108-year-old Detroiter read the Free Press daily until her final weeks, family says
A devoted mother, grandmother, and great-grandmother — Helen died in her Detroit home on Jan. 16, 2025, nearly two weeks after her 108th birthday.
"She literally stopped reading the paper within weeks of her passing," said her granddaughter, Rebecca Dickerson-Mosley. "She was the most healthy 108-year-old person that I'm aware of. She was very, very smart and loved to watch game shows, which kept her sharp."
Born in Pennsylvania in 1917, Helen made Detroit her home in the mid-1940s, where she spent most of her life, her family told the Free Press. She was married to Thomas Dickerson Sr., one of Detroit's first Black police officers, who died in 2015.
"My grandfather made sure she was able to be cared for in her own home until the day she passed away," Dickerson-Mosley said. "He made sure, even when he was gone, that she would have the means to provide for herself."
"He pampered her," added Thomas Dickerson Jr., Helen's only son and Dickerson-Mosely's father. "She never even pumped her own gas."
Please say a prayer for my family. My 108 year old grandmother has transitioned. She lived such a wonderful life filled...
Posted by Rebecca Dickerson Mosley on Thursday, January 16, 2025
Helen remained under the care of her daughter, Linda Dickerson, and her son, Thomas Jr., until her final breath.
Although she was long retired, Helen worked for the Unemployment Insurance Agency when it was still known as the Michigan Employment Security Commission. Her family said she had an affinity for the job, helping people find employment.
In her free time, she was a passionate piano player and an active member of a Detroit bridge club, where she played until the COVID-19 pandemic hit, according to her family. In her younger years, she traveled across the country to compete in bridge tournaments. Music, however, remained a constant in her life. Despite developing neuropathy in her fingers, she continued to play the piano whenever she had the chance.
"She was very faithful and loved to play her gospel music on the piano. My aunt and father would always pull out the piano for her and she'd play for us. Just a couple months ago, she was playing for some visitors from church," Dickerson-Mosley said. "She tried to teach me how to play, too. I learned a little something, but I wasn't disciplined enough."
Helen lived through two world wars, the Great Depression, the civil rights movement—including the Detroit uprising—and, more recently, the COVID-19 pandemic, all with quiet strength.
"People in her age group processed trauma silently," her granddaughter said. "Unfortunately, we have never heard her speak about ... what it was like for her."
More: Iconic images by legendary Free Press photographer Tony Spina capture Michigan history
But even at 108, Helen remained aware of her loved ones until her final days.
"Up until my last visit with her, around Christmas, she was able to say, 'Hey, Becky,'" said Dickerson-Mosley, who lives in South Carolina but visited her grandmother at least two to three times a year.
Helen is survived by two of her three children, two grandchildren, and two great-grandchildren. Her eldest daughter, Anita Dickerson, died last year at age 88.
Funeral services were held last Thursday at Greater Grace Temple in Detroit, with arrangements entrusted to O. H. Pye, III Funeral Home.
More: Detroit City Councilman Fred Durhal III announces run for mayor
Nour Rahal is a trending and breaking news reporter. Email her: nrahal@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @nrahal1.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Lifelong Detroit Free Press reader, Helen Dickerson, dies at 108
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
I've taught college students. The 'Gen Z stare' is real, but I don't blame them.
