The best and worst baby tech for 2025: from white noise machines to wipe warmers
baby
, it seems like there is now a seemingly endless stream of 'must have' products pitching at the modern parent. From devices that promise to make new parenting a doddle to those that claim they will smooth the path to well-rounded toddler-hood, there is a product for almost anything you can think of, and quite a few that never crossed your mind.
Some will live up to their promises; others will become a dust-gathering cautionary tale about falling for marketing promises. If you are lucky, you'll manage to flog the unwanted items on Adverts or DoneDeal, rehoming it to someone who might get more use out of it. What works for one parent is another's white elephant, and vice versa.
All have one thing in common though: they will cost you money.
And it's not getting any easier. The
baby tech market
is growing all the time, from high-tech sterilisers to sensors that will alert you to a developing nappy situation, the tech industry has been busy creating new products you never imagined you might need.
READ MORE
So which are worth investing in, and which should you swerve?
Five baby products worth the investment
White noise machines:
White noise, brown noise, gentle rainfall, lapping ocean waves – whatever your personal favourite is, it can drown out the background noise of everyday life. Not only is it relaxing for adults, it is especially useful for babies.
While you can use all manner of
white noise apps
on your phone, there is something to be said for having a device that won't be interrupted by a phone call or a notification.
A favourite around these parts was the Tommee Tippee OllieOwl (€40). Originally created by the Gro company, which Tommee Tippee owner Mayborn Group bought in 2018, Ollie is more than just a soft toy. The owl is also an effective soother for a fussy baby, sending them to sleep with a night light and the choice of three lullabies – a soothing heartbeat, rainfall and calming white noise.
Ollie also has what its creator describes as CrySensor technology, which will kick in if the baby starts to cry, playing comforting sounds for 20 minutes to try to soothe your baby back to sleep. It only reacts to sudden noise, which means you creeping in to check on the baby won't activate it.
The second generation of the device is USB chargeable, and lasts up to 25 hours of use on a full charge. It is also machine washable, which as parents eventually come to realise, is worth its weight in gold, time-saving, mind-easing gold.
Video baby monitor:
Some people swear by
smart socks
and monitors that count your baby's breaths, but a high quality video monitor is more than enough for most people to keep an eye on their baby while they sleep.
But which one to choose? There are monitors that rely solely on an app for the video feed, instead of a dedicated parent unit. On one hand, you can check on your child from anywhere in the world; on the other, you need to have a smart device on hand all the time – and one to leave for potential babysitters.
Sometimes the less complicated option is the right one. The LeapFrog LF2936FHD (€261) comes with its own parent unit, but also allows you to log on via its Baby Care+ app, so you can do a quick check on your baby.
The parent unit has a decent-sized touchscreen, with a battery life of around 10 hours. It also has good range, so you can be anywhere in the house and still be able to use it. The camera itself is flexible, panning 360 degrees and able to tilt up and down 110 degrees.
There are potential security implications of using an
internet connected camera
, with plenty of tales of parents finding strangers talking to their child over their baby monitor. While the LeapFrog device allows wifi connections, it also encourages you to put in place a strong unique password, which should help make things more difficult for unauthorised people to access the video feed.
Smart lights:
Not strictly a baby gadget, but very useful for the days when you are trapped under a sleeping baby and can't get up to turn off lights.
They can be linked to your smart speakers – if you have them – or controlled via your smartphone's digital assistant so you don't need to do the sleeping baby shuffle. All you need is the aforementioned smartphone, and a bit of time to set them up.
Tapo offers a range of connected LED bulbs that won't break the bank or require a separate hub, linking directly into your home wifi hub. Get the right bulbs and you can dim them with a (whispered) voice command.
Baby swings:
Baby swings can be a sanity saver if you have a baby whose preferred method of sleep is 'in motion'. The swings can rock your baby when you need a toilet or shower break, or just need to get feeling back into your arms. And while stretchy wraps and baby carriers are useful here too, they aren't always an option.
You don't need anything too fancy – see below – but one that has a couple of swing speeds, comfortable padding and, most importantly, can fit through the door without being dismantled will fit the bill. Joie offers a couple of swings for under €200, but there are plenty of options out there that don't require sacrificing part of your mortgage payment.
