
Scientists find mysterious particle that wobbles is still acting weird
The experiment focused on muons, mysterious particles considered heavier cousins to electrons. Muons wobble like a top when inside a magnetic field, and scientists have been studying that motion to see if it lines up with the Standard Model, the foundational rulebook of physics.
Tova Holmes, an experimental physicist at the University of Tennessee Knoxville, who is not part of the collaboration, said the experiment is "a huge feat in precision."
Experiments in the 1960s and 1970s seemed to indicate all was well. However, tests at Brookhaven National Laboratory in the late 1990s and early 2000s produced something unexpected: the muons weren't behaving as they should.
Decades later, an international collaboration of scientists decided to rerun the experiments with an even higher degree of precision. The team raced muons around a magnetic, ring-shaped track — the same one used in Brookhaven's experiment — and studied their signature wiggle at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory near Chicago.
The first two sets of results — unveiled in 2021 and 2023 — seemed to confirm the muons' weird behavior, prompting theoretical physicists to try to reconcile the new measurements with the Standard Model.
Now, the group has completed the experiment and released a measurement of the muon's wobble that agrees with what they found before, using more than double the amount of data compared to 2023. They submitted their results to the journal Physical Review Letters.
That said, it's not yet closing time for our most basic understanding of what's holding the universe together. While the muons raced around their track, other scientists found a way to more closely reconcile their behavior with the Standard Model with the help of supercomputers.
There's still more work to be done as researchers continue to put their heads together and future experiments take a stab at measuring the muon wobble — including one at the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex that's expected to start near the end of the decade. Scientists also are still analyzing the final muon data to see if they can glean information about other mysterious entities like dark matter.
'This measurement will remain a benchmark ... for many years to come,' said Marco Incagli with the National Institute for Nuclear Physics in Italy.
By wrangling muons, scientists are striving to answer fundamental questions that have long puzzled humanity, said Peter Winter with Argonne National Laboratory.
'Aren't we all curious to understand how the universe works?' said Winter.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scientists work to understand why dozens of whales have recently died in the San Francisco Bay Area
Scientists are investigating a sharp rise in the number of whales killed in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2025 even as local whale pods struggle to recover from a massive die-off in 2019. The California Academy of Sciences said on Monday that researchers had logged the deaths of 21 gray whales, two unidentified baleen whales, and one minke whale in waters near San Francisco this year so far, compared to 14 in 2019 and 15 in 2021. Researchers also reported an "unusually high" number of gray whale sightings in the region, with more than 30 individuals confirmed versus only six in 2024. "This latest gray whale caught everyone a bit by surprise, given how late in the season it is and the fact that we had not sighted the species in the Bay in nearly two weeks," Kathi George, director of cetacean conservation biology at the Marine Mammal Center in nearby Sausalito, told ABC News. "It shows signs of concern for this population as it moves forward into the future... we know that climate change is changing ocean conditions and changing prey available availability for these whales in the Arctic." Eight of the gray whales were probably killed by vessel strikes, the Academy said, but the cause of death for the others was uncertain. Nor was it clear why so many whales were visible in the Bay Area this year. Gray whale populations in the North Pacific are still reeling from an estimated 45 per cent drop between 2019 and 2023, during which nearly 700 whales died along the west coast of North America. That episode, known by scientists as an "unusual mortality event", is thought to have slashed whale numbers from around 20,500 in 2019 to just over 14,500 in 2023. A study in 2023 found evidence that melting Arctic sea ice had prolonged the die-off, in comparison to previous such events, by disrupting the food chain of algae and plankton on which gray whales ultimately depend. Gray whales are large, highly social filter feeders that migrate up and down the west coast of North America, traveling thousands of miles from their summer feeding grounds near Alaska to their winter breeding areas off western Mexico. Once common in the Atlantic Ocean too, they were hunted in huge numbers by humans for their blubber throughout the 19th century. Now they exist in two populations in the northwest and northeast Pacific, with the former group being officially endangered.

