
Driver appeals sentence over deadly wedding bus crash
Brett Andrew Button, 60, had been driving too fast and engaged in risk-taking behaviour before the deadly crash, which also injured 25 people, in the NSW Hunter Valley region in June 2023.
He was sentenced in September to a maximum jail term of 32 years with a non-parole period of 24 years.
At the time, NSW District Court Judge Roy Ellis said he was unaware of any other case that had such a devastating impact on so many people.
Button has filed a challenge to his sentence which was briefly heard in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal on Thursday.
A hearing has been scheduled for October 3.
Prosecutors expect voluminous evidence to be tendered, including victim impact statements from the families of those who died or were injured in the crash.
The court will consider a psychological report for Button and several references attesting to his good character.
The bus driver will not be appealing against his conviction.
He pleaded guilty in the District Court to 10 charges of dangerous driving causing death, nine counts of driving causing grievous bodily harm and 16 counts of causing bodily harm by wanton driving.
Button was told in 2022 that he was dependent on the opioid Tramadol.
He admitted taking more than the prescribed amount prior to the crash.
The vehicle entered a roundabout on Wine Country Drive on the way to Singleton after a wine estate wedding at an estimated 52km/h.
It then accelerated to about 56km/h when on the roundabout, the District Court was earlier told.
The speed required to tip the bus over was only 31km/h.
A class action has been filed by those injured and family members of the deceased against the NSW government alleging failings in the design of the roundabout.
The speed limit through the interchange was also allegedly too high.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
‘Evil': Son's ‘pleasure' in killing parents
Warning: Distressing content. A man who took a 'chilling' delight in killing his father and stepmother is fighting his 42-year jail sentence more than a decade after the brutal crimes. Corey Breen was jailed for 42 years with a non-parole period of 33 years in 2015 after he murdered his father, Paul Breen, and stepmother, Felicia Crawford. Breen in 2013 used a hunting knife to smash the glass panels of the unlocked front door of his father's North Sydney home before kicking the door open on Good Friday. Breen later admitted to police he had smashed the glass to give his dad the 'f**king spooks before I killed the c**t'. Paul screamed out before his son stabbed him 15 times, killing him 'on the spot'. Ms Crawford tried to hide behind the door of a converted bedroom in the garage just outside the home, but Breen used the door to pin her against the wall before stabbing her 10 times. Aussie killer Corey Breen is appealing his sentence more than 10 years after he brutally murdered his dad and step mum. Tim Hunter. Credit: News Corp Australia She managed to stagger back to her bedroom, falling from her bed before she died. Two young children were inside the home and witnessed the horrific murders, with judge Jane Mathews saying they would be affected by the events for the rest of their lives. After spending more than 10 years in prison, Breen, now 38, is fighting his sentence in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He argued in his grounds of appeal that Judge Mathews made several errors in sentencing, including by taking into account nine connected offences from a crime spree Breen embarked on the afternoon of the murders. It included stabbing a bystander in the face that caused a 'significant' laceration that required emergency treatment. His grounds of appeal also allege Judge Mathews made mistakes determining Breen's overall non-parole period in finding the offences involved multiple victims and a series of criminal acts and by determining previous convictions were an aggravating factor. Paul Breen was murdered by his son in 2013. Supplied Credit: Supplied Breen also killed his stepmother, Felicia Crawford. Supplied Credit: Supplied Killer's 'violent fantasies' Breen had been 'nursing violent fantasies' long before killing his parents, evidenced by a chilling letter he wrote to his mum in 2009. He wrote he was 'happy, fun and would do anything for my friends', but things changed when he was alone. 'I get very angry and plot out murders of people I hate. I do it all in my head. I run over it again and again refining every detail,' Breen wrote. 'They are always extremely horrific and extremely brutal. 'I'm scared someday soon the monster that I've kept locked away for so long will finally reach the surface.' He wrote that people would suffer and die if the 'monster' was unleashed, acknowledging the thoughts were 'evil' and he had not acted on them because nothing had 'pushed (him) quite that far yet'. 'But I do feel it is close,' he wrote. Judge Mathews said in her judgment the 'letter assumes a highly chilling quality when one considers the circumstances of these offences, more than 3½ years later.' Breen's hands were caked in blood during his police interview after the horrific murders. 7News Credit: Channel 7 His mum encouraged him to seek psychological help after she received the letter, but Breen appeared to keep his 'evil' thoughts to himself. He threatened to kill several of his relatives the following year over the belief they didn't support him enough when he lost his job after he was convicted for a 2009 assault at work. By 2011, he was estranged from his entire family. 