
Philippine Supreme Court rules impeachment bid against Vice-President is unconstitutional
The House of Representatives, which impeached Ms. Duterte in February and sent the case to the Senate for trial, violated a rule that only one impeachment case could be processed by the lower chamber against an impeachable official in a single year, court spokesperson Camille Ting said.
The House received at least four separate impeachment cases against Ms. Duterte between December and February but only one was transmitted to the Senate, which would have served as an impeachment tribunal.
The other three impeachment cases were placed in the House's order of business but were archived with no action and 'effectively dismissed,' according to the ruling.
The ruling was 'immediately executory,' the court said.
'It is not our duty to favour any political result,' the court said in a statement, suggesting it did not pass judgement on the array of allegations. 'Ours is to ensure that politics are framed within the rule of just law.'
Ms. Duterte's lawyers welcomed the decision, which they said upheld the rule of law.
'We remain prepared to address the allegations at the proper time and before the appropriate forum," the attorneys in a statement.
Ms. Duterte, 47, became the first Vice President of the Philippines to be impeached by the House in February over an array of alleged high crimes.
The accusations were led by her threat during a November online news conference to have President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., his wife and cousin, then-House Speaker Martin Romualdez, killed by an assassin if she were killed herself during her high-profile disputes with them.
The daughter of Marcos' controversial predecessor, Rodrigo Duterte, she also has been accused of large-scale corruption, sedition, terrorism and failing to openly support Philippine government efforts to oppose and denounce China's aggressive actions against Filipino forces in the disputed South China Sea.
Ms. Duterte allegedly backed her father's brutal crackdowns against illegal drugs that led to extrajudicial killings in their southern home city.
Her impeachment trial was set to begin either next week or early next month by the 24-member Senate, which has convened to hear the case. If the Supreme Court ruling becomes final, the Vice President's opponents could file another impeachment case after a year.
Ms. Duterte ran as Marcos's running mate in 2022 on a campaign battle cry of unity in their deeply divided and poverty-stricken Southeast Asian country. Both were scions of strongmen accused of human rights violations, but their strong regional bases of political support combined to give them landslide victories.
Their whirlwind political alliance, however, rapidly frayed when they took office.
Ms. Duterte's father openly accused Marcos of being a weak leader and a drug addict even during the campaign, allegations the President denied. The Vice President later resigned from her then-concurrent Cabinet post as Educations Secretary as the rifts between the two political families deepened.
She later accused Marcos, his wife and Romualdez of corruption, weak leadership and attempting to muzzle her because of speculation she may seek the presidency in 2028 when Marcos's six-year term ends.
Ms. Duterte made the comment about killing Marcos and his family members during a Nov. 23 news conference, a threat she warned wasn't a joke.
Faced with the prospects of criminal lawsuits, Ms. Duterte later said she wasn't threatening him but was expressing concern for her own safety. Still, her statements set off a criminal investigation and national security concerns and prompted calls for her impeachment.
Among the impeachment complaint signatories was the president's son, Rep. Sandro Marcos, and Romualdez. The petition urged the Senate to shift into an impeachment court to try the vice president, 'render a judgement of conviction,' remove her from office and ban her from holding public office.
'Duterte's conduct throughout her tenure clearly displays gross faithlessness against public trust and a tyrannical abuse of power that, taken together, showcases her gross unfitness to hold public office and her infidelity to the laws and the 1987 Constitution,' the complaint said.
Last month, senators voted to send the raft of complaints back to the House due to legal questions, sparking street protests demanding Ms. Duterte's immediate trial.