Finextra
2 hours ago
- Finextra
From advisors to algorithms: The shift in wealth guidance
From advisors to algorithms: The shift in wealth guidance 0 Editorial This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. For decades, wealth management was a relationship business. Clients used to meet their financial advisors in offices, discuss life goals, and trust human judgment to guide their financial futures. However, over the last decade, a quiet revolution has taken place: one that's replacing handshakes with algorithms and intuition with machine learning. Today, millions of people receive financial advice not from a person, but from a platform. Robo-advisors, AI-driven planning tools, and hyper-personalised investment apps are reshaping how we think about wealth, and who gets to build it. However, according to McKinsey, by 2034, 'at current advisor productivity levels, the advisor workforce will decline to the point where the industry faces a shortage of roughly 100,000 advisors.' McKinsey data shows that advice revenues have been the main economic driver for the US wealth management industry. Revenues 'generated from fee-based advisory relationships [...] have grown from approximately $150 billion in 2015 to $260 billion in 2024, and growth in the number of human-advised relationships has outpaced population growth by three times in the same period.' Amid the growing demand for advice, declining advisor head count and addressing the shortage with an advisor talent and productivity system, the quiet revolution has advocated for the recruitment of new-to-industry advisors. By improving the advisor career path for entry-level talent, there is also a clear path for new sources of talent by targeting career switchers. Recruitment will not be enough. This is where generative AI comes in. McKinsey's estimate reveals that even a '30-40% average advisor adoption of more wealth-management-specific gen-AI-enabled tools and processes across the value chain and across the full advisor population by 2034 can deliver 6-12% of time savings – and, in turn, increase advisor capacity.' From suits to software Addressing a 100,000-advisor capacity shortage will be no easy feat, especially with the first wave of robo-advisors having emerged in the early 2010s, offering low-cost, automated portfolio management. They were simple, rules-based systems, efficient, but impersonal. Fast forward to 2025, and the landscape has evolved dramatically. Modern AI-driven platforms don't just rebalance portfolios. They analyse behavioural patterns, anticipate life events, and tailor advice to individual goals, risk appetites, and even emotional states. What began as a cost-saving tool has become a sophisticated engine for personalised wealth guidance. As Sébastien Payette, director consulting expert, financial services, CGI, writes, robo-advisors are becoming an 'integral part of investment strategies for both retail and high-net-worth (HNW) and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) investors.' He points to three key trends: 'Hybrid advisory models – Traditional financial institutions are incorporating robo-advisors alongside human expertise, offering a blend of automated technology and personalised, face-to-face financial guidance. Hyper-personalisation – Advanced robo-advisors utilise AI-driven insights that integrate financial market data with investors' digital footprints, tailoring investment strategies to unique financial goals, risk appetite, and life stages. Diversified asset offerings – Robo-advisors are expanding beyond equities and fixed-income products to include alternative investments such as derivatives, real estate, private equity, and cryptocurrencies, broadening the scope of automated wealth management.' What AI does better Payette also explains that smarter AI and predictive analytics through robo-advisors 'will leverage even more advanced AI capabilities to predict market trends and mitigate risks, leading to increasingly optimised portfolios and investment strategies.' AI's appeal lies in its speed, scale, and objectivity. It can: Monitor markets and portfolios in real time. Optimise tax strategies across multiple jurisdictions. Detect behavioural biases and nudge users toward better decisions. Offer 24/7 access to insights, no appointment necessary. For younger investors and the mass affluent, these tools offer something traditional advisors often couldn't: accessibility. With lower fees and intuitive interfaces, AI has opened the door to wealth planning for millions previously priced out of the conversation. As the World Economic Forum states, 'large language models (LLMs) are still evolving. They are expanding beyond robo-advisors, progressing from chatbots to assistants to agents, reducing the advice gap for retail investors. 