logo
Daughter of Denis Donaldson demands public inquiry into killing after Gerry Adams case

Daughter of Denis Donaldson demands public inquiry into killing after Gerry Adams case

BreakingNews.ie30-05-2025
The daughter of a man who was shot dead after being revealed to be an IRA informer has called for an urgent public inquiry into the killing, which was a key issue in Gerry Adams's successful defamation action against the BBC.
Mr Adams claimed a BBC Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, which he denies any involvement in.
Advertisement
On Friday, the jury found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 in damages.
Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years.
His daughter, Jane Donaldson, was prevented from giving evidence to the jury during the BBC's defence of the case.
Following the verdict, she said the case proves the need for an urgent public inquiry into the killing.
Advertisement
In a statement on behalf of the family, Ms Donaldson said: 'By reducing events which damaged our lives to a debate about damage to his reputation, the plaintiff has trivialised our family tragedy.
'Daddy's murder and surrounding circumstances devastated our family. The plaintiff [Gerry Adams] prioritised his own financial and reputational interests over any regard for retraumatising my family.
'We are still no closer to the truth. No-one spoke for my family in court. We supported neither side in this case.'
Speaking after the verdict, Mr Adams said: 'I'm very mindful of the Donaldson family in the course of this long trial, and indeed of the victims' families who have had to watch all of this.
Advertisement
'I want to say that the Justice Minister, Jim O'Callaghan, should meet the family of Denis Donaldson as quickly as possible, and that there's an onus on both governments and everyone else, and I include myself in this, to try and deal with these legacy issues as best that we can.'
However, Ms Donaldson criticised Mr Adams' legal team's approach to her evidence.
'Although the plaintiff claimed sympathy for my family, his legal team objected to me giving evidence to challenge the account of his witnesses.
'The jury heard sensitive, privileged family information tossed around without our consent, but did not hear my testimony.
Advertisement
'Limitless legal resources and vast expense were invested in this case while there is supposedly a live Garda investigation into my daddy's murder.
'The public interest can only now be fully served by some form of public inquiry, with a cross-border dimension which is ECHR Article 2-compliant, empowered to investigate the whole truth about the conspiracy to expose and murder my daddy.'
Ciaran Shiels, a solicitor who represented the family in the past, was called as a witness in the case.
BBC videograb of Denis Donaldson
Mr Shiels, a solicitor and partner at Madden and Finucane Solicitors, told the court the BBC was not only 'barking up the wrong tree' but was in the 'wrong orchard' over the claims against Mr Adams.
Advertisement
Mr Shiels said he represented Mr Donaldson and his family from a period before his death until a period after the broadcast.
He said he came to act as a spokesperson for the family after Mr Donaldson's death but said he no longer does so.
Mr Shiels told the court the family do not accept or believe in any way that Mr Adams had anything to do with it.
However, Ms Donaldson issued a statement after his appearance in court to say the family had not been consulted about him giving evidence in the case.
She said she wanted to make clear Mr Shiels no longer acts for the family.
Solicitor Ciaran Shiels outside the High Court in Dublin (Brian Lawless/PA)
In a voir dire hearing without the presence of the jury, Ms Donaldson said she had followed the case 'very closely and very painfully' over a number of weeks and felt compelled to contact the BBC because she felt there were inaccuracies presented as evidence in the case.
She said the family did not accept the claim of responsibility for the killing by the dissident republican group the Real IRA.
Ms Donaldson said her father had been 'thrown to the wolves' and there was a conspiracy to deliberately expose him as an agent.
She said it was the family's position that it had an 'open mind' in relation to the murder and it was focused on 'pursuing the truth'.
Ms Donaldson also said she had no idea Mr Shiels was going to give evidence and she had not authorised it.
She said Madden and Finucane represented her family until February this year but Mr Shiels was never appointed as a family spokesman.
She said the family were not aware of the first meeting between Mr Shiels and BBC Spotlight journalist Jennifer O'Leary about the programme, but were aware of subsequent meetings and other correspondence.
When questioned by Tom Hogan, SC, for Mr Adams, she also acknowledged her husband, Ciaran Kearney, was later present at a meeting involving the BBC and Mr Shiels at the firm's office.
She said she knew her husband was going to meet them and he told her about the meeting afterwards.
However, she stressed the family were not aware of the first meeting between Mr Shiels and Ms O'Leary.
Judge Alexander Owens. Photo: Brian Lawless/PA
Trial judge Alexander Owens intervened to say that was 'water under the bridge' for the second meeting.
Mr Hogan asked Ms Donaldson if she was aware of correspondence on behalf of the family responding to allegations about Mr Kearney.
Ms Donaldson said Mr Shiels was speaking on behalf of the family at that time in relation to the specifics of the programme.
Mr Hogan said Mr Shiels had told the court he no longer represented the family.
Ms Donaldson said the statement she had issued on Mr Shiels's relationship to the family was to contradict a newspaper report.
She also said she felt there was a narrative that the family were in support of one side over the other when they were not.
Judge Owens asked Ms Donaldson if Mr Shiels was speaking for the family on September 23rd, 2016, when he made representations to the media following a meeting with An Garda Síochána.
She said he was at that stage, and acknowledged he was authorised to put out statements for the family over the years.
Asked about Mr Shiels's evidence when he said the family would have told the programme they did not believe Mr Adams's authorised the killing, she said she did not recall discussing that in detail or discussing Mr Adams in particular.
She said their legal advice had been not to take part in the programme.
Judge Owens asked if Mr Shiels had been right in relation to their view at the time, adding it may not be 'either here or there'.
Ms Donaldson replied: 'I think it is neither here nor there.'
She added she cannot recall a conversation about that at the time, adding the family's position has evolved over the years.
Tom Hogan, barrister for former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams. Photo: Brian Lawless/PA
Mr Hogan contended Ms Donaldson's comments had not borne out that Mr Shiels had provided a serious inaccuracy to the court.
He said he was in fact authorised to act as a spokesperson for the family at the time.
Paul Gallagher, SC, for the BBC, said it would be a 'fundamental unfairness' to not allow Ms Donaldson to comment on the evidence put forward by Mr Shiels.
Judge Owens said the Donaldsons were aware of Mr Shiels's actions from the second meeting onwards.
He told Ms Donaldson he appreciated all of her concerns and the points she made.
However, he said his concern was whether her evidence was relevant to the jury making decisions.
Ireland
Gerry Adams awarded €100,000 in damages after winn...
Read More
He said he had listened to counsel and her statements very carefully.
Judge Owens said: 'While you do have all of these concerns, I don't think your evidence in relation to the matter is going to assist the jury in arriving at their decision.'
He added: 'In no circumstances am I going to permit you to give evidence to the jury.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former MP Mhairi Black announces she has left the SNP
Former MP Mhairi Black announces she has left the SNP

