North Carolina in, West Virginia out and more selection committee questions
North Carolina was a borderline call the whole time. The Tar Heels turned out to be At-Large Team No. 37 when they just as easily could have been seen as At-Large Team No. 38 on the wrong side of the cut line. That's simultaneously a big difference in practice, but not a huge one in terms of evaluation.
The real subplot was lurking in plain sight for the past three months, and it was alluded to at the very end of Sunday's final Washington Post bracket projection:
Repeating from Saturday: If there's a seemingly safe team that might be in more danger than most think, it's West Virginia. The Mountaineers did much of their best work before Tucker DeVries got hurt in early December.
Lo and behold, the Mountaineers were At-Large Team No. 38. West Virginia had six Quad 1 victories, two of them before DeVries was injured after eight games. The Mountaineers also lost to last-place Colorado in the second round of the Big 12 tournament last week, a misstep that seemed like it might relegate them to Dayton.
Instead, West Virginia got sent to the NIT. And the one-Quad-1-win twins, North Carolina and Xavier, get to play on in the middle of this week.
Among the biggest snubs and surprises from Sunday. …
The Tar Heels were the team that, in retrospect, should have been rooting harder for Memphis in the American Athletic tournament championship game. Had the Tigers lost to UAB, Hubert Davis' Heels would have been squeezed out of the field. Instead, North Carolina gets a matchup with San Diego State, a game that features a pair of recent tournament runners-up.
North Carolina didn't do much wrong; its worst loss was a one-point setback at home against Stanford. But it also didn't do much right, going 1-12 in Quadrant 1 games, the lone victory over UCLA. It beat two teams in the tournament field (Patriot League champ American was the other). Absolutely no one in Chapel Hill had any right to moan if the Tar Heels got excluded.
But they're in after winning eight consecutive games against teams other than Duke over the final month of the season. North Carolina (22-13) needed every last one of those victories to secure a reprieve.
The Tar Heels were the team that, in retrospect, should have been rooting harder for Memphis in the American Athletic tournament championship game. Had the Tigers lost to UAB, Hubert Davis' Heels would have been squeezed out of the field. Instead, North Carolina gets a matchup with San Diego State, a game that features a pair of recent tournament runners-up.
North Carolina didn't do much wrong; its worst loss was a one-point setback at home against Stanford. But it also didn't do much right, going 1-12 in Quadrant 1 games, the lone victory over UCLA. It beat two teams in the tournament field (Patriot League champ American was the other). Absolutely no one in Chapel Hill had any right to moan if the Tar Heels got excluded.
But they're in after winning eight consecutive games against teams other than Duke over the final month of the season. North Carolina (22-13) needed every last one of those victories to secure a reprieve.
If someone does have the right to complain, it's the Mountaineers (19-13). Yes, the DeVries injury lowered their ceiling considerably, and they were 8-11 after Jan. 4. They also won at Kansas without the 6-foot-7 wing, and also picked off Iowa State in Morgantown after DeVries was lost for the season.
That said, West Virginia was not a metrics darling (between 42nd and 53rd in six of the seven team sheet rankings), and the Big 12 tournament stinker against Colorado was a terrible last impression (especially when compared to North Carolina winning twice in the ACC tournament). Sunday's exclusion makes DeVries's injury an even bigger what-if than it already was.
If someone does have the right to complain, it's the Mountaineers (19-13). Yes, the DeVries injury lowered their ceiling considerably, and they were 8-11 after Jan. 4. They also won at Kansas without the 6-foot-7 wing, and also picked off Iowa State in Morgantown after DeVries was lost for the season.
That said, West Virginia was not a metrics darling (between 42nd and 53rd in six of the seven team sheet rankings), and the Big 12 tournament stinker against Colorado was a terrible last impression (especially when compared to North Carolina winning twice in the ACC tournament). Sunday's exclusion makes DeVries's injury an even bigger what-if than it already was.
How the committee found three teams worth of difference between the Musketeers and North Carolina on its seed list is the most perplexing part of the evening. Regardless, Sean Miller's team made it in after a late-season high-wire act that included seven consecutive victories, largely against the bottom third of the Big East.
