James Moore: Canada is a getting a fresh start on artificial intelligence. Let's not waste it.
The recent federal election provided Canada with a much needed reset on the debate on artificial intelligence (AI), and we should all be thankful for it.
There is a new member of Parliament who is the new minister for the file: Evan Solomon. Thoughtful and studious, the new Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation — the first we have had — provides an opportunity for a fresh start on the file.
Evan Solomon, AI
Evan Solomon fist bumps a guest as he heads to be sworn-in as Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario during a ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 13, 2025. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Spencer Colby)
Further, all the opposition critics of the AI file from the last parliament — Conservative MP Ryan Williams; Bloc Québécois MP René Villemure; and NDP MP Brian Masse — were all defeated on election day in their respective ridings.
This dynamic of personal change, coupled with some good faith on policy development, should give a clear opportunity for the government to re-engage the AI issue with gusto.
To start, I think it would be a mistake for the government to simply re-introduce the old Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) (Bill C-27) from the previous parliament. A great deal was exposed about the imperfections, concerns of overreach, governance and questionable spending in the debates around AIDA after its introduction in April of 2023 that should signal the government to walk away from the previous AI policy efforts.
There are six areas of AI policy challenges, and they are interconnected and complex.
Public safety
First, is the need to balance public safety and innovation. Complimenting and supporting a thriving AI ecosystem (and the increasingly mature hubs in Edmonton, Toronto, and Montreal) while protecting people and firms from the risks of unregulated AI systems is a difficult challenge. The risk of overregulating is real and could result in a flight of startups. But at the same time, there will be public collapse of the tolerance and integration of AI into our lives if the harms of surveillance, disinformation and bias are not addressed.
Privacy
The second issue that needs consideration is the need to address data privacy and consent. AI systems consumed massive datasets which raises concerns about the protection of data and the informed consent of the public for the use of that data — particularly when it comes to health, family, and biometric data. Consent loopholes and data scraping are constant challenges and need to be mitigated in the public interest. And, of course, these protections need to be as borderless as we can possibly secure.
Accountability
The third issue to be addressed must be the public sector use of AI data and systems. It is reported that agencies are increasingly using AI to try to drive efficiency, but there are credible concerns that they are doing so without adequate public facing accountability or transparency.
This needs to be fixed. Any algorithmic decision making by the government needs to be disclosed and the principles of the Privacy Act need to be modernized and ported into any use of AI technology.
Jobs
Fourth, the impact of labour displacement could trigger a torrent of anxiety and disruption that is greater than we imagine. The impact on jobs and skills development will be substantial and we need to gauge — with the provinces and territories — how best to reskill and retrain workforces who may find their lives sideswiped by AI implementation.
Public risk
Fifth, the government must apply a national security lens to the AI opportunity/challenge. One of the dominant concerns about AI technology is the lack of accountability given the possible risks that may cause harm to individuals when wrong decisions are made autonomously.
For example, there is no common description in law that agreed to or enforced with respect to using AI-based lethal robotic systems for selecting targets with possible lethal force. There is a clear need for defence and intelligence policies to be modernized and continually scrutinized in collaboration with our allies.
Competition
And sixth, as Canada marches forward with our AI policy that serves Canada and our needs, we need to consider where global standards are headed in the E.U. and U.S. and align our interests accordingly. We must be able to compete internationally, contribute to emerging global norms on AI ethics, governance and safety and avoid regulatory fragmentation that leaves us at a disadvantage with our competitors.
In sum, AI presents a complex, fast-evolving set of policy challenges that touch nearly every aspect of society. Policymakers must be agile, principled, and ambitious in the coming Parliament.
AI is reshaping economies, transforming workplaces, and redefining our economic boundaries. The opportunities are incredible and the policy challenges associated with the opportunities demand the best efforts our leaders to get it right.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
22 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Premiers Smith, Moe disappointed by Trump's tariffs but most exports remain duty-free
REGINA - The premiers of Alberta and Saskatchewan say they're disappointed by higher tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump but pleased the majority of their exports won't face duties. Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe says the Canada-United States-Mexico trade agreement remains in place, allowing 95 per cent of his province's exports to move into the United States tariff-free.
