Aussies' data, including passports compromised
Although the third-party incident occurred last year, it was just confirmed this month that Australian customers may be impacted by the attack conducted by cybercriminal organisation Clop.
Passports, driver's licenses, card information and other private details such as name, date of birth, phone numbers, and email addresses could now be exposed.
Clop previously published the compromised data on its site, along with other Australian companies on the hit list, such as Steelblue, Linfox and Ampol.
129 Zip archives of Hertz data are currently sitting on Clop's dark web leak site.
'The company doesn't care about its customers, it ignored their security!!!' Clop said on the post containing the Hertz leak.
In a Notice of Data Incident statement, Hertz Australia reassured customers.
'Hertz takes the privacy and security of personal information seriously,' the statement read.
It goes on to outline that Cleo has now investigated the event and addressed identified vulnerabilities.
The incident has also been reported to law enforcement by Hertz, who are also in the process of reporting the event to regular regulators.
'Out of an abundance of caution' Hertz said it has also secured the services of cybersecurity company Kroll to provide two years of identity monitoring services to potentially impacted individuals at no cost.
However, the car rental company told potential victims to stay vigilant.
'While Hertz is not aware of any misuse of personal information for fraudulent purposes in connection with the event, we encourage potentially impacted individuals, as a best practice, to remain vigilant to the possibility of fraud or errors by reviewing account statements and monitoring credit reports for any unauthorized activity and reporting any such activity.'
A Hertz spokesperson said: 'At Hertz, we take the privacy and security of personal information seriously. This vendor event involves Cleo, a file transfer platform used by Hertz for limited purposes. Importantly, to date, our forensic investigation has found no evidence that Hertz's own network was affected by this event. However, among many other companies affected by this event, we have confirmed that Hertz data was acquired by an unauthorized third party that we understand exploited zero-day vulnerabilities within Cleo's platform in October 2024 and December 2024. '
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
3 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Mauna Kea Technologies Enters Australian Market with Endotherapeutics Partnership
PARIS & BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regulatory News: Mauna Kea Technologies (Euronext Growth: ALMKT), inventor of Cellvizio®, the multidisciplinary probe and needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (p/nCLE) platform, today announces its entry into the Australian market by signing a new exclusive distribution agreement with Endotherapeutics Pty Ltd, a leading Australia-based distributor of cutting-edge medical devices, to bring the Cellvizio platform to Australian physicians. This strategic expansion comes as Mauna Kea experiences growing momentum for its CellTolerance application, prompting the company to open new geographic markets with strong growth potential. The three-year agreement grants Endotherapeutics the exclusive rights to distribute and promote the Cellvizio platform in Australia. As part of the market entry, a submission for Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approval for the latest generation of Cellvizio products is underway. Mauna Kea Technologies has already been granted TGA clearance in the past and does not anticipate any hurdles in obtaining it again. The partnership will leverage the upcoming launch of the CellTolerance program with Professor Gerald Holtmann, MD, PhD, MBA, a leading Australian physician at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, who is planning to acquire one Cellvizio for food intolerance applications. 'This technology brings hope of change for millions of patients suffering from food-related IBS symptoms,' commented Professor Holtmann. 'Cellvizio is truly unique in its ability to help identify the root causes of patient symptoms, enabling the creation of tailored diets. My entire team is excited to explore its full potential and improve the lives of our patients.' 'We're very pleased to partner with Mauna Kea Technologies to introduce Cellvizio to the vibrant Australian GI market,' stated Rob Curtin, Business Manager for GI at Endotherapeutics. 'The potential for Cellvizio and its key indications, particularly pancreatic cyst characterization and food intolerance detection is very significant.' Sacha Loiseau, Chairman and CEO of Mauna Kea Technologies, added: "We are thrilled to partner with Endotherapeutics, a premier distributor of cutting-edge medical devices and a trusted partner with deep roots in the Australian healthcare system. This partnership marks a key milestone in our international expansion strategy. As we see good momentum in the adoption of our platform, particularly for CellTolerance, we are taking key initiatives to expand our market reach in territories with strong growth potential.' *** About Endotherapeutics Pty Ltd Endotherapeutics is a leading Healthcare Technologies distributor serving customers across Australia and New Zealand, headquartered in Sydney, Australia. Endotherapeutics' mission is to improve healthcare and achieves this by supplying innovative healthcare solutions with the highest levels of service and support. To find out more, visit About Mauna Kea Technologies Mauna Kea Technologies is a global medical device company that manufactures and sells Cellvizio®, the real-time in vivo cellular imaging platform. This technology uniquely delivers in vivo cellular visualization which enables physicians to monitor the progression of disease over time, assess point-in-time reactions as they happen in real time, classify indeterminate areas of concern, and guide surgical interventions. The Cellvizio® platform is used globally across a wide range of medical specialties and is making a transformative change in the way physicians diagnose and treat patients. For more information, visit Disclaimer This press release contains forward-looking statements about Mauna Kea Technologies and its business. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this press release, including, but not limited to, statements regarding Mauna Kea Technologies' financial condition, business, strategies, plans and objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. Mauna Kea Technologies believes that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions. However, no assurance can be given that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements will be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Chapter 2 of Mauna Kea Technologies' 2024 Annual Report filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) on April 30, 2025, which is available on the Company's website ( as well as the risks associated with changes in economic conditions, financial markets and the markets in which Mauna Kea Technologies operates. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are also subject to risks that are unknown to Mauna Kea Technologies or that Mauna Kea Technologies does not currently consider material. The occurrence of some or all of these risks could cause the actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements of Mauna Kea Technologies to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. This press release and the information contained herein do not constitute an offer to sell or subscribe for, or the solicitation of an order to buy or subscribe for, shares of Mauna Kea Technologies in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. The distribution of this press release may be restricted in certain jurisdictions by local law. Persons into whose possession this document comes are required to comply with all local regulations applicable to this document.
