‘No basis to seek…': US disagrees to India asking for WTO consultations on auto tariffs; calls it ‘essential security exception'
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The United States notified the WTO on Monday that the automotive tariffs were implemented under Section 232, a national security provision, and that the country continues to maintain these measures under the essential security exception within global trade regulations. US said it was 'maintaining these actions pursuant to the essential security exception.'
India had asked for consultations with the United States after the latter implemented a 25% ad valorem tariff increase on imports of passenger vehicles, light trucks, and specific automobile parts originating from India.
The automotive components measure took effect from May 3, 2025, without any specified end date, according to an ET report.
US rejects India seeking WTO consultations
India had raised concerns about the US's failure to notify the WTO Committee regarding safeguard measures under the Agreement on Safeguards (AoS) provisions.
Global auto parts imports to the US totalled $89 billion in the previous year, with Mexico supplying $36 billion, China $10.1 billion, and India contributing $2.2 billion.
The United States has said that its actions were not taken under Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, which governs safeguard measures. The US added that consultations under the Agreement on Safeguards were not applicable as these were not safeguard measures.
The US response mirrors its stance on India's proposed retaliatory duties on 29 US products, including apples, almonds, pears, anti-freezing preparations, boric acid and specific iron and steel items. These were intended to counter US tariffs on steel and aluminium, which India reported would impact $7.6 billion of US imports.
These WTO discussions come amidst ongoing negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) between the two nations. US trade representatives visited New Delhi from June 4-10 for discussions regarding the trade pact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Balancing strengths-sensitivities': India secures safeguards for key sectors in UK FTA; import access to be phased
Representative image (TOI) Only around one fourth of the UK's exports by value will receive immediate duty-free access to the Indian market, with most sensitive sectors remaining safeguarded, the government said on Friday, according to ET. Commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal, addressing the media, explained that product-specific rules of origin have been established. These include value-addition requirements designed to prevent transshipment and block third-country goods from benefiting under the deal. India has protected several sensitive sectors under the trade deal, including dairy, cereals, millets, pulses, vegetables, and high-value products such as gold, jewellery, lab-grown diamonds, and certain essential oils. Key exclusions also cover critical energy fuels, marine vessels, used clothing, important polymers and their monofilaments, smartphones, and optical fibres, reported ET. For strategically important goods, especially those where domestic manufacturing is being strengthened under the 'Make in India' and production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes, tariff concessions will be phased in gradually over five, seven, or ten years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Historic Figures Who Were Actually Photographed Gloriousa Undo India and the UK signed the comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA) on July 24, following years of discussions and negotiations. Barthwal noted that this agreement stands apart from India's previous free trade deals, as it reflects the country's evolution into a more mature economy. He added that India is now engaging in areas previously untouched in past trade agreements, marking its shift toward developed nation status. Working between strengths and sensitivities The agreement strikes a balance between "sensitivities and strengths," the official said, reported ET. 'We wanted to shed the label of 'tariff king,' and FTAs are a way to achieve that,' said commerce secretary Barthwal. 'FTAs bring a lot of certainty and predictability to businesses which this UK FTA will ensure. FTAs are give and take and when we build a narrative, we are sensitive that it's not one-sided.' Barthwal also mentioned past comments by US President Donald Trump, who had called India a "tariff king," and referenced ongoing negotiations with both the US and the European Union, as quoted by ET. 'Detailed talks are happening in the EU FTA. Talks with the US are going on, it will fructify,' he said. Barthwal said the India-UK partnership is rooted in fair play, equity, and mutual benefit. 'We protected our sensitivities and they protected theirs. This FTA has been a balance of sensitivities and strengths,' he stated. Calling it a complex and comprehensive agreement, Barthwal added, 'our defensive interests have been taken care of.' He noted that while the UK may take under a year to ratify the CETA, India will use that time to build the capacity of its exporters and educate them on how to leverage the deal. The government is also working with state governments and export promotion councils to assess how they will be affected. 'We are doing granular studies,' he said. India and the UK have agreed to negotiate mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) to facilitate the movement of professionals such as nurses, accountants and architects to Britain. 'Non-tariff barriers will be eased, and regulatory systems and MRAs would be improved,' Barthwal said, reported ET. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court grants bail to man accused in kidnapping case involving Vikas Yadav
