduction (she calculated minimum RM2 loss per kg) Staff costs: RM3 per kilogram Transport and fuel: RM1 per kilogram Total cost: RM25 per kilogram According to her account, the market selling price also sits at RM25 per kilogram, leaving no profit margin. 'Cost RM25, sell RM25. When durians go bad, I have to compensate myself – these orchard owners and wholesalers don't pay for damages,' she wrote, describing the financial responsibility that falls on retailers. The Middleman Problem Exposed In her most recent post, the vendor directly confronted what she sees as the root of retailers' struggles—exploitative middleman practices. 'Middlemen, you're making too much money from water weight,' she posted, revealing that wholesalers are adding up to RM6 per kilogram in charges related to weight loss during transport and storage, while simultaneously supplying substandard, watery durians to retailers. 'Middlemen make the most money, and they don't offer return guarantees. They're the ones profiting the most,' she wrote, highlighting how the supply chain structure leaves retailers vulnerable to losses while middlemen secure their profits. The vendor also criticised the fruit selection skills of her suppliers: 'This middleman is quite stupid at picking fruit,' she added, expressing frustration at receiving poor quality durians despite paying premium wholesale prices. The Perishability Challenge The vendor emphasised the time-sensitive nature of durian sales, explaining that the fruit must be sold within a day to maintain its freshness and appeal to customers. She also described the exacting quality standards that buyers expect. 'Some customers want compensation if the durian is slightly wet, and also want compensation if it's too dry,' she posted, outlining the narrow quality parameters she must meet—standards that become nearly impossible to achieve when receiving subpar fruit from suppliers. In 'This isn't selling cheap – this is market reality,' she explained in the video. The vendor attributed some challenges to what she sees as inconsistent fruit selection by suppliers: 'These wholesalers need to learn how to properly select fruit! They know how to make money but don't know how to pick good durians!' Industry Comparison Reflecting on market changes, the vendor noted: 'The market situation isn't like it was 10 years ago.' She mentioned that while some vendors might misrepresent fruit grades for profit, she maintains she deals in genuine Grade A products, though the quality she receives from wholesalers often doesn't match the premium prices she pays. The vendor concluded her posts by stating: 'Now I can only try to protect my costs. Making big money has become an unreachable dream.' Her candid account offers insight into the operational challenges faced by durian retailers in the current market environment, highlighting the narrow margins and financial risks associated with selling perishable, premium fruit. While her experience represents one vendor's perspective, it illuminates broader issues within Malaysia's durian supply chain, where the structure appears to systematically favour middlemen while leaving retailers struggling to break even despite handling a fruit that commands premium prices from consumers. The case underscores how agricultural supply chains can create situations where those closest to the final consumer—and bearing the most significant operational risks—may paradoxically be the least profitable participants in the trade. Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.


New Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Authorities probe RM120mil milk supply cartel
KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is investigating three individuals believed to be behind a RM120 million milk supply cartel that delivered substandard products to a government department. The operation was carried out jointly with the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) and Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), reported Berita Harian. Sources said three homes and a company premises in the capital were raided, with investigators seizing documents related to milk supply contracts dating back to 2019. About 80 bank accounts worth RM70 million have been frozen. The case is being investigated under Section 16 of the MACC Act 2009 and the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001. LHDN is also conducting a probe under the Income Tax Act 1967.


New Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Data centre surge
MALAYSIA, a small hydrocarbon producer by world standards, is eyeing the new oil of the 21st century: data centres. Glowing bromide hype on such centres match their power demand surge. On Monday, Hong Leong Investment Bank Bhd (HLIB Research) said in a thematic note to Business Times that Malaysia is no longer a spillover market from Singapore and that it is a go-to destination for hyperscalers. Johor is partly the reason for the hype. From 10 megawatts (MW) of data centres in 2021, the state grew to 1.3 gigawatts last year, according to media reports. Not so fast, we must say. They are not just guzzlers of water and energy, but gobblers of land, too. Sure, there is ample land, as HLIB Research reckons, but only for now. Even cost competitiveness is under threat with the recent Tenaga Nasional Bhd tariff hike. A Reuters report on July 1 quoted industry and government officials as saying that the new tariff hike would add 10 to 14 per cent to the electricity costs of data centres. According to Gary Goh of Sprint DC Consulting, a data centre advisory firm that the news agency quotes, for a 100 MW facility, that works out to be an additional US$15 to US$20 million per year, not including fuel surcharge. Fuel surcharge is announced by the government every month based on fuel prices and foreign exchange. Goh also said many in the industry were caught unprepared for the scale of increase and that some investors were already on the wait-and-see mode. Be that as it may, Reuters, pointing to a joint report issued in May by Bain & Co, Google and Singapore's state-owned Temasek, said Malaysia is set for the region's fastest surge in data centre power demand, tripling to 21 per cent by 2027 from seven per cent in 2022. Malaysia, committed as it is to tame climate change, is slowly but surely phasing out black gold due to its Earth-warming effect. But data centres aren't exactly problem-free. Think guzzlers and gobblers. According to one estimate, a 100 MW data centre consumes electricity equivalent to what 45,000 households use. A data centre with similar capacity is said to use water equivalent to a 10,000-person city in the calculation of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, an American entity. Malaysia may have enough energy and water for now, but what about in the years to come? Many will argue that the data centres are paying a premium for access to energy and water, but both are drawn from the same sources. As more and more data centres come chasing cheap land and energy, electricity infrastructure and rivers will be stressed beyond their capacity. This is precisely why Singapore imposed a moratorium on data centres between 2019 and 2022. On Jan 5, then natural resources and environmental sustainability minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad admitted in an interview with the Financial Times that data centres had put "a lot of pressure" on Malaysia's energy and water resources. For sure, data centres, especially the hyperscalers, bring in billions of investment dollars, but they come attached with a heavy price tag. Can we afford it? Only if the benefits outweigh the costs.