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Former MP Mhairi Black announces she has left the SNP

Former SNP MP Mhairi Black has left the party - predominantly over its stance on trans rights and Palestine, the BBC who was formerly the SNP's deputy leader at Westminster, said there had been "too many times" when she did not agree with decisions made by the to The Herald newspaper, she said the SNP had "capitulated" on issues important to her"Basically, for a long time, I've not agreed with quite a few decisions that have been made," she said. Black was catapulted into the political limelight when she was elected to Westminster at the age of 20 and became the youngest MP since stood down ahead of the general election last year, citing safety concerns, social media abuse and unsociable was elected as the MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South, ousting the former Labour cabinet secretary Douglas Alexander, with her victory there coming as the SNP captured all but three of the seats in Scotland in the 2015 general was first national election since the Scottish independence referendum in announced her departure from the SNP ahead of her show "Work in Progress" at the Edinburgh Fringe. "There have just been too many times when I've thought, 'I don't agree with what you've done there' or the decision or strategy that has been arrived at," she said in the Herald interview. Black said she was "still just as pro-independence," but claimed the party's "capitulation on LGBT rights, trans rights in particular" had been an issue for added: "I thought the party could be doing better about Palestine as well."The former MP said: "If anything, I'm probably a bit more left wing than I have been. I don't think I have changed all that much. I feel like the party needs to change a lot more."Black was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during her time at Westminster, saying previously that the condition was picked up after she became unwell with "burn-out" during her time as an SNP spokesperson said the party was "united under John Swinney's vision of creating a better, fairer Scotland".

Detectives release new 'aged' pics of Clydebank man missing in unsolved 20-year case
Detectives release new 'aged' pics of Clydebank man missing in unsolved 20-year case

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Detectives release new 'aged' pics of Clydebank man missing in unsolved 20-year case

David McCallum went missing in the Loch Lomond area in 2003. Police have released images of a man who was reported missing over 20-years ago, on what would have been his 54th birthday. ‌ David McCallum was last seen on Sunday, March 30, 2003 in the Rowardennan area of Loch Lomond and his black Ford Focus was found nearby. ‌ The artificial age progression images created by Dundee University were released today, on what would be David's 54th birthday. They show David with short and long hair, and also with a beard. ‌ Officers describe David, who was 31-years-old when he went missing, as 5ft 9ins tall, slim build, dark brown hair. Despite an extensive police enquiry and multiple appeals over the years there have been no confirmed sightings. However, there were potential sighting of him in Sussex in 2017 and in the Tower Hill Underground Station in 2019. ‌ David's brother and sister Susan Donaldson and Alistair Maclaren previously spoke of their anguish after their brother's case was featured in a BBC show in 2007. Susan said: "It is just like he has vanished into thin air. Even coming up to four years, you still think about him just as much. ‌ "For us as a family we are getting no closure. Just to have nothing at all makes it very difficult. Alistair added: "It is just as raw as it was from day one. I imagine after this year we're going to have to accept that if David is out there, he is not wanting to be found. "David's disappearance is like we're all sitting with a book and we have got a final page missing. We just want to know what's at the end. ‌ "If the programme rings a bell with anyone they should phone the Missing Person's Helpline or Clydebank Police. Even if they think it's irrelavent, it might be the piece of the jigsaw that we're looking for." Detective Inspector David Lavery, Dumbarton Police Office, said: 'We regularly review unsolved missing person cases and there have always been unanswered questions around David's disappearance. 'There have been a number of appeals over the years, including by the charity Missing and on television documentaries. ‌ 'These latest images show what David may look like now. If anyone recognises David from these images, or has any information that can help our enquiries, please contact us. 'I would appeal particularly to anyone who was wild camping in the Lochan Maoil Dhuinne area the weekend David was last seen, as well as people who have worked with the homeless community in London over the years.' Police Scotland works in close partnership with the Missing People Charity. They can be contacted via telephone on free phone 116 000 or by visiting the Missing People website.