Doug Weaver, 36, is an artist who, until 2024, taught at several colleges in the St. Louis area as an adjunct professor and, at times, experienced the so-called " Gen Z stare," a phrase that's recently gained traction on social media. The following has been edited for brevity and clarity. At the start of any class, I've always had jitters because you never know what the class dynamics will be. There were a few years where it was hard just to get students to interact with each other, especially for those who were in their junior or senior year of high school when COVID-19 hit. With my students, I would give instructions, and they would just stare at me. Or, we were going to do introductions, and I would be like, "OK, it's your turn to introduce yourself," and they would just stare at me. I'm like, "Am I asking wrong?" After COVID, I did see an increase in the amount that students who just don't engage, and it makes it a lot harder to get the class going. To be able to actually teach the class, and to be able to actually know where you are, I just need a little bit of interaction. I need a bit of what your background is, what your name is, and what your interest in art is. For a few years after COVID, I would give students the questions that we were going to discuss and have them write things down. Then, you're reading it instead of saying it. That would be helpful, though sometimes they wouldn't write anything. That's when I would just be like, I don't really know what to do. If you just don't participate — I expect that more from middle school and high school students. Those students often don't want to be there, but they have to be. In my case, these were college students. I was like, "You're choosing to be here, and you're paying to be here." That's what was always hard for me. I want you to have the experience that you want. And if you won't tell me, if you won't interact with me, then I don't know what your values are or what kind of interaction you want. Why videos feel more comfortable You need students to ask questions when they don't know what to do. Sometimes it's good for them to say, "Hey, I'm a little lost." During COVID, when everything was online, I made video versions of a lot of my in-class demonstrations and lectures. I still made those videos after students came back to class. Yet the in-class demo was better because you can ask questions, and I can talk to you more specifically about what I'm doing. But I would find that, instead of asking questions or asking me to clarify things, I would have students watching the videos during class. I would even have students watch the video of me doing a demonstration while I am doing that same demonstration in class. It's mind-blowing to me, but it almost just felt more comfortable for them to look at that on a screen. I really think that those few years of being on Zoom for everything affected that entire generation's social skills. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing. The future is more and more online. A lot of them are going to be working online, and so navigating online social spheres and Zoom work life is important. The value of being in class is social interaction, getting specific questions answered, and getting an education that is specific to you. If you're in the class, watching a video of the class — it really just broke my brain a little bit to see that happen. The way education is now, most information that you're going to get in school, you can get online. The value of going to an educational institution is to have that education tailored toward you. The reason you're there is for you to work on your own self-expression, your own way that you navigate the world, and having someone looking at what you do and tailoring the education toward you. With colleges and universities, what you pay for is the way the information is presented, and for the interaction that you have with professors and with experts, and to have opportunities to meet people and to just have experiences that you wouldn't be able to have otherwise. A tarnished experience This group of students had a really bad situation because of COVID. For some of them, their high school experience was really tarnished, and, for some, their college experience was tarnished. Their education was lacking, and their social interaction was lacking. Their ability to enter the workforce was affected. It really just negatively impacted every social aspect of their lives. I know how much COVID negatively impacted my mental health, and I am far past my most-formative years. So, there's no way that couldn't have a huge impact on their mental health. There's all this conversation about them staring at you in a social interaction when it's just like, the world failed them. Society failed them in a major way. The larger discussion should be that we need to figure out better ways for all of us to have access to the mental health services that we need, because I don't think we have recovered from COVID.
Black America Web
4 hours ago
- Black America Web
Heirs' Property And Black Land Loss: A Hidden Threat To Generational Wealth
Source: skynesher / Getty For many Black American families, land ownership has long represented more than financial security; it symbolizes survival, self-reliance, and freedom. Yet a quiet crisis has steadily eroded Black landownership across generations. That crisis is known as heirs' property, a legal and cultural issue deeply rooted in America's racial history. It could single-handedly diminish Black land wealth if left untreated. To understand how we got here, we must take a look back at history. The origins of this issue date back to Jan. 16, 1865, when Union General William T. Sherman issued Special Field Order No. 15, according to the National League of Cities. This wartime decree temporarily allocated 400,000 acres of land—roughly half the size of Yosemite National Park—to formerly enslaved Black Americans in 40-acre plots. It was a transformative vision for racial justice, later remembered by the phrase '40 acres and a mule.' But the promise was swiftly rescinded after President Lincoln's assassination. President Andrew Johnson reversed the order and returned the land to former Confederate owners. While a small number of Black families managed to purchase land, systemic racism and legal loopholes quickly began chipping away at those gains. Sadly, many did not have the proper documentation in place to protect their family land so that it could be safely passed down throughout generations. Heirs' property, sometimes referred to as 'tangled title' land, occurs when property is passed down informally from generation to generation without a will or formal estate plan. When the original landowner dies without a legal will, the property is inherited equally by all legal heirs. Over time, this can mean dozens of people may claim ownership of a single piece of land, none of whom hold a clear or marketable title. Without this clear title, families cannot sell the land, develop it, use it as collateral for loans, or qualify for many federal assistance programs. Every new generation adds more heirs to the legal tangle, making resolution more difficult. Source: Yuliia Kaveshnikova / Getty The consequences of heirs' property are particularly devastating for Black families. Between 1900 and 2000, Black Americans lost an estimated 80% of the land they had acquired—approximately 14 million acres, according to a 2023 report published by the Union of Concerned Scientists . This includes nearly 90% of farmland once owned by Black farmers. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), heirs' property is the leading cause of involuntary land loss among Black landowners. Land tied up in unresolved ownership cannot be used effectively, and its value is often locked away. Even worse, heirs' property opens the door to partition sales. Because all heirs share ownership of the entire property, any one of them—even someone who inherits a small percentage—can petition the court to force a sale of the whole property, the Union of Concerned Scientists notes. This process is often exploited by outside speculators, who purchase one heir's share and then force a court-ordered auction. These sales often result in properties being sold for far below market value, robbing families of both land and generational wealth. The roots of heirs' property are tangled up in decades of systemic racism and legal exclusion. During the early 20th century, very few Black lawyers practiced in the South, and many white attorneys refused to work with Black clients or actively worked against their interests. As a result, many families did not have access to legal help for writing wills or managing estates. A landmark study in 1980 estimated that 81% of Black landowners at the time did not have a will. Some families avoided the legal system entirely, often out of mistrust rooted in personal or community experience. For many Black landowners, the court system was not a place of justice; it was another venue for exploitation. Some believed that avoiding formal documentation would better protect their property from being taken away, a belief that ironically left their descendants even more vulnerable. The situation was compounded by discrimination at the institutional level. The USDA has a long-documented history of denying loans, grants, and technical assistance to Black farmers. In fact, Lloyd Wright, a former director of civil rights at the USDA, once referred to it as 'the last plantation.' Class-action lawsuits like Pigford v. Glickman and Pigford II acknowledged decades of discrimination against Black farmers between 1981 and 1996. However, even after legal victories, many Black farmers struggled to receive promised payments. A 2023 analysis found that only 36% of Black farmers who applied for USDA loans received them, compared to 72% of white farmers. Heirs' property also locks families out of many federal programs intended to support farmers, homeowners, and landowners. Without proof of a clear title, these families are often ineligible for disaster relief, agricultural subsidies, and other aid, especially in times of crisis. Source: Vladimir Vladimirov / Getty Heirs' property continues to rob Black families of the land and wealth their ancestors fought so hard to gain. However, there are steps families can take to protect their property and preserve their legacy. The first and most important step is estate planning. Creating a legal will or living trust ensures that land passes clearly and intentionally to chosen heirs. According to the Center for Agriculture & Food Systems , a trust is a legal arrangement used to hold and manage assets, including real estate. Establishing a trust can be an effective way to prevent the creation of heirs' property. If you own land in your name, you might consider transferring that land into a trust. Here's how it works: you transfer the ownership of the land into the trust and name yourself as the trustee, meaning you retain control and manage the property. You can also name yourself as the initial beneficiary, allowing you to continue enjoying the benefits of the land during your lifetime. In the trust document, you would designate successor trustees to take over management after your death, as well as successor beneficiaries who will inherit the benefits of the trust. By keeping ownership within the trust, the land does not pass informally through generations. This structure avoids the legal confusion that leads to heirs' property and ensures a clear, organized plan for who will manage and benefit from the land in the future. Working with a lawyer or nonprofit that specializes in trusts and heirs' property can help sort out the legal claims and create a path forward. Families can also benefit from creating family land agreements. These are internal written contracts that outline how the land will be used, maintained, and passed on. 'A family agreement should include everyone's contributions, what they expect in return, and what should happen if the agreement ends,' Compass notes. Establishing clear communication among heirs—no matter how distant—can prevent confusion and conflict later, if it arises. Legal reforms are also underway to protect Black families and vulnerable communities. A growing number of states have adopted the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA), which offers legal protections for families by giving co-owners the chance to buy out a potential seller's share and requiring fair market value assessments before sales are allowed. While these laws don't solve every problem, they are an important tool for keeping land in the family. Finally, education and open conversation are essential. Families should talk openly about land ownership, inheritance, and planning for the future. The silence surrounding these topics has, in many cases, allowed the issue of heirs' property to grow unchecked. Heirs' property is not just a legal inconvenience. It is a structural barrier that continues to strip Black families of generational wealth, economic opportunity, and community stability. For Black families, protecting that legacy means reclaiming the promise that was denied generations ago, and ensuring that future generations inherit not just property, but power. SEE MORE: Mindset Of An Entrepreneur: Why Black People Should Consider Homesteading To Create Generational Wealth Altadena Not For Sale: Preserving Black Homeownership SEE ALSO Heirs' Property And Black Land Loss: A Hidden Threat To Generational Wealth was originally published on
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
Putting on my wedding ring made me look like an adult. Taking it off 12 years later made me finally feel like one.
