Talk of revenge after acrimonious week for Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael
It is not a huge cohort, but there are enough there to make up a quorum of motivated individuals eager to maintain the internecine warfare of recent days.
It all stems form the shockwaves generated by James Lawless' logical but politically unwise answer on RTÉ's This Week programme, that as things stand student fees could rise by €1,000 this year.
Although the worried public outbursts from Fine Gael have ceased, the party remains steadfast in its view that Mr Lawless needlessly wounded the entire Government.
One senior figure summed up the week saying, "we have many issues where we will lose support or struggle politically but this one could have been avoided."
There is a feeling in the party too, as constituency office calls and emails are "off the charts," that it could be difficult to hold the line until October's Budget.
Already there are broad hints that the final figure for student fees will be below €3,000 and the Budget reductions will this time be permanent
Fianna Fáil believes it was Simon Harris' intervention that "escalated" the entire episode into a full-blown crisis which dominated Dáil debate for three days.
The party's weekly meeting in Leinster House saw several TDs lash out at what was described as "media posturing" by Fine Gael.
Those close to Simon Harris contend that he was merely trying to bring clarity to matters given his intricate knowledge of the topic as a former higher education minister himself.
That defence drew nothing but guffaws from both Fianna Fáil ministers and TDs.
"He's good like that isn't he," one scathingly said.
Then there are those who are intent on settling scores.
Battle plans from some foot soldiers have identified Minister of Agriculture Martin Heydon's efforts to retain the Nitrates derogation, as a possible point of attack.
The Fine Gael tactics board has zoned in on Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan's upcoming decision on whether to accept the Judicial Council guidelines proposing an increase in personal injury awards, against the backdrop of rising insurance costs.
Throughout the week, Independent ministers like Kevin 'Boxer' Moran have urged both parties to talk to each other more, and to be mindful of the financial strain many households are experiencing.
Further up the chain the sores are felt less intensely though and there is a general view that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael ministers are generally working well together.
Reports of friction 'overstated' - minister
Reports of deep friction and lasting damage to the Government's cohesiveness were "a bit overstated" according to one influential Cabinet minister.
The switching of portfolios after the general election is even said to have boosted a sense of mutual respect with ministers possessing a greater understanding of their colleagues' workload.
There is a view in the higher echelons of Government that in the context of the many challenges it faces, this week amounted to little more than a "bit of pushing and shoving" or good old fashioned "ground hurling".
The true measure of the coalition's sense of unity will be the Budget negotiations.
These will be framed against the worrying reality that the economic good times are most likely drawing to a close.
That means caution will be the guiding principle in the months ahead for the Fine Gael's Minister for Finance and Fianna Fáil's Minister for Public Expenditure.
Both Jack Chambers and Paschal Donohoe are said to be of a similar mind about the approach required, and their working relationship is described as close.
It is that key axis and how it navigates a Budget amid growing uncertainty, and without the option of a cost-of-living package, which will ultimately reveal if the coalition can function collectively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Cork taskforce 'must entice people to live in city centre'
A taskforce on Cork City must be focused on 'reimagining the core' to entice people to live on shopping and commercial streets, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. Mr Martin has said that any taskforce will need to have 'clear objectives' to pursue, but stressed that he has been focused on developing Cork since first becoming Taoiseach in 2020. 'I didn't need a taskforce to tell me what we needed to do in terms of the docklands and the investment in the airport, in the port, all of which has happened,' Mr Martin said. I think the focus has to be reimagining the core of the city, the city centre, but also the immediate suburbs adjacent to the city centre. 'It seems to me cities and towns are changing and we have to reimagine what a modern city centre would look like and how we sustain commerce in the city centre but also bring in more residential.' In late June, Tánaiste Simon Harris said the Government would be establishing a taskforce on Cork, after promising during the election campaign that Fine Gael would seek its creation within 100 days of Government. That pre-election deadline passed in early May. The Taoiseach said he wanted to see the current Government begin the development of light rail in the city, as set out in the so-called Cork Luas plan. The rail is set to run for 18km, going between Ballincollig and Mahon point, with a total of 25 stops along the way, including at Munster Technology University's Bishopstown campus, Cork University Hospital, University College Cork, Kent train station, the docklands, Blackrock, and Mahon. Mr Martin acknowledged that the public consultation is underway and there are issues around Ballintemple which need 'to be resolved". However, he said: In my view, we shouldn't wait forever to get started. Meanwhile, the Tánaiste said the Cork taskforce is a 'very clear commitment' within the programme for government. 'This is something that Government is working on and I think the example we have seen in Dublin shows that a taskforce will benefit businesses and communities alike,' Mr Harris said. 'We have seen the difference it can make in Dublin, where Government, local government, and community stakeholders, work together and say: 'What's our common vision — let's stop this silo [thinking], that's a job for the council, that's a job for the government, that's a job for somebody else — let's actually pull together and say where do we want the city to be over the next 10 to 15 years.' 'We've now done it in Dublin. It needs to happen in Cork.' The Government has yet to outline the funding allocation to the Cork taskforce, but said the model used in the Dublin taskforce could be replicated by a taskforce in Cork City. Following the Dublin taskforce report, the Government approved the establishment of a new body due to oversee redevelopment of the capital city. However, proposals to redevelop the GPO to include retail units and offices have been sharply criticised by the opposition.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Government seeks to beef up Ireland's competitiveness
