
‘Deeply concerned' over India press censorship, says X as accounts blocked
X restored the Reuters News account in India on Sunday, a day after it was allegedly asked by the Indian government to suspend it, citing a legal demand.
Many other blocked accounts were also restored, with New Delhi denying its role in the takedown.
In a post on Tuesday, X, promoted by billionaire Elon Musk, said the Indian government on July 3 ordered it to block 2,355 accounts in India under Section 69A of the Information Technology (IT) Act.
'Non-compliance risked criminal liability. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology demanded immediate action – within one hour – without providing justification, and required the accounts to remain blocked until further notice,' X said.
'After public outcry, the government requested X to unblock @Reuters and @ReutersWorld.'
On July 3, 2025, the Indian government ordered X to block 2,355 accounts in India, including international news outlets like @Reuters and @ReutersWorld, under Section 69A of the IT Act. Non-compliance risked criminal liability. The Ministry of Electronics and Information…
— Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) July 8, 2025
On Sunday, a spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau told Reuters that no Indian government agency had required withholding the news agency's handle, adding that officials were working with X to resolve the problem.
The 2000 IT law allows designated government officials to demand the takedown of content from social media platforms they deem to violate local laws, including on the grounds of national security or if a post threatens public order.
X, formerly known as Twitter, has long been at odds with India's government over content-removal requests. In March, the company sued the federal government over a new government website the company says expands takedown powers to 'countless' government officials. The case is continuing.
India, the world's biggest democracy, regularly ranks among the top five countries for the number of requests made by a government to remove social media content.
Rights groups say freedom of expression and free press is under threat in India since Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014.
New Delhi has regularly imposed blanket internet shutdowns during periods of unrest.
In April, the government launched a sweeping crackdown on social media, banning more than a dozen Pakistani YouTube channels for allegedly spreading 'provocative' content following an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. Many of those have been restored.
New Delhi has also imposed intermittent internet outages in the northeastern state of Manipur since 2023 in the wake of ethnic violence.
The government has justified internet and social media bans as ways to curb disinformation in a country where hundreds of millions have access to some of the cheapest mobile internet rates in the world.
In its post on Tuesday, X said it was exploring all legal options available over censorship but added that it was 'restricted by Indian law in its ability to bring legal challenges'.
'We urge affected users to pursue legal remedies through the courts,' it said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump expresses frustration over Putin's ‘b*******'
Dozens missing after monsoon triggers Nepal-China floods NewsFeed US President Donald Trump said he is tired of the meaningless 'b*******' from his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin during negotiations over the war on Ukraine. He added that extra sanctions could be on the table. Video Duration 00 minutes 38 seconds 00:38 Video Duration 01 minutes 26 seconds 01:26 Video Duration 03 minutes 25 seconds 03:25 Video Duration 01 minutes 10 seconds 01:10 Video Duration 02 minutes 25 seconds 02:25 Video Duration 02 minutes 12 seconds 02:12 Video Duration 02 minutes 17 seconds 02:17


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over alleged persecution of women
Judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) have issued arrest warrants for two top Taliban leaders on charges of persecuting women and girls. ICC judges on Tuesday said there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said in a statement. The Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. 'In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.' The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. The court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, sought the warrants in January, saying that they recognised that 'Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban'. UK-based rights group Amnesty International welcomed the move by the ICC, saying it was an 'important step towards justice'. 'The announcement is an important development that gives hope, inside and outside the country to Afghan women, girls, as well as those persecuted on the basis of gender identity or expression,' Amnesty International chief Agnes Callamard said in a statement. 'This is a crucial step to hold accountable all those allegedly responsible for the gender-based deprivation of fundamental rights to education, to free movement and free expression, to private and family life, to free assembly, and to physical integrity and autonomy.' The US-based Human Rights Watch also welcomed the decision. 'Senior Taliban leaders are now wanted men for their alleged persecution of women, girls, and gender non-conforming people. The international community should fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court's warrants,' Liz Evenson, the group's international justice director, said in a statement. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants – with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. Last year, the United Nations accused the Taliban government of barring at least 1.4 million girls of their right to an education during their time in power. Taking into account the number of girls not going to school before the group came to power, the UN said 80 percent of Afghan school-age girls – a total of 2.5 million – were being denied their right to an education. Authorities also imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs. Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks and gyms as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone. A 'vice and virtue' law announced last summer ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be 'concealed' outside the home.


Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
ICC arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over alleged persecution of women
Judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) have issued arrest warrants for two top Taliban leaders on charges of persecuting women and girls. ICC judges on Tuesday said there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said in a statement. The Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. 'In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.' The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants – with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained.