Fewer than half of young men believe abortion should be legal, poll finds
Fewer than half of young men believe abortion should be legal, far less than the general population, a shocking new poll has found.
Just 46 per cent of 18 to 36-year-old men believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, compared with 71 per cent among the general population.
Amid concerns about the rise of the manosphere - a growing online community of hypermasculine influencers - the Ipsos poll showed a stark drop in support for abortion in those aged under 36.
Eight in 10 55 to 75-year-old men support abortion being legal in all or most cases, while three-quarters of 35 to 54-year-olds do. And, among those aged 18 to 36, more than a third of men think abortion should be illegal in most or all cases, the poll found.
Labour MP Stella Creasy, a prominent campaigner in parliament for abortion access, told The Independent: 'Those [who are] complacent that abortion access is supported in this country don't understand the culture war is chipping away at all women's rights, including healthcare.'
The polling comes before MPs vote this week on decriminalising abortion through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill.
Currently, abortions can legally be carried out within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy in England, Scotland and Wales.
They must be approved by two doctors, with the health professionals agreeing continuing with the pregnancy would be riskier for the physical or mental health of the woman than having an abortion. While this is what the law stipulates, in reality, abortions can be given, whatever the person's reasoning.
But an amendment tabled by Ms Creasy would see abortion enshrined as a human right, as has been done in Northern Ireland.
'The only way we can stop women being targeted in this way and ensure they have safe and legal access is to designate abortion a human right as we have in Northern Ireland, and only new clause 20 to the policing bill will do that,' she added.
A rival amendment tabled by Labour's Tonia Antoniazzi - which would mean women can no longer be prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy in England and Wales - is seen as more likely to get the backing of MPs.
Ms Antoniazzi told The Independent the poll should serve as 'a reminder to male MPs for the vote on Tuesday that they can't just leave this work to women'.
She urged colleagues to back her amendment and added: 'This is one poll. It's important to recognise that this poll, just like every other on abortion, shows that the country as a whole remains staunchly pro-choice.'
But she said the findings were a 'clear example of the fact that women's hard-won rights can never be taken for granted'.
It 'underscores why we must always keep fighting to preserve and advance them, as we do,' she added.
It came as a row broke out in the final days before Tuesday's votes, with supporters of Ms Creasy's amendment accusing backers of Ms Antoniazzi of a campaign to get MPs to withdraw their support.
Ms Creasy fears Ms Antoniazzi's amendment does not go far enough in enshrining and protecting the right to abortion, but the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) said it has 'profound concerns' about the drafting of Ms Creasy's amendment.
It called on MPs to withdraw their support for Ms Creasy's proposal and refuse to support it.
Ahead of the votes, Ipsos found broad support for abortion access except among young men.
The pollster also found that around half of voters think the current 24-week time limit for abortions is 'about right', with a quarter saying it is too late and just 4 per cent saying it is too early. Nigel Farage said last month that it is 'ludicrous we allow abortion up to 24 weeks' and that the law is 'totally out of date'.
And, asked about illegal abortions, just over half of voters said the person who performed an abortion should face a penalty, compared with under a third who think the woman having the abortion should.
Ipsos Pollster Kate Duxbury at Ipsos said: "While the majority of Britons support legal abortion, with seven in ten in favour, our polling reveals a significant fault line: less than half of young men aged 16-34 agree.
'This divergence, coupled with the fact that around half of Britons think the current 24-week limit is 'about right', highlights the complexities facing policymakers as they consider decriminalisation. It's clear that public opinion is far from monolithic, demanding a nuanced approach to this sensitive issue."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's watered down welfare reforms will push 150,000 into poverty, modelling shows
LONDON, June 30 (Reuters) - New British welfare reforms are still expected to push 150,000 people into poverty despite Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government watering down the measures, according to fresh modelling ahead of a key parliamentary vote. Seeking to quell a rebellion threatened last week, Starmer revised his planned welfare cuts in an attempt to win over more than 100 lawmakers from his own party who had threatened to revolt over the issue in a vote on Tuesday. He amended the bill so that changes to make it tougher to collect some disability and sickness benefits would now apply only to new applicants, while the millions of people who already rely on benefits would no longer be affected. Publishing analysis of the updated policy, the government on Monday estimated that an extra 150,000 people will be pushed into relative poverty in 2030, 40% fewer than the 250,000 forecast to be affected before the changes. A spokesperson for Starmer told reporters that the analysis was not an impact assessment but poverty modelling. "What it doesn't reflect is the wider action we are taking to lift people out of poverty and raise living standards," they said. The government has said it is investing 1 billion pounds ($1.4 billion) a year to help people with disability and long-term health conditions into jobs, as part of broader employment support across the parliamentary term. Lawmakers opposed to the welfare cuts will now have to assess whether the changes Starmer has made are enough to convince them to back the bill. Starmer has argued that Britain's disability benefits system is too costly to sustain, and makes it too difficult for people who can work to do so, by penalising them for their earnings. Those who oppose the welfare cuts say the changes mean too many people will still be harmed and argue that a two-tier system will be created. ($1 = 0.7304 pounds)
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Island businesses criticise ferry cancellation fund
