Where did ‘husband' come from?
'No, darling,' I said. 'You're the one in the house who just is or lives there.' Only later did I tell him that the word bond, behind the -band of husband, sank in worth with the years, following the same path as boor, churl and peasant.
Whereas I as a housewife enjoy a comparatively transparent label, any husband's title is obscure. It is simply a house-bond, but the first element of husband, hus-, no longer seems like house, and the -bond element is often mistaken for a form of bond, a separate word to do with binding.
The bond in husband derives from words in Norse languages with related meanings 'to live, dwell, to cultivate, to build'. Old English had a connected word, buan, 'to dwell', and these all came from the ancient Indo-European word that gave us be, as well as the Latin fui and the Greek stem phu- (hence physics). The history of the English word be finds cousins in Persian, Russian and Irish.
Anyway, before the Norman Conquest, bonda in English meant a freeman, like a ceorl (churl), below a noble thane but above a servile worker. After the Normans came, the churl sank from freeman to a tenant bound to a lord, and bonde in Middle English became equivalent to a villein or serf, and then to a slave. It was at this stage that the word became confused with bond as in bondage. In husband, the fossilised -band was insulated from these developments in meaning.
Husbandry meant at first management of a household, an obsolete sense, of which we retain only husbanding of resources. Husbandry was the task of a husbandman, cultivating the soil. The husband as master of the house came to mean the correlative of a housewife, to whom he'd be married. Strangely some men in the Middle Ages, such as Richard Husewif (1192), had the word as a surname; perhaps it was taken as a role independent of sex. My husband certainly couldn't be mistaken for one.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Massive Biblical battle unearthed as previously unexplored 'Area X' begins to give up its secrets
Previously unexplored 'Area X' unearths new evidence that Josiah, the last great king of Judah, fell at the hands of the Egyptian Pharaoh Necho II thousands of years ago Archaeologists have unearthed "incredible" artefacts that suggest a Biblical king was vanquished by a formidable Egyptian army millennia ago. The team of researchers has found remarkable evidence pointing to the defeat of a renowned Biblical monarch by an extensive Egyptian force, as indicated by remnants of Egyptian pottery in the Levant region. Recent findings support the theory that Josiah, Judah's last significant king, met his demise at the hands of Pharaoh Necho II. The fateful battle took place in Megiddo in 609 BCE, casting a shadow over the future of the kingdom of Judah and setting the stage for Armageddon – the prophesied location of the apocalypse in Christian belief. It wasn't until March this year that tangible archaeological proof came to light, with the discovery of a unique collection of ceramics in present-day Israel. Excavations in the ancient city of Megiddo revealed pottery associated with Necho's forces. Among the finds were substantial quantities of Egyptian and Greek pottery, as detailed by Professor Israel Finkelstein from Haifa University, who has led the Megiddo excavations for years, alongside Dr Assaf Kleiman from Ben-Gurion University, reports the Mirror US. In two papers published in January and February in the Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Kleiman, Finkelstein, and their colleagues discuss their discoveries. They propose that the debris is indicative of Necho's Egyptian troops' presence, potentially including Greek mercenaries as part of the contingent. Around the 10th-9th century BCE, Megiddo was part of the Kingdom of Israel, though there's ongoing debate about whether Megiddo and other territories were earlier part of the so-called David and Solomon and whether the united Israelite monarchy described by the Bible ever truly existed. What we do know is that for at least two centuries, Megiddo was a significant hub. Around 732 BCE, Megiddo was captured and the Israelite capital of Samaria fell shortly after. Renamed Magiddu, it became the capital of a new Assyrian province in the Levant. Years after the fall of the northern kingdom, Assyria faced pressure from emerging powers in Mesopotamia and Iran, namely the Babylonians and the Medes. Around 630 BCE, the Assyrians abandoned Megiddo. In 609 BCE, under Necho's leadership, Egypt marched into the Levant to aid the failing city. In Jerusalem, Josiah had been on the throne for 31 years before he was defeated by Necho at Megiddo. The Book of Kings leaves it unclear why Necho killed Josiah. The Book of Chronicles suggests that Josiah had tried to block Necho's advance and that the ensuing battle was a disastrous affair during which the Judahite king was killed. The bulk of ancient Megiddo was excavated during the 1920s by a University of Chicago expedition, which dug up and carted away most of the upper strata to reach the earlier versions of the settlement beneath. However, one section in the northwest corner of the site, dubbed 'Area X', remained largely undisturbed. It was in this spot that Finklestein's team discovered a stone-paved courtyard area. According to the ceramic evidence, the structure dates back to the mid-seventh century BCE. The discoveries included fragments from local pottery vessels, including traditional cooking pots, alongside serving dishes showing Mesopotamian influence. "Scholars believed Megiddo completely changed socially, that the ratio of the local population was very low or non-existent, but we show it must have been higher than what was previously believed," Kleiman says. "There must have been a significant component of Levantine population in Megiddo at the time, and we see this, for example, in the cooking pots, which are very important cultural and social indicators. The pots we found tell us the population at the site cooked like their parents and grandparents, in the same local traditions." The most significant discovery was the abundance of Egyptian pottery in Area X. "When we opened the boxes of finds from the dig at my lab in Ben-Gurion University, I told my students to put the Egyptian pottery on the tables, and table after table got filled," Kleiman revealed. "The number of Egyptian vessels is double or even triple the amount found in the entire Levant for that period. This is not decorated fine tableware, so it's very hard to argue that someone at Megiddo, a deportee or a surviving Israelite, all of a sudden acquired a taste for sub-par Egyptian pottery and decided to import it into his house."