Thermometer:
At some point, you will find yourself obsessively feeling your child's forehead, trying to decide if they have a fever or are just a little warm from the pyjamas/sleepsack combo. This is where the trusty thermometer will come in handy.
Don't be tempted by the high-tech, non-contact, bluetooth connected one with all the bells and whistles. That can come later. Right now, you need accuracy and trust. Braun's Thermoscan 7 (€80) can be used from newborn, is age adjustable and will let you know when you've got a stable position to make sure you get the most accurate reading.
And if you can't live without an app and bluetooth, you can pay a few euro more and upgrade to the Thermoscan 7+ Connect, which connects to Braun's app so you can keep track of the whole family's fevers.
Five gadgets to skip
Wipe warmers:
We can see where these devices come from. Who wants to disturb a baby any more than necessary at nappy change time, particularly in the middle of the night, with a cold wipe? But there are issues.
It is another thing you'll have to remember to clean regularly, or risk it becoming a source of bacteria and going mouldy. Also, these warmers need to be plugged in, which means you won't be carrying it around.
At some point, your child will be getting a room temperature wipe, which may come as a shock and generate a bit of protest. Best to get it over with from the start.
Battery-powered baby nail files:
Whoever invented devices designed for clipping a baby's nails clearly never had an actual baby. That goes for traditional nail clippers where you feel like brain surgery might be less fraught, and the newer instrument of torture, the battery powered nail file. It takes longer, and while new parents are understandably nervous of sharp things and baby fingers, there are more effective ways to use your time than wrestling your baby for a lengthy manicure. Just get them while they are asleep.
Voice controlled, bluetooth-connected baby swings:
A baby swing is a useful gadget, but the MamaRoo MultiMotion Baby Swing teeters on the brink of 'too much tech'. Aside from actually rocking the baby, what does it do that the far cheaper baby swing won't?
Well there are five different motions that you can also mix with five speeds, so you can figure out what one works for your baby. Then you get to the smart home features, with the MamaRoo swing including both bluetooth and Alexa/Google Home support.
Does your baby really need a voice-controlled swing with bluetooth audio to be soothed when crying? The idea of a 'hands-free soothing solution' seems a little out of step with today's parenting vibe too, even if you don't subscribe to it.
AI strollers:
Speaking of hands-free, a smart baby buggy seems like another step too far. The Gluxkind AI stroller has already made inroads, building up a waiting list of parents. It rocks the baby for you, has push assist to help with hills, and will even brake should you have a runaway baby situation. It can soothe your baby to sleep with white noise and soothing sounds.
Do you really need a buggy with automatic parking though? The price tag – a cool $2,469 (€2,130) might be enough to put even the most ardent tech fan off.
Smart bath thermometers:
When it comes to baby baths, digital thermometers are probably overkill. While it might be nice to know that the water is exactly 19 degrees, what you really need to know is if it is too hot for your newborn's skin. Dipping an elbow or wrist in the water seemed to work for generations of mothers, and it had the benefit of being free.
