MP Diane Abbott suspended from Labour Party over comments about racism
The move means the whip is automatically suspended in the House of Commons for the Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP, it is understood.
'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing,' a Labour Party spokesperson said.
Ms Abbott was suspended by the Labour Party in 2023 after writing a letter to the Observer comparing racism experienced by people of colour with that seen by other groups.
She apologised for any anguish caused by the remarks, which drew criticism from Jewish and Traveller groups, and was readmitted to the party before the 2024 general election.
But in a new interview with BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she said she did not look back on the incident with regret.
'No, not at all,' she told the BBC.
'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know.
'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them.
'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. They are different types of racism.'
She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.'
Ms Abbott posted a clip of her BBC interview after news of her suspension emerged. She did not respond to a request for comment.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments.
'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour Party, and obviously the Labour Party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian.
'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.'Ms Abbott is the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, having entered Parliament in 1987, and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House.
She lost the whip in April 2023 after her letter to the Observer, sparking a long-running process during which she sat as an Independent MP for about a year while an internal investigation took place.
She was readmitted as a Labour MP shortly before the 2024 election.
Ms Abbott suggested in the letter that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism.
She withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'.
In the newly released BBC interview, she said she was 'grateful' to be a Labour MP, but that she was sure the party leadership had been 'trying to get me out'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
24 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Kneecap's Glasgow Hydro gig sells out as rap trio headline their biggest Scottish show yet
In a jibe to First Minister John Swinney, the band said "A very special thank you to our Head of PR in Scotland Mr John Swinney... best in the business". Kneecap is set to make a return to Glasgow this winter as part of their "biggest run of shows ever" with tickets selling out shortly after going on sale. The Belfast based rap trio - Mo Chara, Móglaí Bap, and DJ Próvaí - will perform 14 shows across Scotland, England and Wales later this year. The tour includes a headline performances at Glasgow's OVO Hydro on November 30, 2025, marking the groups biggest show in Glasgow to date. Originally slated to play 11 shows, the group extended the tour by adding three additional dates in Leeds, Sheffield, and Manchester after pre-sale tickets sold out almost immediately due to overwhelming demand. And now it appears the gig has sold out. Taking to Instagram, Kneecap's official account wrote: "Glasgow SOLD OUT in a few hours. 13,000 Scottish F****** comrades... let's go!" In a jibe to First Minister John Swinney, they added: "A very special thank you to our Head of PR in Scotland Mr John Swinney... best in the business". Swinney played down his beef with Kneecap after he was called out by the Irish rappers at a gig in Glasgow earlier this month. The SNP leader previously warned some of the group's political sloganeering was "beyond the pale". The group hit back during their O2 Academy show on July 8, with Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara asking the crowd: " What's your First Minister's name?" "They stopped us playing TRNSMT but they can't stop us playing Glasgow." Taking to Instagram to initially announce the tour, Kneecap's official account wrote: "Here we go. We're back in November across Scotland, England and Wales to play our biggest run of shows ever. "The Prime Minister himself cant stop could stop sending bombs to Israel but that's another story..." Alongside their tour poster - which shows the trio in a bright green car emblazoned with the phrase "Irish Independence Traders" - the band also made a nod to their political stance. The car's number plate reads "26+6=1," a well-known slogan advocating for a united Ireland, referring to the 26 counties of the Republic of Ireland and the 6 counties of Northern Ireland coming together as one. Their winter tour follows controversy earlier this year when Kneecap were originally headlining the King Tut's stage at TRNSMT 2025 but were dropped from the line-up in May after Police Scotland raised public safety concerns. At the time, a Police Scotland spokesperson stated: "Any decision on the line-up at TRNSMT is for the organisers, and there was no prior consultation with Police Scotland before acts were booked. "Officers have highlighted that the potential reaction of such a large audience to this band would require a significant policing operation in order to support the delivery of a safe event. "We have also passed on information from the public around safety concerns to allow organisers to make an informed decision on the running of the festival." Following their removal, Kneecap instead played a sold-out show at Glasgow's O2 Academy on Tuesday, July 8 - the week of the festival - insisting they wouldn't let fans down. Over 2,500 tickets were snapped up in just 80 seconds. Now, the trio is scaling up, preparing for their biggest Scottish show yet at the 14,000-capacity OVO Hydro.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Britain is lowering the voting age to 16. It's getting a mixed reaction