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission is to be given new powers and there will be a significant investment in artificial intelligence (AI) as part of a range of measures aimed at boosting competitiveness. On Monday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin is hosting a competitiveness summit along with Tánaiste Simon Harris and enterprise minister Peter Burke as trade talks between the EU and US enter a crucial phase. Under plans to protect the economy, three pilot clusters will be set up to enable collaboration between businesses, research centres, and third-level institutions, in particular high-potential and high-growth sectors. Critical skills review A critical skills review will also be completed by the end of the year to inform how to prioritise skills-based migration for those sectors facing particular shortages, including the tourism industry. The Taoiseach has met with most of the multinationals based here in recent months, and when he was last in US, the key message was the EU, and as part of that Ireland, is falling behind on AI because of over-regulation instead of innovation. A key focus will now be on investing in AI, speeding up policymaking, and reducing red tape to give Ireland an edge. The meeting, which will be attended by IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland, will include a presentation by Frances Ruane, chair of the National Competitiveness and Productivity Council on the recommendations in the forthcoming Ireland's Competitiveness Challenge report. 'Major investment needed' Mr Burke has stressed the importance of actions that must be taken now to improve the country's competitive offering and retain jobs. He will tell colleagues that a major investment is needed to ensure we do not lose out on jobs of the future and action must to be taken now on six key areas to attract foreign direct investment. Mr Harris will tell the summit the focus must be on working constructively to protect Irish jobs and investment and shield Irish businesses and consumers from any negative impacts. A competitiveness action plan, expected to be finalised in the coming weeks, will help insulate businesses from some of the global trade uncertainty. With the clock ticking to Donald Trump's July 9 deadline, Mr Burke struck a cautionary note on Sunday, saying the 'best case' scenario is now agreeing an outline framework that would then create a pathway to further negotiation between the US and EU. 'Obviously, there are number of areas that the EU are looking for, zero for zero carve-outs and favoured nation status,' he told RTÉ's This Week. 'These centre on aviation, life science, semiconductors, and spirits,' Mr Burke said.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Pa Daly: Why Sinn Féin is challenging the Government on super junior ministers
This week I will bring a constitutional challenge against the Government in the High Court regarding the appointment of super junior ministers. The case challenges what I believe is a deeply problematic and unconstitutional practice that has taken root in recent decades - the attendance and participation of so-called super junior ministers at meetings of the Government. This case is a constitutional challenge aimed at protecting the integrity of our system of government under Bunreacht na hÉireann with which Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Lowry-led Independents are playing fast and loose. The Constitution is clear. Article 28.1 states that 'the Government shall consist of not more than 15 members'. That is not a guideline, a suggestion, or an ideal. To me, this is a legal limit on the number who may be part of the Government. The practice of allowing super junior ministers to attend Cabinet meetings, contribute to discussions and access all Cabinet documentation, amounts, in effect, to treating them as full members of Cabinet. That is, in our view, in clear breach of the Constitution. While super junior ministers do not have a formal vote at Cabinet, that argument is largely academic. As former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar himself acknowledged earlier this year, votes at Cabinet happen rarely, if at all. What matters is that super junior ministers are regularly present, bring memos for decision, and are deeply involved in the executive decision-making process. They are treated, in all meaningful respects, as equals to Cabinet ministers, without being bound by the same legal framework and without the constitutional permission to operate in that role. This, we will argue, undermines the core principles of collective Cabinet responsibility and Cabinet confidentiality. The Constitution guarantees that the Government speaks with one voice and that its internal workings are conducted within a protected, confidential framework. This is necessary to ensure stability, coherence, and accountability. When individuals who are not legally members of the Government are present, that principle is eroded. Cabinet confidentiality is diluted, and the chain of collective responsibility becomes blurred. Let's be clear, this is not a historical anomaly. The attendance of a Minister of State at Cabinet first occurred in 1994 under the Rainbow Coalition. Every government since has perpetuated this arrangement. But that doesn't make it right - nor does it make it legal, but we believe that it is time for the courts to adjudicate on the issue. We have reached a point now where four super junior ministers of State are incentivised, via public funds, to operate as Cabinet members in all but name. I believe that this is incompatible with the Constitution. It effectively uses taxpayer money to encourage a practice that breaches the constitutional limits placed on the composition and function of Government. That should concern every citizen, regardless of party or politics. We are told this is a matter of practicality or political expediency. We're told it helps the government run more smoothly or allows for more inclusive voices at the table. Who is running the Government? But when Michael Lowry TD - someone who brokered a deal between Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and the Regional Independent Group - states publicly that super juniors 'will sit at the Cabinet table, have access to all Cabinet papers, contribute at Cabinet, and attend all leaders' meetings,' we must ask - who is really running the Government? This arrangement isn't about good governance. It's about maintaining power through political horse-trading. It is about doing deals behind closed doors and bending constitutional norms to fit political convenience. It is now time to get clarity from the courts on the constitutionality of the issue. The Constitution must mean what it says. If we allow these lines to be blurred, we invite further erosion of the democratic checks and balances that are essential to our system of government and to our democracy. This case is not about party politics. It is not about those who currently serve as super junior ministers. But the constitutionality of their role at Cabinet I believe must be clarified. A culture has developed where constitutional boundaries can be bent by political deal-making. The cost is the loss of public trust in politics and the weakening of our democratic institutions. This case is about reasserting the rule of law, reaffirming the authority of Bunreacht na hÉireann, and ensuring that the Government operates as the Constitution demands. Anything less would be a disservice to the people of Ireland.
