Flypast over Rome in honour of King's state visit
The Italian president, accompanied by his daughter Laura, greeted the King and Queen in a ceremonial red-carpet welcome inside the cobbled courtyard of the medieval palace.A military band played as they entered the palace, which over the centuries has been a home to 30 popes, as well as Italian kings and presidents.The Queen was wearing a diamond brooch that once belonged to Queen Victoria.On Monday, the King and Queen met Lord Llewellyn, the UK's ambassador to Italy, at his residence.
Speaking about the visit, Lord Llewellyn said the alliance between the Italy and the UK was "vital in a changing Europe, as both our countries stand steadfast in our support of Ukraine".The ambassador has spoken of the "intangible but priceless" value of such soft power royal visits, as the UK tries to "reset" its relations with European neighbours after Brexit.The King and Queen will see more of Rome's ancient monuments on Tuesday, including a trip to the Colosseum.
The visit comes after the King had recently spent a short time in hospital over temporary side effects from his cancer treatment. He looked to be in good spirits and enjoying the trip.The King, as head of state, is in Italy on behalf of the UK government, and on Wednesday will give a speech to both houses of the Italian Parliament - the first time a UK monarch has delivered such an address.Wednesday will also be the couple's 20th wedding anniversary and soon after their arrival on Monday, the King and Queen had anniversary photographs taken in the gardens of the British ambassador's residence.They will spend the evening of their anniversary at a glitzy state banquet, where guests are expected to include politicians and celebrities.
Sign up here to get the latest royal stories and analysis every week with our Royal Watch newsletter. Those outside the UK can sign up here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Ministers face £5bn Nuked Blood bill as they refuse to reveal evidence
Ministers have refused to tell Parliament what evidence they have found about human radiation experiments on troops. The Nuked Blood Scandal threatens to land the MoD with a potential £5bn lawsuit Ministers have uncovered government plans to conduct radiation experiments on troops, but refused to give details to Parliament. It comes days after the Defence Secretary told MPs he was 'deeply uncomfortable' about a super-injunction that prevented him discussing a £7bn data leak about Afghan troops and translators. Now the Mirror can reveal that his department is again hiding potentially expensive errors behind the cloak of a 'ministerial review' - with final costs estimated at a further £5bn. Tory grandee Sir John Hayes said: "Given that the ministers will have discovered a great deal in this review, it's important they inform Parliament of it at the earliest opportunity to maintain good faith, and I will be raising this in the House as a matter of urgency." The inquiry was ordered last year after a BBC documentary showcased our investigation of the Nuked Blood Scandal, a Cold War programme of mass blood and urine testing on servicemen conducted in Australia and the Pacific for more than a decade. The results are missing from medical files, effectively denying them war pensions, compensation, and the right medical treatment. MoD officials have repeatedly told Parliament and the courts that blood testing never took place. Veterans Minister Al Carns has been asked several times by MPs of all parties to reveal his findings from the 10-month review of Ministry of Defence archives, but has rejected the calls, saying he is hunting for evidence of an official policy of blood-testing. 'I will update the house when I am in a position to share the findings of the exercise that is looking at concerns raised with me about some nuclear test veterans' medical records,' he told the Commons. His staff have examined 43,000 files, amounting to more than a million pages. They include a 1957 request from Charles Adams, the scientific director of the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment that blood counts should be done on troops even if others 'thought it unnecessary'. A second AWRE letter examined by his team says blood tests are needed 'from the medico-legal aspect' for all troops and civilians before they leave the UK because 'we wish to exclude people with existing pathological conditions... we wish to be able to demonstrate that this has been done in any case in which a claim for damage is made'. The review is also thought to have uncovered a 1958 operational order from Bomber Command stating that 'all personnel who go to Christmas Island should have the following blood examinations made and the results recorded in [their file]'. READ MORE: Video of Labour's broken promises to nuke veterans gets 3 million views as pressure grows It is not known whether these documents have been personally shown or briefed to the minister, but his officials are known to have examined the files between January and July. The MoD is facing a lawsuit from veterans and widows about non-production of the medical records, estimated to top £5bn. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: 'The data leak which has caused so much outrage was blamed on the previous government, but this happened entirely on Labour 's watch. 'They set up the review, they've been briefed on the findings, and they've refused repeated requests from Parliament to reveal what they know. They don't even have the excuse of a super-injunction to hide behind - this is the government's own doing.' A spokesman for the MoD said: 'The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look seriously into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority, and this is now underway. "This work will be comprehensive, and it will enable us to better understand what information the department holds in relation to the medical testing of service personnel who took part in the UK nuclear weapons tests, ensuring that we can be assured that relevant information has been looked at thoroughly.' The spokesman was unable to confirm whether the minister had personally reviewed the files seen by his team.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP explains 'data surveillance' policy for Universal Credit claimants
