Small, Stable Pancreatic Cysts May Show Reassuring Outcomes
Compared with the general population, patients with small, stable cysts without baseline worrisome features or high-risk stigmata did not have an increased risk for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer (PC). Smaller cyst size (< 15 mm) and growth rate less than 2.5 mm/y emerged as reassuring features with a lower risk for progression.
METHODOLOGY:
This nested study from the PACYFIC-registry collaboration spanning 44 centres across Europe and Northern America evaluated the risk for HGD and PC on the basis of different pancreatic cyst sizes and growth rates.
A total of 975 patients with neoplastic and undefined pancreatic cysts (median age, 67 years; 65% women) without baseline worrisome features or high-risk stigmata who had either reached the malignant progression (HGD or PC) or undergone surgical resection by the 24-month follow-up were included in this study.
High-risk stigmata were defined as obstructive jaundice in patients with pancreatic head cysts, an enhancing mural nodule of 5 mm or larger or any solid component, a main pancreatic duct of 10 mm or larger, and suspicious/positive cytology.
Worrisome features included recent acute pancreatitis, elevated CA19-9 levels in serum (≥ 37 kU/L), new-onset diabetes, an enhancing mural nodule under 5 mm, a thickened or enhancing cyst wall, a main pancreatic duct measuring 5-10 mm, and/or an abrupt calibre change and lymphadenopathy.
Data on cyst characteristics, such as size and growth (indicated by the difference in size between the first and last follow-up visits), were collected. Overall, 438 patients had a cyst size less than 15 mm and 885 had cyst growth under 2.5 mm/y, and 20 patients developed HGD or PC over a median follow-up duration of 45 months.
TAKEAWAY:
Patients with smaller cysts (< 15 mm) showed a 1.5-fold lower risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata than those with larger cysts (≥ 15 mm; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.7; P = .03).
Patients with slow-growing cysts (< 2.5 mm/y) had a 2.8-fold lower risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata (aHR, 0.4; P < .001) and a 25-fold lower risk of developing HGD or PC (aHR, 0.04; P < .001) than those with fast-growing cysts (≥ 2.5 mm/y).
When considering both cyst size and growth, the absolute risk of developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata was lowest for those with a baseline cyst size less than 15 mm and growth under 2.5 mm/y.
Compared with the general population, patients with small, stable cysts without baseline worrisome features or high-risk stigmata did not have an increased risk for HGD or PC (standardised incidence ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.01-6.30).
IN PRACTICE:
"Low‐risk cysts should be a focal point of attention for future studies aiming to alleviate the burden on patients and health care resources by reducing the intensity of follow‐up regimes or even discontinuing surveillance after years of stability," the authors of the study wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Iris J.M. Levink, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It was published online on June 18, 2025, in United European Gastroenterology Journal.
LIMITATIONS:
Cyst management was not standardised across centres and determined by the treating physician, potentially introducing variability in treatment approaches. The study may have referral bias as 14 of 30 participating centres were tertiary care facilities. Only 27% of participants had more than 5 years of follow-up, which limited conclusions about long-term surveillance cessation.
DISCLOSURES:
This study did not receive any specific funding. Some authors reported receiving research grants, consulting fees, and support for investigator-initiated studies and having other ties with various sources. One author reported holding stock/stock options with a pharmaceutical company.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senators Came to Their Senses on AI Regulation Ban
Some sense has prevailed in the Senate — a 99-1 vote against a provision in its huge tax and spending bill that would have banned state-level artificial-intelligence laws for the next 10 years. It's been just 944 dizzying days since ChatGPT was launched into the world — imagine what might have happened over the next 3,653. A last-gasp effort to amend the bill, which included reducing 10 years to five, also failed. The new wording would have been more onerous than the original, decimating existing state laws on facial recognition and data privacy. New laws will need to tackle AI-triggered issues on discrimination, recruitment and mental health. The matter is simply too urgent to be left only in Washington's hands. Senators rightly saw through the moratorium as doing the bidding of big tech companies that want free rein to do as they please in the insatiable race to build and sell AI.
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
German Medtech Shelves IPO After Investors Said to Pull Orders
Medical technology company Brainlab postponed its initial public offering in Frankfurt on Tuesday after some investors withdrew their orders, according to people familiar with the matter, the latest deal to be shelved as Europe's market for new listings remains subdued. An IPO at a later time for the Munich-based firm remains under consideration, according to a statement, which did not give a reason for the postponement. The deal had been expected to price at the low end of its marketed range, with enough investor demand to cover the offering multiple times at that level, according to terms of the offering seen earlier by Bloomberg.
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Major reports about how climate change affects the US are removed from websites
WASHINGTON — Legally mandated U.S. national climate assessments seem to have disappeared from the federal websites built to display them, making it harder for state and local governments and the public to learn what to expect in their backyards from a warming world. Scientists said the peer-reviewed authoritative reports save money and lives. Websites for the national assessments and the U.S. Global Change Research Program were down Monday and Tuesday with no links, notes or referrals elsewhere. The White House, which was responsible for the assessments, said the information will be housed within NASA to comply with the law, but gave no further details. Searches for the assessments on NASA websites did not turn them up. NASA did not respond to requests for information. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which coordinated the information in the assessments, did not respond to repeated inquiries. 'It's critical for decision makers across the country to know what the science in the National Climate Assessment is. That is the most reliable and well-reviewed source of information about climate that exists for the United States,' said University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs, who coordinated the 2014 version of the report. 'It's a sad day for the United States if it is true that the National Climate Assessment is no longer available,' Jacobs said. 'This is evidence of serious tampering with the facts and with people's access to information, and it actually may increase the risk of people being harmed by climate-related impacts.' Harvard climate scientist John Holdren, who was President Obama's science advisor and whose office directed the assessments, said after the 2014 edition he visited governors, mayors and other local officials who told him how useful the 841-page report was. It helped them decide whether to raise roads, build seawalls and even move hospital generators from basements to roofs, he said. 'This is a government resource paid for by the taxpayer to provide the information that really is the primary source of information for any city, state or federal agency who's trying to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate,' said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who has been a volunteer author for several editions of the report. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in NOAA's library . NASA's open science data repository includes dead links to the assessment site. The most recent report, issued in 2023, included an interactive atlas that zoomed down to the county level. It found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority and Native American communities often disproportionately at risk . The 1990 Global Change Research Act requires a national climate assessment every four years and directs the president to establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Program. In the spring, the Trump administration told the volunteer authors of the next climate assessment that their services weren't needed and ended the contract with the private firm that helps coordinate the website and report. Additionally, NOAA's main website was recently forwarded to a different NOAA website. Social media and blogs at NOAA and NASA about climate impacts for the general public were cut or eliminated. 'It's part of a horrifying big picture,' Holdren said. 'It's just an appalling whole demolition of science infrastructure.' The national assessments are more useful than international climate reports put out by the United Nations every seven or so years because they are more localized and more detailed, Hayhoe and Jacobs said. The national reports are not only peer reviewed by other scientists, but examined for accuracy by the National Academy of Sciences, federal agencies, the staff and the public. Hiding the reports would be censoring science, Jacobs said. And it's dangerous for the country, Hayhoe said, comparing it to steering a car on a curving road by only looking through the rearview mirror: 'And now, more than ever, we need to be looking ahead to do everything it takes to make it around that curve safely. It's like our windshield's being painted over.' ___ Associated Press writer Will Weissert contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at .