If you really need reassurance, the Munchkin White Hot Safety Bath Duck (€6) will alert you if the temperature is too hot via the disc on the bottom. Put it in the bath, pick it up and if it says 'hot', you'll know the temperature isn't suitable for your newborn. Plus it is water tight so it won't go mouldy, and it doubles as a bath toy. Win-win for parents who will be drowning under a mountain of toys for at least the next decade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
If you didn't have qualms about Spotify before, wait until you hear what its founder has done
If you are one of Spotify 's 268 million subscribers, you might be interested to learn of a recent investment by the company's co-founder and chief executive Daniel Ek . In mid June, it emerged that Ek had led a funding round of €600 million into a Munich-based start-up called Helsing, through his venture capital firm Prima Materia. Helsing, whose founders have backgrounds in both the video games industry and in Germany's ministry of defence, makes military drones and AI software for the enhancement of weapons systems. By all accounts, this appears to be a very smart investment: the company, which was founded in 2021, has more than doubled its market value over the last year, and is now worth an estimated €12 billion. Ek is not just a major investor, he is also now chairman of the company's board of directors. Over the past couple of years, tech investors in both Europe and the United States have pivoted toward a collective embrace of the military-industrial complex. Just a few years ago, the culture of Silicon Valley was such that, for companies like Google and Meta , any kind of direct military application of their technology was considered beyond the pale. In 2018, after its employees staged a mass walkout in protest against a deal with the Pentagon, Google pledged not to work on AI weapons systems. READ MORE But a number of cultural and geopolitical factors – an openly rightward turn among the tech elite; the growing perception of a Chinese threat to US global hegemony; Russia's invasion of Ukraine , along with Trump's withdrawal from established defence arrangements , putting the fear of God into EU leaders – have made it clear that there is money, fast and deep money, to be made in defence tech. Silicon Valley, whose deep foundations were laid in the postwar years with a massive injection of US Defence Department money into a handful of technology firms in Palo Alto, has rediscovered its roots in the military-industrial complex. Perhaps the most arresting recent indication of this came earlier this summer, with the news that the US Army had launched a so-called Executive Innovation Corps, intended – in the words of a press release – to 'fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation'. Under this new programme, high-level tech executives from companies including Meta, Palantir , and OpenAI were commissioned into the armed forces as lieutenant colonels. Ek is, in this sense, by no means an outlier. He is simply and straightforwardly following the money. But there is something particularly galling about his ploughing such a massive amount of his personal wealth into the arms trade. Many people already feel ethical qualms about using streaming services like Spotify, whose total restructuring of the distribution model for recorded music has brought about the vast enrichment of people like Ek, a man with an estimated net worth in the region of $9.2 billion, while making it extraordinarily difficult for artists to make a living from their own work. Daniel Ek, chief executive of Spotify. Photograph:Rather than attempting to mitigate this situation – by, for example, using some of that money to pay musicians a fairer share of streaming revenues – Ek is putting it directly into a company that makes strike drones, and, in the words of its promotional materials, AI technology 'to achieve scaled target acquisition and co-ordinated precision effects'. So far, the response to Ek's move into the weapons industry has been relatively muted – for, I would guess, two intimately-connected reasons: first, thanks to their near-total destruction of the means by which musicians were traditionally paid for the recorded work, streaming services like Spotify are the only way most musicians can now reach an audience; and second, Spotify's standing among musicians was already about as low as it could get. [ Irish tech firms pivot to defence as EU rearms Opens in new window ] The most high-profile response has come from the indie rock band Deerhoof, who at the end of last month announced the removal of all their music from Spotify. ''Daniel Ek uses $700 million of his Spotify fortune to become chairman of AI battle tech company' was not a headline we enjoyed reading this week,' as the band put it in a statement it published online. 'We don't want our music killing people. We don't want our success being tied to AI battle tech ... If the price of 'discoverability' is letting oligarchs fill the globe with computerised weaponry, we're going to pass on the supposed benefits.' There is nothing very new about this interconnectedness of the music business and the arms industry. Back when there used to be such a thing as major record labels, EMI Records – along with its subsidiaries like Capitol Records and Parlophone – belonged to the Thorn EMI group, among whose multifarious corporate interests was the production of missile guidance technologies. In the artwork for their 2002 album Yanqui UXO, the Canadian instrumental post-rock group Godspeed You! Black Emperor included a hand-scrawled diagram mapping out the web of corporate connections between major labels and the arms industry. That band, and many