This could have been much easier for Xavier (21-11) had it defeated Marquette in the Big East quarterfinals after holding a double-digit lead in the second half. Instead, the Musketeers will make the roughly hour-long drive north to Dayton for a play-in game for the first time since 2014. They should have plenty of support in the stands while facing Texas.
How the committee found three teams worth of difference between the Musketeers and North Carolina on its seed list is the most perplexing part of the evening. Regardless, Sean Miller's team made it in after a late-season high-wire act that included seven consecutive victories, largely against the bottom third of the Big East.
This could have been much easier for Xavier (21-11) had it defeated Marquette in the Big East quarterfinals after holding a double-digit lead in the second half. Instead, the Musketeers will make the roughly hour-long drive north to Dayton for a play-in game for the first time since 2014. They should have plenty of support in the stands while facing Texas.
The Cardinals (27-7) ranked 28th or better in all seven team sheet metrics, and while their Quadrant 1 record wasn't fantastic (4-6), they were 11-1 in Quad 2 games and didn't lose to anyone outside that group. It's hard to believe Pat Kelsey's bunch is on the No. 8 line.
Louisville is the most blatantly underseeded team in the field. The good news? They'll open the tournament in nearby Lexington and have a chance to pack archrival Kentucky's arena. The bad news? They likely will face Auburn in the second round. That's a much tougher ask than facing a No. 3 or No. 4 seed, even if that would have required some extra travel.
The Cardinals (27-7) ranked 28th or better in all seven team sheet metrics, and while their Quadrant 1 record wasn't fantastic (4-6), they were 11-1 in Quad 2 games and didn't lose to anyone outside that group. It's hard to believe Pat Kelsey's bunch is on the No. 8 line.
Louisville is the most blatantly underseeded team in the field. The good news? They'll open the tournament in nearby Lexington and have a chance to pack archrival Kentucky's arena. The bad news? They likely will face Auburn in the second round. That's a much tougher ask than facing a No. 3 or No. 4 seed, even if that would have required some extra travel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox Sports
17 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
Michigan Discussing Kicking Off 2026 Football Season in Germany
Michigan is having discussions about kicking off the 2026 football season against Western Michigan in Germany. The school announced Friday on social media that it is seeking to play at Deutsche Bank Park in Frankfurt on Aug. 29, 2026. It would be the first game the Wolverines would play outside of North America. Athletic director Warde Manuel said in a statement this would be a "first-of-its-kind opportunity" for the Wolverines and their fans. "The University of Michigan is one of the few worldwide brands in college athletics and the interest in playing an international game would be unique," Manuel said. "This would be a great opportunity to teach 'Go Blue' to a new group of fans in Germany." Home to Eintracht Frankfurt of Bundesliga, the stadium features a retractable roof with a capacity of 55,000. Deutsche Bank Park has hosted five NFL games, including two regular-season games in 2023. Michigan coach Sherrone Moore said they're always looking for unique opportunities for their players, noting the program has been to Italy, France and South Africa over the past decade. The game would require a rescheduling of Michigan's home opener that's currently set for Sept. 5. "This game would provide another chance to grow our international fanbase," Moore said. American football isn't new to traveling overseas and this isn't the first time the college game has made its way overseas. There have been bowl games and annual Classics played overseas since 1976. Grambling State beat Morgan State, 42-16, in the Mirage Bowl in Tokyo, Japan. Grambling would return to Tokyo, defeating Temple in 1977, 35-32. The Mirage Bowl was an annual bowl game in Japan until 1993, featuring powerhouse programs like Notre Dame, Miami, Nebraska, USC, Oregon and Clemson. The Mirage Bowl was replaced by the Coca-Cola Bowl the following year and was shortly discontinued after two years. Japan wasn't the only place the NCAA traveled to promote the game. Dublin, Ireland has hosted collegiate games, most recently last season when Georgia Tech upset, at the time, No. 10 Florida State in Week 0. The first game to be played in Ireland was in 1988 between Boston College and Army. Boston College won 38-24. The collegiate game has traveled as far as Australia, when Colorado State took on Brigham Young University (BYU) in 1987. BYU won 30-26. The Sydney College Football Cup returned in 2016 and 2017; California trounced Hawai'i, 51-21, in 2016. In 2017, Stanford routed Rice, 62-7. The NFL has also made the move to spread the game overseas, in its "International Series", playing regular-season games in Europe, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Brazil. The first game was in 2007 between the New York Giants and Miami Dolphins. The NFL played five games in their "International Series" last season, spanning from Brazil to London to Germany. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account , and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Item 1 of 3 Get more from the Michigan Wolverines Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Transgender athletes in limbo as Olympic sports grapple with USOPC ban
