Community safety, modernization: Whitehorse's council has adopted a roadmap for its term
On Monday night, councillors officially adopted their strategic priorities for the next three and a half years — broad goals such as infrastructure investment, community safety and supporting growth.
Mayor Kirk Cameron joined Yukon Morning's guest host Joseph Ho to chat through the priorities.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
How does council decide on its strategic priorities?
Our strategic priorities become the framework, if you will, for this council moving forward. Unlike the Legislative Assembly, you don't have one singular platform following an election — you get seven people, all elected independently with their own ideas, their own thinking about issues that are important. They've all been out knocking on doors, listening to Whitehorse residents, and then we all come into council chambers with different perspectives.
So our first priority is to get alignment among the seven of us on where we want to take the next four years.
What kind of public feedback went into the setting of these priorities?
It started at the election. It starts with all of us knocking on doors, listening to Whitehorse residents talking about where they see our city going.
I think the big one I heard is the need for infrastructure. First, we're being impacted by growth. This city is, I think, fifth fastest growing in Canada. We're built around municipal infrastructure that, in many cases, goes back to the 1940s and '50s. And then we have climate change. We have the Robert Service Way escarpment to worry about. We've also got our aging water treatment facility. These things are all colliding at the same time to drive the cost up for us quite dramatically. So these strategic priorities connect exactly with this topic around infrastructure drivers.
The word 'modernize' comes up a lot in these priorities. Why is renewal such a big theme?
Whitehorse has this really interesting journey, starting out as being a pretty quiet little stop on the Yukon River, to becoming a major transportation centre in 1952. We ended up the capital city of the Yukon because of how much that transportation meant to the territory. But throughout all of that history, we kind of cobbled together Whitehorse.
We had that Second World War expansion from new federal programming in the 1960s that drove a lot of infrastructure. And so it's been kind of piecemeal over time — growing, but not necessarily all growing in the same direction. We also had a mine here, Whitehorse Copper, which again, drove a certain way and a certain approach to how this city evolved through that period in the '60s and '70s.
Now is a time we believe where we can get focused.
We can look at all of those drivers and we can say, 'OK, what makes the most sense over the next five to 10 years to build a community that we can rely on for a future which could very well be 70 to 100,000 people?' We don't know where it's going to ultimately top out. But you look at other communities like Kelowna and how fast that community grew over the '60s, '70s and '80s, well, we have the same possibilities here in Whitehorse, and we have to prepare as city council to be able to meet those demands.
So it's not only alignment internally within our own organization, our own departments. It's also alignment with our partners, whether it be the two First Nations here in Whitehorse, federal government or the territorial government.
Under the priority of good government, you have 'Modernizing City Council processes.' How do you see the council working differently?
Okay, this is near and dear to my heart. Our Procedures Bylaw is substantial and nitpicky in terms of how to manage and guide our council proceedings, and especially as they relate to our community, it's a fairly formal process. For example, if you come to the council table as a delegate to speak to us about something that's important to you, it's a pretty intimidating place to be. It kind of feels like you're in a courtroom and you got a judge sitting up there, and there's certain rules about how we are to behave within the context of asking those questions.
So those kind of hard and fast rules are centuries old, and this council is looking to see if there are ways we can break those down a bit, to soften up the way in which we do our business to make council a more inviting place for citizens to come and talk to us about issues that are important to them in our city.
You also mentioned that community safety is something that you heard a lot about, especially during the municipal election. You mentioned a Whitehorse community safety plan. What kind of action would that lead to?
We don't know yet, and that's the value of having an initiative like this, which is being supported by federal officers and territorial governments in a very big way.
When we first took action, it was the minister of Justice and myself who met with officials about moving this forward and getting this out to start, what is really a conversation with the community. We need to get input and insight from our community to give us the horsepower to put in place the plan that's going to make the most sense.
And it triggers another theme that's significant in our priorities document, and that's the notion of our partnerships. We have to really rely on federal but also territorial governments when it comes to policing, and when it comes to other supports within the community, to drive at that community safety.