There has been a mixed reaction in Britain to the government's announcement that it will lower the voting age from 18 to 16 before the next national election. The Labour Party administration says it's part of a package of changes to strengthen British democracy and help restore trust in politics. The opposition says it's a power-grab by the left. Experts say it's complicated, with mixed evidence about how lowering the voting age affects democracy and election outcomes. The biggest change since the 1960s Britain's voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries, including the United States, followed suit within a few years. Now the government says it will lower the threshold to 16 by the time the next general election is held, likely in 2029. That will bring the whole country into line with Scotland and Wales, which have semiautonomous governments and already let 16- and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. A handful of other countries currently have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. A few European Union countries, including Belgium, Germany and Malta, allow 16-year-olds to vote in elections to the European Parliament. The case for votes at 16 Supporters argue that 16-year-olds in Britain can work and pay taxes, so should be allowed to vote. 'If you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. Pro-democracy organizations welcomed the lower age, and a move toward automatic voter registration, saying it would help increase voting rates. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7%, the lowest level in more than two decades. The age change is part of a package of electoral reforms that includes tightening campaign financing rules and broadening the range of documents that can be used as identification at polling stations. Supporters argue it will increase democratic participation by getting teenagers into the habit of voting at a time when most are still in school. 'Younger people who are in full-time education and often still live at home can make for better, more engaged first-time voters compared with 18- to 20-year-olds, who often experience their first election in a highly transitory phase of their lives,' Christine Huebner, a social scientist at the University of Sheffield who has studied youth voting, wrote in The Guardian. Critics call it a cynical move Opponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds should not be given the vote because in most ways they are not considered adults. 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?' Conservative lawmaker Paul Holmes asked Thursday in the House of Commons. Mark Goodwin, a senior lecturer in politics at Coventry University, agreed the move could seem paradoxical, because 'socially, if anything, we're moving in the opposite direction.' 'Increasingly the age of majority, the age at which you become a fully capable and responsible adult, is moving more towards 18,' he said. The government's political opponents on the right argue that Labour hopes to benefit from 1.5 million new potential young voters who generally lean to the left. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right party Reform UK, said Labour was trying to 'rig the system.' Conservative former foreign secretary James Cleverly said the government had cynically announced the change because it is 'tanking in the polls.' Labour can't take youth votes for granted Experts say enfranchising 16- and 17-year-olds is unlikely to dramatically change election results, because they are a relatively small group with diverse views. And it's far from clear that Labour will reap most of the benefits of a bigger youth vote. U.K. politics, long dominated by Labour and the Conservatives, is becoming increasingly fragmented. Polling suggests younger voters lean left, but they are split among several parties including Labour, the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. Farage's embrace of TikTok has built his brand with youth, and Reform has some support among young men. Goodwin said that in many parts of the world, 'young people are abandoning the center-left in droves. 'And in many cases, they're lending their support to parties of the populist right, or challenger parties, outsider parties, independents, more alternative parties," he said. 'If it is a cynical ploy to get more Labour votes, there's certainly an element of risk about where those votes would ultimately be cast.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Diane Abbott row shows how impoverished Britain's conversations about race have become
