Opinion - Vladimir Putin's growing ‘red tide' in eastern Ukraine
Meanwhile, to the south, Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion has only managed to advance 17 kilometers toward Lyman since January 2025. But the devil is in the details.
Like the salients aimed at menacing Kupiansk and Lyman, six other Russian salients are slowly coming together as mutually supporting operations expanding from the Donbas in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine.
The pace remains slow — Putin's daily gains are traversed with boots, not tires. Yet now there is a new purpose behind them. If you zoom out and view each of these salients along a north-south axis across eastern Ukraine, you can see how they are increasingly mutually supporting one another.
They are also reflective of a change in Russian strategy. Moscow is avoiding a direct attack on what has become known as the 'fortress belt' of the Donetsk Oblast. He is instead committed to what the institute deems a 'multi-year operation to envelop the southern half of the fortress belt.'
In non-military terms, Putin's battlefield doctrine is crystal clear. Putin is unwilling to enter into a ceasefire because he is still convinced he can outlast Washington and Brussels and conquer all of Ukraine. In Russian warfare, the 1,034,460 casualties are just the cost of doing business.
The spotlight is trained on Russian ballistic missile and drone strikes on Ukrainian cities, but the ground war — the close fight — continues with little exposure from the mainstream media. 'Flying under the radar' is the appropriate military term — and the bad result is what we common describe as 'boiling the frog.'
If Putin's red tide is left unchecked, over time these marginal Russian territorial advances risk gaining exponential momentum. If viewed through this narrow prism, they are very much akin to a land-version of a red tide that is slowly spreading and bringing total death and destruction to all of eastern Ukraine.
As it is, Ukraine — especially eastern Ukraine — is already the most mined country in the world and has been since 2023. Now, out of necessity, Kyiv alongside Finland, Poland and the Baltic states, has withdrawn from the Ottawa Convention, the landmark 1997 agreement banning the use of anti-personnel mines.
Beyond just Ukraine, Putin's red tide is threatening to spread throughout Europe – and arguably, it already has spread globally via Putin's widespread use of paramilitary forces across the Sahel in Sub-Saharan Africa.
The results are always the same: toppled democracies, the plundering of Ukraine's and other countries' national resources (especially their rare earth mineral reserves), widespread destruction and leveled cities — including Bakhmut and Avdiivka early in the war and now Pokrovsk and countless other small Ukrainian cities and settlements as well.
Team Trump's decision to resume defensive arm sales to Ukraine comes at a critical time. Yes, for now, much of the media's attention has understandably been focused on both Russian and Ukrainian aerial attacks.
Yet, while Ukraine's deep fight has been against legitimate military targets including June's Operation Spiderweb – smuggled Ukrainian drones spectacularly attacked and destroyed dozens of Russian bombers across Russia – Putin has intentionally targeted Ukrainian civilians.
Even First Lady Melania Trump has taken notice. As Trump admitted, his wife pointed out to him that every time the president has a 'perfect call' with Putin, the Russian dictator ends the call by bombing another Ukrainian city.
Wars are won with boots on the ground — by occupying terrain. Aerial bombardments merely set the conditions for winning that fight. The war in Ukraine will be won or lost across the 600-mile frontline in eastern Ukraine. Defensive weapons can help, but they will not win the war.
As we have warned, the fighting and bloodshed will not stop unless Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his generals have more artillery rounds and ample offensive weapons to engage and interdict Russian forces before they can enter eastern Ukraine, as well as precision deep strike weapons to defeat the weapon systems killing Ukrainian citizens in their homes.
Nor will it be enough to fend off the Russian advances that are slowly eating away at the value of Trump's much-vaunted rare earth minerals deal with Ukraine. It is estimated that 50 percent of Ukraine's $11.5 trillion of rare earth minerals are located in eastern Ukraine — and much of that is already occupied by Russia.
Ukraine fully understands that its independent future depends upon aligning with Team Trump, and that its rare earth minerals deal must underpin that relationship now and after the war era.
Zelensky's nomination of Yulia Svyrydenko as Ukraine's new prime minister is proof of that understanding. Svyrydenko was instrumental in finalizing the rare earth minerals deal that was signed by Trump and Zelensky.
One of Svyrydenko's first acts will likely be to remind Team Trump that Putin in June seized a valuable lithium mine in Donetsk. It too was small — just 100 acres — but its lithium reserve is vast, and until June it was part of Trump's deal.
Zelensky's recall of Oksana Markarova, Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S., is yet another step in the right direction. Markarova has long been criticized by Republicans on Capitol Hill after House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) accused her of supporting the candidacy of former Vice President Kamala Harris.
For the moment, Putin is winning the race for the title of Don of the Donbas. To end the conflict, team Trump must turn back Putin's red tide in Ukraine.
Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Putin is Running Down the Clock for a Peace Deal - Fareed Zakaria GPS - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Putin is Running Down the Clock for a Peace Deal Fareed Zakaria GPS 43 mins Today on the show, Russian President Vladimir Putin has just 37 days to meet Trump's deadline for a peace deal - but Moscow seems unphased as Russian forces continues to pummel Ukraine. Fareed talks to Alina Polyakova, the president of the Center for European Policy Analysis about prospects for peace. Then, a violent power struggle is emerging in post-Assad Syria. Robert Worth, a contributing writer at The Atlantic, joins the show to discuss Israel's recent strike on Syria's defense ministry, and the growing rift between the US and Israel over Syria. Next, this week the White House announced its plan to make America the world leader in artificial intelligence - largely by scaling back regulations. Fareed sits down with Microsoft cofounder and philanthropist Bill Gates to talk about how he sees the present and future of AI. Finally, economist David Autor warns a second 'China shock' is on the horizon -- and says it may be worse than the first. GUESTS: Alina Polyakova (@apolyakova), Robert Worth (@robertfworth), Bill Gates (@BillGates), David Autor (@davidautor)


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers
FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) — President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: What's in the agreement? Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on 'the vast majority' of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S. What's not in the deal? Trump said the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. What's the impact? The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' What is some of the reaction to the deal? German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations' and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' The Federation of German Industries was blunter. 'Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry,' said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, 'the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet,' said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy,' Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' What about car companies? Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump's 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%. The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a 1.3 billion euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years. What were the issues dividing the two sides? Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade. Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for U.S.-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.


Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
EU trade deal with Trump helps Europe ditch Russian fuels
The new trade deal that President Trump unveiled with the European Union includes a European pledge to buy $750 billion worth of U.S. energy. Why it matters: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said it will help the bloc further wean itself off Russian gas. The $750 billion is spread across three years, she told reporters in Scotland on Sunday. The big picture:"We still have too much Russian LNG that is coming through the back door ... to our European Union," von der Leyen said, and also cited some continued oil shipments. "We want to absolutely get rid of Russian fossil fuels, and therefore it is much welcome to purchase the more affordable and better LNG from the United States," she said. EU pipeline imports of gas from Russia, once its dominant supplier, have fallen greatly. But imports of Russian LNG remain substantial. What we're watching: EU members' purchases of U.S. LNG and oil have risen sharply since Russia invaded Ukraine. And European energy companies have already been signing deals for future LNG volumes from U.S. projects that are planned or already under construction. The bottom line: Details are lacking. The big question is how much this increases purchases that would have occurred anyway. ClearView Energy Partners, in a note, said that even if the $250B annually includes existing U.S. energy exports to the EU of roughly $78B per year, it would still be a big jump. The total "would far outstrip" U.S. energy purchases in Trump's "phase one" deal with China, ClearView said.