'The essential question is can AI systems deliver the level of emotional intelligence and empathy required by investors to share information and needs in ways they do with their human advisors, i.e., could machines ever replace human advisors?' But what's lost? Despite its advantages, AI lacks something essential: human empathy. Financial decisions are rarely just about numbers. They're about fear, ambition, family, and identity. A human advisor can read between the lines, sense hesitation, and offer reassurance. An algorithm, no matter how advanced, can't replicate that, at least not yet. There's also the question of accountability. When an AI-driven platform makes a poor recommendation, who's responsible? The developer? The firm? The user? As AI takes on more advisory functions, these questions become more urgent — and more complex. Can AI wealth models be credible? Yes, by processing vast datasets with speed and precision. Agentic AI can also integrate collaboration with human experts, which strengthens the credibility of the systems. Can AI wealth models be reliable? Yes, AI is consistent and free from human error, but there are transparency concerns. LLMs can offer guidance and with modules such as retrieval augmented generation (RAG), context is enriched. Can AI wealth models be intimate? Yes, AI can recognise sentiment, but cannot offer the lived experience and cultural nuances that humans can. Can AI wealth models be self-oriented? Yes, AI can operate without personal biases, but the data its trained on or how it's deployed by financial firms may introduce conflicts of interest. Regulatory oversight may be needed to ensure AI acts in the best interests of the clients, and recommendations are not biased. The rise of hybrid models Rather than replacing human advisors, many firms are now blending the best of both worlds. This transformation or phase of the evolution requires a balanced approach that capitalises on AI systems but preserves human touch. This is how trust-based relationships can be built in wealth. These advisors can use AI to handle data-heavy tasks, while humans focus on relationship-building and strategic guidance. It's a model that promises both efficiency and empathy, and it's gaining traction fast. In conversation with Finextra in 2023, Renato Miraglia, head of wealth management and private banking, Italy, at UniCredit, says that human beings will continue to be essential in the relationship with private and wealth clients into the future, but the use of data and technology will change the analytical tools with which client materials are produced. He cites the value of generative AI to create highly personalised and detailed real-time reports and analyses on the peculiarities of each client's position. 'The wealth manager of the future will use new and sophisticated tools to analyse risks and investment opportunities – and this will improve the accuracy of financial planning. The next generation of tools consider key elements in an integrated way, taking a holistic view of factors such as the interaction with real estate or business assets, changes in lifestyle, and elements of risk that can be secured through various forms of insurance,' Miraglia elaborates. The next evolution The future of wealth guidance may not be about choosing between humans and machines, but about redefining the role of each. As generative AI becomes more conversational and emotionally intelligent, it could take on more nuanced advisory roles. Meanwhile, human advisors may evolve into financial coaches, helping clients navigate not just markets, but meaning.


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
FAA investigating SkyWest jet's near miss with B-52 bomber over North Dakota
WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration said on Monday it is investigating a near miss between a SkyWest Airlines (SKYW.O), opens new tab jet and a U.S. Air Force jet over North Dakota last week. SkyWest Flight 3788, an Embraer ERJ-175 operating as a Delta Connection (DAL.N), opens new tab flight from Minneapolis to Minot, North Dakota, landed safely in Minot on Friday after performing a go-around during its landing approach when another plane became visible in its flight path, SkyWest said. The Air Force confirmed a B-52 aircraft assigned to Minot Air Force Base conducted a flyover of the North Dakota State Fair on Friday. "We are currently looking into the matter," the Air Force said. The SkyWest pilot reportedly said the incident caught him by surprise, prompting him to make an aggressive move to avoid a possible collision, according to a video recording posted by a passenger on social media. SkyWest did not immediately comment on the video or confirm its accuracy. Representative Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, said she was highly concerned with the incident. "The incident in Minot raises serious questions about passenger safety," McCollum said. "Given the Department of Defense training that takes place in the surrounding area, Minot International Airport must also immediately receive and install radar technology to have a full accounting of all local air traffic." The FAA noted that air traffic services were provided by the Minot air traffic control tower, which is run by a private company and not FAA employees. The National Transportation Safety Board and FAA are investigating another close call involving a Delta jet and a group of Air Force jets near Reagan Washington National Airport on March 28. The jet in that incident, a Delta Airbus A319, received a cockpit collision warning alert that another aircraft was nearby, and controllers issued corrective instructions to the Delta plane and one of the military jets. The Delta plane had been cleared to depart as four Air Force T-38 Talons were heading to nearby Arlington National Cemetery for a flyover. The NTSB said in a preliminary report there had been confusion about when controllers were to halt traffic during the flyover. There has been intense focus on military traffic near civilian airplanes since an Army helicopter collided with an American Airlines (AAL.O), opens new tab regional jet on January 29 near Reagan National, killing 67 people. In early May the FAA barred Army helicopter flights around the Pentagon after another near miss.