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Terrified woman forced to sleep in CAR after more than 500 bats invade Scots home
Scroll down to see the what Anne-Marie is dealing with HOME INVASION Terrified woman forced to sleep in CAR after more than 500 bats invade Scots home Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TERRIFIED homeowner told how she's been forced to sleep in her car - because BATS have moved into her house. Spooked Anne-Marie Murchie has a colony of more than 500 of the winged creatures in her walls and roof. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Anne-Marie Murchie revealed she's being forced to sleep in her car Credit: Anne-Marie Murchie / Facebook 4 She posted a video on Facebook showing one of the creatures Credit: Anne-Marie Murchie / Facebook But because they're protected by law there is nothing she can do about the scary lodgers. And the taxi driver, from Aberdeen, revealed she's the one who's been forced out of her own gaff. Because she can no longer cope with the racket she's working nights and often kipping in her motor to escape. Anne-Marie said: 'I'm living in fear every day. "I'm scared to come into the house. Sometimes I actually sleep outside in the car. I'm just petrified. "The noise is horrendous, it's like running water. But I think it's all the wings going together, like flapping. "It never stops. They get louder at about five or six at night and then when they come in at five in the morning. But they're constantly making noise. I wonder if they sleep." Anne-Marie initially thought she had mice or a wasps's nest after hearing strange noises at her home. She told the BBC she called in pest control experts who revealed the problem was being caused by bats. Since then she's 'flipped' after she found one hiding in her toilet roll holder and others in her living room and kitchen. Snooker star bats away WASP on live TV during World Grand Prix leaving TNT Sports commentator baffled She revealed her anxiety has spiralled through the roof as she's plagued by noises and smells. But animal experts have warned that she can't do anything that will impact the colony of soprano pipistrelles, Britain's most common type of bats. At one point she moved out and is now spending as much time as she can on the road to avoid her winged tenants. She said: 'It's sad that you can't do anything about it in your own home. "I feel like the rules should change a bit. Surely someone can come in that's licensed and take them away to somewhere humanely?" It's hoped the bats will move on in the next few weeks and once they're gone Anne-Marie will be allowed to seal up the spots they've squeezed in through. A spokesman for Naturescot said: ''With regard to what you can do with them, actually nothing. 'They are a protected species under European protection laws and Scottish and UK laws. "So the bats themselves can't be touched, nor can the roosts.'' 4 Bats are a protected species Credit: Getty
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
I tried baked beans from Tesco, Asda, Aldi and more — a 23p tin beat £1 Heinz
Baked beans are a staple food in many UK households, with Heinz being the leading brand. Baked beans are such a great food. So versatile, they can be a side for breakfasts such as a full English or a meal in themselves on toast. They're also great with fish and chips, a jacket potato and some may even add them into chilli con carne. But is there a difference between supermarket beans and brand leaders like Heinz? I put this to the test in a blind taste test. I sampled nine tins of baked beans from various supermarkets to see whether I could pick out Heinz from a range of supermarket own brands. And I also wanted to know which one was the tastiest. I compared beans from Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's, Morrisons, M&S, Waitrose, Lidl, Aldi and Heinz. Spoiler alert: Heinz was not the tastiest brand. Tesco - 25p for 220g Tesco beans had a firmer texture than the others, but did have a pleasant, rich tomato sauce. However, the sauce was slightly watery despite being cooked well, which I didn't like. Score: 6/10 Asda - 23p for 210g These beans were sweeter than others in the taste test, which I preferred, and had a great sauce and consistency. Overall, these were really great-tasting baked beans, and I would happily buy them again. Score: 10/10 Sainsbury's - 30p for 220g I felt these baked beans had a little bit of a weird aftertaste, which I didn't find too pleasant. However, they did have a good flavour and consistency compared to some of the others. Score: 7/10 Morrisons - 39p for 220g The beans had a much stronger smell compared to the others, and were a lot sweeter. I felt they lacked a little bit of flavour, but my boyfriend really enjoyed these ones. Score: 5/10 M&S - 30p for 220g These baked beans were slightly disappointing as they were really strong but didn't taste of tomato. They had a slight BBQ taste, so I think it would be nice mixed in with a meal such as a chilli con carne. Score: 5/10 Waitrose - 40p for 220g The flavour of these beans was quite mild, which isn't a bad thing, but I do prefer a stronger tomato taste. However, my boyfriend found them tasty, so it really is down to personal preference. Score: 7/10 Lidl - 41p for 425ml On first impressions, Lidl's baked beans had a thick sauce and a good colour, but I didn't find them enjoyable at all. I found them to lack flavour, but for the price point, I would definitely consider trying them again. Score: 3/10 Aldi - 38p for 410g Aldi's baked beans had a mild flavour, but it was pleasant, and for the price, you can't go wrong. I thought all of the supermarket's own-brand baked beans would all taste really different, but they were more similar than I thought. It was interesting to note that in my local Lidl and Aldi stores, you could only buy large tins. Score: 4/10 Heinz £1 for 200g (purchased in Sainsbury's) Despite being able to tell that these were Heinz, they weren't my favourite, and the price doesn't justify the quality for me. Score: 6/10 The verdict The taste of baked beans is all down to personal preference, and while I didn't like some, my boyfriend did. For me, Asda won this taste test thanks to the flavour and texture of the beans, as well as the price. Prices are accurate at the time of writing and purchasing.
