
Dartmoor will be poorer for the Supreme Court's decision
Dartmoor had been one of the few places in the UK where ramblers could pitch a tent for the night until the hedge fund manager, Alexander Darwall, brought legal action claiming that the right to camp was expressly not allowed in accordance with the Dartmoor Commons Act.
Darwall was a focal point of that bright wintery morning. His visage appeared on banners, his name was on everyone's lips, and at the end of the day, as the sun went down, a chant of 'Darwall… a---hole' went up, while drummers kept time. It was very much an us versus him paradigm and the tales were wild. His reason for buying the land, according to some, was mineral rights. Others told me he'd inherited it all. But then again, another observer told me it was about the vast profits he supposedly makes from pheasant shooting. Alexander Darwall was everywhere and nowhere, not so much a man as an idea.
There was a real carnival atmosphere. It felt both quietly revolutionary and quite childish. But I wasn't there to protest. I was there to research my book on land access, Uncommon Ground, and the protest, in spite of being the focus of the media, wasn't where the most interesting story actually was.
About five months after the protest, I headed back to Dartmoor to visit a 76 year old gamekeeper who, for 43 years, has run a shoot on that contested ground. 'Frightened the s--t out of me', he admitted, when we sat down to talk in his cottage. He'd spent the morning on guard in his pheasant pens in the valley below and then, in the afternoon, he'd driven up to have a look. He was keen to make it known that he hadn't encountered 'a bad person among them.' Snowy clearly isn't worried about thoughtful ramblers. The trouble, he told me, 'are the scrotes'. He has apparently wasted huge amounts of time over the years clearing up after irresponsible fly campers.
His observation was fascinating as I encountered a whole suite of people who would happily see Snowy's way of life as a pheasant keeper consigned to history but his point was important – it's very hard for those who camp responsibly to recognise that a great many don't.
While we chatted about times past and about Snowy's love of wildlife, a truck pulled into the yard. 'This here', Snowy explained with great admiration, as the driver got out, 'is young Simon.' Simon, he told me, would be taking over as head keeper, and with him was a local farmer's son.
Simon was thoughtful, tremendously balanced, and clearly immensely keen on conservation. Sometimes, he told me, he almost has to laugh. He'll find people having a picnic right in the middle of his lapwing plot (a bird which is almost extinct on Dartmoor) and the picnickers tend to have no idea they are disturbing anything. Some of them, he went on, are really respectful and want to learn but others seem to want a fight.
Snowy turned to the young lad and asked him what he thought of it all. Shyly, he said to me that as he sees it those at the forefront of the fight to camp on Dartmoor are just 'a bunch of rich Londoners trying to tell us what to do.' He's not entirely right – but he's closer to the truth than many would like to admit and who am I to tell him he's wrong? What's interesting is that he feels that way and he added, in case I was in any doubt, 'any young farmer will tell you the same'.
What stays with me most from that conversation was Snowy saying that when he first realised the impact that the public has on nature was during foot and mouth. The whole thing, he recalled, was terrible but because there weren't any people, everything changed. 'I saw adders. I saw birds in places I've never seen, and the insect life in the grass was just totally different.'
On 21 May, 2025, at mid-morning, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that people do have the right to camp on Dartmoor. Part of me is pleased – it means a great deal to some but I worry too for the wildlife and I worry about that young lad and Simon and Snowy. I worry because the media is focussing predictably on the campaigners and those privileged few who own the land. As ever it's as though those who work the land don't exist. Ask any young farmer, that boy said in that cottage kitchen, except we won't.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge allows Palestine Action to challenge Home Office over terrorism ban
Banned group Palestine Action will be able to challenge the Home Office over its proscription as a terrorist organisation, a judge has ruled. The co-founder of the pro-Palestinian action group, Huda Ammori, has sought to challenge the government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Home secretary Yvette Cooper decided to proscribe the group, effectively branding it a terrorist organisation, after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two military planes with red paint. She also cited the group's protest at a weapons equipment factory in Glasgow in 2022, which reportedly caused more than £1m worth of damage, and its targeting of Elbit Systems UK, a defence technology company. The ban came into force in early July making supporting Palestine Action a criminal offence, with membership or expressing support for the group punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Over 80 organisations are already proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000, including al-Qaeda and the Wagner group. Britain's proscription of Palestine Action was condemned as a 'disturbing misuse' of counter-terror laws by the United Nations human rights chief last week. Volker Turk urged the UK to lift the ban, which he said was 'disproportionate and unnecessary'. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring a High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the court that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' Sir James Eadie KC, for the Home Office, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the g overnment, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.'


BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cambridge university freedom of speech 'better than it was'
Free speech was stifled at the University of Cambridge in recent years but has since "got better", according to a departing college Mosey, the master of Selwyn College, said: "For a period I think we were in rather a difficult spot when that freedom was not as strong as it should have been."He was "delighted" former minister Lord Smith had been elected as the university's chancellor because he had campaigned on a platform of free speech and academic university has been approached for comment. Mosey, who is the former head of BBC television news, said universities were supposed to be about free speech, free ideas and academic spoke to the BBC after writing about the "chilling" atmosphere felt by some academics in the Telegraph."One of the things I say to students when they come to Selwyn is they may hear views they may find upsetting, they may not agree with people, but that's part of being at a university - and if someone says something you disagree with, challenge them."I think that's what was difficult three, four or five years ago."From this summer, a new law will place a stronger responsibility on universities in England to uphold freedom of speech and academic freedom. Mosey, who is standing down as Selwyn's master after 12 years, said: "My point is, you can both say, 'I'm in favour of free speech' and be in favour of trans rights or gender rights or racial rights or whatever."I think we got into this weird position where somehow free speech was seen as undermining people, whereas I think a debate strengthens you - it makes you better able to defend yourself if you can debate."Debates within universities on such issues were not "really connected to the outside world", he added."If you talk to people in towns and cities and villages across the region, they're not having the debates that are happening in university," he said. "[University freedom of speech] was bad about five years ago and it's got better now and I think it's got better because I think society's changed a bit - I think we're a little bit more relaxed now about some issues." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Palestine Action co-founder wins permission to challenge ban
The co-founder of Palestine Action can bring a legal challenge to the home secretary's decision to ban the direct action group under anti-terrorism laws, a high court judge has ruled. Lawyers for Huda Ammori argued at a hearing in London last week that the proscription of Palestine Action, placing it on a par with groups such as Islamic State and Boko Haram, was 'repugnant' and an 'authoritarian and blatant abuse of power'. They warned that it was already having a chilling effect on freedom of speech and protest, highlighting dozens of arrests – the number is believed to have risen above 200 – of people for demonstrating since the ban came into force on 5 July. Sir James Eadie, for the Home Office, argued that a judicial review was not the correct avenue to challenge the ban, given that parliament had designated the POAC (Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission) precisely for that purpose. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion On Wednesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled that Ammori's case against the ban was arguable and so should proceed to trial.