'Ur dead': Disturbing text before murders Breen began his crime spree in the hours before the homicide by assaulting his girlfriend. He armed himself with a 19cm hunting knife and took out a rifle at one point, but a guest at his home managed to confiscate it before Breen walked out of the home with the blade. Running at a female bystander, Breen changed course and stabbed a man in the face before stealing a woman's bike and unleashing at a nearby convenience store. There, he assaulted another two bystanders and his girlfriend – who had followed him to try to calm him down – and tried to steal a car. He knocked over shelves in a bid to get to one of the bystanders and take his keys, stabbing at the staff door the man had hid behind. As the chaos unfolded, Breen texted his girlfriend's mum, writing 'Ur dead u filthy c**t', and stole a car from a nearby home before driving to his grandparents' home with the intent to kill them. Corey Breen pleaded guilty to the murders. Tim Hunter. Credit: News Corp Australia Once there he stole another car and drove to his friends' home to steal guns to use to kill his parents. A resident who was home refused to give him a shotgun, and he squeezed her hand holding the keys to a firearm storage room tightly. He eventually let her go and left after taking her phone, at which point he drove to his dad's house. Police caught him a short time later, with an officer telling him he was under arrest for several stabbings and car theft. 'Multiple murder, mate,' Breen replied. 'I achieved my mission.' Son's 'delight' in killing parents Judge Mathews said both Paul and Ms Crawford's final moments must have been 'filled with unimaginable fear and horror', the 'horrendous' events sparked after something inside Breen 'snapped'. In a 'chilling' interview with police after the murders, Breen revealed he had been on his way to his mum's house when he was caught, saying he would have 'knifed her', his mum's boyfriend, his siblings, 'and whoever else was there'. Breen was sentenced to a minimum of 33 years in jail for the horror crimes. 7News Credit: Channel 7 He told officers he'd had a 'time bomb' sitting in his head and he knew he would kill his dad sooner or later. 'Just tonight was the night,' he said in his police interview. Judge Mathews said Breen expressed 'pleasure' over the killings, telling officers of his 'absolute pure hatred' for Paul and Ms Crawford because of his 'sh*t upbringing'. 'The delight he expressed in having murdered the two victims is quite chilling,' Judge Mathews said of Breen's police interview. Breen later told a forensic psychiatrist that he didn't remember any events surrounding the murders or the interview: He said: 'The person in the interview is not me … it sends my blood chilling.' Judge Mathews noted Breen had told a forensic psychiatrist that he was drinking heavily on the day of the killings and was taking an antidepressant, the doctor later diagnosing him with a substance abuse disorder. He found while Breen did set out to kill his dad and stepmum, it was not planned in advance. That, along with Breen's 'deep remorse' and findings he had reasonable prospects of rehabilitation, meant the offences fell short of the maximum imprisonment of life in jail, Judge Mathews said. Breen will fight his sentence during an appeal hearing on October 22. mental health support

ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Jury discharged in sex abuse trial of Petford Training Farm founder Geoff Guest
A jury has been discharged after failing to reach a verdict on whether the 98-year-old founder of a former training camp for troubled youth in North Queensland is guilty of child sex offences. Warning: This article contains details of alleged child abuse that some readers may find distressing. During a week-long trial in the District Court in Cairns, a jury was told by the prosecution that Geoffrey John Guest repeatedly and violently sexually abused a teenage boy in the 1970s. Mr Guest gave evidence in his defence, telling the court the allegations were untrue and that he was not a violent person. He pleaded not guilty to one count of unlawful carnal knowledge, four counts of unlawful and indecent dealings with a child, and one count of repeated sexual conduct against a child under 16. Crown prosecutor Nicole Friedewald told the court Mr Guest would regularly beat the teenage boy with closed fists and a leather strap. Two witnesses, who were also teenagers at the time, gave evidence about Mr Guest's violent behaviour, including that his "whole demeanour changed when other people were there". Mr Guest received widespread recognition, including an Order of Australia Medal, for his work during the 1980s and 1990s with mostly Indigenous youth at his Petford Training Farm. The complainant, now aged in his 60s, first disclosed the alleged sexual abuse in 2009 after he broke down to his partner while watching television current affairs program 60 Minutes that covered Mr Guest's work with troubled youth. In 2012, the complainant made a statement to police, which was signed a decade later, the court heard. In her closing address, Ms Friedewald told the court the complainant told the truth and volunteered details that would have been sensitive and embarrassing to reveal. Defence lawyer Kelly Goodwin said the abuse did not happen and pointed to inconsistencies in the complainant's recollection of events. Eleven men gave character evidence in Mr Guest's defence during the trial, including three who spent time at Petford as boys, a documentary filmmaker, and a psychiatrist who spent time with Mr Guest while researching his doctorate. Each told the court they had not seen Mr Guest use violence or behave sexually toward children. The jury retired to consider its verdict on Wednesday afternoon. After more than 14 hours of deliberations, Judge Tracy Fantin issued the jury a direction informing them that enough time had passed, allowing them to return a majority verdict, in which 11 of the 12 jurors were in agreement. However, despite an hour of further deliberation, the jury was still unable to reach a verdict on any of the six charges. Judge Fantin discharged the 12 jurors on Friday, after they told her they did not believe they would reach a verdict even if given more time. "Thank you for your service; thank you for the diligence with which you have approached this task," Judge Fantin told the jurors. Mr Guest's bail was extended, with the case to be listed for mention next month. "At that time, if the Crown seeks a new trial listing, it will be given a new trial," Judge Fantin said. "Whether that is this year or next is not clear."


Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
‘Pretend kiss': Teacher denies abusing girl
A music teacher who was photographed kissing an underage teen girl in a cinema photo booth has taken the stand to defend herself at trial, claiming it was a 'pretend kiss' that she did not want or expect. Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting the allegations that she groomed and sexually abused a teen girl some years ago and testified this week at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller. The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Ms Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity. Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Ms Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair. She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other. That same night, Mr Allen said, Ms Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area. The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Ms Fletcher and in Ms Fletcher's car. This week, the prosecution presented emails and messages between the girl and Ms Fletcher and also various photographs that they allege demonstrate Ms Fletcher was in a sexual relationship with the child. Janelle Fletcher has pleaded not guilty to sexual abuse of a child and communicate to make a child amenable to sexual activity. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia A photo taken from a photo booth at a cinema shows the pair kissing, but Ms Fletcher, under questioning from defence lawyer Andrew Culshaw, said she was 'pulled in and the photo went off'. 'In the second photo from the bottom … we can see you and (the girl) appear to be kissing … can you explain to Her Honour what happened,' Mr Culshaw asked. 'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Ms Fletcher said. 'When you say 'she pulled you in and the photo went off', what happened?' Mr Culshaw pressed. 'Just like around my neck sort of thing, just like, just so we would touch, yeah. 'Did you voluntarily engage in a kiss with her?' Mr Culshaw pressed 'No, I did not,' Ms Fletcher said. Other photos, exhibited in court, show the girl at Ms Fletcher's house. 'You appear to be leaning against her (the girl),' Mr Allen said. 'Yes,' Ms Fletcher replied. Defence lawyer Craig Caldicott (right) is representing Ms Fletcher. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'Is that a selfie taken by you?' Mr Allen asked. 'It does appear that way, yes,' Ms Fletcher said. 'Does it appear that it is taken in your house?' Mr Allen continued. 'Yes,' Ms Fletcher said. In a series of emails read out in court, Ms Fletcher appears to express strong feelings for the girl. In one, Ms Fletcher wrote: 'My feelings for you are not lust but love.' 'In your mind, what is the difference between the two?' Mr Culshaw asked. 'Lust is like with you are attracted to someone. You have the hots for them, so I guess similar,' Ms Fletcher replied. 'Love is not necessarily sexual or romantic, it is love.' In other emails, Ms Fletcher told the girl: 'I am being selfish wanting you to myself when I need to let you live your life with someone your own age', and also 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret ...' But Ms Fletcher argued these messages were written to keep the girl happy and also to guide her away. 'Really, all the emails, the intention behind it was to try and make (the girl) feel that she is not abandoned, she is loved, she is wanted and that in another time or place, maybe she could entertain that she could be with me, but my sole intent of all of these was to slowly get her to think it was her idea to not be with me but to be with … someone her own age and I wanted her to think it was her idea,' Ms Fletcher said. She told the court the girl had expressed romantic feelings for her and that she was struggling with her sexual identity. Ms Fletcher said the girl started exhibiting 'concerning behaviour' and she sought to point her in the direction of a more age-appropriate relationship. In one email, she told the girl she was 'completely in love' with her, but she told the court that was a lie. 'I did think she was a beautiful person,' Ms Fletcher said. 'It wasn't true that I was in love with her.' 'Why did you write it there,' Mr Culshaw asked. 'Because that's what I knew she wanted to hear,' Ms Fletcher said. The trial is being held at the South Australian District Court in Adelaide. NewsWire / Naomi Jellicoe Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Allen, in his opening cross-examination of Ms Fletcher, reiterated the prosecution's allegations of extended sexual abuse at various locations and Ms Fletcher flatly denied each allegation. When Mr Allen said Ms Fletcher was grinding on a chair inside a room with the girl and another girl present, Ms Fletcher appeared to giggle. 'Do you think that's funny?' Mr Allen said. 'Sorry, I don't mean to be rude. No, that's not,' Ms Fletcher replied. Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith. She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court. Closing arguments in the judge-alone trial are expected on Monday.