House Democrat: We should be let into ICE facilities
'This administration has continuously tried to go around Congress and block Congress from doing its constitutionally responsible duties,' Meek said during a Friday appearance on MSNBC.
'We are and have oversight and should be let into these facilities without notice,' he added.
Meeks said when provided advanced notice Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials can misrepresent conditions.
His comments come after DHS issued new guidance requesting 72-hour notice before members of Congress visit facilities.
Several lawmakers in New Jersey, California, Illinois and New York have been barred from entering facilities to conduct legal oversight. Meeks said DHS' new policy is 'problematic.'
'The way that you find out what actually is taking place, and we've done this under several administrations, Democrat and Republican previously, you're able to walk in and make an assessment of what is and what is not taking place,' Meeks told MSNBC.
'When you are prevented from doing your job and prevented from, you know, doing what the Constitution says you should be doing, then it makes you feel that there is something going on that should not be going on.'
Multiple detainees have complained of overcrowding and a lack of due process amid national protests regarding the Trump administration's new immigration policies.
Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) also said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is seeking to block lawmakers from visiting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field offices, even during advance visits.
DHS did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the allegations.
'No matter how much she and Trump want to force us to live under their authoritarian rule, ICE is not above oversight and the Department must follow the law. This unlawful policy is a smokescreen to deny Member visits to ICE offices across the country, which are holding migrants – and sometimes even U.S. citizens – for days at a time,' Thompson, ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, said in a statement.
'They are therefore detention facilities and are subject to oversight and inspection at any time. DHS pretending otherwise is simply their latest lie. There is no valid or legal reason for denying Member access to ICE facilities and DHS's ever-changing justifications prove this,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Kathy Hochul's Chances of Losing New York Governor Election: Polls
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Governor of New York Kathy Hochul is up for reelection in 2026, and a new poll has found that she is leading a hypothetical primary race and hypothetical general elections, despite the majority of voters saying they want a new governor. A poll taken by the Siena College Research Institute of 800 New York State voters between June 23-26 found that 49 percent of Democratic voters would vote for Hochul in a primary between her, Lieutenant Governor Antonio Delgado, and Congressman Ritchie Torres. When asked whether they would want to re-elect Hochul or vote for someone else, 55 percent of people said "someone else." However, when pitted against hypothetical Republican candidates, Hochul polled ahead of her opponents. Governor Hochul has been contacted for comment via email. New York Governor Kathy Hochul speaks during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, Thursday, June 12, 2025, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. New York Governor Kathy Hochul speaks during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, Thursday, June 12, 2025, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo Why It Matters Opinions on Hochul largely fall along partisan lines, with 69 percent of Democrats approving of her, but only 18 percent of Republicans sharing the same view. This is likely due to her fighting the Trump administration on New York City's congestion pricing plan and on immigration. Hochul's race comes at a tumultuous time in New York Democratic politics. She is yet to endorse Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, distancing herself from his democratic-socialist stance and his opinions on Israel. What To Know The Sienna poll for a Democratic primary put Hochul against Delgado and Torres. Torres has not officially announced his candidacy for governor yet, and has said he would not run if Mamdani wins the mayoral race. Delgado was appointed by Hochul to his position in 2022, but is now primarying his boss. He did not name Hochul in his announcement, saying: "Listen, the powerful and well-connected have their champions. I'm running for governor to be yours." The Republican race is currently being won, per the same Sienna poll, by Congresswoman Elise Stefanik. Elise Stefanik leaving a House Republican Conference meeting with President Donald Trump on the budget reconciliation bill in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. Elise Stefanik leaving a House Republican Conference meeting with President Donald Trump on the budget reconciliation bill in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images Stefanik was originally President Donald Trump's pick to be Ambassador to the United Nations, but her nomination was pulled. She has raised millions for a gubernatorial run but has yet to make a formal announcement that she will be joining the race. Per the poll, she leads a Republican primary against Mike Lawler and Bruce Blakeman by 35 percent to Lawler's 18 percent and Blakeman's 7 percent. But, she loses a general election to Hochul by 24 points to Hochul's 47 points. What People Are Saying Elise Stefanik posted on X (formerly Twitter) about a fundraiser in New York: "I ask you all today to join us in this effort to SAVE NEW YORK and fire Kathy Hochul in 2026. This is about the people of New York. And it's going to take fighters all across this state to get this done." Kathy Hochul for Governor site: "As Governor, Kathy has taken decisive action to deliver immediate relief to working and middle class families and small businesses, beat back the pandemic, and accelerate New York's economic recovery. In addition, she has reaffirmed New York's position as a national leader in defending reproductive rights and in combating climate change." What Happens Next The New York gubernatorial race is not until 2026. According to the poll, 43 percent of people do not know, or have no opinion on, Stefanik, meaning that as more people get to know her, the polls will likely move.