Some island community leaders have criticised a new £4.4m Scottish government fund set up to support businesses affected by ferry Islands Business Resilience Fund (IBRF) will be available to eight of the 23 islands served by publicly-owned ferry operator Schmoller, of community company Stòras Uibhist on South Uist, said there was a lack of information on the funding, and she raised doubts it would go far businessman Joe Reade said his island was not on the approved list, but local businesses were suffering due to a reduced service. Islands Secretary Mairi Gougeon said the Scottish government was determined to do everything it could to support island communities. IBRF will be available to eligible business, including firms that rely on tourism or trade in perishable goods, operating on South Uist, Colonsay, North Uist, Eriskay, Benbecula, Berneray, Grimsay and Scottish government said the islands were chosen because they had more than 15% of ferry cancellations over the last three summer Ms Schmoller told BBC Radio's Good Morning Scotland programme: "We've had no direct information."The announcement was made yesterday, I gather, but we haven't actually seen any details beyond the fact it will be operated by Highlands and Islands Enterprise."She said a study Stòras Uibhist did last year suggested more than £1m was lost to South Uist's economy due to disrupted sailings over six weeks between Easter and Schmoller said she was not sure £4.4m would be enough to cover every eligible added: "There are other businesses that have lost out as well." Mr Reade said it was "bizarre" Mull was not on the list of said the island's ferry capacity had been reduced by 22% since March because the ferry, MV Isle of Mull, was out of Reade told Good Morning Scotland: "Every tourist related business on Mull is reporting a really bad season."Restaurants are not as full as they should be, tourist trips are not taking as many passengers, accommodation providers have got vacancies in the middle of the season, which is unprecedented."He added: "We can see to the end of June we've lost 7,000 passenger visits to the island."Mr Reade said Mull could be missing out because reduced service was not being used as a measure for IBRF said: "I am absolutely astonished and bemused that the government should use such a blunt way about deciding who gets assistance and who doesn't. "Everybody needs it." How will IBRF work? Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) will manage IBRF on behalf of the Scottish government. Applications will be accepted from Wednesday until midday on 1 September with decisions and payments expected by 31 businesses include those that rely on tourism, and firms that manufacture or transport perishable goods, such as Scottish government said funding awards would be based on demand and the size of organisations that apply for said awards were expected to range from between £3,000 and £35, carried out analysis of information and statistics provided by Transport Scotland and CalMac relating to ferry Scottish government said the eight islands were chosen because each had more than 15% ferry disruption over the last three summer seasons. It said the average cancellations of ferry services across CalMac's network during that time had been about 7%. 'Challenging times' Islands Secretary Ms Gougeon said the Scottish government knew island communities faced "distinct" said: "People and businesses require ferry services running reliably and frequently to support their livelihoods."We worked with Highlands and Islands Enterprise to refine the eligibility criteria and identify how this money can make a real difference to the businesses who need it most."Ms Gougeon said reliable and regular ferry services were key to said: "We know that the current situation of delays and ongoing maintenance to some vessels has created real difficulties for some."We are determined to do everything we can to support islands, their local businesses and employers through these challenging times."
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Gloating migrants take selfies on packed dinghy headed for UK – as Labour slammed over ‘merry-go-round' deal with France
GLOATING migrants have been spotted snapping cheery selfies as they attempt to cross the Channel in a bid to enter the UK. The boat was seen setting out from Gravelines, France, today, June 30. 5 5 Pictures show one boat, laden to the brim with migrants, setting off from a beach in France as one of them snaps selfies. Images show the migrants decked out in bright orange lifejackets and holding floatation devices. One of the men on the dinghy, sitting near the front, can be seen snapping a selfie in celebration. He holds both hands in the air in joy as he and his mates set out across the Channel. Others on the boat can also be seen pumping their arms in the air as the dinghy sets off for Britain's shores. Some further back in the boat look to be waving for the celebratory snaps. PM Sir Keir Starmer has come under increasing pressure to turn the tide on a record year of small boats after promising to 'smash the gangs' in the election. It comes after Labour was slammed for signing up to a "migrant merry-go-round" with France. Ministers are expected to reach a 'one in, one-out' returns deal with the French in a bid to deter small boats. Undercover delivery driver investigation The deal was branded a "gimmick" by Tory Shadow Home Secretary Chris Phillip. Starmer has previously admitted that the small boats crisis was "deteriorating." Record numbers of migrants have crossed the channel under Labour's government. Many are now finding easy work and free accommodation once reaching the UK, incentivising others to follow. 5 5 5 A Sun investigation revealed how Channel migrants were picking up jobs as food delivery couriers earning up to £250 a week after arriving in the UK. The investigation showed how migrants across the country could work illegally from asylum hotels as fast-food delivery drivers within hours of arriving in Britain. Bosses of Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat were hauled in by the Home Office to discuss the issue. He purchased the login to the delivery app's service from a seller called Danyel. Small boat migrants get illegal £1k-a-week delivery rider jobs within HOURS of landing in UK By Thomas Godfrey CHANNEL migrants are working as fast-food delivery riders within hours of arriving in the UK while being housed and fed at taxpayer expense. They rake in nearly £1,000 a week operating from asylum accommodation, used as hubs for black-market work on apps like Deliveroo and Just Eat. Migrants in hotels are banned from working in any circumstances if they have been in Britain for less than 12 months. Even those here longer are not allowed to legally work as delivery drivers. But at hotels around the country, including in London, Bournemouth and Manchester — each one housing hundreds of asylum seekers — we snapped migrants in branded jackets for Deliveroo, JustEat and Uber Eats. Some rode £1,000 e-bikes while others used public-hire bicycles. Last night Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'This crucial Sun investigation reveals yet another appalling abuse of our immigration system. 'These delivery companies know exactly what they're doing. It's a disgrace and they need to be made to feel consequences.'