But if I can add one thing, it connects back to making our community a more inviting place to be for people, families, the whole community, to spend time in our downtown, in our neighbourhoods, out there, walking around, playing and really showing pride of place.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
18 hours ago
- Axios
AI's global race in the dark
The U.S.'s great AI race with China, now freshly embraced by President Trump, is a competition in the dark with no clear prize or finish line. Why it matters: Similar "races" of the past — like the nuclear arms race and the space race — have sparked innovation, but victories haven't lasted long or meant much. The big picture: Both Silicon Valley and the U.S. government now agree that we must invest untold billions to build supporting infrastructure for an error-prone, energy-hungry technology with an unproven business model and an unpredictable impact on the economy and jobs. What they're saying:"America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it," Trump said at a Wednesday event titled "Winning the AI Race." Policy experts and industry leaders who promote the "race" idea argue that the U.S. and China are in a head-to-head competition to win the future of AI by achieving research breakthroughs, establishing the technology's standards and breaking the AGI or "superintelligence" barrier. They suggest that the world faces a binary choice between free, U.S.-developed AI imbued with democratic values or a Chinese alternative that's under the thumb of the Communist Party. Flashback: The last time a scientific race had truly world-shaping consequences was during the Second World War, as the Manhattan Project beat the Nazis to the atomic bomb. But Germany surrendered well before the U.S. had revealed or made use of its discovery. The nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union that followed was a decades-long stalemate that cost fortunes and more than once left the planet teetering on an apocalyptic brink. The 1960s space race was similarly inconclusive. Russia got humanity into space ahead of the U.S., but the U.S. made it to the moon first. Once that leg of the race was over, both countries retreated from further human exploration of space for decades. State of play: With AI, U.S. leaders are once again saying the race is on — but this time the scorecard is even murkier. "Build a bomb before Hitler" or "Put a man on the moon" are comprehensible objectives, but no one is providing similar clarity for the AI competition. The best the industry can say is that we are racing toward AI that's smarter than people. But no two companies or experts have the same definition of "smart" — for humans or AI models. We can't even say with confidence which of any two AI models is "smarter" right now, because we lack good measures and we don't always know or agree on what we want the technology to do. Between the lines: The "beat China" drumbeat is coming largely from inside the industry, which now has a direct line to the White House via Trump's AI adviser, David Sacks. "Whoever ends up winning ends up building the AI rails for the world," OpenAI chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane said at an Axios event in March. Arguing for controls on U.S. chip exports to China earlier this year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei described competitor DeepSeek as "beholden to an authoritarian government that has committed human rights violations, has behaved aggressively on the world stage, and will be far more unfettered in these actions if they're able to match the U.S. in AI." Yes, but: In the era of the second Trump administration, many Americans view their own government as increasingly authoritarian. With Trump himself getting into the business of dictating the political slant of AI products, it's harder for America's champions to sell U.S. alternatives as more "free." China has been catching up to the U.S. in AI research and development, most tech experts agree. They see the U.S. maintaining a shrinking lead of at most a couple of years and perhaps as little as months. But this edge is largely meaningless, since innovations propagate broadly and quickly in the AI industry. And cultural and language differences mean that the U.S. and its allies will never just switch over to Chinese suppliers even if their AI outruns the U.S. competition. In this, AI is more like social media than like steel, solar panels or other fungible goods. The bottom line: The U.S. and China are both going to have increasingly advanced AI in coming years. The race between them is more a convenient fiction that marshals money and minds than a real conflict with an outcome that matters.


Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Holocaust education ‘not just a Jewish topic,' educator says
Lessons that build empathy through Holocaust survivor testimonies and case studies of Jewish life before 1933 are at the core of Manitoba's newest curriculum. Starting this fall, Grade 6, 9 and 11 teachers will analyze the systematic killing of six million Jews during the Second World War and what antisemitism looks like 80 years later. The curriculum developer told the Free Press that Manitoba students will be challenged to identify bystanders, victims, perpetrators, collaborators and survivors to grasp how propaganda and indifference enabled genocide. 'This is not just a Jewish topic, and I always try to tell this to people,' said Kelly Hiebert, who teaches high school history in Winnipeg. 'This is looking at the longest hatred of all time — but this can also relate to other marginalized and minority groups that have been persecuted over time.' The Nazi regime sought to exterminate Jews, but its early victims of persecution included members of the LGBTTQ+ community, Jehovah's Witnesses, communists and people of colour, among others, Hiebert noted. The career teacher, who does not practise Judaism, specializes in Holocaust and antisemitism studies. He's spent much of the last 10 months meeting with other teachers, museum curators and ethno-religious leaders to design a new social studies framework. The result is a curriculum that explores the Nazi seizure of power in Germany and subsequent creation of ghettos and concentration camps, Canada's response to Jewish refugees, and the lasting impact of the genocide on the world at large. Hiebert said the 'progressive scaffolding' model will teach students foundational knowledge and help them develop compassion for others through 'take action' assignments. The Manitoba government announced on Yom HaShoah in May 2024, also known as Holocaust Remembrance Day, that it was introducing mandatory education to combat antisemitism. Further details were revealed in the spring. One of the early tasks involved drafting a list of definitions. Both the Manitoba and Canadian governments have adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism, 'a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.' 'Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities,' it adds. Examples of it include the denial or downplaying of the use of gas chambers to target Jews and calling the state of Israel a 'racist endeavour,' as per the IHRA understanding. Hiebert called that definition the 'gold standard.' At the same time, he recommends teachers ask older students to critically examine the IHRA definition, along with the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism and a summary published by the Nexus Project, an American non-profit organization. As far as he is concerned, criticism of Israel becomes antisemitic only when it involves demonization, delegitimization and 'double standards that you're not using against China, you're not using against Russia, you're not using against Myanmar and the Rohingya people.' 'There will be disagreements (in Manitoba classrooms),' Hiebert said, reflecting on his 18-year career in education and the complex history in the Middle East that has led to current events. Incidents of both antisemitism and Islamophobia rose in the wake of Hamas militants' Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel and retaliatory violence that has turned into a 21-month-long war. 'Why this is so necessary now is to help students understand the historical significance of antisemitism, develop critical thinking and develop compassion and empathy for others,' he said. Hiebert said he is urging colleagues to prioritize building relationships, trust and respectful classroom environments before introducing these sensitive topics. Marianne Cerilli, a former teacher and NDP MLA who now runs her own consulting firm in Winnipeg, recently facilitated a workshop on teaching controversial topics. Cerilli said she was called upon by a rural teachers union to share her tips with its members in the spring. A survey of attendees revealed many of them felt unprepared to discuss politicized topics at school and they wanted more time to talk to colleagues about their experiences, she said. She advises teachers to brush up on conflict de-escalation and resolution techniques, consider personal biases and practise active listening. The education department will be available to work with teachers who have questions or concerns about the curriculum this fall, said Tracy Schmidt, minister of kindergarten-to-Grade 12 schooling. 'But we don't anticipate a whole lot of concern,' Schmidt said, adding she believes the rollout is 'a really positive step.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Fox News
5 days ago
- Fox News
Kirk Cameron, David Wells, And The Fight For American Tradition (ft. Emily Austin, Kirk Cameron, & David Wells)
Featuring Guest Host – Author of 'Behind The Badge' & FOX News Contributor, Joey Jones Story #1: Journalist & Activist Emily Austin and Joey dive into the rise of Marxist-aligned candidates like Zohran Mamdani and Omar Fateh, their extremist views such as abolishing prisons and private property and give a warning about the collapse of cities under far-left ideology. Austin also recounts her viral interview with President Donald Trump and learned recently that Stephen Colbert was a comedian and not a political activist. Story #2: Actor & Star of 'Iggy And Mr. Kirk' and Author of 'Born To Be Brave,' Kirk Cameron, weighs in on Jeff Daniels' anti-Trump rant, warns about AI deepfakes and institutional distrust, and champions his upcoming 'See You at the Library' movement, a nationwide grassroots push for faith-based children's story hours. Cameron emphasizes returning to 'first principles,' family, and faith as the cure for societal decline. Story #3: Former New York Yankees & MLB Starting Pitcher, David 'Boomer' Wells, sits down with Joey to discuss President Trump's call to bring back the Redskins and Indians team names, arguing that sports are being corrupted by politics. They also discuss stories of Wells' playing days and Joey praises Boomer's work with nonprofits like 'Tunnel to Towers' and their shared passion for supporting military veterans and first responders. Subscribe to 'Will Cain Country' on YouTube here: Watch Will Cain Country! Follow Will on X: @WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit