
Redefining Black Motherhood: How Jaycina Almond Is Building Support Systems For Single Mothers
In the US, we live in a society where motherhood is heavily stigmatized. 28% of single mothers live in poverty, with Black mothers being disproportionately impacted. Jaycina Almond is actively working to change this narrative. As the founder of The Tender Foundation, she provided critical resources and financial support to single mothers in Atlanta. Her work directly addresses some economic pain points single mothers in the Atlanta area face with programs such as bill pay assistance with rent, utilities, and childcare costs; grocery store gift cards, and a diaper bank that provides free diapers, wipes, and formula. In recognition of her impact, Almond was recently named an Adidas Honoring Black Excellence (HBE) 2025 Honoree, with the brand set to debut a short-form film this Women's History Month exploring her journey.
Almond's efforts are particularly timely, as single mothers in the U.S. continue to face systemic barriers, including poverty rates and limited parental leave. Even our lawmakers in Congress are fighting to be accommodated with the ability to vote remotely for new mothers. Showing that no woman is truly exempt from the systematic barriers that come with being a mother. In this interview, Jaycina talks about teaming up with corporate partners like Adidas, whose support amplifies her work and provides more mothers the chance to thrive.
Stephanie Tharpe: Your work with The Tender Foundation is deeply personal. Can you share what initially inspired you to create this organization and how your own experiences as a mother have shaped its mission?
Jaycina Almond: Tender is definitely the culmination of my own personal experience: my mom was a single mom for the first half of my childhood. She was stuck in a bad relationship because she couldn't support 3 girls on her own. I got pregnant pretty young at 20 and I was a single mom for the first several years of my daughter's life - I didn't have to worry about things like affording diapers but being the solo caregiver was still so tough - I can barely remember the first year because it was just a battle to stay above water. Now make that even harder by being in survival mode or being stressed about making rent. I just knew mamas like me deserved care.
Stephanie Tharpe: Motherhood is often romanticized, yet Black motherhood, in particular, carries unique societal expectations and challenges. How has your journey challenged conventional narratives, and how do you hope to shift perceptions through your work?
Jaycina Almond: Before you even give birth, everybody has an opinion on what's right or wrong. All mothers are always under scrutiny in our society on if they fit the archetype of what we've been told a "mom" is. Then you add the intersection of being a Black woman and a mother; the stereotypes and judgments are compounded. I got pregnant at 20, went through my pregnancy solo, and was a single mom for the first several years of my daughter's life. I could have let the stereotypes define me, I could have let the stigmas tell me I can't do more. I'm not really supposed to be having this conversation with you right? But because I got lucky and I am - I hope that at Tender we can continue to change the narratives around single motherhood and poverty. Some women decide to become single moms, some women lose partners, and sometimes relationships just don't work out - there's no shame in these things. There's no shame in living paycheck to paycheck. These things are not individual failures.
Stephanie Tharpe: The Tender Foundation provides not just financial relief but also a sense of community for single mothers. Can you speak to the importance of both economic support and emotional solidarity in helping mothers navigate systemic challenges?
Jaycina Almond: Community is so important - just knowing you're not alone in something is enough to keep you going. But, also community can look like tangible support: providing things like diapers or cash in your hands every month. You can be there emotionally for somebody but if they don't have access to the basic human needs we all deserve to live flourishing lives like a place to call home or food in the fridge, emotional support can only go so far. We believe direct assistance and connection go hand in hand if we want to make a lasting impact in our families' lives.
Stephanie Tharpe: What are some of the most pressing issues you've seen Black single mothers face, and how does The Tender Foundation address these gaps in support?
Jaycina Almond: I struggle with questions like this honestly, I never want to speak for our mamas. I think there are some more conceptual things Black single mothers face - like the "welfare queen" trope and the stigmas we face that try to tell us we are irresponsible, promiscuous, or negligent parents. There are also more physical challenges that come with being the only breadwinner for your family. Housing costs skyrocketing, being just one unexpected bill or emergency away from financial ruin, maintaining reliable transportation, childcare costs ending up as 20-30% of your income, things of that nature. Especially in a city like Atlanta where there's a lack of affordable housing and the historically Black neighborhoods, that a majority of our mamas live in, have been under-resourced.
There's always more I wish we were doing but currently at Tender, we're building a safety net for single mothers living on the margins here in Atlanta so that they can invest in what they need from housing to keeping the fridge stocked and everything in between. We offer emergency bill pay assistance with rent, utilities, and childcare costs, we operate a Diaper Bank where all families can get diapers, wipes, and formula for free, and we also run a guaranteed income program called The Bridge where our mamas receive monthly cash payments for a full year - no strings attached. We truly do believe in trust-based solutions that are rooted in dignity.
Stephanie Tharpe: With adidas making a donation to your foundation, what new opportunities or expansions will this funding allow for? Are there any specific programs or initiatives you're excited to introduce?
Jaycina Almond: As a grassroots organization, our partnership with Adidas of course allows us to reach more mamas with direct assistance but it also gives us the space to dream about what's next, to be flexible and adapt to our mamas' needs, and to try new initiatives out. With Adidas's help, we'll be doing an inaugural event for our families that will combine physical activity, advocacy, and community building into one day. We're still in the R&D phase but extremely excited! We also will be launching the second cohort of our direct cash transfer program, The Bridge. Single moms will receive monthly cash payments for a full year with no strings attached.
Jaycina Almond Founder of Tender Foundation
Stephanie Tharpe: Being recognized as an adidas HBE Honoree is a major milestone. What does this acknowledgment mean to you personally and to the broader mission of The Tender Foundation?
Jaycina Almond: Receiving such recognition on such a large scale is so surreal! When you are in the thick of it, there's always more you feel like you could be and should be doing. I want to make sure all our families stay housed, everybody has enough for groceries this month, etc. There's always more we want to do but only so many dollars in the bank to do it with. Receiving this honor not only allows us to reach more mamas with direct assistance and it also helps raise awareness to destigmatize poverty and single motherhood. Also, being named one of adidas HBE Honorees made me take time to reflect on everything we've been able to accomplish and how my community, and village are the folks who made it possible for me to be where I am today.
Stephanie Tharpe: The upcoming short-form film on your journey aims to redefine Black motherhood and challenge stereotypes. How do you see this film influencing the broader cultural conversation around Black motherhood and the support systems that need to be in place?
Jaycina Almond: I hope the film can be a conversation starter or the catalyst for someone to interrogate their beliefs about Black motherhood. Storytelling plays such a powerful role in shifting perspective and I think this film reflects the heart of community, creativity, and care that's at the core of both Tender and the HBE initiative. I just hope that whoever watches it feels something — whether it inspires them to take action, learn more, or simply check in on a mom friend. Even small actions can be part of building a more supportive and understanding community.
Stephanie Tharpe: Beyond financial support, how do you envision corporate partnerships evolving to create sustainable, long-term change for Black mothers? What more can brands like Adidas do to move from momentary gestures to systemic impact?
Jaycina Almond: Non-profits aren't sustainable on their own — we rely on our supporters to choose us, year after year. One of the most impactful things a for-profit company can do is offer financial support and visibility to grassroots organizations so we can focus on our mission. That's why partnerships like the one we have with adidas through HBE are so meaningful — their support has been both financial and deeply rooted in driving awareness.
Long-term change needs to happen at a structural level, and that requires community building and public engagement so we can collectively advocate for solutions that work. For example, we run a guaranteed income program at Tender — something that was once seen as unconventional but has now started gaining traction across the country. These programs have been shown to be more cost-effective and more efficient than many existing social services. Thanks to our corporate partners, we've been able to launch our own initiative where mamas receive direct monthly payments for a full year, no strings attached. We're contributing our findings to the growing national conversation around guaranteed income, with the hope that these programs become a widely available solution for those who need it most.
Stephanie Tharpe: As a mother, model, writer, and founder, you embody multiple identities. What's next for you and The Tender Foundation?
Jaycina Almond: We would love to add a mobile Diaper Pantry to our programming within the next couple of years. We currently operate a Diaper Bank and deliver diapers, wipes, and formula to families across the metro Atlanta area for free but there are many families we cannot reach because we rely on volunteer drivers and families don't always have reliable transportation to come pick up. Having a truck of our own, stocked with diapering supplies, and being able to hire a driver is a major goal! Otherwise, the ability to respond to what our families indicate they need, advocate for our mamas, and continue building and sharing a culture of community care is always our north star. Personally, I'm just open to exploring everything that excites me! I love when I get the chance to blend all of my passions together.
Adidas's HBE initiative is a prime example of how corporations have a social responsibility to its consumers. Partnerships between global corporations like Adidas and change makers like Jaycina Almond show that intentional allyship leads to major impact and quantifiable systematic change.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Top White House official urges probe of Fed's Jerome Powell over deceptive' testimony on 'Palace of Versailles' $2.5B HQ revamp
A top White House official on Wednesday claimed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell could lose his job over his allegedly 'deceptive' testimony to Congress over the central bank's lavish $2.5 billion revamp of its DC headquarters. Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte, who is also chairman of the two US-backed mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, demanded that Powell be probed by lawmakers and suggested he could even be fired by President Trump. 4 FHDA director Bill Pulte, left, has called on Congress to investigate Jerome Powell, right, for his 'deceptive' testimony to the Senate Banking Committee last week over the 'Palace of Versailles' $2.5B revamp. Advertisement 'I am asking Congress to investigate Chairman Jerome Powell, his political bias, and his deceptive Senate testimony, which is enough to be removed 'for cause', Pulte said in a leaked statement obtained by The Post. 'Jerome Powell's $2.5B Building Renovation Scandal stinks to high heaven, and he lied when asked about the specifics before Congress. This is nothing short of malfeasance,' the 37-year-old former journalist and private equity titan added. Powell has already been heavily criticized by President Trump this week, who took the unusual step of sending him a handwritten note urging him to cut interest rates. Advertisement Pulte's call for the Congressional probe comes one week after the Fed chair's appearance before the Senate Banking Committee in which he denied The Post's exclusive reporting about the renovations that have been likened by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) to the 'Palace of Versailles.' 'There's no VIP dining room, there's no new marble. There are no special elevators,' Powell insisted under questioning from the powerful panel on Wednesday. 'There are no new water features, there's no beehives, and there's no roof terrace gardens,' Powell said during the grilling by lawmakers. 4 The Post's artwork from its story on Monday which broke the news about how lawmakers were concerend that he may have lied to Congress. Jack Forbes / Donald Pearsall / NY Post Design The 72-year-old's testimony sparked outrage because they directly contradicted the Fed's own planning documents that were signed off by US government pen pushers in 2021 and have not been revised since. Advertisement 'The private dining rooms on Level 4 (of the Fed's Eccles building) will be restored,' reads one excerpt from the filing with the National Capital Planning Commission. 'The Governors' private elevator will be extended to discharge at the dining suite level.' The documents also expressly mention 'vegetated roof terraces' that will welcome 'urban wildlife and pollinators' as well as new marble and water features. A Post editorial published on Tuesday hit out at Powell over 'his privileged arrogance' in the way he spoke to the committee. 4 The Fed's own filings with the National Capital Planning Commission tell a very different story from the one recounted by Jerome Powell to the Senate Banking Committee. NCPC Advertisement He also appeared to dismiss concerns that the revamp was being subsidized by American taxpayers in Wednesday's hearing, saying simply that 'the cost overruns are what they are.' The eye-watering price tag for the overhaul has already ballooned by 30% from an original estimate of $1.9 billion. After The Post broke the story in April about the Fed's reckless spending on the HQ upgrade, former Department of Government Efficiency chief Elon Musk called the news 'an eyebrow raiser.' The Tesla titan, who has since left government, said DOGE should 'definitely' investigate how so much money came to be blown on the glorified vanity project. By comparison, JPMorgan's new headquarters in Midtown Manhattan — a luxe, 60-story tower at 270 Park Ave. designed by star architect Norman Foster — is set to cost an estimated $3 billion. 4 Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) said the renovations with their lavish amenities look like they belong in the 'Palace of Versailles', the official residence of the long deposed French monarchy. AP The revelations are controversial at a time when the Fed is struggling with mounting losses, which stand at a total of $233 billion from the past three years. Its interest costs surged and outstripped its earnings on bonds it owns when Powell hiked rates in trying to tame rampant inflation during the Biden administration. Advertisement It sank into the red for the first time in its history, posting losses of $114.6 billion in 2023. Officials there insist that losing money in no way impacts their ability to operate and conduct monetary policy. When the Fed makes a profit, that money is passed on to the US Treasury to become part of the federal government's budget. The losses are bundled together in what is known as the Fed's 'deferred asset' that it must pay down before money can be spent on other things, such as defense, education and Medicare.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Greene says Johnson doesn't have votes to pass ‘big, beautiful bill': ‘S‑‑‑ show'
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) predicted a tough battle ahead for President Trump's agenda-setting tax and spending megabill as it returns to the House following its dramatic Senate passage Tuesday, describing the situation as a 's— show.' 'There's no way that [Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.)] has the votes in the House for this,' Greene told political pundit and Trump ally Steve Bannon on an episode of his 'War Room' podcast. 'I think it's far from over.' She added, 'It is really a dire situation.' The House returned to the Capitol on Wednesday to try to hash out differences between its version of the bill and the one advanced through the Senate — which was narrowly passed after a tiebreaking vote from Vice President Vance following a marathon debate on its specifics. Trump has pressed GOP lawmakers to send the bill to him for final approval by Friday. 'We're on a time clock that's been really set on us, so we have a lot of pressure — and then also given the fact that there's 435 members of Congress and it's hard for us to get to an agreement on anything,' Greene continued. 'So this whole thing is — I don't know what to call it — it's a s‑‑‑ show.' 'I know we're not supposed to say that on the air, but that's truly what it is,' the Georgia Republican added. The House passed its take on the bill in May in a razor-thin 215-214 vote amid pressure from Trump, Vance and other White House allies. Johnson and other GOP leaders have been trying to bring skeptical House members on board with changes that the Senate made in its version by this week's self-imposed deadline Trump has pushed. 'We knew we would come to this moment. We knew the Senate would amend the House product. I encouraged them to amend it as lightly as possible. They went a little further than many of us would have preferred, but we have the product now,' Johnson told reporters in the Capitol on Tuesday. 'As the president said, it's his bill. It's not a House bill, it's not a Senate bill, it's the American people's bill.' 'My objective and my responsibility is to get that bill over the line, so we will do everything possible to do that, and I will work with all of our colleagues,' he added. Johnson has also acknowledged that inclement weather could add another road bump, after several lawmakers posted online that their flights back to Washington were delayed or canceled. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CBS News
14 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump asks Supreme Court to let him fire members of Consumer Product Safety Commission
Washington — President Trump's administration asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to allow him to fire three members of the independent Consumer Product Safety Commission. The request to the high court by Solicitor General D. John Sauer arose from a federal judge's decision earlier this month that found Mr. Trump's removal of the three commissioners — Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. — was unlawful and blocked their terminations. The officials had been named to the five-member Consumer Product Safety Commission by former President Joe Biden for seven-year terms. Boyle's term was set to end in October, Hoehn-Saric's time on the panel was due to end in October 2027 and Trumka's in October 2028. The commission sets consumer product safety standards, can order product recalls and bring civil suits against companies. The three members were told in May that their positions were terminated, effective immediately. Under federal law, a president cannot remove a commissioner at-will, but only for neglect of duty or malfeasance. Removal restrictions like those governing the Consumer Product Safety Commission have been put in place by Congress to insulate independent agencies from politics. But Mr. Trump has sought to test his removal powers through a series of firings targeting members of those entities. Following their firings, the commissioners sued and asked a federal judge in Maryland, where the Consumer Product Safety Commission is headquartered, to restore them to their positions. They succeeded in their bid earlier this month, when U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox allowed the three commissioners to resume their roles. "Depriving this five-member commission of three of its sitting members threatens severe impairment of its ability to fulfill its statutory mandates and advance the public's interest in safe consumer products," Maddox wrote in his decision. "This hardship and threat to public safety significantly outweighs any hardship defendants might suffer from plaintiffs' participation on the CPSC." A unanimous panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit declined to block the district court's decision and allow Mr. Trump to fire the commissioners. The commissioners, Judge James Wynn wrote in a brief opinion, "were appointed to serve fixed terms with statutory protections designed to preserve the commission's independence and partisan balance. Permitting their unlawful removal would thwart that purpose and deprive the public of the commission's full expertise and oversight. And because the attempted removals were unlawful, the Plaintiff-Commissioners never ceased to lawfully occupy their offices." Sauer's emergency appeal to the Supreme Court is the third involving the president's power to remove executive officers, which the administration has argued is generally unrestricted. The justices in May cleared the way for Mr. Trump to remove without cause two members of two federal independent labor boards while legal fights over their terminations move forward. Over the dissent of the three liberal justices, the high court said in its unsigned decision that it "reflects our judgment that the government faces greater risk of harm from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty." Sauer said that May decision from the high court regarding the earlier removals should have foreclosed the reinstatement of the Consumer Product Safety Commission members. The district court's order, he wrote, effectively transfers control of the panel from Mr. Trump to three members who were appointed by his predecessor. "That plain-as-day affront to the President's fundamental Article II powers warrants intervention now," the solicitor general wrote. Sauer asked the high court to act immediately and issue a brief administrative stay that would allow it more time to consider his request for emergency relief. Lawyers for the commissioners opposed that request for swift action, noting that they have been serving in their roles in the nearly three weeks since the district judge ruled in their favor. The Trump administration, the lawyers said, did not identify any harm that would stem from the commissioner's continued service during the time it will take for the Supreme Court to rule.