American transgender women will no longer be able to compete in events that match their gender identity, as the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee aligned its policies on athlete eligibility to match the Trump administration's gender politics. Earlier this week the USOPC quietly updated its athlete safety policy, 'to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act.' In a letter reported by international media, USOPC chief executive Sarah Hirschland and board chair Gene Sykes justified the change by saying 'as a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations.' The letter went on to say that the USOPC would work with National Governing Bodies (NGBs) under its umbrella to hammer out details. Since taking office Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress have pushed a number of executive orders limiting transgender participation in public life. Examples include preventing transgender women from using bathrooms that match their gender identity in federally owned buildings, threatening to withdraw federal funding from hospitals that provide gender affirming healthcare for transgender children and barring transgender girls and women from playing on sports teams that match their identity in schools. Both California and Maine received threats from the Trump Administration over the potential to withhold federal funds unless transgender school sport inclusion policies were changed. Maine sued the administration after funds were withheld, settling out of court and not budging on changing its policies. Meanwhile, California's track and field state championships were mired in controversy after introducing a new policy that allowed transgender athletes to compete, but offered separate podium spots for cisgender athletes that were beaten by transgender athletes. The long-term ramifications of the USOPC's decision remain up in the air. The committee did not respond to multiple requests and a detailed list of questions from the Chronicle about which level of athletes will be affected, or how the new policy came to be. What levels this ban will apply to, however, have not been finalized, but will have an impact well beyond the U.S. national teams. As part of its mission to administer Olympic sports in the United States the USOPC oversees 50 Olympic NGBs and a variety of Paralympic NGBs. The USOPC's decision to change its athlete eligibility policy exposes a tough reality for the IOC, which oversees 206 different National Olympic Committees. The USOPC does not receive any federal funding, and as a private organization is not bound by federal policy. However, it does draw a significant amount of its athlete base from the NCAA and other school institutions. Navigating a political landscape where different countries have different laws and regulations regarding gender identity in sports is the IOC's new reality after it spent close to a decade reviewing its landmark 2016 policy that allowed athletes to compete in the Olympic Games without the need for gender confirmation surgery. Previously, transgender athletes were first allowed to compete in the Olympic Games at Athens 2004, but required surgery to be eligible. 'This is a highly complex topic which has been approached by International Federations and National Olympic Committees in different ways depending on their sport and their national legislation and context,' an IOC spokesperson said in a statement to the Chronicle. The body is now seeing NOCs and International Federations taking markedly different paths to implementing its 2021 'Framework on Fairness, Inclusion and Non-Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity and Sex Variations.' That policy represented a marked shift for the IOC, delegating to international federations the responsibility to draft its own policies with regards to transgender, intersex and gender diverse athletes in their sports. Still, the policy called on federations to both respect people's gender identity and craft processes to draft policies that did not presume competitive advantages from transgender athletes. Kirsty Coventry became the first woman to lead the IOC after she was elected president in June of this year. The new President is a staunch ally of outgoing president Thomas Bach, who oversaw both the 2016 and 2021 transgender inclusion policies. The same month of her election the IOC held a workshop on the future of transgender inclusion in women's sport, which led to 'overwhelming support…for the proposal that the IOC should protect the female category.' 