New powers are coming in to allow officials to request bank details of claimants The DWP has issued a statement after it was asked about "data surveillance" of people who claim Universal Credit. In a written question in Parliament, Liberal Democrat MP Angus MacDonald asked if the DWP had made an assessment of "the potential impact of data surveillance on recipients of Universal Credit". DWP minister Andrew Western said in reply: "No assessment has been made as the DWP does not currently or have any plans to use data surveillance to regulate, police or monitor the actions of individuals or groups in receipt of benefits." Despite this reassurance, a bill is going through Parliament to grant new powers to DWP investigators to request banking information, including about Universal Credit claimants. In efforts to prevent error and fraud in the benefits system, officials will be able to request bank providers to hand over details about the accounts of those who receive benefits, including Universal Credit, Employment and Support Allowance, and Pension Credit. The information will be used to check those who are receiving these benefits are eligible to get their payments. The powers could be expanded to include other benefits. Also included in the bill are measures to allow officials to directly take funds from a person's bank account where they owe an amount to the DWP, and they are refusing to pay up. In cases where these powers are used, investigators will have to request at least three months of bank statements for the relevant account, to make sure the person has the funds available. The person must get at least 28 days' notice to give them a chance to settle the debt before the funds are taken from their account. MPs recently approved a bill to make key changes to Universal Credit payments. The legislation will guarantee that the standard allowance will go up at least in line with inflation each year, from 2026/27 to 2029/30. But there will be cuts to the extra amounts you can get if you have a health condition that affects your ability to work. These are the current rates for the monthly Universal Credit standard allowance: If you're single and under 25 - £316.98 If you're single and 25 or over - £400.14 If you live with your partner and you're both under 25 - £497.55 (for you both) If you live with your partner and either of you are 25 or over - £628.10 (for you both).
Times
7 hours ago
- Times
It's last orders for the onboard bar. Flying is no fun any more
Flying used to go something like this. Turn up at the airport, perhaps slurp a cheeky beer at Gatwick's Red Lion before you board. Switch your smartphone to flight mode, knowing you have a few hours' reprieve to watch something brain-dead like Mission: Impossible without being pestered. Listen intently for the rattle of the in-flight trolley, which still has the ability to reduce me to a panting Pavlovian dog (just me?). And if I'm flying in premium, a discreet slope off to the onboard bar once the seatbelt sign has been switched off. This long-conditioned ritual at 37,000ft skidded to a halt this month. Virgin Atlantic — our 'fun' airline to the more sensible British Airways — said it would axe its beloved bars by 2028; the space will instead be used for more premium seating called 'retreat suites'. It also said it would introduce free Starlink wi-fi across its fleet by the end of 2027. Blame sober Gen Z obsessed with wellness, blame squeezed airline margins, blame our hyperconnected world. I'm dismayed — and thirsty. I have fond, and squiffy, memories of in-flight bars. One of the most ridiculous flights I've been on was — no surprise — a Virgin service to New York for 2019's World Pride, staffed entirely by LGBT crew. The DJ Jodie Harsh took over the bar on the Airbus A330 and we passengers, giddy on gin miniatures and mini pretzels, jumped around to Spice Up Your Life somewhere over Newfoundland. It's hard to imagine that kind of stunt today. Other times it's more prosaic. These extra social spaces — installed on all Virgin aircraft at great expense — are an escape valve from your seat, particularly if you're flying long haul. That there are gin and tonics and delicious little bags of crisps and sweets on tap is neither here nor there. 'We have loved the bar, but we have a new vision for social spaces: the retreat suites, the private space built for sharing and socialising,' Virgin Atlantic said. Meh. Onboard bars still do exist, but increasingly limply. The Gulfies, including Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad, all offer social spaces only on their monstrous Airbus A380s, but on the few times I've sneaked in they have been pin-drop quiet. When I flew on the weird Global Airlines inaugural flight in May — the founder's aim being to take the airline back to the golden age of flying — I spent a lot of it propping up the SkyPub on the upper deck of the A380. Qantas's A350 aircraft, which it uses for ultra-long-haul flights from London to Australia, instead have a 'wellbeing zone' for stretching and hydrating … and not the fun kind. The advent of free onboard wi-fi is a further dent to the in-flight experience, forcing us to stay connected to the ground. Lots of airlines, like British Airways, offer free wi-fi to their premium passengers and members of their loyalty schemes. Others, like JetBlue and Air New Zealand, offer it to everyone, regardless of cabin. Other carriers are trialling streaming entertainment straight to your phone — which I guess is fine and perfectly logical. But, but, but. I spend my life looking at my phone — is it too much to ask to stare at a slightly bigger screen to watch some mindless guff for a few hours? The sky is the last sanctuary we have. Rhys Jones, aviation editor of the frequent-flyer website Head for Points, agrees that 'it's a shame to see the bar go'. He adds: 'It was part of what set Virgin Atlantic apart. Without it, Virgin will lose a little bit of its sparkle. That said, I understand why it has made this decision: attitudes have changed and competition has become cut-throat. Increasingly we are seeing airlines maximise every square foot of space on board planes and, unfortunately, the bar just simply didn't pay its way.' I think I speak for a lot of frequent flyers when I say: one for the road?
