logo
Harris 'not convinced' that dole increases should be in line with other social welfare payments

Harris 'not convinced' that dole increases should be in line with other social welfare payments

The Journal2 days ago
TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS has said that he would rather see further increases in public pension and other social welfare payments than the jobseekers' allowance in Budget 2026.
Harris was asked in Dublin this afternoon if he was in favour of separating the dole from universal increases to social welfare payments in the upcoming budget.
While seeking to refrain from discussing budgetary matters before negotiations, the Tánaiste said he was in favour.
'I do always think there is merit in not looking at social welfare payments with uniformity across the board.'
Harris said that he would 'keep an open mind' about separating the jobseekers' allowance from future increases in social welfare payments.
He added: 'I'm not convinced that you need to see as significant a rise in the dole as you do in the pension, for example, at the time where our country is at full employment, when there is lots of supports out there for people getting into work.
'When there are other supports out there for very many people who can't work for very many good reasons. That's my opinion. We'll thrash it out all that out at the time of budget.'
Addressing recent debate around the earmarked increase in student college fees next year, Harris claimed that 'roughly €1.20 to €1.25 on every social welfare payment' is equivalent to government seeking to continue a €1,000 reduction.
Advertisement
'Budgets are all about choices,' the Fine Gael leader said. 'They're all about balance, and there's only so much money in the pot.'
Harris is not alone in this opinion within his party. Fine Gael's Offaly TD John Clendennen
recently told local station Midlands 103
that he is opposed to increasing the dole at the same rate as pensions or disability allowances.
College fees
Earmarked increases in college fees took centre stage
for a second day during Leaders' Questions in the Dáil earlier today
. Public expenditure minister Jack Chambers did not provide clarity on the decision, despite being asked repeatedly in the chamber.
Harris, a former higher education minister, claimed today that the only reason he didn't reduce fees on a permanent basis during his term was because there were only enough funds to introduce temporary measures.
According to Social Democrats' deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan, families have been budgeting for reductions because the commitment to cut and abolish fees was included in the Programme for Government and election manifestos.
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said that parents and students need to know what they will be paying as a contribution fee at third-level facilities in the new term.
Chambers largely repeated what he said yesterday, telling the TDs that the engagement around the issue remains ongoing and that higher education minister James Lawless will work to introduce more permanent reductions in the long-term.
The government is endeavouring to avoid permanent public expenditure being dependent on temporary corporate tax revenue, the Taoiseach Micheál Martin said today.
While there are significant uncertainties around what might transpire with US tariffs, Martin said it was important not to 'build up expenditure levels that are not sustainable'.
With reporting by Christina Finn in Japan.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Absolutely not' – Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary rules out Irish Presidency bid but backs ‘terrific' contender for Aras
‘Absolutely not' – Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary rules out Irish Presidency bid but backs ‘terrific' contender for Aras

The Irish Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

‘Absolutely not' – Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary rules out Irish Presidency bid but backs ‘terrific' contender for Aras

RYANAIR boss Michael O'Leary has ruled out trying to land the Presidency and has instead thrown his weight behind Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness in the race to the Aras. The election to replace The date for Asked if he fancied a tilt at the Aras, O'Leary told 'So I wish well whoever decides to run for President but it sure as hell won't be me.' Read more in News However, the motormouth airline CEO is backing former The ex- The hugely popular former Party figures say McGuinness has been openly courting the candidacy and she has made several media appearances in recent months in a bid to keep her name in the conversation. Most read in The Irish Sun Ryanair boss O'Leary said: 'If Mairead McGuinness ran for President I would be happy to endorse her. 'I think she's been a terrific success on the European stage both as an MEP and Vice President of the CAMPAIGN CLANGER O'Leary previously propelled Fine Gael into the headlines for the wrong reasons the last time he endorsed one of their candidates. In the general election last year, he launched Westmeath TD Peter Burke's campaign and made a gag about there being too many teachers in the Despite this, Burke topped the poll and was appointed Minister for Enterprise again in the new coalition. Meanwhile, Aontu leader Paedar Toibin today revealed that his party are considering backing a candidate and they have held talks with several potential runners. The 1 Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary has ruled out trying to land the Presidency Credit: Reuters