'It was agreed by the IOC Members that the IOC should take a leading role in this, and should bring together experts and the International Federations, in order to look for a consensus,' the spokesperson added. With the USOPC's decision to move in line with the Trump administration's political agenda and despite the lack of any federal laws banning transgender athletes, the new policy would not be considered government interference in a National Olympic Committee's affairs. If an NOC is found to have been influenced by a national government, the IOC could revoke its standing and bar athletes from competing under their national flag at the Olympic Games. In addition, the IOC has offered athletes with barred NOCs or other extenuating political circumstances the chance to compete in the Olympics as independent or neutral athletes. It remains to be seen if transfeminine athletes from the United States can compete if rules for the international federations which organize competitions have more liberal transgender inclusion policies. How those athletes would compete in the United States in events organized by international federations, and not the USOPC or relevant NGBs, such as the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games or other World Championships, also remains an open question. In the United States, some NGBs have attempted to begin answering some of these questions. At least one NGB, USA Fencing, changed its eligibility to reflect the updated policy from the USOPC. Other NGBs such as USA Track and Field and USA Swimming had previously updated their eligibility policies to be in line with their sports' international federations, which had placed strict requirements for participating transgender women – which many organizations have labeled de facto bans. USA Fencing on its website says that it updated its eligibility policy to bring 'fencing into compliance,' with the new USOPC guidance and will be effective on Aug. 1. Previously in April, USA Fencing put on its website a ' proactive ' update to its inclusion policy that would not go into effect unless directed by the USOPC or the International Fencing Federation (FIE), which came from a 'months‑long review,' starting in 2023 according to USA Fencing Director of Communications Bryan Wendell. 'The policy applies to all USA Fencing‑sanctioned domestic competitions and categories, including amateur, veteran/masters, and youth events. Mixed‑gender local events remain unchanged,' Wendell told the Chronicle, and that there was 'no formal directive' from the USfOPC about this policy. Transgender athletes competing at all levels told the Chronicle there remain a number of questions, such as whether all NGBs will extend this policy to include all competitions, including masters and amateur competition. '[This] ambiguity is abject cowardice meant to shield USOPC leadership from consequences while creating a policy vacuum that will almost certainly hurt everyone that isn't a cisgender man,' Kristen Aliberto, a transfeminine player for the New York Exiles of Women's Elite Rugby said. Without clarity, trans women have no idea where they will be able to compete in their sports going forward, if they are even able to, she added. Athlete Ally, an advocacy organization dedicated to promoting inclusion for LGBTQ athletes in all sports, called the USOPC 'another example of an institution giving up their authority and expertise to politicians" in a statement. 'This rule change is not in response to new research or new guidelines from medical experts in sports. Instead, it is the result of mounting political pressure and government hostility toward one of the smallest minorities in society, let alone sports.' The Ted Stevens Act from 1978 chartered the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee. Executive Order 14201 was signed by President Donald Trump after his second inauguration, titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' and threatened to revoke federal funding to schools and institutions that allow transgender women from competing in women's sports. The order did not discuss intersex or transgender male athletes, instead designating that the only athletes able to compete in 'women's' events were those assigned female at birth by a doctor. Almost immediately, the NCAA announced it would comply with the executive order and updated its athlete eligibility policy, a change that affected 'less than 10' student-athletes among more than 500,000 playing college sports in the U.S. For U.S. transfeminine athletes, Olympic dreams appear to have been shattered, with little recourse for how this conflicting set of rules aligns with the current patchwork international sport system. And for amateur athletes, there will be questions about how far NGBs go in banning transfeminine athletes in masters and youth events not organized in school settings. Legal challenges in both the U.S. court system and the Court of Arbitration for Sport remain possibilities.
NBC Sports
an hour ago
- NBC Sports
Panthers sign CB Mello Dotson, waive CB MJ Devonshire
The Panthers swapped cornerbacks Friday. The team announced it has signed Mello Dotson and waived MJ Devonshire with an injury designation. The Raiders waived Dotson earlier this week. He had signed with Las Vegas as an undrafted free agent from Kansas. Dotson was a first-team All-Big 12 selection last year. During his college career, he intercepted 12 passes and returned four of them for touchdowns. Devonshire, a seventh-round pick of the Raiders in 2024, was claimed off waivers by the Panthers in April. He spent last season on the Raiders' practice squad before signing a futures deal in January.