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
List of Places Where Tesla Faces Legal Action Over Self-Driving Cars
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Tesla, headed by CEO Elon Musk, has come under increasing legal scrutiny worldwide over its self-driving technology, with lawsuits and regulatory actions unfolding in France, Australia, Florida, and California. Many of the cases share a common theme of criticizing Tesla's advertising, with lawyers saying that the company's claims of "autonomous vehicles" fail to live up to reality. Newsweek contacted Tesla for more information on the legal action via email. The Context Tesla's global sales have struggled in 2025, with developing foreign competition further threatening its leading position in key markets, and backlash against CEO Elon Musk's role in President Donald Trump's administration resulting in protests and boycotts of the company's vehicles. The legal challenges across the world mean Tesla has further issues to deal with, despite Musk's departure from the White House. France In France, the government has ordered Tesla to fix a series of violations over deceptive business practices, with the company facing daily fines of $58,000 if it fails to comply. French regulators determined that Tesla's "autonomous driving" features do not meet the standard implied by the company's marketing, and said that the company misled buyers by overstating the power of its autonomous driving technology. A Tesla electric car retail store and company brand logo sign at night, Wuhan, China, May 2nd 2024. A Tesla electric car retail store and company brand logo sign at night, Wuhan, China, May 2nd 2024. Getty Images Australia Thousands of Australian Tesla owners have joined a class action alleging "phantom braking" and misleading claims about the vehicles' capabilities and performance. Plaintiffs describe repeated, sudden, and unexplained braking events while using Tesla's Autopilot system, with some incidents leading to collisions or dangerous situations. "Drivers have reported feeling completely terrified when their vehicles have braked suddenly and it has led in some cases to collisions," said class action lawyer Rebecca Jancauskas in an interview in June. "We've had many reports of people who registered for this class action, telling us that they've been driving with their hands on the vehicle, fully alert, and these issues have occurred nonetheless." Florida In Miami, Florida, a federal jury trial is underway following a fatal 2019 crash involving a Tesla Model S using its Autopilot system. Plaintiffs claim Tesla exaggerated the abilities of its self-driving features, encouraging drivers—like George McGee, who admitted distraction at the wheel—to become over-reliant on the technology. The crash led to the death of Naibel Benavides Leon and severe injury to her companion. George McGee said in court, "I trusted the technology too much," acknowledging he took his attention off the road because of his confidence in the autopilot. The trial, overseen by U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom, is expected to set a precedent for how driver-assistance technologies are marketed and what obligations manufacturers bear. California The California Department of Motor Vehicles has filed a lawsuit seeking to halt Tesla sales and manufacturing in the state for at least 30 days. The Department accuses Tesla of making false and misleading claims about its autopilot and full self-driving capabilities, alleging the features are advertised as being more autonomous than they actually are. Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement, "These labels and descriptions represent specifically that respondent [Tesla]'s vehicles will operate as autonomous vehicles, which they could not and cannot do". What Happens Next The outcomes of these legal actions may have wide-reaching implications for Tesla and the broader self-driving automotive sector. In California, the DMV's lawsuit could result in a month-long suspension of Tesla's sales and manufacturing, potentially influencing how all automakers market advanced driver assistance systems.