others like them, went out of their way to avoid being ensnared in any such webs. But in the decades since that album was released, on a small Canadian independent label, the entire infrastructure of corporate record labels has all but collapsed, and streaming services like Spotify are practically the only show in town. If you want to listen to Yanqui UXO now, you can hear it on Spotify, along with all of Godspeed You! Black Emperor's other albums. There may, as they say, be no ethical consumption under capitalism. But there is a special queasiness to the dynamic by which the creative work of musicians, having been so thoroughly devalued by the likes of Spotify, has been used to fund a weapons company. Simply by firing up Spotify and streaming a song from Yanqui UXO – or by streaming, for that matter, John and Yoko's Give Peace a Chance, or Black Sabbath's War Pigs, or Bob Dylan's Masters of War – you can now do your bit to fund the arms industry. Alternatively, you could cancel your Spotify subscription, and take your business elsewhere.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
OPW to end contracts with Elon Musk's Starlink once Irish alternative is available
The Office of Public Works (OPW) has said it will discontinue its contracts with Elon Musk's Starlink satellite service once an alternative from an Irish company is available. The OPW is one of a number of State agencies that relies on the controversial former Donald Trump ally's satellite internet services company. An Garda Síochána, the Prison Service and the Revenue Commissioners also currently have Starlink contracts. Starlink, which is owned by SpaceX , is a powerful broadband internet system based on a constellation of thousands of low-orbit satellites. It offers internet services to more than six million people across 140 countries. The OPW contracts Starlink to bring internet and phone data coverage to two historic sites in remote parts of the country with poor connectivity. READ MORE The first is Tintern Abbey, a Cistercian monastery in partial ruins on the Hook peninsula in Co Wexford. The second is Annes Grove, an estate near Castletownroche in Co Cork. The OPW started using Starlink last June. The OPW said it signed up to Starlink for 'remote sites where we were unable to acquire a suitable broadband service locally or through existing procurement frameworks'. 'These satellite services are procured on a month-to-month basis and are likely to be discontinued once terrestrial alternatives become available in the future,' it said. The Office of the Revenue Commissioners also uses Starlink for maritime satellite internet communication units on each of its three anti-smuggling patrol vessels. These vessels, called cutters, need internet services for their analytics and detection technologies. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said the three Revenue cutters are 'utilising services provided by Starlink', which were 'procured in line with public procurement procedures'. Mr Donohoe was responding to a series of parliamentary questions from Fine Gael TD for Longford-Westmeath Micheál Carrigy. Mr Carrigy asked a number of Government Ministers if their departments or any agencies under their aegis had contracts with Starlink. Revenue said it had spent €93,237 on Starlink since 2023, and the SpaceX-owned service is 'widely used as a cost-effective marine data provider across the marine industry internationally'. It said it has 'no issues or concerns' regarding the current services provided by Starlink. [ Elon Musk's Irish friends and their influence on the powerful billionaire Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan said both An Garda Síochána and the Irish Prison Service 'have procured Starlink satellite services to support their telecommunications requirements'. A spokesman for the prison service said it 'does not comment on operational or security matters'. On Thursday, Mr Musk was forced to apologise after Starlink suffered a major international outage that knocked tens of thousands of users offline. On X, the social media platform which he also owns, Mr Musk wrote: 'Sorry for the outage. SpaceX will remedy root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again.' The rare disruption, which affected Starlink users across the US and Europe, was blamed on an internal software failure. [ Profits jump at Irish unit of Musk's Starlink Opens in new window ] [ Starlink's Irish unit proves a lucrative one for its staff Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
How Substack is upending media: ‘It is seriously challenging the old-guard message that people won't pay for writing'
Elon Musk wanted to buy Substack not long after he bought Twitter in 2022. But the newsletter and podcast platform wasn't for sale. This month Substack raised a further $100 million (€85.44 million) in investment. The deal put a reported $1.1 billion valuation on the business. For now, Substack remains privately owned. Even though it's been around for eight years, it's only in the last couple of years that Substack has become more visible and popular. Part of the reason is that several big-name writers have started using the platform. Margaret Atwood , George Saunders, Miranda July , Salman Rushdie , Chuck Palahniuk and many others have Substacks. [ A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: A masterclass in how to write by George Saunders Opens in new window ] Maybe it's the ethos of Substack that draws writers of such renown. As the app states, 'with full editorial content and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in'. At this starry juncture of the careers of Atwood et al, it's difficult to imagine any book editor savaging new manuscripts they