logo
Instant fines, tougher sentences for shoplifters on the way

Instant fines, tougher sentences for shoplifters on the way

RNZ News20 hours ago
Shoplifters could be issued on-the-spot tickets up to $1000 as part of the government's latest crime crackdown.
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced the new infringement regime in Auckland on Tuesday, as well as tougher penalties for theft.
"Currently, the administrative burden can deter retailers from making official complaints, and lower-level offending often goes unreported or unpunished," Goldsmith said.
"Our government will not sit by while shoplifters rob businesses of their livelihoods."
Under the new scheme, those caught shoplifting lower-value goods could be stung up to $500. For stolen goods worth more than that, the fine could climb as high as $1000.
The maximum punishment for theft would also be hiked to one year imprisonment for goods worth $2000 or less, or seven years for goods worth more than $2000.
A new aggravated theft offence would be created for high-value theft carried out in an "offensive, threatening, insulting, or disorderly" manner.
"Harsher penalties could mean up to twice as long behind bars for aggravated theft, and criminals will be forced to think twice before destroying more lives," McKee said.
The changes fulfilled a commitment in the National-New Zealand First coalition agreement for tougher consequences for lower-level crimes such as shoplifting.
At the weekend, Goldsmith
proposed the introduction of higher penalties for people who assault first responders
.
And on Monday, the government said it would legislate to ensure coward punches
were treated as a specific offence
.
Coward punches, also known as king-hits, are when strikes are delivered to a victim's head or neck without warning, and when the victim is unable to defend themselves.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Body found in Freeman's Bay, homicide investigation launched
Body found in Freeman's Bay, homicide investigation launched

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Body found in Freeman's Bay, homicide investigation launched

A scene examination was being carried out at a Renall Street property. Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi A homicide investigation is under way after a body was found in Freeman's Bay. Auckland City Detective Inspector Scott Beard says police discovered the deceased on Renall St around 10pm. "Police are continuing to gather information from the scene and enquires into the exact circumstances surrounding what has occurred are ongoing." A person is in custody and police are not looking for anyone else in connection at this stage. Detective Inspector Beard said a scene examination was under way at the address and there will be an increased police presence in the area while the investigation continues. Police at Renall Street, Freeman's Bay, after a body was found. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi "Members of the public can be assured there is no risk to public safety." A post-mortem will be carried out in due course. Part of the street area was cordoned off on Wednesday morning. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Anyone with information that could assist the investigation, is asked to make a report via 105, using the file number 250630/9878 and quote 'Operation Yarrow'. Alternatively, information can be provided anonymously to Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111 or Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Auckland money launderer Ye Hua has prison sentence reduced on appeal
Auckland money launderer Ye Hua has prison sentence reduced on appeal

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Auckland money launderer Ye Hua has prison sentence reduced on appeal

By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Ye "Cathay" Hua was sent to prison for seven and a half years after a jury found her guilty of 15 money laundering charges. That has now been reduced to six years. Photo: NZ Herald / Jason Oxenham A convicted money launderer repeatedly complained to international drug kingpin Xavier Valent that cash her staff were handling was wet, sticky and covered with white powder. "I am scared of drug money," Ye "Cathay" Hua told Valent in a text message. "Our staff sick of counting wet money ... are you sure not drug money?" asked Hua, who at the time owned a legitimate money-handling business turning over tens of millions of dollars a year. The messages were sent to Valent, the former Auckland Grammar student whose international drugs empire has been described as making him a modern-day Mr Asia. He is now serving a life sentence for the importation and supply of methamphetamine and other Class A and B drugs. Hua warned Valent, also known as Harry Whitehead, she was worried police would search her premises if the money he was sending was linked to drug dealing. She asked the drug smuggler for a $100,000 deposit to offset that risk. He did not meet that request, but Hua went ahead and processed the transaction anyway. Hua was subsequently found guilty after a jury trial of 15 money laundering offences involving $18 million, which she processed on behalf of Valent and three other convicted drug dealers. She was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison in 2023, but took an appeal against both that sentence and her convictions to the Court of Appeal. The appeal court upheld the convictions but, in a decision released on Friday, reduced her sentence to six years in jail. The appeal court judges said her offending was tempered by the fact Hua did not know for sure the cash was drug money, and she had not made unduly large profits by handling it. The court was told that the $18m was laundered within the context of her registered financial services business, Quian Duo Duo (QDD), which turned over $357m between 2017 and 2020. About $70m of those transactions were in cash. "While we agree that the period of the offending and the amount of money laundered are serious aggravating factors, the lack of actual knowledge of the source of the cash and the lack of any unusual profits temper the gravity of the offending," the Court of Appeal decision said. "Another factor tempering the gravity of the offending is the lack of any involvement in the crimes committed by those utilising the appellant's money remittance business." Although QDD was a registered financial services provider, it had a history of non-compliance with anti-money laundering legislation. In addition to the criminal case against Cathay Hua, the Department of Internal Affairs has recently prosecuted the company for failing to report over $19m worth of transactions between New Zealand and China. It is facing a fine of $1.25m. It was fined $356,000 for similar offending in 2018. Although Hua never met Valent face-to-face, communications between the money launderer and the drug-smuggler were cited in evidence that she was "reckless" about where the cash was coming from. At one point, she told him not to send any money on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday the following week, because she was due to have an on-site inspection by the Department of Internal Affairs on those days. On another occasion, vacuum-packed white powder was left at QDD by a person who dropped off the cash. Hua took a photograph of the powder and sent it to Valent, who replied that it was lithium. Hua messaged back to him: "As long as not drug". Valent was found guilty in 2023 of 86 charges including the importation, manufacture, supply and possession for supply of methamphetamine, cocaine, MDMA and ephedrine. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no parole for 10 years - one of the stiffest sentences for drug trafficking and of a level normally handed down to people convicted of murder. The drugs involved amounted to more than 200kg and Valent ran his operation so tightly that he subjected his syndicate members to lie detector tests if he suspected they were stealing drugs or money. - This story was first published by NZ Herald