I was 27 when I got married, but I could have easily passed for 18. I've always looked younger than I am, which frustrated me, especially as a young professional. I was a star-student, perfectionist, overachiever trying to get a foothold in my career, and I wanted to be respected and valued. But I felt like the fact that I looked like a kid held me back. At a professional conference, a male colleague asked me if I was old enough to drink alcohol. Whether he was earnest or joking (I'm still not sure) doesn't matter — his point was clear: you're not big enough to be a real player here. When my husband slipped on my wedding ring, I was flooded with excitement and hope for our shared future, yes, but it also sparked a surprising transformation that was just about me. With the ring on my finger, I finally looked like an adult. I wore it proudly in the world, gesturing at networking events. It dated me in a positive way. It gave me credibility. I delighted in the heft of it, until I didn't. I was doing all of the adult things, but I still didn't feel like one Twelve years later, we had built a whole life: bought a house, made a home, had two children, navigated the grief of my mom's death, weathered the COVID pandemic, built our careers, and established my business as a professional coach and career strategist. It all involved a lot of adulting, but I still didn't feel like an adult. Sometimes, I'd be driving our daughters to school and catch a look at myself in the rearview mirror. "How did this happen?" I'd think. "How can I be the adult here when I still feel like a kid?" And then my husband and I realized that after all these years together, we were headed on different paths. We decided to divorce. Removing my ring wasn't momentous at first I took my wedding ring off on a regular weekday. It wasn't a milestone in the divorce process, not the day we made the choice, the day he moved out, or the day the courts made it official. It was a Tuesday. Over the coming weeks, I watched as the indent on my left ring finger faded. I slowly adjusted to the lightness of my finger. I went to a professional conference and noticed the rings worn by other women in the room — how they sparkled as they gestured, emphasizing their points in their small group discussions. I looked at my own hands and didn't miss my ring at all. Now I'm blossoming into the adult I was meant to be Putting on my wedding ring may have made me look like an adult, but it was taking it off that made me feel like one. Looking back, choosing to get married wasn't really an adult decision — it was me following the ladder of life, the path of expectations laid out for me by society, my parents, and myself. It was the next natural step towards what seemed like success in my late 20s. Deciding to end my marriage was an intentional step off of that ladder. It was a sign of me forging my own path and being true to myself, even when that went against others' expectations. At 27, I needed a ring as a prop to give me a sense of credibility. At 39, I derive that credibility from my track record of work, from the strands of grey in my hair, from the values I've defined as core to who I am, from the fact that I own my own business and can say, "I've been doing this for over a decade," from the internal satisfaction I get from showing up as the mom that I am. I bought myself a simple gold ring that I now wear on my right hand. I picked it out for myself, for the woman I am becoming. It's engraved with a blooming camellia flower. To me, it's a sign that I'm finally coming into my own as a late bloomer. I'm finally an adult.
