Kenya's president warns against bid to 'overthrow' govt by protests
His toughest remarks yet come as the east African nation faces a wave of violent protests over economic stagnation, corruption and police brutality.
"They want to start chaos, organise protests, burn people's property, bring disaster so as to overthrow the government before 2027... This is a democratic country," Ruto told supporters in the capital Nairobi, speaking in Swahili.
"This country will not be destroyed by a few people who are impatient and want a change of government through unconstitutional means," he said.
"You cannot sponsor violence and go scot-free," he added, saying any attacks on the police would be seen as a "declaration of war".
Ruto, who was elected in 2022, also said violent protesters "should be shot in the leg, be taken to hospital and taken to court".
The demonstrations began in June last year as a youth-led anti-taxation protest, which subsequently forced the government to withdraw the contested finance bill.
But many of Kenya's youth are once again engaging in protests, which last month degenerated into looting and violence, killing dozens and destroying thousands of businesses.
They are disillusioned by the economic situation, corruption and high taxes, as well as police brutality after a teacher died in custody last month.
Fifty-one people have died in protests over the last two months, according to an AFP tally citing rights groups.
Rallies early this week saw hundreds arrested and scores wounded.
Rights groups said 31 people died across the country in the protests which marked Saba Saba day -- meaning Seven Seven -- or July 7, 1990 when Kenyans rose up to demand a return to multi-party democracy after years of autocratic rule by then-president Daniel arap Moi.
Protesters accuse the authorities of paying armed vandals to discredit their movement, while the government compared a demonstration in June to an "attempted coup".
- Boycott call -
Opposition leaders, including Ruto's former deputy and ally Rigathi Gachagua, have accused the government of unleashing state-sponsored violence against its citizens, slamming it as "hostile".
AFP/File | Luis TATO
On Tuesday, they called on the public to "boycott all businesses, services and institutions owned, operated or publicly linked to this regime and its enablers".
Gachagua campaigned for Ruto during the 2022 election but the two fell out last year, leading to his impeachment.
Ruto's allies have accused Gachagua of bankrolling violent protests, with some calling for his arrest.
He has denied the accusations.
Marches last month marked the one-year anniversary of the anti-tax protests that saw young demonstrators breach parliament on June 25, with rights groups saying at least 60 people died in last year's rallies.
Social media and rising economic expectations have fanned anger over inequalities in a country where around 80 percent are trapped in informal, poorly paid jobs.
UNTV/AFP |
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
ICJ begins handing down landmark climate opinion
THE HAGUE - The world's top court on Wednesday began delivering a much-anticipated ruling laying out what legal obligations countries have to prevent climate change and whether polluters should pay up for the consequences. It is the biggest case ever heard at the International Court of Justice and experts say the judges' opinion could reshape climate justice, with major impacts on laws around the world. In opening remarks, ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa said the consequences of climate change "are severe and far-reaching: they affect both natural ecosystems and human populations". "These consequences underscore the urgent and existential threat posed by climate change," he said. The push for a court opinion was spearheaded by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu amid growing frustration at sluggish progress in UN climate negotiations. Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu's climate change minister, said the ICJ ruling could be a "game-changer" in the fight against global warming. "We've been going through this for 30 years... It'll shift the narrative, which is what we need to have," Regenvanu told AFP. The United Nations has tasked the 15 judges at the ICJ, a UN court that adjudicates disputes between nations, to answer two fundamental questions. First: what must states do under international law to protect the environment from greenhouse gas emissions "for present and future generations"? Second: what are the consequences for states whose emissions have caused environmental harm, especially to vulnerable low-lying island states? ICJ advisory opinions are not binding upon states and critics say that top polluters will simply ignore what comes out of the court. But others note the moral and legal clout enjoyed by the world's highest court and hope the opinion will make a tangible difference to national climate change policies and ongoing legal battles. Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme's law division, said the ICJ should "clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis." "And that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes, and public debates," he told AFP. To help answer the two questions, ICJ judges have pored over tens of thousands of pages of submissions from countries and organisations around the world. Analysts say Wednesday's ruling is the most consequential of a string of recent rulings on climate change in international law as courts become a battleground for climate action. Outside the court in the Hague, about a hundred demonstrators waved flags and posters bearing slogans like "No more delay, climate justice today". Those bringing the cases are often from climate-vulnerable communities and countries, alarmed by the pace of progress toward curbing planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels. The Paris Agreement, struck through the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has rallied a global response to the crisis, but not at the speed necessary to protect the world from dangerous overheating. 'Disappear beneath the waves' ANP/AFP | Lina Selg In December, the iconic Peace Palace in the Hague hosted the court's biggest-ever hearings, with more than 100 nations and groups giving oral statements. In what was billed a "David Vs Goliath" battle, the debate pitted major wealthy economies against the smaller, less developed states most at the mercy of a warming planet. Major polluters, including the US and India, warned the ICJ not to deliver a fresh legal blueprint for climate change, arguing the existing UNFCCC sufficed. The US, which has since withdrawn from the Paris accord, said the UNFCCC contained legal provisions on climate change and urged the court to uphold this regime. But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects and that the ICJ's opinion should be broader. These states also urged the ICJ to impose reparations on historic polluters. "The cardinal principle is crystal clear. Responsible states are required to make full reparation for the injury they have caused," said Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh representing Vanuatu. These states demanded a commitment and timeline to phasing out fossil fuels, monetary compensation when appropriate, and an acknowledgement of past wrongs. Representatives from island states, many wearing traditional dress as they addressed the court for the first time in their country's history, made passionate pleas to the robed judges. "Despite producing less than 0.01 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, on the current trajectory of GHG emissions, Tuvalu will disappear completely beneath the waves that have been lapping our shores for millennia," said Eselealofa Apinelu from Tuvalu. Vishal Prasad, director of a campaign by Pacific Island students that pushed the issue before the court, said climate change will become "catastrophic as the years go by, if we do not course-correct." "The urgency of the matter, the seriousness of why we're here, and how important this is, is not lost upon all Pacific Islanders, all small island countries," he told AFP "That's why we're looking to the ICJ."
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Watch – Redi Tlhabi & Michela Wrong on Rwanda–DRC peace deal and tensions
Redi Tlhabi speaks with journalist and author Michela Wrong about the murky peace deal between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. What's really driving this latest effort: justice, minerals, or Trump's quest for a Nobel Peace Prize? Wrong unpacks the long-standing roots of the conflict, Rwanda's covert military interventions, and the DRC's strategic value in a world desperate for critical minerals. Together, they explore the price of transactional peace, the manipulation of genocide trauma, and the fragile political future of both nations. Michela Wrong has spent more than three decades writing about Africa, working for the likes of Reuters, the BBC, Financial Times, Guardian, New Statesman and Spectator. Her books include 'In the Footsteps of Mr Kurtz', the story of Mobutu Sese Seko, 'I didn't do it for you', on Eritrea, 'It's Our Turn to Eat', an examination of Kenyan corruption, and 'Borderlines', a novel set in the Horn. Her latest book, 'Do Not Disturb', is a critique of Rwandan President Paul Kagame's repressive rule.
eNCA
6 hours ago
- eNCA
Freezing of assets on the line as US moves to sanction ANC officals
JOHANNESBURG - A US bill targeting South Africa has cleared its first legislative hurdle. The US South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 calls for a full review of ties and possible sanctions against some ANC officials. International Relations expert Dr. Kingsley Makhubela says the sanctions could have dire consequences for those officials, including the freezing of assets held abroad and a ban on travel to the US. He says the bill would also require the US administration to re-evaluate its overall foreign policy stance toward South Africa. A key concern is the potential threat to the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a cornerstone of US-Africa trade that allows select African countries, including South Africa, preferential access to US markets with few or no tariffs to export there. AGOA is seen as crucial to driving investment. The House Foreign Affairs Committee approved the bill on Tuesday, with a majority of lawmakers on the committee objecting to South Africa's close ties with Russia and China. The committee chairman, Brian Mast, added that the ANC's direct engagement with Hamas leaders and the country's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice are further proof of worsening relations between South Africa and the US. Makhubela says it's urgent that South Africa adopts a foreign policy strategy to navigate its relationship with the US. However, internal divisions within the Government of National Unity (GNU) are making this difficult.