Youth MPs stand by original speeches in wake of 'politically neutral' row
Youth MPs stand by original speeches in wake of 'politically neutral' row

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Youth MPs stand by original speeches in wake of 'politically neutral' row

one Youth MP says. Photo: RNZ / Alexander Robertson The government is rejecting accusations it is censoring Youth MPs , however, some of the young people aren't buying its reasoning for making changes to their speeches. The Ministry of Youth Development says the changes focus on clarity, keeping Youth Parliament non-partisan and protecting them from legal risk with the final decisions left to young people. However, the email sent to one Youth MP carries the subject line "changes required", and stated the ministry "have had to make some changes". Labour says the government is undermining the whole point of the Youth Parliament which is only held every three years. Youth MP and Year 12 student Lincoln Jones, of Auckland, said they had received Standing Orders to follow but some Youth MPs were chosen to give speeches during the general debate in the House and these had to be submitted to the ministry. The Youth MPs were then sent speeches edited by the ministry's staff. "Things that were removed were things that criticise or spoke about existing legislation, government policy, government ministers." They were also told topics or questions to Ministers were not to be fact or opinion and had to be "politically neutral", leaving them wondering what they could talk about. "So there was a lot of unexpected rules and things in place that we did not see coming ... lots of the key content in our speeches had been cut because they did not fit I guess what the ministry was looking for." Jones who is due to speak in the House on Wednesday morning, said he will be delivering an unedited version of his speech and knew others intended doing the same. "We'll be speaking as the rangatahi of New Zealand." He said they all understood they had to abide by standing orders, however, all the changes that had been requested were changes that might have criticised the government. One of his friends was pushing for literacy programmes for young people but this had been deemed "anti-rich". Jones said the 123 Youth MPs represented diverse opinions from across the spectrum and did not speak with a single voice. "We thought we would have the freedom to be able to voice our own concerns and opinions and not be censored as such." Youth Minister James Meager said there was no censorship, instead the ministry was trying to ensure the Youth MPs were protected from any future social media abuse or legal problems. Speaking to Morning Report , he referred to two emails that had been sent as guidance to the Youth MPs, including one that had advised them they weren't protected by privilege, unlike current MPs. Asked if he had seen what had been redacted in the speeches, he said he hadn't but the Youth MPs he had heard on Tuesday had been "robust, they were challenging and they were direct and I thought they were all really good". He was worried some of the Youth MPs might say things that ended up online and exposed them to being "trolled online". Meager said the Youth Parliament was a taxpayer-funded initiative and the participants shouldn't be aligned with political parties. "There is no censorship ... ultimately it's up to them as to what they say ... and the ministry will continue to support them if there is any fallout from here." A wide range of views had been expressed by those who gave speeches yesterday and the young people were clear on trying to challenge existing policies, Meager said. Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins says it's against the spirit of Youth Parliament to have young parliamentarians censored. Hipkins accused the government of undermining the Youth Parliament with its instructions that it shouldn't be criticised and Ministers shouldn't be named. "Parliament is political and young people are entitled to be political as well. I think this is censorship and I think young people should be entitled to be free to say what they want within the confines of the law. "Censoring legitimate political debate completely cuts against the point of Youth Parliament." Labour leader Chris Hipkins Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Teenagers had received emails from the ministry headlined "Changes required" which would sound "very like a direction". Parliament doesn't hear from young people very much and they should be allowed free rein with the opportunity only given to them once every three years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store