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Canada should refrain from any retaliatory measures: Sask. Premier Moe on U.S. tariffs hike
Premier of Saskatchewan Scott Moe speaks to media following the First Minister's Meeting in Saskatoon, Sask., Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe says U.S. President Donald Trump's new 35 per cent tariffs are disappointing and that Canada should refrain from any retaliatory measures that would cause harm to Canada's economy. However, he says that efforts remain in effect to ensure the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement (CUSMA) remains in effect. 'While Saskatchewan is disappointed in the Trump administration's decision to increase tariffs on non-CUSMA compliant Canadian goods to 35 per cent, Canada's efforts to ensure CUSMA remains in effect means that 95 per cent of Saskatchewan exports to the U.S. will remain tariff-free,' he said in a statement. Moe says CUSMA remaining in effect is very significant given the U.S. has imposed across-the-board tariffs on many countries. Trump signed an executive order activating tariffs against 68 countries and the European Union Thursday evening. New tariffs of 35 per cent on Canadian exports, effective Friday, exclude products under CUSMA, the White House has said. Moe says Canadian exports that remain tariff-free now have a competitive advantage relative to other countries facing tariffs on the same products. 'Our government will continue to engage with U.S. businesses and lawmakers to improve our trade relationship while continuing to expand our export markets to over 160 countries around the world that buy Saskatchewan products,' he said. He says Saskatchewan will also continue to press the federal government to adopt the 'Strong Saskatchewan, Strong Canada Plan' to approve economic infrastructure projects and eliminate regulations hindering economic development. Moe is expected to speak to reporters on Friday at 12 p.m., which can be livestreamed at the top of this article. -More to come…
National Post
22 minutes ago
- National Post
Irwin Cotler & Noah Lew: We support a two-state solution. But not this way
On Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada intends to recognize the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. This follows similar announcements by French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Article content Fortunately, unlike Macron's approach (pledging unconditional recognition) and Starmer's approach (pledging conditional recognition, yet perversely imposing those conditions on Israel, rather than the Palestinians), Carney made Canada's recognition of the state of Palestine dependent on the Palestinian Authority meeting two key conditions: Democratization, described as fundamental governance reforms and a promise to hold elections in 2026, with Hamas precluded from participating; and the demilitarization of the future Palestinian state. Article content Article content Article content At first glance, this announcement appears to be a step in the right direction. We strongly support a two-state solution, involving two democratic countries for two peoples, living alongside one another in peace, security and mutual recognition of each others' legitimacy. Carney's preconditions appear to seek something very similar — requiring the state of Palestine to be democratic and to be demilitarized, which is key to securing peace and security for the two nations. Article content Article content Regrettably, it is highly unlikely that Canada's approach will be successful, as it suffers from several key flaws. First and foremost, Canada's framework is backwards. The future state of Palestine should be required to meet certain preconditions — including those put forward by Carney, and then Canada should recognize Palestine as a state — not the other way around. Article content Under Carney's framework, Canada will recognize the state of Palestine in September — less than two months from now. It is inconceivable that Canada's conditions could be met in that time frame. Accordingly, either Canada will not go ahead with recognizing Palestine at the UN, or the 'conditions' will prove to be unenforceable, aspirational rhetoric that fail to achieve their intended goals — a democratic, peaceful Palestinian state. This is readily apparent upon a closer inspection of the conditions. Article content Article content The 'democratization' condition does not make Canada's recognition of Palestine conditional on that state being democratic — rather, it makes it conditional on the unenforceable promise made by someone who has ruled over an authoritarian, ineffectual and deeply corrupt government for 20 years that it will be transformed overnight into a functional democracy. Article content Article content To make matters worse, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas has repeatedly broken his promises to hold elections in the past. One of us (Irwin Cotler) has personally met with Abbas and his former foreign minister, Riyad al-Maliki, many times over the years. They have repeatedly promised that they would abolish the pay-for-slay program, end incitement and move towards demilitarization, de-radicalization and the like. Regrettably, those promises have largely gone unfulfilled. Article content Canada's second precondition, demilitarization, is equally unfeasible. The PA only has tenuous control over the West Bank, and has no control whatsoever over Gaza (assuming these will be the recognized territorial boundaries of the state of Palestine). Gaza is currently controlled by a genocidal terrorist organization, Hamas, whose sworn purpose is the annihilation of the State of Israel and the Jewish people, and has promised to repeat the events of October 7 'again and again.'