The Drive
2 hours ago
- The Drive
It's Not Just Hertz: More Rental Car Brands Are Using AI Scanners to Nickel-and-Dime You
The latest car news, reviews, and features. The attention on digital vehicle rental scanners using artificial intelligence may have started with Hertz, but it's not the only player in the business that has introduced the technology—and it surely won't be the last. Competitor Sixt is using scanners, too, and two customers recently wrote The Drive to explain how the company charged them for damage it later admitted was already present on its vehicles. There is reason to believe Avis may also be rolling out digital inspections, too. After my last story on the topic, multiple messages landed in my inbox telling of experiences with rental car damage scanners. Some were uneventful, and others, a bit more fraught. Most stories involved Hertz and Sixt, but notably, one individual said they had to drive their Avis rental through a scanner at LAX, while another claimed that Enterprise was using a scanner at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston. Neither noted any problems in those instances, but these reports show that this technology may be gaining ground even more quickly than the public realizes. The Drive separately reached out to Avis Budget Group and Enterprise Mobility (which also includes the National and Alamo brands) to confirm at the corporate level whether each company uses scanners for rental inspections. An Avis representative didn't answer that question specifically, but said that 'the damage assessment process at Avis remains human-led. While certain technologies, including AI, may be used to support internal efficiencies, they do not replace the judgment or involvement of our employees. Delivering fair, transparent, and service-driven experiences for our customers remains our top priority.' It's worth noting that Avis previously tested an AI-based system developed by a company named Ravin at London Heathrow Airport back in 2019. As for Enterprise, that company was more direct in its response, unequivocally denying use of the tech. 'Enterprise Mobility is not using digital damage scanners at check-in, check-out, or in our damage review process for any of our car rental brands, which includes Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo,' the company told The Drive over email. A rental drives through Hertz's UVeye AI vehicle inspection scanner. UVeye Sixt is a rental car company that, like Hertz, has publicized its scanners. Its Car Gate system analyzes vehicles when customers first drive them away, and then again when they are returned. A key difference between Hertz's application and Sixt's is that the latter says it only issues damage claims to customers after a staff member has reviewed what the computer flagged. But in two eerily similar cases, Sixt customers told The Drive that the company invoiced them to repair damages that were proven to have occurred before their rentals, not during them. One reader named Badi told us that they rented a Mazda CX-50 from Sixt at Atlanta Hartsfield Airport. Three weeks after they brought it back, having been 'extremely careful with parking,' they were hit with a $605.82 bill for wheel damage. Badi requested proof, and Sixt responded with a photo 'showing what appeared to be a pristine wheel,' in the customer's words. Badi couldn't even locate the purported issue until an employee zoomed in to highlight the scuff. You can see it in the images below. Then, Badi noticed something: The image that Sixt was using as evidence was stamped with the date when they drove the Mazda away, not when they brought it back. This photo was taken during the initial scan to set a baseline for the current state of the vehicle so that the customer, ideally, isn't charged for any blemishes already on the car. Badi said Sixt wanted to replace the entire wheel, to the tune of $600, for damage they didn't cause. The Sixt employee they dealt with reportedly threatened collections if the invoice wasn't paid in a certain timeframe. 'I immediately contacted Sixt, explaining they were using the wrong photo,' Badi told The Drive over email. 'After escalating to management, they dropped the claim entirely. Had they not accidentally shared the exit photo, they likely would have proceeded with collections.' Notice that the damage highlighted on the later date was also present on the earlier date, when Badi first drove the car off the lot. Courtesy photos The Drive contacted Sixt about this case, seeking more context on how it happened. The company didn't provide any background, but stated, 'We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience to the customer. This experience does not reflect our high service standards. In the rare event a discrepancy occurs, our team is committed to reviewing it thoroughly and resolving it promptly—as was done here in response to the customer's feedback.' Another Sixt customer named Ray wrote of an incident not terribly unlike Badi's, at Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C. After returning their rental on a particularly stormy day, Ray said they received an email from Sixt showing two small scratches: one on a wheel and another on a fender. 'The email stated that I needed to provide my insurance information to them or pay $650,' Ray told us. You can probably guess what happened next. 'So after I calmed down and looked at the pictures again,' Ray said, 'I noticed that the car was completely dry.' Then they spotted the date of the initial scan—not the final scan—on the supposedly incriminating photos. 'It even said 'exit' on the picture,' Ray added. The customer told Sixt that they weren't responsible for those marks, and a week later, Sixt closed the case. Transparency and accuracy are often touted as the rationale for these AI scanning systems by the companies that employ them. In an ideal world, these scanners are finding real, actionable damage and charging customers fair rates for it. Instead, rental car agencies seem to be using this tech to needle renters for minimal wear and tear that, in some cases, the renters didn't even cause—and only backing away when the errors are pointed out to them. That's the opposite of accuracy and efficiency. Mistakes and predatory inspection practices happened when humans were running this show, too, but accounts like these we've been hearing cast doubt that AI is actually helping change the status quo for the better. If you do face an AI scanner during your next rental and have a story to tell—good or bad—reach out to us at tips@