submit, but maybe it's the freedom to play around with random content and ideas that is the attraction. Other well-known people on the platform are the Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown and singer-songwriter Patti Smith . READ MORE So how did Substack evolve? Back in the analogue day, we hand-wrote letters to each other when we had something to say. That lasted for centuries. The most exposure those letters received were overwhelmingly to an audience of one. That's unless the recipients and/or senders were famous, and had the foresight to keep their correspondence; a correspondence that some day in the future ended up being published as Collected Letters. Then came the Internet and mobile phones for all, and the new reality of your thoughts, images and live experiences reaching huge digital audiences. On the writing side of this in the early days were blogs, usually on the platform Word Press. Plenty of ordinary people blogged about their lives, children, travels, social experiments, interests and an inexhaustible range of other subjects. In the democracy of the online world, some blogs were good, some were terrible. They were free to read, or at least any I came across were, although, as ever, donations were welcome. Some that became widely read went on to have another life, one example being Julie Powell 's 2002 blog Julie & Julia, 365 days, 524 Recipes, 1 Tiny Apartment. Powell blogged for a year about cooking her way through Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking. It later became a bestselling book, then a hit movie starring Meryl Streep as Child. After the long and enduring life of the blog came newsletters. These differed from blogs in that they were less frequrntusually once a fortnight or once a month. You could sign up to be added to the mailing list. I subscribed for a time to author Dolly Alderton's newsletter, which was, as I recall, short, newsy and funny. Maybe it's the ethos of Substack that draws writers of such renown. Photograph: Gabby Jones/Bloomberg Substack is essentially the 3.0 sophisticated incarnation of the blog-stroke-newsletter, its aim to secure a subscription fee for access to at least some of the writer's content. Substack was founded in San Francisco by Hamish McKenzie, Chris Best and Jairaj Sethi. It was funded by various venture capitalist investors. The mission statement on the app reads: 'Building a new economic engine for culture. Do your best work, supported by your subscribers. Substack lets independent writers and podcasters publish directly to their audience and get paid through subscriptions.' There aren't any ads on Substack, and it is free to use the platform. The idea was that writers – in an era when freelance assignments have become ever rarer and ever more poorly paid – could have some autonomy over monetising their own content. Readers pay writers directly, rather than the traditional arrangement of editors commissioning copy, and organisations then waiting to pay contributors after weeks or even months. Writers posting on Substack have an individualised website for their archive content, in addition to whatever way they wish to personalise the page. New articles on Substack get emailed to subscribers. The author owns their content and their mailing list. Traditional media outlets frequently retained copyright over content written by writers. Writers can make their content free, or subscriber-only. Substack's business model takes a 10 per cent cut on paid subscriptions. The company doesn't release profit figures, so if it's difficult to know how much it makes. However, Substack said earlier this year that it now has five million paid subscribers. That came just four months after the company claimed four million paid subscribers, so this number appears to be advancing rapidly. To talk about media or publishing at this moment, you have to talk about Substack or look out of touch There is usually some free, or 'unlocked', content on a Substack, so potential subscribers can get a flavour of what's being offered. When writers are starting out, they can choose to make all their content free, while also offering a 'pledge' option. This means that if and when content becomes subscriber only, the pledge automatically transforms into a subscription. Freelance journalist Laura Kennedy , a contributor to The Irish Times who is now based in Australia, has had a Substack called Peak Notions since 2022. It has 14,000 subscribers, though she prefers not to reveal how many of those pay for her content. 'For a writer or freelancer, steady income and consistent work – the reliability of it, the editorial control and ownership of your own content and platform – is legitimately life-changing,' she says. 'A small, regular income that can't be pulled from under you at no notice is more than most writers can expect. 'Substack has sort of upended media in the best sense – it is seriously challenging the old-guard message that people won't pay for writing, that it is the platform and not the writer they value, that they only want to read particular kinds of work, or that local news is not something people will fund directly. Kennedy points out that some writers have secured book deals through their Substacks. [ Demystifying the path to publication, for free Opens in new window ] In May of this year, the New Yorker published an essay by Peter C Barker titled Is the Next Great American Novel Being Published on Substack? As Kennedy says: 'To talk about media or publishing at this moment, you have to talk about Substack or look out of touch. That's a profound change and a good one. There is no reason writers and journalists can't be in both worlds – they enrich one another. They're the same world.'