Bayeux Tapestry should be re-named the 'Canterbury Embroidery' because it was probably made in Kent and ISN'T a tapestry, historian says
Bayeux Tapestry should be re-named the 'Canterbury Embroidery' because it was probably made in Kent and ISN'T a tapestry, historian says

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Bayeux Tapestry should be re-named the 'Canterbury Embroidery' because it was probably made in Kent and ISN'T a tapestry, historian says

The Bayeux Tapestry should be renamed the 'Canterbury Embroidery' because it was almost certainly made in Britain and isn't technically a tapestry, a historian has said. Dr David Musgrove said the 230-foot long artefact was most likely woven in Kent rather than France and was created using an embroidery technique, meaning it is not a tapestry. The academic, who has a PhD in medieval landscape archaeology, spoke after news that the 11th-century work depicting the 1066 Norman Conquest is to go on display at the British Museum next year. The expert said the artefact's trip presents academics with a chance to confirm that the treasure was created in the UK. Dr Musgrove is host of the BBC 's History Extra podcast. He said on the latest episode: 'It's an embroidery, so you've got woven elements on a linen backing. 'The wool has been dyed, so there's various different colours that are used. 'So you could make the argument that it should be called the Canterbury embroidery rather than the Bayeux Tapestry, because it was probably made in Canterbury. 'That's what most people would think and it's an embroidery, not a tapestry. 'But that's just not quite as snazzy, is it? 'You're not going to get people queuing around the block at the British Museum to go and see that.' The Bayeux Tapestry depicts the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England, led by William, Duke of Normandy challenging Harold II, King of England. When the artefact returns to Britain, Anglo-Saxon treasures from the Sutton Hoo ship burial will go in the other direction to France for a temporary period. French president Emmanuel Macron revealed during his trip to Britain last month that King Charles helped secure a deal to return the tapestry to England. He claimed France did its best not to loan the artwork but that His Majesty helped get the deal over the line. The embroidery is thought to date to within a few years of the Battle of Hastings. Dr Musgrove told the podcast: 'We know a lot about the way it would have been produced, because people have had a chance to study it. 'We know that there were different panels that were stitched together. 'And you can see actually that they must have been made separately because there were mistakes in the way that the panels are aligned so they're kind of little bits which don't stack up. 'So people, we assume, were probably working in separate teams. 'It was probably women who were doing it, Anglo-Saxon seamstresses who were probably doing it. 'There was a rich tradition of Anglo-Saxon seamstresses working here so we assume it was probably them.' When the embroidery comes to Britain, academics will have a rare chance to look at the back of it, Dr Musgrove said. He continued: 'And it's been quite hard to get to the back of it because there's various different layers that have been added onto it in the intervening century. 'So it's quite hard to actually get there. 'Then we will probably find out lots of really interesting things about the way it was produced. 'And if we can do any sort of scientific analysis, and I can't imagine for one moment there will be an opportunity to do anything which is in any way destructive to it. 'But if we can do any scientific analysis to kind of see where these woollen threads came from, where the sheep came from that produced it, where the dyes were from, where the flax for the linen was grown, then that will really sort of help to give us a clue to if that idea that it was made in England is actually true.' Artificial intelligence could even be used to analyse the features, the expert added. 'If you can feed it into a computer and get it to sort of correlate and work out similarities between bits, then we might learn an awful lot of things. 'But we haven't had the chance because it's been rightly in a climate-controlled case and you can't get to it. 'So this is a real opportunity to learn some stuff about it.' The tapestry will be on display at the British Museum in the autumn of next year until July 2027. Timeline of the Bayeux Tapestry 1066: Between seven and twelve thousand Norman soldiers defeat an English army of a similar size at what is now Battle, East Sussex 1476: The embroidered cloth depicting the battle is referred to for the first time in an inventory of Bayeux Cathedral 1732-3: Antiquarian Smart Lethieullier writes the first detailed English account of the tapestry while living in Paris - but it is not published till 1767 1792: During the French Revolution, the precious artwork was declared public property and confiscated to be used as a covering for wagons - but it was saved by a lawyer who hid it in his home 1804: In a move dripping in symbolism, Napoleon - under the impression France was about to invade and conquer Britain - had the tapestry temporarily moved to Paris for display 1870: The tapestry is removed from Bayeux once again during the Franco-Prussian War - but it is moved back two years later 1944: The Gestapo removed the tapestry to the Louvre in Paris - just days before the German withdrawal. A message from Heinrich Himmler - who coveted the cloth because it is a part of Germanic history - is believed to imply the Nazis planned to take it to Berlin

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store