The late broadcaster and campaigner Darcus Howe and Tottenham MP Bernie Grant once fell out over a hot-seat discussion on the former's current affairs programme, The Devil's Advocate, broadcast on Channel 4. Grant had provoked backlash from the Black press for discussing state-funded 'voluntary repatriation' (a return of migrant and migrant descendant groups to their country of heritage) at a fringe event at the Labour party conference in 1993. Provided an opportunity by Howe to walk back on these comments, he doubled down, suggesting that Black people had 'no future in Europe'. Howe viewed Grant's position as retrograde, and questioned how a British MP could advocate for a future outside Britain. Grant would complain to Channel 4 about the programme, fearing that it had ruined his political career. But it did not. Despite being abandoned by his Black parliamentary colleagues and only finding mixed support against major rebuke, he remained a respected political figure, and Labour MP, until his death in 2000. The episode is an important reminder of something that used to exist in mainstream British discourse: important Black figures engaging in serious debate on a controversial – even, offensive – subject. Here was a mainstream platform where, gladiator-style, a discussion pertaining to race in Britain could be contested in all its messiness, ferocity and rigour. Where can we find such a space in the mainstream today? Perhaps if we were still committed to engaging in complex discussions of race, racialisation and Blackness today, with a public audience acting as a democratic mechanism of accountability, Diane Abbott's comments would have provoked curiosity and real engagement rather than panic and overreaction. The Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, first elected to her seat 38 years ago, was again suspended from the party on Thursday for comments in a BBC Radio 4 interview defending her previously revoked statements around the different experiences of racialisation between certain demographic groups. Where Abbott's wording in her original letter to the Observer had been clumsy, this time she took the opportunity to clarify what she meant, saying: 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know … but if you see a Black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're Black.' These comments strike me as true. In the same way that while my Blackness is immediately and unambiguously read, my sexuality (I am a gay man) could only be inferred by context, stereotypes or by my own confirmation. Similarly, you may not know that a white person is Irish until you infer it from their name, accent or simply ask them. That does not undermine the reality of anti-Irish (or antisemitic or anti-Traveller) discrimination, and yet it is plainly not the same as what can be visibly deduced before any kind of identifying context is introduced. But even if you disagree with these comments, as you may, why are they so unsayable to the point that Abbott has had the whip suspended? Why, instead, can there not be public discussion on the differing experiences of racialisation, even if they are provocative? In part, this is down to the decline of serious engagement with Black intellectual thought. Howe's programme had its cheap moments. And yet in the mid-1990s you could turn on your television and witness thought-provoking debates around race without participants expecting to be served their P45. Equally, you might have been more used to the presence of Black intellectuals on television and radio – the likes of Stuart Hall and CLR James, who had their own interview broadcast on Channel 4 in the 1980s where they discussed, among other things, the Gold Coast revolution and James's Trotskyism. It is not that such intellectuals or their works no longer exist, but that they are undervalued or treated more tokenistically. Now, where Black academics and thinkers are called to discuss matters of race, they are largely reduced to shouting matches with the likes of Piers Morgan, with the preferred topics being culture-war fodder around the permissibility of praising Winston Churchill, or the latest development on Meghan Markle. No wonder when faced with a real, considered and provocative attempt to parse race and racialisation, the channels simply shut down. The warning signs for this decline were there: when Howe was interviewed by the BBC to discuss the 2011 riots, the anchor erroneously suggested that he had a history of rioting, to which he responded 'Have some respect for an old West Indian Negro.' The clearest problem, to me, is that there is a lack of interest in the diversity of what Black people think, and how to respond when that may present a challenge. The Labour party has a persistent problem with it – and that includes when the MP Rupa Huq described the former Conservative chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng as 'superficially' Black. Patronising and opportunistic as ever, Keir Starmer, after failed attempts to deselect Abbott, praised her as a 'trailblazer' upon becoming mother of the House following her re-election. Yet it is a safe conclusion that he has absolutely no interest in what she thinks or says. The same is true of Baroness Lawrence, whom he was all too happy to wheel out in the interests of campaigning, only to face accusations that he was not listening to her when she attempted to engage in dialogue about anti-Black racism. Our public discussions on race are utterly impoverished, and this is largely because our haughty institutions have developed a preference to either run scared or dismiss real discourse rather than challenge, engage and understand. If the answer to Britain's first Black female MP parsing the lived experience of racism is to suspend her and confect another political controversy, then the message is that you may not ever say anything difficult at all. Jason Okundaye is an assistant newsletter editor and writer at the Guardian. He edits The Long Wave newsletter and is the author of Revolutionary Acts: Love & Brotherhood in Black Gay Britain Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