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Solar Firms Surge as Senate Drops Excise Tax From Trump Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Shares for solar companies rose on Tuesday on the Senate's decision to remove an excise tax on wind and solar projects from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Shares in Sunrun Inc. were up about 11%, Enphase Energy Inc. was up about 4% and Solaredge Technologies Inc. were up 9% at around 12:49 p.m. in New York after news reports on the change. The Senate passed the $3.3 trillion bill on Tuesday after making the last-minute change and other modifications meant to mollify some Republicans. The measure spiked a previously proposed excise tax on wind and solar projects that contained a certain threshold of components made in China, Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, told reporters Tuesday. That proposed tax, which had been tucked into the Senate bill unveiled days ago, was supported by some US manufacturers who said the country needs to urgently wean clean energy supply chains off China. But it had sparked alarm from renewable developers who said it could hike costs for wind farms and solar arrays that still rely on some foreign components and supply chains dominated by Beijing. Senator Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, hailed the removal of the excise tax in a post on X ahead of passage. The bill would still phase out subsidies for wind and solar projects placed in service after December 31, 2027; some Republicans had made a last-ditch push to ease the credit cutoff. The various iterations of Trump's tax and spending package have whipsawed much of the renewable energy industry — and, with it, shares of developers, installers and manufacturers. The proposed addition over the weekend of the tax on some wind and solar projects stunned the industry, prompting shares to slide Monday. But now, with the excise tax's removal, shares popped on a day that would otherwise have threatened the pace of the growth of renewable energy in the US. Clean energy trade groups had warned that without changes, Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' would have threatened some wind farms and solar arrays already under construction. The changes weren't enough to satisfy renewable developers who on Tuesday said the Senate-passed bill still poses a major threat to the industry. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership. If this bill becomes law, families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs, and our electric grid will grow weaker,' Abigail Ross Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said in a statement. --With assistance from Erik Wasson. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Miami-Dade's immigrant past: from the Mariel tent city to Alligator Alcatraz
With Alligator Alcatraz opening today — complete with a visit from President Donald Trump — some may not recall this isn't the first time undocumented immigrants in Miami-Dade have been housed in makeshift camps under Florida's blazing sun while the government decides what to do with them. We've been here before — but this time, it's about punishment, not trying to help immigrants fleeing oppression. It was 45 years ago this summer that Miami-Dade had another tent city. Dozens of military-style tents were pitched beneath the Interstate 95 overpass near Southwest Eighth Street by the Miami River. The city had allowed the encampment as a last resort for housing hundreds of undocumented Cuban men, women and children who had no relatives in Miami, no jobs, no work permits and nowhere to live after arriving during the chaos of the 1980 Mariel Boatlift. It wasn't ideal, but it reflected a community overwhelmed, not vindictive. A small number of Mariels were said to have been released from Fidel Castro's prisons, but deportation was never considered for the people in this original tent city. And there was no glee from leaders about housing human beings in rough conditions or about using 'natural security' — alligators and pythons — to keep them in line. The 1980s version — where José Martí Park's basketball courts are now — was a necessity. More than 125,000 Cubans had poured into South Florida in just a few months, escaping Castro's communist Cuba. Conditions were rough: tents, minimal sanitation, little privacy. The goal was resettlement and integration. Eventually, the Carter administration responded with the Cuban-Haitian Entrant Program (CHEP), which granted special immigration status to those who had arrived during that time. It allowed Mariel refugees to start a new life. Now compare that to today. The Florida Everglades — an ecologically fragile and nationally protected treasure — is the site of a sprawling pop-up detention center meant to house up to 5,000 undocumented immigrants. Gov. Ron DeSantis, who called for its construction in a matter of days using emergency authority, has proudly dubbed it Alligator Alcatraz, a name now printed on GOP merchandise. This new tent city isn't a response to a humanitarian crisis. It's a message from DeSantis and the Trump administration with one goal in mind: mass deportation. Back in 1980, local leaders worked to help refugees. Today, the city and county have signed agreements to help ICE — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — catch and deport immigrants already living here. This time, the optics are deliberate. A detention camp in a swamp sends a clear message: You are not welcome. Alligator Alcatraz evokes isolation and fear. It's political theater. In many ways, these two crises reflect their eras. The 1980s tent city was a Cold War scramble to help refugees fleeing communism. The public was wary but there was a sense of moral obligation. Miami was a city of refugees. Alligator Alcatraz, by contrast, treats undocumented immigrants not as people to help but as threats to contain and deport under an administration that demands it. It's a 'get out' mentality. One constant remains: Miami is still ground zero for America's unresolved immigration crisis. We now have the benefit of hindsight. Many of the Mariel refugees once warehoused under a highway overpass became American citizens, business owners and vital parts of our community. The same could be true for today's undocumented immigrants — if we gave them the chance. Granted, some of those being detained committed crimes. In general, those people should be deported. But the rush to push people out of the country includes lots of immigrants who have not committed offenses. Our response to the immigration crisis must be rooted in dignity: Alligator Alcatraz fails miserable at that goal. Sadly, Trump's visit is meant to turn Florida into an immigration detention poster state for the country. What a difference 45 years can make. Click here to send the letter.