Taoiseach hints childcare focus in Budget will be on increasing places rather than cutting costs
Taoiseach hints childcare focus in Budget will be on increasing places rather than cutting costs

The Journal

time9 hours ago

  • The Journal

Taoiseach hints childcare focus in Budget will be on increasing places rather than cutting costs

TAOISEACH MICHEÁL MARTIN has stressed the need to create more childcare places across the country quickly. Asked by reporters in Japan, where the Taoiseach is this week for a trade mission, if there will be reductions to the cost of childcare in this year's Budget, the Taoiseach was coy in his response. Cutting the cost of childcare to €200 per month per child was a core election promise by both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. It is now a pledge in the Programme for Government to deliver the reduction over the lifetime of this government. 'I think we want to continue to make progress on childcare, but we have a whole range of issues now that we have to make progress on,' the Taoiseach said, adding that there will be negotiations leading into this year's Budget in October. 'We can't do everything at once, so we will endeavor to prioritise and continue the progress we've made in recent years. We've made very good progress in childcare, but we need more places, so the access issue and the number of places is also important, as well as affordability.' Advertisement Martin made the point that recent research has pointed to the need to improve the number of available childcare places. 'That speaks to the growth of population and the pressures on childcare and health services, and education,' he said. He added that the government will be prioritising the transformation of Ireland's infrastructure in the Budget. Asked if the government will be prioritising increasing childcare places over reducing costs this year, the Taoiseach said this will be a decision for Minister for Children Norma Foley, who will approach government with her priorities ahead of October's Budget. 'All Programme for Government commitments will be followed through. So that's the basic point,' he said. With reporting from Christina Finn in Japan Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Irish in Germany are caught between starkly different perspectives on the war in Gaza
Irish in Germany are caught between starkly different perspectives on the war in Gaza

Irish Times

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Irish in Germany are caught between starkly different perspectives on the war in Gaza

There was plenty for Tánaiste Simon Harris to discuss on Friday in Berlin with his new German foreign minister colleague, Johann Wadephul. After a chilly meeting of Irish and German foreign ministers last year, no joint press conference was planned this time around. Berlin and Dublin, traditionally close partners on EU and foreign policy, have found themselves far apart following the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on October 7th 2023, which claimed at least 1,200 lives. In his January 2024 visit, then-tánaiste Micheál Martin suggested Berlin's view of the Gaza conflict was constrained 'by the historical prism of the Holocaust', though 'evolving'. Germany's position has evolved quite a bit further since then, with growing public outrage here over Israel's Gaza blockade, settler violence in the West Bank and a Palestinian death toll nearing 60,000. A more critical tone towards Israel from the new German government, however, has yet to be matched in any significant policy shift. The current Israel-Hamas conflict, for many Irish people living in Germany, resembles what John le Carré once called a 'looking glass war'. In their daily lives here and during visits back to Ireland, the German-Irish negotiate two separate minefields with one common denominator: dissent from the majority opinion – or attempts at differentiation in the public debate – are often denounced. READ MORE The most visible sign of tension surrounds two Irish citizens who face expulsion from Germany in connection with their alleged role in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, including a violent confrontation at a Berlin university. Their precise role in what happened there has yet to be established and, in an emergency injunction, a Berlin court has halted expulsion proceedings until after trial, likely in the autumn. That didn't stop Berlin's governing mayor Kai Wegner prejudging them, in a national newspaper, as 'anti-Semitic criminals'. Many Irish people here who join Gaza solidarity marches, as they would if they were in Ireland, report harassment in their workplace and police violence. Some face charges they view as spurious and – after 18 months and counting – the charges have neither come to trial nor been dropped. That keeps them flagged in police databases, making every re-entry to Germany a stressful business of arbitrary delays and border police questions. For them, this is official Germany's intentional chilling effect for holding the 'wrong' views on Gaza. (A similar chilling effect, critics of Israel's Gaza war say, follows German efforts since November 2023 to outlaw every public utterance of 'from the river to the sea' as an illegal slogan supporting the proscribed Hamas group. In May a Berlin court dismissed one such prosecution as a politicised endeavour lacking evidence and any legal standing.) The colonial framing of the Gaza conflict, as popularised by Kneecap, gets an airing in Germany, particularly in universities, but others reject it as ill fit for the complexities of the conflict All of this is attracting outside attention. Last month the Council of Europe, the continent's leading human rights body, sent a two-page letter of concern to the Berlin federal government. Police violence, limits to freedom of assembly and 'the blanket classification of criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism', the letter warned, do a disservice to democracy and may even endanger it'. While German officials dismiss such concerns, campaigners are already collating information about the crackdown they see. And writer Maxim Biller has even devised a diagnosis for the motivation: Morbus Israel, Germany's Israel disorder. 'At the core of [this] neo-German Orient neurosis is, very loosely: Germans' disappointed love for their former victims,' he argued in a column for Die Zeit weekly. His polemical text was later removed from the Zeit website following protests over his description of the 'strategically correct but inhumane hunger blockade of Gaza'. [ An Irishman in Berlin: 'For Germans, everything is forbidden unless it allowed' Opens in new window ] As the conflict drags on, though, some Irish in Germany wonder – quietly and cautiously – if Ireland has a disorder of its own. Earlier in the conflict, before everything was eclipsed by the real and justified horror over children being starved – or shot dead by Israel soldiers – one Irish acquaintance asked: where was the Irish protest over Hamas contempt for – and human rights violations of – its own people? Given the unprecedented degradation in Gaza, such questions may seem like cynical what-aboutery. Yet another middle-aged Irish acquaintance, living in Germany as long as the Belfast Agreement, wondered aloud recently how Irish people, who resented the IRA killing people on their behalf, feel about Hamas doing the same for Palestinians? The colonial framing of the Gaza conflict, as popularised by Kneecap, gets an airing in Germany, particularly in universities, but others reject it as ill fit for the complexities of the conflict. After a strange start, Germany's debate has shifted radically in recent months. The popular Bild tabloid still ignores the reality in Gaza and denounces Palestinian solidarity marchers as 'Jew haters', but other outlets offer a broader and more challenging range of views. [ Israeli foreign minister finds shifting moods as he visits Berlin Opens in new window ] On Wednesday, the Süddeutsche Zeitung daily printed a harrowing 5,000-word report on the starve-or-be-shot reality in Gaza. A day later, it ran a full-page essay by French-Israeli sociologist Eva Illouz, asking 'Is anti-Zionism a form of anti-Semitism?' With large Jewish, Israeli and Palestinian communities, Germany's Israel-Gaza-Hamas debate is messy, emotional, confused and conflicted. A diverse range of voices compete to be heard, airing grievances which not all share but are nonetheless real. Two conflicts are playing out, as Berlin arms one side and tries to feed the other. Attempting to meet two non-negotiable postwar obligations – to Israel and human dignity – has created a domestic conflict of conscience with an equally unpredictable outcome. By comparison, many Irish living in Germany perceive Ireland's debate as Irish people telling other Irish people, at no personal cost and from a safe distance, how terrible things are for the Palestinians. A recent public television poll here asked who respondents feel is responsible for the plight of the civilian population in Gaza. Some 69 per cent said the Israeli government was fully or partly to blame while 71 per cent said the same of Hamas. How would a similar poll look in Ireland? Ireland and Germany hold competing views on the conflict, yet both have considerable credibility among Palestinians and Israelis respectively. How can our two countries leverage that good will for a better future in the Middle East? That is a debate worth having.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store