Cheltenham's Elms Park development approved by councillors
More than 100 people and seven nearby villages objected to the proposals, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.Objectors fear the development, off the A4019 Tewkesbury Road near Uckington, will lead to a huge increase in traffic and pollution, as well as overwhelming health services.They also raised concerns about the design and appearance of the housing developments, road safety, parking concerns, flood risk, overlooking and that the scheme conflicts with planning policies.
However, Elms Park Consortium, which is led by housebuilders Bloor Homes and Permission, say the £2.5bn scheme will provide 1,000 affordable homes and up to 4,000 jobs will be created, including 30 apprenticeships per year during construction.Rob White, agent for the applicant, also told the meeting: "Approximately £25m will be spent on community infrastructure, including a GP healthcare centre, neighbourhoods and local community centres delivered on site."He said there would be sports facilities and a transport hub, including a 350 space park and ride interchange.The planning committee voted unanimously to approve the scheme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Business live: UK borrowing costs in focus as Currys resumes dividend
The electrical retailer has resumed dividend payments as it posted upbeat full-year results this morning. Headline profit at Currys rose 37 per cent to £162 million in the 12 months to the end of April, from £117 million. Revenue over the period rose 3 per cent to £8.7 billion, from £8.47 billion the previous year. Like-for-like sales were up 2 per cent across the group, driven by a 4 per cent increase in the UK. The retailer announced a full-year dividend of 1.5p a share. Currys suspended dividends in 2023 as it grappled with its then-troubled Nordic business, which is now back on track. Government borrowing costs will be in focus this morning after Sir Keir Starmer rushed to back the chancellor Rachel Reeves after doubts were raised about her future following about-turns on welfare reforms that blew a hole in her budget plans. Bond yields rose sharply across the board and the pound dropped yesterday after the chancellor appeared tearful during prime minister's question time after Starmer had refused to confirm that she would stay as chancellor until the next election when questioned by Kemi Badenoch. While the rise in bond yields and the fall in the pound eased after Starmer's support for Reeves, the graphs show markets remain nervous. Economists say the chancellor will struggle to meet her fiscal rules after the £5 billion in savings from proposed welfare reforms are wiped out by this week's amendments. It raises the prospect of higher taxes and a freeze on tax thresholds.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off
Update: Date: 2025-07-03T06:24:50.000Z Title: Introduction: Bonds and sterling in spotlight after Wednesday wobble Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. All eyes are on UK bonds, and the pound, after both fell sharply yesterday amid speculation over the future of chancellor Rachel Reeves. Wednesday was a turbulent day for the UK bond market; prices of British government debt fell heavily as investors were gripped by concerns of change at the top of the Treasury. The selloff highlights anxiety that the government's u-turn on welfare reform has blown a multi-billion pound black hole in the chancellor's budget plans. Bonds slumped, driving up borrowing costs, after Keir Starmer failed initially to give his full backing to Reeves at prime minister's questions, with a tearful chancellor alongside him. The pound also suffered, falling by a cent against the US dollar as it slid from $1.3745 to $1.3636, making it the worst-performing major currency in the world. Starmer has now defended Reeves, saying her tears were due to a 'personal matter' and insisted she will remain chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. The bond selloff may actually have reinforced Reeves's position as chancellor, highlighting that the markets would not welcome a replacement who might be less devoted to fiscal discipline. Andrew Wishart, economist at Berenberg Bank argues that 'Investors probably saved the Chancellor', saying: By selling sterling assets investors have probably kept UK chancellor Rachel Reeves in her post. Financial markets initially reacted little to the government failing to get approval for savings in the disability benefit budget from its own parliamentary faction. But when the Prime Minister failed to say that a visibly upset Reeves would remain in her job during Prime Ministers Questions, UK assets sold off. The Chancellor has become synonymous with a fiscal rule of covering day-to-day spending with tax revenue. UK selloff signals that fiscal rules are not just for show #reeves #fiscal #gilts #macro #ukeconomy #ukmacro That fiscal rule may dictate tax rises in the autumn budget, as spending cuts could be too much of a political headache, judging by the massive rebellion against the welfare bill that has created a £5bn hole in the chancellor's plans. America's economy may take the market spotlight off Reeves this afternoon, when the latest US jobs report is released. It will show whether trade war tensions have hit hiring at US businesses. 9.30am BST: UK service sector PMI for June 10am BST: OECD Economic Survey of the European Union and Euro Area 1.30pm BST: US non farm payrolls employment report for June
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
We've just had the first ominous taste of what the Blob will do to a Reform government
It would be easy to dismiss the story about a council chief executive in Warwickshire defying its new Reform leadership by refusing to take down a Pride flag. After all, it's only a flag, isn't it? How much can it really matter? Surely not enough to justify the rather wild response by Reform's Zia Yusuf, who claimed that 'unelected bureaucrats' have 'seized control of the country', and 'a coup d'etat is under way in Britain'. Well, perhaps. All the same, I do think Reform's supporters are right to take the story seriously. Because I suspect we've just had the first ominous taste of what the Blob will do to a Reform government. Imagine if Nigel Farage actually does win the next election. In his party's manifesto, he will doubtless have promised to deliver radical change. And, whatever that change entails, it will presumably be a good deal more far-reaching than removing a flag from a council building. Bearing that in mind: how eager do we think Whitehall will be to help him enact this radical change? Any more eager than the council chief executive in Warwickshire, who loftily informed Reform councillors that 'I will not be taking the action that you are requesting', because 'the Pride flag has been flown annually during Pride month for many years and I see no reason to diverge from this approach'? I hope no one will think I'm casting doubt on the scrupulous impartiality of our Rolls-Royce Civil Service. All the same, I'm sure Reform will have taken note of the lecture delivered in Oxford last month by a man with extensive experience of how Whitehall really works: Dominic Cummings. Behind closed doors, claimed the former No 10 chief adviser, civil servants are rather more influential than mere politicians. Or, in Mr Cummings's words: we have 'a system where the political ministers are essentially non-player characters in a video game, and the characters with real power are the unelected officials'. The result of this, he said, is that 'for a very long time, the government has not controlled the government'. Mr Farage will already be familiar with these views, because, a few months ago, he and Mr Cummings secretly met for dinner, and one topic of conversation, the latter has since revealed, was 'we have a broken Whitehall'. When Mr Cummings was in No 10, he didn't get far with his own plans to fix it, as he was derailed by the pandemic, and then fell out with Boris Johnson. I wonder whether he might be interested, one day, in having another crack. And whether the same thought has occurred to Mr Farage.