New Delhi, A Delhi court has granted bail to a co-accused in the extortion and kidnapping case involving Vikas Yadav, a former Indian government official charged by the US authorities for his alleged role in a foiled plot to assassinate Sikh separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun on American soil. Court grants bail to man accused in kidnapping case involving Vikas Yadav Additional Sessions Judge Saurabh Partap Singh Laler, who was hearing the bail plea of Jalaluddin alias Sameer, said that there was undisputed evidence of the complainant and the accused travelling together to Thailand, merely three weeks after registration of the FIR on January 6, 2024, creating a prima facie doubt. In its order dated July 23, the court noted that the complainant, Raj Kumar Walia, alleged that he was kidnapped, assaulted, and robbed by co-accused Vikas Yadav and Abdullah Khan on December 17, 2023, where Yadav claimed to be acting on behalf of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang. "The complainant stated that he was forced to make a video call to the applicant/accused , who was purportedly based in Dubai, demanding hawala payments. The complainant was allegedly injected with a substance, beaten, and robbed of valuables, including cash, jewellery, and cheques," the court noted. It noted that the Delhi Police's special cell then registered an FIR invoking charges of kidnapping for ransom, attempt to murder, criminal intimidation, robbery, criminal conspiracy, and violations under the Arms Act. The court noted that Yadav and Khan were arrested earlier and certain recoveries were made at their instance, but Jalaluddin was arrested on July 1 this year for his alleged role in the criminal conspiracy. Jalauddin's counsel told the court that his client and Walia travelled to Thailand on the same day on January 6, 2024, shortly after the FIR was lodged on December 17, 2023, and this fact was not disclosed by the complainant to the Investigating Officer or the court at any stage. After examining the relevant passport pages, the court said, "The passport entries unequivocally confirm that both the complainant and the applicant arrived at Thailand on January 6, 2024. "The complainant's passport shows his arrival in Thailand on that date, and the applicant's passport and flight tickets corroborate the same." It said that while the photographs of Jalaluddin and Walia together, along with WhatsApp communications, were disputed by the complainant by alleging manipulation, the passport details were "undisputed and form objective evidence." The court said that despite repeated queries, Walia failed to explain the simultaneous travel to Thailand. It said Jaluddin's role was primarily conspiratorial, no recoveries had been effected from him, the investigation regarding him was complete, he had no prior criminal record, and he also assured compliance with court conditions. "However, the pivotal factor tilting the balance in favour of bail is the undisputed fact of the post-FIR travel to Thailand by both the complainant and the applicant. This occurrence, merely three weeks after the FIR, raises serious questions about the complainant's conduct and the credibility of his allegations," the court said. It said Walia was duty-bound to disclose this material fact to the IO and the court, as it directly impacted the prosecution's case. "His failure to do so, coupled with the lack of any plausible explanation despite court queries, suggests possible suppression of facts. While the disputed photographs and communications require forensic verification at trial, the passport evidence alone creates a prima facie doubt regarding the complainant's version, sufficient to justify bail at this stage," the court said. It granted him bail on furnishing a bail bond and two surety bonds of ₹1 lakh each and subject to several other conditions, including not tampering with evidence, not contacting the complainant and cooperating for expeditious disposal of the case. A chargesheet has already been filed against Jalauddin, and the matter has been fixed for further proceedings on August 25. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Enigma Of Success': Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella After 15,000 Job Cuts
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella on Friday said the massive layoffs in 2025 weighed heavily on him, even as the company continued to thrive. In a memo to employees, Mr Nadella said: "Before anything else, I want to speak to what's been weighing heavily on me, and what I know many of you are thinking about: the recent job eliminations. These decisions are among the most difficult we have to make." He acknowledged that while 15,000 roles, including 9,000 in early July, have been cut this year, the company's overall headcount remains largely unchanged. Despite the scale of the workforce reductions, Mr Nadella mentioned that the tech giant was going strong with its market performance, including strategic positioning and growth, all pointing up and to the right. He called it an "enigma of success," adding that tech companies must constantly evolve to stay ahead. The 57-year-old said the company was reimagining its mission to stay relevant in today's fast-changing era. "What does empowerment look like in the era of AI?" he asked. Mr Nadella stated that the company was now looking for building tools that give the ability to people to build their own tools using AI, instead of focusing on tools for specific roles or tasks. "That's the shift we are driving-from a software factory to an intelligence engine empowering every person and organization to build whatever they need to achieve," he added. The CEO also mentioned the company's goals, with three major priorities - security, quality, and AI transformation. "Security and quality are non-negotiable," he added. Earlier this week, US Vice President JD Vance slammed Microsoft for firing 9,000 Americans while still going for H1-B visas, reported Fox Business. "You see some big tech companies where they'll lay off 9,000 workers, and then they'll apply for a bunch of overseas visas." He lambasted the company's hiring practices, stating, "But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America. That's a bulls**t story."