Then-Senate President Chiz Escudero said the move led by Ms. Duterte's allies in the Senate did not mean the impeachment complaint was being dismissed and issued a summons for Ms. Duterte to appear when the trial proceeds.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cong set to corner govt as assembly monsoon session begins on Monday
Bhopal: The 12-day monsoon session of the MP assembly begins on Monday, and is likely to witness sharp exchanges, with the Congress gearing up to corner the Mohan Yadav govt on a range of issues -- from law and order and corruption to financial distress. The 12-day session will have 10 meetings. Three bills and a supplementary Budget will also be tabled during the session. Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar convened a meeting of party MLAs on the eve of commencement of the monsoon session to discuss issues to be raised and prepare a strategy with his fellow MLAs on effectively cornering the state govt on key issues. Following the meeting, Singhar said the issues like corruption in recruitment exams conducted by departments and agencies of the state govt, dispossessing tribals from the land in their possession, blatant corruption prevalent in the state, drugs abuse on the rise among youths and involvement of persons allegedly affiliated to the BJP in drugs supply, early recruitment on vacant posts, caste census in a transparent and time-bound manner and raising the OBC reservation to 27 percent are some more issues identified in the meeting on which the Congress MLAs will prominently raise during the session. The govt, on the other hand, will try to turn the tables on the Opposition citing its achievements particularly efforts of the chief minister to attract investment in the state receiving overwhelming response both in the country and abroad, which shall not only bring hefty industrial investment in the state but also create thousands of jobs, plans afoot to promote use of solar power among farmers, new medical colleges coming up, MP Sri Air Ambulance scheme for critically ill patients, procurement of summer moong from the farmers and welfare schemes being run by the state government to reach out to the poor and the needy. The principal secretary, Vidhan Sabha, AP Singh said the House would transact a lot of business during its 10 sittings. The assembly secretariat has, so far, received 3377 questions from the members, 226 call attention motions, one notice for adjournment motion and detained discussion under section 139 and 23 private members' Bill. The state government will present three Bills in the House and a supplementary budget will also be presented during the session. The assembly speaker Narendra Tomar inspected the assembly building on Sunday to take stock of preparedness for the monsoon session. When asked by media persons present on the occasion about his circular banning protests and sloganeering in the assembly premises, he said "It's nothing new". The Congress had criticised the circular saying it's an attempt to suppress the voice of dissent.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Dhankhar's exit: A cautionary tale for political ambitions
The concentration of power in the hands of the Chairman and the manner of its exercise are reflected in the proceedings of the Rajya Sabha. The suspension of opposition members, instances of switching off their microphones, and the open bias reflected in the allocation of subject matters to be raised and discussed in the House are all matters of record. The frequent public articulations of the Vice President questioning the theory of the Constitution's 'basic structure' and that the laws made by Parliament must get primacy within the constitutional framework, and reprimanding members of the House raising objections to and questioning the constitutionality of legislation initiated, are also reflected in the proceedings of the House. The Chairman's conduct, both within and outside the House, often aligned with the BJP's agenda and ideology. He frequently commented upon the necessity of enacting and implementing a legislative framework in which the power to appoint judges to the higher judiciary was vested in the government. Despite all this, the Vice President resigned on July 21, 2025, citing alleged health reasons that prevented him from continuing in office. It is pretty clear from subsequent events that the reason the Vice President resigned had nothing to do with his 'precarious' health, but rather with his actions, both known and unknown to the public. What is evident is that his announcement in the Rajya Sabha regarding the motion moved against Justice Yashwant Varma riled the government because the Lok Sabha, which was also seized of a similar motion by more than 100 Members of that House, had not dealt with it. This appears to be the trigger point for the Vice President's resignation, apart from other possible reasons that we may not be aware of. The meeting of the Business Advisory Committee held at 4:30 pm on the day of his resignation, not being attended either by the Leader of the House, or the Minister of Law & Justice, or, for that matter, the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, was an ominous signal, a precursor to what was to follow. The fact that he has not been given a farewell, and that none in the BJP visited him to inquire after his health, along with the tepid tweet from the Prime Minister, suggested that the government was no longer in a mood to tolerate him.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Monsoon session: Congress issues whip to Lok Sabha MPs for 3 days as House to debate on ‘Operation Sindoor'
The Congress has issued a whip to its Lok Sabha MPs, mandating their presence in the House for three days starting Monday, with a debate set to take place on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. The ruling alliance and the opposition are set to lock horns over the two issues steeped in national security and foreign policy imperatives. The BJP-led ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the opposition parties are expected to field their top guns during the discussion in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. A whip has been issued by the Congress mandating the presence of its MPs in the House for three days starting Monday. Sources said Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar will speak on the issues amid indications that Prime Minister Narendra Modi may make an intervention to convey his government's "robust" stand against terrorism. After the first week of the Parliament's Monsoon session ended up in a virtual washout due to opposition protests over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar and other issues, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said on July 25 that the opposition has agreed to the start of a discussion on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha on Monday and in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. The two sides have consented to a marathon 16-hour debate in each House, which invariably stretches longer in practice.